Skip to main content
← Back to A Definitions

Additional bonds test

What Is Additional Bonds Test?

The additional bonds test is a critical financial assessment used primarily in the context of municipal finance and bond issuance. It determines whether an issuer, typically a governmental entity or public authority, can issue new bonds based on its existing revenue streams and financial capacity. This test is a key element of bond covenants found within a trust indenture, particularly for revenue bonds, which are backed by specific project revenues rather than general taxing power33. The purpose of the additional bonds test is to ensure that the issuer's revenues meet predetermined thresholds, thereby guaranteeing that the entity can service the debt on both its outstanding bonds and any proposed new bonds31, 32. By requiring this assessment, the additional bonds test enhances market transparency and assists bondholders and investors in evaluating the associated risks of new debt29, 30.

History and Origin

The concept of financial covenants, including tests like the additional bonds test, evolved as a mechanism to protect lenders and investors by formalizing conditions for debt issuance and management. In the United States, the broader framework for protecting bond investors in public offerings was significantly strengthened with the passage of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939. This legislation mandated that public debt offerings above a certain threshold (initially $10 million, later updated to $50 million) be issued under a formal written agreement, or indenture, with an independent trustee appointed to safeguard bondholder interests. While the Trust Indenture Act primarily applies to corporate bonds, the principles of protective covenants, such as the additional bonds test, became standard practice in municipal bond financings to provide similar assurances to investors28. These covenants are integral to the structure of revenue bonds, ensuring the fiscal integrity of the issuing entity before it takes on further debt secured by the same revenue stream.

Key Takeaways

  • The additional bonds test is a financial safeguard, ensuring an issuer's ability to service new and existing debt.
  • It is a specific covenant within a bond's trust indenture, common for revenue bonds.
  • The test assesses existing pledged revenues against debt service requirements, including the proposed new debt.
  • Passing the test is typically a prerequisite for issuing parity bonds, which have an equal claim on revenues.
  • It contributes to market transparency, allowing investors to better assess the credit rating and risk of an issuer's debt.

Formula and Calculation

The additional bonds test itself is not a singular formula but rather a condition that relies on specific financial metrics and calculations, most commonly the debt service coverage ratio (DSCR). Issuers must demonstrate that their current or projected revenues are sufficient to cover the debt service requirements of both existing and proposed additional bonds.

A typical additional bonds test provision in a trust indenture might require that the net revenues of the facility or project in the preceding fiscal year (or average of recent years) are at least a certain multiple of the maximum annual debt service (MADS) on all outstanding and proposed bonds. For example, a common requirement could be a DSCR of 1.25x or 1.50x26, 27.

The general principle for calculating the required coverage would be:

[ \text{Projected Net Revenues} \ge \text{Minimum Coverage Ratio} \times (\text{Annual Debt Service on Existing Bonds} + \text{Annual Debt Service on Proposed Bonds}) ]

Where:

  • Projected Net Revenues: Often calculated from historical financial performance, sometimes with adjustments for known increases or decreases25.
  • Minimum Coverage Ratio: A factor specified in the bond covenant (e.g., 1.25 or 1.50).
  • Annual Debt Service: The total principal and interest payments due on the bonds in a given year.

This calculation ensures that there is a sufficient cushion of revenue beyond what is strictly necessary to cover the bond payments.

Interpreting the Additional Bonds Test

Interpreting the additional bonds test involves understanding its implications for both the issuer and the investor within the broader context of bond issuance. For an issuer, passing the additional bonds test signifies financial strength and the capacity to undertake new debt obligations without jeopardizing existing commitments. Failure to pass the test typically prohibits the issuance of new parity bonds—bonds that would have an equal claim on the same revenue stream as existing debt. 24In some cases, failure might still permit the issuance of junior lien bonds, which have a subordinated claim on revenues, offering less risk to current bondholders.
23
For investors, a stringent additional bonds test within a bond's trust indenture provides an added layer of security. It indicates that the issuer is contractually obligated to maintain specific financial health metrics before incurring more debt. This provides assurance that the revenue stream backing their investment is not likely to become over-leveraged. The specific ratio required by the test (e.g., 1.25x or 1.50x) helps investors gauge the level of financial cushion the issuer must maintain.
22

Hypothetical Example

Consider the City of Lakeside, which operates a municipal water utility financed by revenue bonds. The existing bond indenture includes an additional bonds test requiring net revenues to be at least 1.30 times the maximum annual debt service on all outstanding and proposed bonds.

Currently, the water utility has:

  • Existing annual debt service: $5 million
  • Net revenues from the last fiscal year: $7 million

The city plans to issue new bonds to fund a major capital project for water infrastructure expansion, which will add an estimated $2 million to the annual debt service.

To determine if the city passes the additional bonds test for the new issuance, the calculation would be:

  1. Calculate total proposed annual debt service:
    $5,000,000 (existing) + $2,000,000 (proposed) = $7,000,000

  2. Calculate the required net revenues based on the 1.30x coverage:
    $7,000,000 (total proposed annual debt service) × 1.30 (coverage ratio) = $9,100,000

  3. Compare current net revenues to the required amount:
    The city's current net revenues are $7,000,000. The required net revenues, including the new debt, would be $9,100,000.

