Is Owning a Home a Smart Investment? Real Returns Revealed

Ask most Americans about the best long-term investment, and many will point to their home. In fact, a 2023 Gallup survey found that 34% of Americans chose real estate as the top investment—more than stocks, gold, or bonds. That number is down from a record high of 45% in 2022, but still aligns with pre-pandemic trends. But is that perception grounded in data?
Real estate is often seen as a safe bet—but inflation-adjusted returns, leverage, and regional volatility show a more complex picture of what homeownership really delivers.
This article dives into historical data, hypothetical scenarios, and practical analysis to unpack the actual performance of housing as an investment. Our goal is to provide clear, unbiased context so readers can decide how homeownership fits into a well-diversified portfolio.
The Historical Reality: What the Data Actually Shows
Historically, U.S. home prices have delivered modest inflation-adjusted returns. From 1928 to 2023, residential real estate appreciated at an average annual real rate of approximately 4.2%. However, this figure includes unusually strong gains in recent years—especially between 2020 and 2023, when national home prices surged nearly 50%.
These figures do not account for transaction costs, property taxes, or maintenance. When those are added, real returns on housing fall further—unless buyers time the market exceptionally well.
Homes appreciate slowly in real terms, and most of the gain comes from leverage or external conditions—not intrinsic asset performance.
Leverage: A Double-Edged Sword
One of the biggest drivers of housing returns is leverage. A typical homebuyer uses a mortgage, which means small price movements can translate into amplified gains—or losses.
Hypothetical Scenario:
- Home value: $400,000
- Down payment: $80,000 (20%)
- Home appreciates by 3% in year one → $12,000 gain
- Return on equity: $12,000 / $80,000 = 15%
However, this only works in positive markets. If home prices decline or stagnate while maintenance, taxes, or interest accrue, the leverage effect can cut the other way.
It’s critical to remember that leverage increases risk. This isn’t inherently good or bad—but it changes the nature of the investment.
Regional Volatility and Liquidity Risk
Housing returns also vary significantly based on geography. Consider two homeowners:
- One buys in Austin, TX during the early 2010s tech boom.
- The other buys in a stagnant post-industrial town in the Midwest during the same period.
While one sees double-digit annual appreciation, the other may see flat or negative growth—even with similar purchase prices.
Unlike stocks or ETFs, homes can’t be sold instantly, and high transaction costs (agent fees, closing costs) reduce the net return. This means:
- Long holding periods are often necessary to realize gains
- Market timing has an outsized impact on ROI
Real estate isn't just about location—it’s also about liquidity and timing. That makes it different from most other investments.
Ownership Costs That Eat into Returns
Buying a home comes with ongoing costs:
- Property taxes (often 1–2% of the home's value annually)
- Maintenance and repairs (1–2% of home value per year)
- Insurance
- HOA dues (if applicable)
These reduce effective returns considerably. Let’s model a 10-year scenario:
Hypothetical: $400,000 Home Over 10 Years
- Average appreciation: 3% per year → ~$537,000 value after 10 years
- Costs (taxes, maintenance, insurance): ~$5,000 per year = $50,000
- Selling costs (6% agent + closing): ~$32,000
- Mortgage interest paid: ~$60,000
Net return after costs: less than 2% annually, depending on tax treatment
Emotional ROI vs. Financial ROI
There’s a powerful non-financial case for homeownership:
- Stability
- Control over living environment
- Emotional satisfaction
But mixing financial and emotional goals can create confusion. If a primary residence is treated as an investment, it should be evaluated with the same scrutiny as any other asset.
Homes can bring joy—but joy and ROI are not the same thing.