Skip to main content
← Back to A Definitions

Acquired market drift

What Is Acquired Market Drift?

Acquired market drift refers to the phenomenon where an investment portfolio's actual asset allocation deviates from its target due to differing rates of return among its underlying investments. This concept is a crucial aspect of portfolio management, highlighting how market fluctuations can unintentionally shift a portfolio's risk profile and expose it to unintended concentrations. Without intervention, faster-growing assets, such as equities during a bull market, can come to represent a larger proportion of the portfolio than originally intended, while slower-growing or declining assets, like bonds, shrink in relative size. Acquired market drift is a natural consequence of market dynamics and requires proactive management to maintain an investor's desired risk tolerance and achieve their financial goals.

History and Origin

The concept of acquired market drift is as old as diversified investing itself, implicitly understood by early portfolio managers who observed how the relative values of different assets changed over time. However, its prominence and the need for systematic approaches to address it grew significantly with the rise of modern portfolio theory and, more particularly, the advent and widespread adoption of passive investing strategies through index funds and Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) starting in the late 20th century.

As academic research and influential figures like Paul Samuelson advocated for broad-market indexing due to the difficulty for most active management to consistently outperform a benchmark index after fees, the growth of assets tracking these indexes surged. Assets under management in index funds alone have grown dramatically, from $511 million in 1985 to over $4.0 trillion by 2017, with total indexed assets surpassing $5.5 trillion when including ETFs.5 This proliferation of passively managed portfolios, often constructed to mirror market-capitalization-weighted indexes, intrinsically amplified the effects of acquired market drift. As the largest companies and sectors within these indexes grew, their proportional weight in tracking funds also increased, leading to an automatic concentration in successful segments of the market. This highlights how index construction choices, despite seeming "passive," can lead to varying outcomes over time, contributing to drift.4

Key Takeaways

  • Acquired market drift occurs when an investment portfolio's actual asset weights diverge from its target allocation due to varying asset returns.
  • It is a natural outcome of market movements, especially pronounced in diversification strategies that involve multiple asset classes.
  • Unchecked acquired market drift can inadvertently increase or decrease a portfolio's overall risk level relative to an investor's original strategy.
  • The phenomenon necessitates periodic adjustments, commonly known as portfolio rebalancing, to realign with target allocations.
  • Understanding acquired market drift is essential for maintaining long-term investment discipline and adhering to a predefined investment strategy.

Interpreting Acquired Market Drift

Interpreting acquired market drift involves assessing the degree to which a portfolio's current asset allocation has strayed from its intended targets. A significant drift indicates that the portfolio's exposure to different asset classes or sectors has changed, potentially altering its expected risk and return characteristics. For instance, if a portfolio was initially set with a 60% equity and 40% bond allocation, but strong equity performance leads to a 75% equity weighting, the portfolio has experienced considerable acquired market drift. This new allocation would likely carry a higher level of market risk than originally desired.

Conversely, if a portfolio drifts towards a higher allocation in less volatile assets like bonds, it might become more conservative than intended, potentially sacrificing long-term growth opportunities. Evaluating acquired market drift is not about judging the performance of individual assets but rather about ensuring the portfolio's structure remains consistent with the investor's strategic objectives and comfort with risk.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investor who starts with an initial asset allocation of 70% equities and 30% bonds in their investment portfolio. Let's assume the initial portfolio value is $100,000, meaning $70,000 is in equities and $30,000 is in bonds.

Over the course of one year:

  • The equity portion experiences significant growth, increasing by 20%.
  • The bond portion experiences modest growth, increasing by 5%.

Calculation of new values:

  • Equities: $70,000 * (1 + 0.20) = $84,000
  • Bonds: $30,000 * (1 + 0.05) = $31,500

The new total portfolio value is $84,000 + $31,500 = $115,500.

Now, calculate the new percentages:

  • New Equity Percentage: ($84,000 / $115,500) * 100% ≈ 72.73%
  • New Bond Percentage: ($31,500 / $115,500) * 100% ≈ 27.27%

In this example, the portfolio has experienced acquired market drift. The equity allocation has increased from 70% to approximately 72.73%, while the bond allocation has decreased from 30% to approximately 27.27%. This seemingly small shift means the portfolio is now slightly more aggressive than the investor's initial risk tolerance and target allocation, purely due to market performance, not an intentional change by the investor.

