Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to A Definitions

Abnormal returns

What Is Abnormal Returns?

Abnormal returns represent the difference between the actual return of an investment and its [Expected Return]. While the expected return reflects what an investment should yield given its level of [Systematic Risk], abnormal returns capture any excess or deficit in performance. This concept is central to [Portfolio Management] and falls under the broader umbrella of asset pricing within financial markets. Positive abnormal returns indicate an investment outperformed its expectation, while negative abnormal returns signify underperformance. The study of abnormal returns is particularly relevant when evaluating [Market Efficiency] and identifying potential [Market Anomaly].

History and Origin

The concept of abnormal returns gained prominence with the development and subsequent challenges to the [Efficient Market Hypothesis] (EMH), a cornerstone theory in financial economics. Pioneered by Eugene F. Fama in the 1960s, the EMH posits that financial markets are "informationally efficient," meaning asset prices fully reflect all available information, making it impossible to consistently achieve abnormal returns through information-based trading8.

However, empirical observations of consistent deviations from expected returns led to the identification of various "market anomalies," which are patterns or phenomena that contradict the EMH. Early significant research contributing to this field includes Rolf W. Banz's 1981 work on the "size effect," which suggested that small-capitalization stocks historically generated higher [Risk-Adjusted Return] than larger firms, a finding inconsistent with the then-prevailing [Capital Asset Pricing Model] (CAPM)7. Such findings prompted further investigation into why abnormal returns might persist, often leading to the realm of behavioral finance, which examines how psychological factors influence investor behavior and can contribute to market inefficiencies, such as during periods of irrational exuberance or market bubbles6.

Key Takeaways

  • Abnormal returns measure the deviation of an investment's actual performance from its expected performance, typically adjusted for risk.
  • They are a key metric for assessing the effectiveness of an [Investment Strategy] or the impact of specific events on asset prices.
  • The consistent existence of abnormal returns challenges the strong form of the [Efficient Market Hypothesis], suggesting potential market inefficiencies.
  • Positive abnormal returns may indicate superior stock selection, favorable market conditions, or simply good fortune. Conversely, negative abnormal returns suggest underperformance.

Formula and Calculation

Abnormal returns are typically calculated by subtracting the expected return of an asset from its actual realized return over a specific period. The most common model used to determine the expected return is the [Capital Asset Pricing Model] (CAPM), which considers the asset's sensitivity to market movements ([Beta]), the overall market's expected return, and the prevailing [Risk-Free Rate].

The formula for abnormal return (AR) using the CAPM is:

ARi=Ri−E(Ri)AR_i = R_i - E(R_i)

Where:

  • (AR_i) = Abnormal Return for asset i
  • (R_i) = Actual return of asset i
  • (E(R_i)) = Expected return of asset i

The expected return (E(R_i)) using CAPM is calculated as:

E(Ri)=Rf+βi×(Rm−Rf)E(R_i) = R_f + \beta_i \times (R_m - R_f)

Where:

  • (R_f) = [Risk-Free Rate] (e.g., return on a U.S. Treasury bill)
  • (\beta_i) = [Beta] of asset i (a measure of its systematic risk relative to the market)
  • (R_m) = Expected market return

Interpreting Abnormal Returns

Interpreting abnormal returns provides insight into an investment's true performance relative to its risk and market expectations. A positive abnormal return suggests that the investment generated more profit than what would be predicted by its risk profile. This could be due to the skill of a portfolio manager, the company outperforming expectations, or an unidentified [Market Anomaly]. Conversely, a negative abnormal return means the investment yielded less than its risk-adjusted expectation, indicating underperformance.

For investors, a consistently positive abnormal return could be a sign of a successful [Investment Strategy] or superior security analysis. However, it is crucial to consider whether such returns are sustainable or merely a result of luck, as persistent abnormal returns are difficult to achieve in efficient markets. When evaluating the effectiveness of a portfolio or a specific asset, abnormal returns are often analyzed in conjunction with other performance metrics to provide a comprehensive view of the [Risk-Adjusted Return].

Hypothetical Example

Consider a hypothetical stock, "GrowthCo Inc." (GCI), and a one-year investment period.

  • Actual Return ((R_i)) for GCI: 15%
  • Risk-Free Rate ((R_f)): 3%
  • Beta ((\beta_i)) for GCI: 1.2
  • Expected Market Return ((R_m)): 10%

Step 1: Calculate the Expected Return of GCI using CAPM.

E(Ri)=Rf+βi×(Rm−Rf)E(R_i) = R_f + \beta_i \times (R_m - R_f) E(RGCI)=0.03+1.2×(0.10−0.03)E(R_{GCI}) = 0.03 + 1.2 \times (0.10 - 0.03) E(RGCI)=0.03+1.2×0.07E(R_{GCI}) = 0.03 + 1.2 \times 0.07 E(RGCI)=0.03+0.084E(R_{GCI}) = 0.03 + 0.084 E(RGCI)=0.114 or 11.4%E(R_{GCI}) = 0.114 \text{ or } 11.4\%

Step 2: Calculate the Abnormal Return.

