Skip to main content
Financial Literacy

Dollar-Cost Averaging is Overrated – Do This Instead

According to research from Vanguard, lump-sum investing outperforms dollar-cost averaging (DCA) about 66% of the time in historical simulations. Surprising, right? You've probably heard the advice a hundred times: invest a little at a time, regularly, and don’t worry about timing the market. It’s called DCA, and on the surface, it sounds like common sense. We mean, who doesn’t want to lower their average cost and stress less about buying at the wrong time?
Fact checked byDiversification.com Compliance Team
Dollar-Cost Averaging is Overrated – Do This Instead

According to research from Vanguard, lump-sum investing outperforms dollar-cost averaging (DCA) about 66% of the time in historical simulations. Surprising, right? You've probably heard the advice a hundred times: invest a little at a time, regularly, and don’t worry about timing the market. It’s called DCA, and on the surface, it sounds like common sense. We mean, who doesn’t want to lower their average cost and stress less about buying at the wrong time?

But here’s the thing—DCA isn’t always the smartest move. We used to swear by it ourselves, until we took a closer look at the numbers and saw how often it holds back long-term performance. Especially when the market is steadily climbing, DCA can actually drag your returns down.

Let’s walk through what DCA is, where it works, where it falls short, and what we (and many professionals) opt to do instead.

Key Takeaways

  • DCA helps with timing anxiety, but may underperform lump-sum investing.
  • It may be useful during highly volatile or downward-trending markets.
  • The comfort DCA offers can lead to missed gains.
  • Smarter alternatives like lump-sum investing or value-based entry may offer better outcomes.

What is Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA)?

At its core, DCA means investing a fixed dollar amount on a regular schedule—weekly, monthly, quarterly—regardless of what the market is doing.

Let’s say you have $12,000 to invest. With DCA, you might put in $1,000 per month over a year, instead of all at once.

Why People Like It:

  • You don’t have to guess when to invest
  • It takes the emotion out of decision-making
  • It helps smooth out the ride when markets are bumpy

And honestly, for a lot of new investors, that simplicity feels like a relief. We totally get it.

Where DCA Actually Makes Sense

There are a few cases where DCA is genuinely helpful:

  • You’re just getting started and want to build consistency
  • You only have money to invest gradually, like from monthly paychecks
  • The market is wildly unpredictable and you're looking to ease into it

If you’ve ever invested a chunk right before a dip, you know how painful that feels. DCA can ease that sting—at least emotionally.

But just because it feels safer doesn’t mean it’s better.

When DCA Starts Working Against You

1. It Slows Down Your Exposure to Growth

Let’s face it: markets tend to go up over time. So when you stretch out your investments, you’re leaving some of your money sitting on the sidelines.

Hypothetical Example:

You have $12,000 ready.

  • Lump Sum: You invest it all in January, and the market rises 8% → you’re up around $960.
  • DCA: You drip it in over 12 months → some of that money had less time to grow, so your return might only be $600–$700.

2. It Doesn’t Protect Against Big Picture Risks

If the entire market drops 30% and stays low, DCA won’t save you. It just means your losses are spread across several smaller investments instead of one big one.

3. It Can Feel Like a Plan, But Isn’t

Here’s something we’ve realized: a lot of people use DCA because they’re scared. They don’t want to get burned by bad timing, so they delay committing.

That’s not a real strategy—it’s just procrastination in disguise.

What Professionals Often Do Instead

You won’t see many fund managers using plain-vanilla DCA. Here’s what they often do instead:

Go All-In (Lump Sum)

Studies—even ones from Vanguard—show that lump-sum investing beats DCA about 66% of the time. If markets are rising, the sooner your money is working, the better.

Be Tactical, Not Calendar-Based

Instead of investing monthly just because it’s the 1st, they look at indicators—like valuations, momentum, or macro trends—and deploy capital strategically.

Run Scenarios Before Acting

They’ll model different outcomes and weigh the opportunity cost of waiting versus going in now. It’s not guesswork—it’s planning.

So, What’s a Smarter Approach?

Let us offer a few ideas that blend comfort with results:

1. Check the Market Climate

  • If we’re in a bull market or a stable trend, it may make sense to invest more upfront.

2. Do a 60/40 Split

  • Not ready to go all in? Put 60% in now and schedule the rest over the next few months. That gives you growth exposure while easing your nerves.

3. Let Metrics Be Your Guide

  • Instead of fixed dates, base your investments on signals—like if the market drops 5%, or if valuation metrics hit a threshold.

4. Automate Smartly

  • If automation helps you stay consistent, great—just make sure it’s flexible enough to adapt to changes.

Dollar-Cost Averaging — FAQs

What does dollar-cost averaging involve?
It is the practice of investing a fixed amount on a set schedule—weekly, monthly, or quarterly—regardless of market conditions at the time.
When is dollar-cost averaging most useful?
It can be effective during volatile or uncertain markets, for investors who only have incremental funds available, or for those seeking to build savings discipline over time.
What is the main drawback of dollar-cost averaging in rising markets?
It reduces the time that a portion of the money is invested, which may lower compounded returns compared with investing the full amount immediately.
Does dollar-cost averaging protect against broad market declines?
No. If markets drop and remain lower, losses still occur. The difference is that they are spread across multiple purchase points rather than concentrated in one entry.
Why do some investors favor dollar-cost averaging?
It reduces the stress of timing decisions, smooths volatility, and provides a structured, disciplined process, even if long-term returns may be lower than lump-sum investing.
How do professional investors typically approach deployment compared with DCA?
Professionals often rely on lump-sum allocations, tactical entry points based on data, and scenario modeling rather than sticking to fixed calendar-based contributions.
What behavioral factor makes DCA attractive?
It provides reassurance against investing at the wrong moment, though in some cases it may delay full market participation and create opportunity cost.
How might splitting contributions balance comfort and growth?
Allocating part of the funds immediately and phasing the remainder over time may provide exposure while easing concerns about investing all at once.
How do tactical investing approaches differ from DCA?
They often use signals—such as valuation changes or market drops—to guide entry rather than investing at predetermined calendar dates.
What is the role of automation in dollar-cost averaging?
Automation makes contributions consistent and less emotional, but if rigid, it may keep investors locked into a schedule even when conditions change.