Skip to main content
← Back to A Definitions

Acquired zero cost collar

What Is Acquired Zero Cost Collar?

An Acquired Zero Cost Collar is an options strategy designed to protect an existing long position in an underlying asset, such as a stock, against a significant price decline, while simultaneously financing this protection through the sale of upside potential. This strategy falls under the broader category of risk management in portfolio management. It is termed "acquired" because it is implemented on shares already owned, rather than initiated alongside a new stock purchase. The "zero cost" aspect signifies that the premium received from selling a call option ideally offsets the premium paid for buying a put option, resulting in no net cost for establishing the hedge.

History and Origin

The concept of using options contracts for hedging and speculation has ancient roots, with early forms observed even in ancient Greece with Thales of Miletus. However, the standardization and widespread exchange-traded options, which made complex strategies like the Acquired Zero Cost Collar practical for individual and institutional investors, emerged much later. A pivotal moment was the founding of the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) in 1973. This establishment introduced a regulated marketplace for standardized options contracts, making them more accessible and liquid.,6,5 The CBOE's creation, initially trading only 16 stocks with listed options, paved the way for the development of sophisticated options strategies that could be precisely structured to meet specific risk-reward objectives, including those aimed at zero net premium.4 The advent of a centralized clearinghouse, the Options Clearing Corporation (OCC), in tandem with the CBOE, further enhanced the reliability and integrity of options trading, facilitating broader adoption and innovation in derivative strategies.3

Key Takeaways

  • An Acquired Zero Cost Collar protects an existing stock position from downside risk.
  • It involves buying an out-of-the-money put option and selling an out-of-the-money call option on the same underlying asset.
  • The premiums are structured so that the cost of the put is offset by the income from the call, aiming for a net zero expenditure.
  • While providing downside protection, the strategy caps potential upside gains due to the sold call option.
  • It's a form of hedging strategy suitable for investors holding appreciated stock.

Interpreting the Acquired Zero Cost Collar

An Acquired Zero Cost Collar is interpreted as a strategic balance between capital preservation and potential upside limitation. When an investor implements this strategy, they are essentially defining a range within which their stock's value will fluctuate until the expiration date of the options. The purchased put option sets a floor, providing protection below its strike price. The sold call option establishes a ceiling, meaning any gains above its strike price will not be realized by the investor.

The "zero cost" aspect is crucial; it implies a trade-off where the investor sacrifices potential significant capital appreciation for no upfront cost for the protection. The success of an Acquired Zero Cost Collar is not typically measured by profit generation from the options themselves but by its effectiveness in limiting losses on the underlying asset during adverse market movements. It's a testament to how derivatives can be used for nuanced risk management rather than pure speculation.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investor, Sarah, who owns 100 shares of XYZ Corp., currently trading at $100 per share. She is concerned about a potential short-term market downturn but does not want to sell her shares, anticipating long-term growth. She decides to implement an Acquired Zero Cost Collar.

  1. Buy a Put Option: Sarah buys one put option with a strike price of $95, expiring in three months, costing $2.00 per share ($200 total for 100 shares). This provides her protection if XYZ Corp. falls below $95.
  2. Sell a Call Option: To offset this cost, Sarah sells one call option with a strike price of $105, also expiring in three months, receiving $2.00 per share ($200 total for 100 shares).

Scenario 1: XYZ Corp. falls to $90 at expiration.

  • Sarah's stock value declines to $9,000.
  • The put option is in-the-money, allowing her to sell her shares at $95, limiting her loss to $5 per share (plus the cost of the options, which was zero). Her effective selling price is $95 per share.
  • The call option is out-of-the-money and expires worthless.

Scenario 2: XYZ Corp. rises to $110 at expiration.

  • Sarah's stock value rises to $11,000.
  • The put option is out-of-the-money and expires worthless.
  • The call option is in-the-money, and she will be obligated to sell her shares at $105. Her maximum gain is capped at $5 per share above her initial price, ignoring the zero net premium.

Scenario 3: XYZ Corp. stays at $100 at expiration.

  • Both options expire worthless. Sarah still owns her shares at $100, and she had no net cost for the collar.

In each scenario, the "zero cost" of the Acquired Zero Cost Collar provides a defined risk-reward profile without an upfront expenditure for the hedging strategy.

