Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to A Definitions

Active risk indicator

LINK_POOL:

What Is Active Risk Indicator?

Active risk, also known as tracking error, is a measure of the volatility of a portfolio's returns relative to its benchmark. It quantifies the degree to which an actively managed portfolio deviates from the performance of its chosen index. This metric is a core component of portfolio management within the broader field of quantitative finance and investment theory. A higher active risk indicates that a portfolio's returns are more likely to diverge significantly from the benchmark's returns, reflecting a greater commitment to active management and potentially higher conviction bets by the portfolio manager. Conversely, a low active risk suggests that the portfolio closely mirrors its benchmark.

History and Origin

The concept of active risk gained prominence with the evolution of modern portfolio theory in the latter half of the 20th century. As investment management grew more sophisticated, the need to quantitatively assess the performance of actively managed portfolios became critical. The rise of benchmark-centric investing and the increasing availability of data allowed for more precise measurement of deviations from market indices. The emphasis shifted from simply outperforming a benchmark to understanding the sources and risks of that outperformance. Financial institutions and academics began to formalize metrics like active risk to provide greater transparency and accountability in investment strategies. The Federal Reserve, for instance, has long emphasized the importance of robust risk management in the financial system, underscoring the broader institutional focus on understanding and mitigating various forms of financial risk.7

Key Takeaways

  • Active risk measures how much an actively managed portfolio's returns deviate from its benchmark's returns.
  • It is a key metric for evaluating the effectiveness and style of active investment strategies.
  • A higher active risk implies a greater departure from the benchmark and potentially higher conviction bets.
  • Active risk is often considered alongside active share to provide a comprehensive view of active management.
  • Understanding active risk is crucial for investors seeking to align their portfolio's risk profile with their investment objectives.

Formula and Calculation

Active risk is calculated as the standard deviation of the active returns. Active return is the difference between the portfolio's return and the benchmark's return over a specified period.

The formula for active risk (or tracking error) is:

σAR=∑t=1n(RP,t−RB,t)2n−1\sigma_{AR} = \sqrt{\frac{\sum_{t=1}^{n} (R_{P,t} - R_{B,t})^2}{n-1}}

Where:

  • (\sigma_{AR}) = Active Risk (Tracking Error)
  • (R_{P,t}) = Return of the portfolio at time (t)
  • (R_{B,t}) = Return of the benchmark at time (t)
  • (n) = Number of observations

This calculation essentially measures the standard deviation of the differences in returns. If the active returns across various securities in the portfolio are assumed to have zero correlation with each other and with the core portfolio, the calculation can be simplified for instructional purposes.6

Interpreting the Active Risk Indicator

Interpreting the active risk indicator involves understanding the relationship between a portfolio's deviations and its manager's strategy. A low active risk suggests a portfolio that closely tracks its benchmark, characteristic of strategies aiming for modest outperformance with minimal relative volatility. This often aligns with approaches seeking to capture broad market returns while attempting to slightly enhance them through minor deviations.

Conversely, a high active risk indicates a significant divergence from the benchmark, implying a manager is taking substantial active positions. This could be due to strong conviction in certain securities or sectors, or a desire to generate considerable alpha by deliberately moving away from the benchmark's composition. For instance, a portfolio manager might overweight a particular industry that they believe will outperform the market, thereby increasing the portfolio's active risk.5 Investors should consider whether the level of active risk aligns with their expectations for the active manager's style and their own tolerance for deviations from market returns. This ties into overall asset allocation decisions.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a hypothetical equity portfolio and its benchmark, both tracking a specific market index over three months.

  • Month 1: Portfolio Return = 2.5%, Benchmark Return = 2.0%. Active Return = 0.5%
  • Month 2: Portfolio Return = -1.0%, Benchmark Return = -1.2%. Active Return = 0.2%
  • Month 3: Portfolio Return = 3.0%, Benchmark Return = 2.5%. Active Return = 0.5%

To calculate the active risk:

  1. Calculate the average active return: (0.5%+0.2%+0.5%)/3=0.4%(0.5\% + 0.2\% + 0.5\%) / 3 = 0.4\%
  2. Calculate the squared difference of each active return from the average:
    • Month 1: (0.5%−0.4%)2=(0.1%)2=0.0001%2(0.5\% - 0.4\%)^2 = (0.1\%)^2 = 0.0001\%^2
    • Month 2: (0.2%−0.4%)2=(−0.2%)2=0.0004%2(0.2\% - 0.4\%)^2 = (-0.2\%)^2 = 0.0004\%^2
    • Month 3: (0.5%−0.4%)2=(0.1%)2=0.0001%2(0.5\% - 0.4\%)^2 = (0.1\%)^2 = 0.0001\%^2
  3. Sum the squared differences: 0.0001%2+0.0004%2+0.0001%2=0.0006%20.0001\%^2 + 0.0004\%^2 + 0.0001\%^2 = 0.0006\%^2
  4. Divide by (n-1) (where (n=3)): 0.0006%2/(3−1)=0.0003%20.0006\%^2 / (3-1) = 0.0003\%^2
  5. Take the square root to find the active risk: 0.0003%2≈0.0173%\sqrt{0.0003\%^2} \approx 0.0173\%

In this example, the active risk is approximately 0.0173%. This low number indicates that the portfolio's returns closely tracked its benchmark, suggesting a relatively conservative active strategy or a strong alignment with the market. This reflects the portfolio's limited variance from the benchmark.

