Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to A Definitions

Adjusted average alpha

What Is Adjusted Average Alpha?

Adjusted average alpha is a refined measure within portfolio theory that seeks to provide a more accurate assessment of an investment's performance beyond what is explained by market movements and inherent risk. While standard alpha measures the excess return of an investment relative to a benchmark index, adjusted average alpha attempts to account for additional factors or biases that might otherwise distort the perceived skill of a portfolio management strategy. These adjustments can include considerations for the benchmark's own non-zero alpha, specific market conditions, or even aspects of an investor's utility. The goal of using an adjusted average alpha is to isolate the true value added by an investment strategy through security selection or market timing, after controlling for a more comprehensive set of influences.

History and Origin

The concept of alpha, fundamentally a measure of risk-adjusted return, emerged prominently in the late 1960s. Michael Jensen's seminal 1968 paper, "The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945–1964," introduced what became known as Jensen's Alpha, a key component of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) framework. J14ensen's work provided a quantitative method to evaluate the performance of fund managers by comparing a portfolio's actual returns to its expected return given its level of systematic risk, or beta.

13As financial theory evolved, researchers and practitioners recognized that the basic alpha calculation might not fully capture a manager's true skill due to various complexities in market dynamics and portfolio construction. This led to the development of "adjusted" alpha methodologies. For instance, some adjustments address the concern that passive benchmarks themselves can exhibit non-zero alphas, especially during certain market periods, which could skew the perceived performance of actively managed funds. T11, 12he idea of refining alpha to account for these nuances has been a continuous area of research and practical application in investment performance evaluation.

Key Takeaways

  • Adjusted average alpha aims to provide a more precise measure of an investment manager's true skill.
  • It goes beyond traditional alpha by factoring in additional market dynamics, biases, or investor-specific considerations.
  • A positive adjusted average alpha suggests that a manager has generated returns beyond what could be attributed to market risk and other accounted-for factors.
  • This metric is particularly relevant for evaluating active management strategies in complex market environments.
  • The methodologies for calculating adjusted average alpha can vary, depending on the specific adjustments being applied.

Formula and Calculation

The fundamental concept behind adjusted average alpha is to take the standard alpha calculation and modify it to remove or account for specific factors that might introduce bias or misrepresentation. While there isn't a single universal formula for "adjusted average alpha" that applies to all contexts, the general approach involves isolating the part of a portfolio's return that cannot be explained by known risk factors or benchmark anomalies.

A common starting point is Jensen's Alpha, defined as:

αJ=Rp−[Rf+βp(Rm−Rf)]\alpha_J = R_p - [R_f + \beta_p (R_m - R_f)]

Where:

  • (\alpha_J) = Jensen's Alpha
  • (R_p) = Portfolio's actual return
  • (R_f) = Risk-free rate of return
  • (\beta_p) = Portfolio's beta (a measure of its systematic risk)
  • (R_m) = Market's return

Adjustments often involve extending this model to include additional factors (e.g., size, value, momentum as in Fama-French models) or by explicitly accounting for the benchmark index's own alpha. For instance, a "benchmark-adjusted alpha" might be conceptualized as:

αAdjusted=αp−αBenchmark\alpha_{Adjusted} = \alpha_p - \alpha_{Benchmark}

Where:

  • (\alpha_{Adjusted}) = The adjusted average alpha
  • (\alpha_p) = The portfolio's alpha (e.g., Jensen's Alpha)
  • (\alpha_{Benchmark}) = The alpha generated by the benchmark itself. This adjustment seeks to remove any inherent bias or "structural alpha" present in the chosen benchmark.

10The specific variables and the complexity of the adjustment depend on the financial phenomenon being isolated or controlled for.

