Acquired total leverage

What Is Acquired Total Leverage?

Acquired Total Leverage refers to the total amount of debt assumed by an acquiring entity in a merger or acquisition (M&A) transaction to finance the purchase of a target company. This concept is central to corporate finance and plays a critical role in structuring deals, particularly in leveraged buyout (LBO) scenarios. It represents the combined debt of both the acquirer and the acquired entity, or specifically the debt raised to facilitate the acquisition itself, often including the target's existing debt. Understanding acquired total leverage is crucial for assessing the capital structure of the newly formed or combined entity and its subsequent credit risk.

History and Origin

The concept of leveraging debt for acquisitions gained significant prominence during the leveraged buyout boom of the 1980s. Private equity firms began utilizing substantial amounts of borrowed capital to acquire companies, with the assets of the acquired company often serving as collateral for the debt. This approach aimed to amplify returns for equity investors by minimizing the equity contribution. While the practice existed before, the scale and complexity of these debt-financed acquisitions evolved significantly, leading to a closer examination of the resulting "acquired total leverage." The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has historically monitored the growth of corporate debt and leveraged loan markets, noting their expansion and potential vulnerabilities within the global financial system. For instance, the IMF's Global Financial Stability Report (October 2019) highlighted the substantial increase in the value of leveraged loan issuances, which more than doubled between 2012 and 2018, underscoring the rising reliance on such debt in various transactions.⁸, ⁹

Key Takeaways

• Acquired total leverage is the total debt held by a company after an acquisition, encompassing both new and existing debt.
• It is a critical metric in mergers and acquisitions, particularly for private equity firms undertaking leveraged buyouts.
• High acquired total leverage can amplify equity returns but also significantly increase financial risk.
• Regulators, such as the Federal Reserve and the SEC, closely monitor leverage levels and related disclosures to ensure financial stability.
• The interpretation of acquired total leverage often involves comparing it to the combined entity's earnings or assets.

Formula and Calculation

Acquired Total Leverage is typically expressed as a ratio to the combined entity's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). The general formula is:

Where:

• Total Debt (Acquirer + Acquired): This includes all forms of financial debt, such as bank loans, bonds, and other borrowed funds, from both the acquiring company and the target company post-acquisition.
• Combined Pro Forma EBITDA: This represents the estimated adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization of the combined entity, as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the reporting period. "Pro forma" adjustments may account for synergies or cost savings expected from the integration.

This ratio provides a quick assessment of how many years of EBITDA would be required to repay the total debt, assuming EBITDA remains constant and all of it is used for debt repayment.

Interpreting the Acquired Total Leverage

Interpreting acquired total leverage involves assessing the financial health and risk profile of the newly combined entity. A higher ratio indicates a greater reliance on debt financing and, consequently, higher financial risk. For investors and lenders, a high acquired total leverage ratio might signal increased vulnerability to economic downturns, rising interest rates, or operational challenges. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests a more conservative financial position and greater flexibility. The acceptable level of acquired total leverage varies significantly by industry, economic conditions, and the quality of the acquired company's cash flows. Mature, stable industries with predictable cash flows can often support higher leverage ratios than volatile or cyclical sectors. Analysts often benchmark this ratio against industry peers and historical levels to gauge its sustainability.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "Acme Corp," a technology company, acquiring "Beta Solutions," a software firm, for a total purchase price of $500 million. Acme Corp funds the acquisition by taking on $300 million in new debt, while Beta Solutions has existing debt of $100 million that Acme assumes. Acme Corp's existing debt before the acquisition was $50 million.

• New debt for acquisition: $300 million
• Beta Solutions' existing debt: $100 million
• Acme Corp's existing debt: $50 million

The total debt of the combined entity would be $300 million + $100 million + $50 million = $450 million.

Suppose the combined pro forma EBITDA for the new entity is projected to be $80 million annually.

The Acquired Total Leverage Ratio would be:

This indicates that the combined entity's total debt is approximately 5.625 times its annual EBITDA. This number would then be evaluated against industry norms, the stability of the combined cash flows, and prevailing credit market conditions to determine its riskiness.

Practical Applications

Acquired total leverage has several practical applications across various financial disciplines:

• Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) Analysis: It is a key metric in due diligence and deal valuation. Acquirers use it to model the financial impact of a transaction, while sellers might highlight a clean balance sheet to attract buyers. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) mandates specific financial statements and pro forma information disclosures for significant business acquisitions to provide transparency to investors.⁶, ⁷
• Lending Decisions: Banks and institutional lenders scrutinize acquired total leverage when underwriting loans for acquisitions. They often impose covenants (conditions) on loans, such as maximum leverage ratios, to protect their interests.
• Credit Ratings: Rating agencies evaluate the acquired total leverage of a combined entity to assign or adjust its credit rating, which in turn impacts its future borrowing costs.
• Private Equity Investing: For private equity firms, managing acquired total leverage is central to their strategy. Their ability to generate high returns often depends on successfully servicing and eventually reducing the significant debt taken on in an LBO. Research indicates that the median debt-to-EBITDA ratio for LBOs can significantly increase post-acquisition.⁵
• Regulatory Oversight: Financial regulators, like the Federal Reserve, closely monitor trends in leveraged lending due to its potential systemic implications. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York, for instance, has issued staff reports examining the impact of leveraged lending guidance on the banking industry and the migration of risk to non-bank entities.⁴

Limitations and Criticisms

While acquired total leverage is a crucial metric, it has limitations. A primary criticism is its reliance on EBITDA, which, while a common proxy for cash flow, does not account for capital expenditures, taxes, or changes in working capital, all of which impact actual cash available for debt service. This can lead to an overly optimistic view of a highly leveraged company's ability to manage its debt.

Another limitation stems from the varying quality and stability of EBITDA itself. Pro forma EBITDA, often used in M&A, includes assumptions about synergies and cost savings that may not fully materialize, leading to an understated leverage ratio in practice. Furthermore, the increasing prevalence of "covenant-lite" loans in the leveraged loan market means that lenders have fewer triggers to intervene if a borrower's financial performance deteriorates, potentially masking underlying risks until they become severe. The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas has highlighted how evolving leveraged loan covenants, specifically the shift towards incurrence covenants over maintenance covenants, may pose novel transmission risks within the financial system.³ Academic studies also offer a balanced view on the performance of leveraged buyouts, with some analyses suggesting varying operating results post-buyout depending on the deal specifics and market conditions.¹, ²

Acquired Total Leverage vs. Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio

While "Acquired Total Leverage" and "Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio" are closely related and often calculated using the same formula, their contexts differ slightly.

| Feature | Acquired Total Leverage
| Acquired Total Leverage