Practical Applications

Acquired market drift is a central consideration across various facets of finance and investing:

  • Individual Investing: For individual investors, recognizing acquired market drift is fundamental to managing their investment portfolio. It underscores the necessity of regular portfolio rebalancing to ensure the portfolio's risk profile remains aligned with their long-term financial goals and desired asset allocation. Wit3hout rebalancing, a portfolio can become overexposed to volatile assets during bull markets, potentially leading to greater losses during downturns.
  • Institutional Asset Management: Large institutional investors, such as pension funds and endowments, rigorously monitor acquired market drift to adhere to strict investment mandates and risk guidelines. Their sheer size means even small percentage drifts can represent significant monetary value and necessitate careful rebalancing strategies.
  • Target-Date Funds: These mutual funds and Exchange-Traded Funds are designed to automatically adjust their asset allocation over time, gradually becoming more conservative as the target retirement date approaches. This built-in adjustment mechanism helps to counteract acquired market drift and keep the portfolio on its intended glide path.
  • Risk Management: From a broader risk management perspective, understanding drift is key to controlling systemic exposures. If many passively managed portfolios are heavily concentrated in a few large-cap stocks due to market appreciation and resultant drift, it could amplify market movements should those specific stocks decline.

Limitations and Criticisms

While acquired market drift is a recognized phenomenon, its significance and optimal management strategies are subject to ongoing discussion in behavioral finance and portfolio theory.

One primary criticism relates to the very structure of many popular benchmark indexes, particularly those weighted by market capitalization. Such indexes inherently give greater weight to companies with larger market values. This means that as a company's stock price rises, its weight in the index automatically increases, leading to a natural form of acquired market drift within index-tracking portfolios. Critics argue this creates a "momentum bias" where the index continuously allocates more capital to assets that have performed well, potentially leading to overconcentration in overvalued sectors or individual stocks. Thi2s can be seen as a limitation, as it may lead to a lack of diversification and increased risk if those heavily weighted companies or sectors subsequently decline.

Fu1rthermore, constantly correcting for acquired market drift through rebalancing can incur transaction costs and potentially trigger taxable events, especially in non-tax-advantaged accounts. Some investment philosophies, particularly those advocating for a strict "buy and hold" approach, might argue that market drift should largely be ignored, believing that over the long term, market forces will correct themselves, and frequent intervention can be counterproductive due to costs and the potential for mistiming the market.

Acquired Market Drift vs. Portfolio Rebalancing

Acquired market drift and portfolio rebalancing are closely related concepts, but they represent different aspects of portfolio management.

Acquired market drift is the result or the problem: it is the unintentional change in a portfolio's asset allocation caused by differential returns of its underlying investments. For example, if an investor targets a 60% equities and 40% bonds split, and a strong stock market pushes the equity portion to 70%, that 10% deviation is acquired market drift.

Portfolio rebalancing, on the other hand, is the action or the solution: it is the deliberate process of buying and selling assets to bring a portfolio back to its original or desired asset allocation after it has experienced acquired market drift. In the previous example, rebalancing would involve selling enough equities and buying enough bonds to restore the 60/40 target. While acquired market drift is a passive occurrence, rebalancing is an active decision made by the investor or their financial advisor to manage risk and maintain consistency with investment objectives.

FAQs

Why does acquired market drift happen?

Acquired market drift occurs because different investments within a portfolio generate varying returns over time. Assets that perform well grow faster and therefore take up a larger percentage of the portfolio, while slower-growing or declining assets shrink in proportion. This natural fluctuation causes the portfolio's actual asset allocation to "drift" away from its original targets.

Is acquired market drift always bad?

Not necessarily. In a bull market, acquired market drift might lead to a higher weighting in appreciating assets like equities, which could result in greater returns in the short term. However, it can also increase the portfolio's risk exposure beyond an investor's risk tolerance and deviate from their long-term financial goals. The primary concern is that unchecked drift can lead to an unintended portfolio structure.

How can I prevent acquired market drift?

You cannot prevent acquired market drift from occurring, as it's a natural outcome of market movements. However, you can manage it through a process called portfolio rebalancing. Rebalancing involves periodically adjusting your portfolio by selling assets that have grown disproportionately and buying those that have shrunk, thereby restoring your desired asset allocation. This helps maintain your portfolio's intended risk profile.