Interpreting the Adjusted Average Alpha

Interpreting adjusted average alpha involves assessing whether a portfolio manager has truly added value beyond what passive exposure to market factors or benchmark characteristics would provide. A positive adjusted average alpha indicates that the investment has outperformed its expected returns, considering a broader set of influencing factors and risks. This suggests that the manager's security selection, market timing, or other active decisions have contributed positively to the portfolio's performance. Conversely, a negative adjusted average alpha implies underperformance, indicating that the portfolio's returns were less than what would be expected, even after these sophisticated adjustments.

It is crucial to understand the specific adjustments made when evaluating the figure. For example, an alpha adjusted for "revaluation alpha" attempts to strip out performance attributable to changes in the relative valuation of assets, aiming to reveal only the "structural alpha" that reflects fundamental skill. I8, 9nvestors use this metric to gauge the efficiency and effectiveness of their chosen investment strategy and to discern whether the fees associated with active management are justified by demonstrated skill.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a hypothetical actively managed mutual fund, Fund XYZ, whose primary benchmark is the S&P 500.

Over the past year:

  • Fund XYZ's actual return ((R_p)) = 12%
  • Risk-free rate ((R_f)) = 2%
  • S&P 500 return ((R_m)) = 10%
  • Fund XYZ's beta ((\beta_p)) relative to the S&P 500 = 1.1

First, calculate Fund XYZ's Jensen's Alpha:

αJ=0.12−[0.02+1.1(0.10−0.02)]αJ=0.12−[0.02+1.1(0.08)]αJ=0.12−[0.02+0.088]αJ=0.12−0.108αJ=0.012 or 1.2%\alpha_J = 0.12 - [0.02 + 1.1 (0.10 - 0.02)] \\ \alpha_J = 0.12 - [0.02 + 1.1(0.08)] \\ \alpha_J = 0.12 - [0.02 + 0.088] \\ \alpha_J = 0.12 - 0.108 \\ \alpha_J = 0.012 \text{ or } 1.2\%

This 1.2% Jensen's Alpha suggests the fund outperformed its CAPM-expected return by 1.2%.

Now, let's consider an adjustment. Suppose it is discovered that the S&P 500 itself exhibited an inherent "benchmark alpha" of 0.5% over the same period, perhaps due to a particular market anomaly or index construction methodology that wasn't fully captured by the CAPM. This means the benchmark itself had a positive alpha unrelated to its systematic risk.

To calculate the adjusted average alpha:

αAdjusted=αJ−αBenchmarkαAdjusted=1.2%−0.5%αAdjusted=0.7%\alpha_{Adjusted} = \alpha_J - \alpha_{Benchmark} \\ \alpha_{Adjusted} = 1.2\% - 0.5\% \\ \alpha_{Adjusted} = 0.7\%

The adjusted average alpha of 0.7% provides a more nuanced view. While Fund XYZ still demonstrated outperformance, 0.5% of that performance could be attributed to a positive bias in the benchmark itself, rather than solely to the manager's unique skill. This highlights how an adjusted average alpha can offer a clearer picture of value creation.

Practical Applications

Adjusted average alpha is a critical tool in several areas of finance, primarily in the evaluation of investment performance and the due diligence process for investment selection.

  • Fund Evaluation: Mutual fund and hedge fund analysts use adjusted average alpha to assess whether a manager's performance is truly attributable to skill rather than market luck or inherent biases in commonly used benchmarks. This helps investors make more informed decisions when selecting actively managed funds.
  • Performance Attribution: For institutional investors and wealth managers, adjusted average alpha contributes to detailed performance attribution analyses, helping to break down a portfolio's returns into components explained by various factors and the residual "alpha" component after adjustments.
  • Regulatory Compliance and Disclosure: Financial regulators, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), emphasize fair and balanced presentation of performance data in investment advertising. While not explicitly mandating "adjusted average alpha," the spirit of their rules encourages comprehensive disclosures that prevent misleading investors, especially concerning gross versus net performance and the context of extracted performance. I6, 7nvestment advisers must ensure that any presentation of performance is clear, not misleading, and adequately explains methodologies and assumptions.
    *4, 5 Academic Research: In academic finance, adjusted alpha methodologies are continuously explored to test market anomalies, evaluate the efficacy of various investment factors, and refine models for asset pricing and portfolio optimization.