Practical Applications

The Acquired Zero Cost Collar is commonly applied by investors who hold a significant, often appreciated, position in a stock and wish to protect their gains without selling the shares or incurring an upfront cost for the hedge.
It is particularly useful in situations where:

  • Protecting Unrealized Gains: An investor has substantial unrealized gains in a stock and wants to lock in a portion of those gains, anticipating a period of increased volatility or potential market correction.
  • Estate Planning: For inherited stock that has a low cost basis, an Acquired Zero Cost Collar can provide downside protection without triggering a taxable event by selling the shares.
  • Concentrated Positions: Individuals with a large portion of their wealth in a single company's stock (e.g., employee stock options or founders) can use this strategy to mitigate concentrated risk.2
  • Mitigating Market Downside: During uncertain economic times, or ahead of significant company announcements, this strategy can provide peace of mind by setting a floor on potential losses.
  • Meeting Lender Requirements: In some cases, collateralized loans might benefit from such a hedge to stabilize the value of the underlying collateral.

The careful selection of strike price and expiration date is crucial to align the collar with the investor's specific risk tolerance and outlook.

Limitations and Criticisms

While an Acquired Zero Cost Collar offers appealing advantages, it is not without limitations and criticisms. A primary drawback is that it caps the potential upside of the underlying asset. If the stock experiences a significant rally beyond the strike price of the sold call option, the investor will not participate in those gains, as they are obligated to sell their shares at the call's strike price if it's in-the-money. This foregone opportunity can be a significant cost, especially in a strongly bullish market.

Another consideration is that achieving a true "zero cost" is dependent on market conditions and the implied volatility of the options. While the goal is to perfectly offset the put premium with the call premium, real-world pricing means that precise alignment may be difficult to achieve, or it might require accepting less favorable strike prices, thereby tightening the protected range. Investors must also be aware of early assignment risk on the short call, particularly if it becomes deeply in-the-money, though this is less common with American-style equity options due to lost time value. Furthermore, options strategies carry inherent risks, and it is important for investors to understand these.

The strategy also requires ongoing monitoring. As the stock price and market volatility change, the effectiveness and "zero cost" nature of the collar can shift, potentially requiring adjustments or re-establishment of the strategy. Critics might also argue that for some long-term investors, simply tolerating market fluctuations or diversifying their portfolio might be a simpler and more effective approach than engaging in complex derivatives strategies that limit upside potential.1

Acquired Zero Cost Collar vs. Protective Put

The Acquired Zero Cost Collar and a Protective Put are both hedging strategies used to protect an existing long stock position from downside risk, but they differ significantly in their cost and upside potential.

FeatureAcquired Zero Cost CollarProtective Put
ComponentsBuy a put option and sell a call optionBuy a put option
Net CostAims for zero net premium (premium paid for put is offset by premium received for call)Always involves a net cost (premium paid for the put)
Upside PotentialCapped at the strike price of the sold call optionUnlimited upside potential on the underlying stock
Risk ProfileDefined risk and defined reward (within the collar range)Defined risk (to the put strike price) and unlimited reward
Primary GoalDownside protection with no upfront cost, sacrificing upsideDownside protection with full upside participation

While a Protective Put offers unlimited upside, it requires an upfront cash outlay for the put option premium. The Acquired Zero Cost Collar, by contrast, finances the put purchase through the sale of a call, eliminating the upfront cost but at the expense of potential capital appreciation above the call's strike price. Investors choose between these strategies based on their outlook on the stock's future movement, their willingness to pay for protection, and their desired participation in potential upside rallies.

FAQs

What does "zero cost" mean in an Acquired Zero Cost Collar?

"Zero cost" refers to the intent to structure the strategy so that the premium received from selling the call option approximately equals the premium paid for buying the put option, resulting in no net cash outlay to establish the hedge.

Why is it called "acquired"?

It is called "acquired" because the strategy is applied to shares of stock that the investor already owns. It is a way to hedge an existing long position, rather than being initiated simultaneously with the purchase of new shares.

Does an Acquired Zero Cost Collar eliminate all risk?

No, an Acquired Zero Cost Collar does not eliminate all risk. While it protects against downside moves below the strike price of the purchased put option, it caps potential upside gains due to the sold call option. It also does not protect against liquidity risk or the risk of the underlying company going bankrupt.

Can the "zero cost" change over time?

Yes, the "zero cost" is established at the initiation of the strategy. However, as the market value of the underlying asset changes, and as volatility and time to expiration date fluctuate, the theoretical "zero cost" balance between the two options will change. The strategy aims for zero net cost at implementation, but its profitability or cost can vary throughout its life cycle.

Is an Acquired Zero Cost Collar suitable for all investors?

This strategy is generally more suited for investors who hold a concentrated position in a stock and want to protect unrealized gains without selling their shares or incurring an upfront cost. It requires an understanding of options contracts and their risks. It may not be suitable for investors seeking unlimited upside participation or those unfamiliar with derivatives strategies.