ARi=Ri−E(Ri)AR_i = R_i - E(R_i) ARGCI=0.15−0.114AR_{GCI} = 0.15 - 0.114 ARGCI=0.036 or 3.6%AR_{GCI} = 0.036 \text{ or } 3.6\%

In this example, GrowthCo Inc. generated a positive abnormal return of 3.6%. This means GCI outperformed its expected return, given its [Beta] and the overall market conditions during that period.

Practical Applications

Abnormal returns are widely used in various financial contexts to assess performance and identify unusual market behavior.

  • Event Studies: A primary application is in "event studies," which analyze the impact of specific corporate announcements (e.g., mergers, earnings surprises, stock splits, or dividend changes) on stock prices. By measuring the abnormal returns around an event, researchers and analysts can gauge how new information is incorporated into prices and the market's reaction to it.
  • Performance Evaluation: Investors and analysts use abnormal returns to evaluate the performance of fund managers and investment strategies. A fund's [Alpha], a direct measure of risk-adjusted abnormal return, indicates its ability to generate returns beyond what would be expected for the risk taken. Consistent positive alpha is highly sought after in [Portfolio Management].
  • Regulatory Analysis: Regulators, such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), monitor market activity for signs of manipulation. For instance, the SEC's [SEC Rule 10b-18] provides a "safe harbor" for companies repurchasing their own shares, setting conditions to prevent such activities from creating artificial abnormal returns or manipulating stock prices5.
  • Market Anomaly Research: The persistent observation of abnormal returns has driven extensive research into [Market Efficiency] and potential market anomalies. This research seeks to understand if certain factors or behaviors consistently lead to predictable deviations from expected returns, which could theoretically be exploited by sophisticated [Investment Strategy].

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite their utility, abnormal returns have limitations and face criticisms, primarily revolving around the difficulty in accurately defining and measuring "expected return."

A significant challenge is the "joint hypothesis problem," which states that any test of [Market Efficiency] is simultaneously a test of the underlying asset pricing model used to calculate the [Expected Return]. If a market appears inefficient, it might not be due to market imperfections but rather an inadequacy in the asset pricing model, such as the [Capital Asset Pricing Model], which may not fully capture all relevant risk factors4. For example, early research on the "size effect" that found smaller firms generating abnormal returns often suggested CAPM was misspecified or that these returns reflected an unmeasured risk3.

Another criticism involves data snooping or selection bias. Academics have documented numerous market anomalies that seem to generate abnormal returns, but many of these patterns tend to weaken or disappear after they are published and widely known, raising questions about whether they ever offered exploitable profit opportunities or were merely statistical curiosities2. The presence of transaction costs and limits to [Arbitrage] also suggests that even if theoretical abnormal returns exist, they may not be practically achievable for all investors. Furthermore, distinguishing genuine skill or market inefficiency from mere luck in generating positive abnormal returns remains a persistent challenge for both [Fundamental Analysis] and [Technical Analysis].

Abnormal Returns vs. Market Anomaly

While closely related and often used interchangeably, abnormal returns and a [Market Anomaly] represent distinct concepts in finance.

Abnormal returns refer to the quantifiable difference between an investment's actual return and its expected return, given its risk. It is a specific outcome or a measured deviation from a benchmark. An investment has an abnormal return, which can be positive (outperformance) or negative (underperformance).

A market anomaly, on the other hand, is a persistent pattern or phenomenon observed in financial markets that appears to contradict the assumptions of the [Efficient Market Hypothesis] and, if exploitable, could theoretically lead to consistent abnormal returns. Examples include the "January effect," where stocks tend to perform well in January, or the "size effect," where small-cap stocks historically outperform large-cap stocks. Anomaly is the cause or pattern, while abnormal return is the effect or measurement. Therefore, while the existence of a market anomaly might lead to opportunities for abnormal returns, abnormal returns themselves are simply the measurement of that deviation.

FAQs

Can abnormal returns be consistently achieved by an average investor?

Consistently achieving abnormal returns is challenging for the average investor due to the high level of [Market Efficiency] in developed financial markets. While some investors or fund managers may achieve positive abnormal returns for periods, many academic studies suggest that such outperformance is difficult to sustain over the long term, often attributing it to luck rather than repeatable skill1.

What factors can cause abnormal returns?

Abnormal returns can be caused by various factors, including the unexpected release of new information, a company's exceptional operational performance, transient market inefficiencies, or even behavioral biases among investors leading to mispricing. These deviations may or may not be sustainable or exploitable.

Are all abnormal returns a sign of market inefficiency?

Not necessarily. While persistent abnormal returns can signal market inefficiencies or [Market Anomaly], a one-time abnormal return might simply be due to unexpected news, a random fluctuation, or a specific, non-replicable event. True market inefficiency implies that a specific [Investment Strategy] can reliably generate abnormal returns over time, after accounting for all costs and risks.

How do professionals try to achieve abnormal returns?

Financial professionals attempt to achieve abnormal returns through rigorous [Fundamental Analysis] to identify undervalued assets, sophisticated quantitative models to find market patterns, or specialized [Arbitrage] strategies to exploit temporary mispricings. Their goal is to identify and capitalize on situations where the actual return deviates favorably from the expected return.

Do abnormal returns always mean profit?

A positive abnormal return means the investment performed better than its risk-adjusted expectation, which generally translates to more profit than anticipated. However, a negative abnormal return indicates underperformance, meaning the investment yielded less profit (or more significant losses) than expected.