3## Limitations and Criticisms

While adjusted average alpha seeks to provide a more refined view of investment performance, it is not without limitations and criticisms. One significant challenge lies in the subjectivity of the "adjustments" themselves. The selection of factors for adjustment can influence the outcome, and there is no universal consensus on which factors are always appropriate or how they should be weighted. What one analyst considers a valid adjustment, another might view as an over-complication or an attempt to "explain away" poor performance.

Furthermore, even after adjustments, interpreting alpha can be complex. As Morningstar has noted, the statistic can "resist easy interpretation," and it can be difficult to distinguish when a fund's alpha truly reflects managerial contributions versus other influences. S2ome researchers also distinguish between "structural alpha," which might be a reliable source of future return, and "revaluation alpha," which arises from changes in relative valuations and is unlikely to persist. T1his distinction highlights that a historical positive adjusted average alpha does not guarantee future outperformance.

The calculation of any alpha, adjusted or otherwise, relies on historical data. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and market conditions can change, potentially diminishing or altering the sources of alpha. The complexity of calculating and interpreting adjusted average alpha can also make it less accessible for the average investor, potentially leading to misinterpretations if not accompanied by clear explanations.

Adjusted Average Alpha vs. Jensen's Alpha

The key distinction between adjusted average alpha and Jensen's Alpha lies in the scope of their respective adjustments. Jensen's Alpha, as originally formulated, measures a portfolio's excess return over the return predicted by the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), given its beta and the risk-free rate. It focuses on how much a fund outperforms (or underperforms) a benchmark based solely on its systematic market risk. It's a foundational risk-adjusted return metric.

Adjusted average alpha, conversely, builds upon this foundation by incorporating further layers of refinement. While Jensen's Alpha attempts to strip out returns due to broad market movements, adjusted average alpha may account for additional factors that could influence performance, such as specific style biases (e.g., value or growth), liquidity factors, or even the inherent alpha of the chosen benchmark itself. The purpose of adjusted average alpha is to provide an even cleaner signal of a manager's true skill by attempting to neutralize more potential biases or return sources that are not related to active value creation. In essence, Jensen's Alpha is a specific form of alpha, while "adjusted average alpha" refers to any alpha measure that has undergone additional modifications beyond the basic CAPM framework to refine its meaning.

FAQs

What does a positive adjusted average alpha signify?

A positive adjusted average alpha suggests that an investment has generated returns in excess of what would be expected given its underlying risks and other accounted-for factors. It is generally interpreted as a sign of a skilled portfolio manager who has added value through active decisions like security selection or market timing.

How does adjusted average alpha relate to portfolio diversification?

Adjusted average alpha can help assess whether active management truly enhances returns beyond the benefits of diversification and passive market exposure. While diversification helps reduce unsystematic risk, adjusted average alpha focuses on measuring the incremental return generated by active decisions after accounting for systematic risks and other market-wide or benchmark-specific factors.

Is adjusted average alpha always a better measure than traditional alpha?

Adjusted average alpha aims to be a more refined measure by accounting for additional complexities. However, its effectiveness depends on the validity and appropriateness of the adjustments made. Over-complicating the calculation or using inappropriate adjustment factors can lead to misinterpretations. For some simple comparisons, a traditional alpha might suffice, but for deeper insights into manager skill, adjusted average alpha can offer a more nuanced perspective.

Do all investment professionals use adjusted average alpha?

The use of adjusted average alpha varies. While sophisticated institutional investors and academic researchers often employ such refined metrics, many individual investors and financial advisors may rely on more traditional alpha measures due to their relative simplicity. The specific type of "adjustment" can also differ significantly across firms and analyses.