In this hypothetical scenario, the City of Lakeside would not pass the additional bonds test with its current net revenues because $7,000,000 is less than $9,100,000. This means the city would need to demonstrate higher projected net revenues, perhaps through rate increases or other confirmed revenue enhancements, or reduce the amount of the proposed new bond issue, to meet the covenant requirements before proceeding with the bond issuance.

Practical Applications

The additional bonds test is a fundamental aspect of debt management and financial oversight in various sectors that rely on bond financing. Its most prominent application is in the municipal bond market, where state and local governments issue bonds to finance public infrastructure and services. E21ntities such as utilities, transportation authorities, and healthcare systems often issue revenue bonds and are subject to an additional bonds test to ensure their continued financial viability. T20his test is a crucial element examined by credit rating agencies when assigning ratings to new municipal debt, as it provides insight into the issuer's capacity to manage future borrowing responsibly.

19Beyond municipal finance, similar concepts of financial covenants and tests exist in corporate finance, where companies seeking to issue new debt or secure loans must demonstrate their ability to service existing and prospective obligations. T18hese covenants are meticulously detailed in bond indentures and loan agreements, which are legal contracts between the issuer and bondholders or lenders. R16, 17egulatory bodies like the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) contribute to market transparency by providing access to municipal securities disclosures, including official statements that detail such covenants, through its Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) system. T15his system helps investors review the terms and conditions that govern municipal securities, offering a centralized source for this information.

#14# Limitations and Criticisms

While the additional bonds test serves as a vital safeguard in bond issuance, it does have limitations and can face criticisms. One primary concern is that the test is often based on historical financial statements or projections, which may not always accurately reflect future economic conditions or unexpected operational challenges. A12, 13 strong past performance does not guarantee future revenue stability, especially for revenue bonds whose income stream might be susceptible to economic downturns, changes in user demand, or unforeseen events.

Another drawback is the potential cost and complexity for issuers. Performing the additional bonds test often requires engaging external auditors or financial advisors to meticulously analyze revenues and debt capacities, which can increase the overall cost of bond issuance. T11his can be particularly burdensome for smaller municipal entities. Furthermore, while the test provides a snapshot of financial capacity, it may not encompass all aspects of an issuer's financial health or resilience to various stressors. T10he reliance on a specific debt service coverage ratio threshold, for instance, might not fully capture the qualitative risks associated with a project or the broader fiscal environment.

Critics also point out that issuers might sometimes be able to structure new debt in a way that technically passes the additional bonds test but still places increased strain on their financial resources, particularly if the test allows for the issuance of junior lien bonds when revenues are insufficient for parity bonds. T9he ongoing debate over the constitutionality and scope of self-regulatory organizations like the MSRB, which establishes some of the rules related to municipal securities, also highlights broader discussions about the effectiveness and appropriateness of current regulatory frameworks in the municipal market.

8## Additional Bonds Test vs. Debt Service Coverage Ratio

The additional bonds test and the debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) are closely related but serve different functions in debt finance. The DSCR is a specific financial metric that measures an entity's available cash flow to cover its current debt obligations, calculated by dividing net operating income by total debt service (principal and interest payments). It provides a snapshot of an issuer's ability to pay its debts from its operations.

The additional bonds test, on the other hand, is a covenant or condition within a trust indenture that utilizes the DSCR (or similar revenue-to-debt metrics) as a primary component. The additional bonds test dictates whether an issuer is permitted to issue new bonds that would have a claim on the same revenue stream as existing bonds. It sets a minimum DSCR threshold that must be met, considering both outstanding and proposed debt, before any new debt can be incurred. T7herefore, while DSCR is a calculation that assesses financial health, the additional bonds test is a contractual hurdle that must be cleared, often by demonstrating a sufficient DSCR, to ensure prudent future bond issuance.

FAQs

What is the primary purpose of the additional bonds test?

The primary purpose of the additional bonds test is to protect bondholders by ensuring that an issuer has sufficient revenue capacity to meet the debt service obligations of both its existing and any newly proposed bonds. I6t acts as a gatekeeper for future borrowing against a specific revenue stream.

Who typically performs the additional bonds test?

The issuer of the bonds, often a state or local government entity, performs the additional bonds test. They typically work with financial advisors, legal counsel, and sometimes external auditors to ensure compliance with the covenants outlined in the trust indenture.

4, 5### Is the additional bonds test always required for bond issuances?
The additional bonds test is a common covenant, particularly for revenue bonds, which are secured by a specific revenue stream. I3t is not universally required for all types of bond issuances (e.g., general obligation bonds are typically backed by the full faith and credit and taxing power of the issuer), but it is a standard protective measure in many municipal debt agreements.

What happens if an issuer fails the additional bonds test?

If an issuer fails the additional bonds test, they are generally prohibited from issuing parity bonds, which would have an equal claim on the pledged revenues as the existing debt. I2n some instances, the covenant might allow for the issuance of junior lien bonds, which have a subordinate claim on the revenues, thereby posing less risk to existing bondholders.1