Practical Applications

Active risk is a fundamental tool across various facets of the financial industry. In investment management, it is crucial for fund managers to quantify how much their portfolio's performance deviates from its stated benchmark. This helps in understanding the level of active bets being taken and whether those bets are generating desired risk-adjusted returns. For institutional investors, active risk is often incorporated into mandates and guidelines for external managers, ensuring that the manager's strategy aligns with the institution's risk tolerance.

Furthermore, active risk plays a role in risk budgeting, where the total allowable risk for a portfolio is allocated among different active investment decisions. Regulators and compliance officers may also use active risk as a monitoring tool to ensure that investment products adhere to their stated objectives and risk profiles. For instance, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has rules in place concerning investment adviser marketing and disclosure, which indirectly relate to how active risk and deviations from benchmarks are communicated to investors. [Sec.gov] For example, firms like Research Affiliates, known for their work in smart beta and factor-based investing, often discuss how dynamic multifactor strategies manage tracking error and enhance long-term portfolio performance, indicating the real-world application of active risk considerations.4, [ResearchAffiliates.com]

Limitations and Criticisms

While active risk is a widely used metric, it has several limitations and criticisms. One primary concern is that it is a backward-looking measure. It reflects past deviations but does not necessarily predict future active risk. Market conditions, portfolio composition, and manager behavior can change, leading to different levels of active risk going forward.3

Another criticism is that active risk does not distinguish between desirable and undesirable deviations from the benchmark. A high active risk could result from successful high-conviction bets that generate strong outperformance, or it could stem from poor investment decisions that lead to significant underperformance. The metric itself does not provide qualitative insight into the source of the deviation. For example, a significant underweighting of an outperforming sector will contribute to active risk, regardless of whether that decision was strategic or an oversight.

Moreover, active risk, especially when considered in isolation, may not fully capture the complete risk profile of a portfolio. It focuses solely on relative risk to a benchmark, potentially overlooking absolute risks or other types of risks, such as illiquidity risk or concentration risk. Firms like AQR Capital Management, while engaging in active management, have also explored the complexities of measuring and interpreting different forms of risk, including how "volatility laundering" in private markets can obscure true economic volatility.2, [AQR.com] This highlights that focusing solely on active risk can create a misleading sense of security, particularly in less transparent investment vehicles.1

Active Risk vs. Active Share

Active risk and active share are two distinct but complementary metrics used to assess actively managed portfolios. While both relate to a portfolio's deviation from its benchmark, they measure different aspects of that deviation.

Active Risk (or tracking error) quantifies the volatility of the difference between a portfolio's returns and its benchmark's returns. It is a measure of ex-post or predicted relative return volatility. A high active risk indicates that the portfolio's performance is likely to diverge significantly from the benchmark's performance, either positively or negatively. It's a quantitative measure of the magnitude of performance deviation.

Active Share measures the percentage of a portfolio's holdings that differ from its benchmark's holdings. It is a direct measure of how much a portfolio's composition deviates from its benchmark's composition. An active share of 0% means the portfolio is identical to the benchmark (passive investing), while an active share of 100% means there are no common holdings with the benchmark.

The key distinction is that active share measures how different the portfolio's holdings are, while active risk measures how volatile the performance difference is. A manager could have a high active share (meaning very different holdings) but a relatively low active risk if their active bets are diversified and designed to offset each other's volatility. Conversely, a manager could have a lower active share but still exhibit high active risk if their active bets are concentrated and highly correlated, leading to significant relative performance swings. They are often analyzed together to provide a more holistic view of a manager's true active bets and the associated risk.

FAQs

What does a high active risk mean for a portfolio?

A high active risk means that a portfolio's returns are expected to deviate significantly from its benchmark's returns. This indicates a manager is taking substantial active bets, which could lead to either considerable outperformance or underperformance relative to the benchmark. It reflects a greater departure from passive investing.

Is active risk a good measure of manager skill?

Active risk alone is not a complete measure of manager skill. While a skilled manager might take higher active risk to generate alpha, high active risk can also result from poor decisions. It primarily indicates the degree of deviation, not necessarily the quality of the active decisions. It needs to be evaluated in conjunction with the portfolio's active return.

How can active risk be reduced?

Active risk can be reduced by making the portfolio's holdings and their weights more similar to those of the benchmark. This involves decreasing the magnitude of active weights (differences in security weights between the portfolio and benchmark) and ensuring that active bets are less correlated, thereby reducing the potential for large deviations in relative performance. Increased diversification of active positions can also help.

What is the relationship between active risk and benchmark selection?

Active risk is entirely dependent on the chosen benchmark. A portfolio might have a low active risk against one benchmark but a high active risk against another. Therefore, appropriate benchmark selection is crucial for a meaningful assessment of active risk and the manager's relative performance.