Adjusted cash burn efficiency: Meaning, Criticisms & Real-World Uses

A hidden table called LINK_POOL will be created now and will contain 15 internal links and 4 external links. It will not be visible in the final output.

What Is Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency?

Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency, often referred to simply as "Burn Multiple," is a key metric within corporate finance that measures how efficiently a startup or growth-stage company uses its cash to generate new revenue. It helps assess the effectiveness of a company's spending in driving growth, rather than just how quickly it consumes cash. The metric is particularly relevant for companies that are not yet profitable and rely on external funding to fuel their expansion. A lower Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency ratio generally indicates more efficient growth, meaning the company is generating more new revenue for each dollar of cash burned⁵¹, ⁵². This focus on efficiency helps stakeholders, including venture capitalists, understand the sustainability of a company's growth strategy.

History and Origin

The concept of Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency, or the Burn Multiple, was popularized by David Sacks, co-founder of Craft Ventures. It emerged as a response to the "growth at all costs" mentality often seen in the startup ecosystem, particularly during periods of readily available capital. Sacks introduced the metric as a way to evaluate how much money a company burns for every dollar of annual recurring revenue (ARR) growth, thereby shifting the focus from mere growth to the efficiency of that growth⁴⁹, ⁵⁰. This emphasis became increasingly crucial in tighter economic climates when the cost of capital rose and investors became more scrutinizing of how their money was being spent⁴⁷, ⁴⁸. It provided a more nuanced view of a startup's financial health beyond just its cash burn rate.

Key Takeaways

Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency measures how effectively a company converts cash burn into new revenue growth.
It is a crucial metric for startups and growth-stage companies relying on external funding.
A lower ratio signifies greater capital efficiency, indicating more revenue generated per dollar burned.
The metric provides insights into the sustainability of a company's growth strategy and its ability to manage its cash flow.
It gained prominence as investors shifted focus from pure growth to efficient growth, especially in challenging fundraising environments.

Formula and Calculation

The Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency is calculated by dividing a company's net burn by its net new annual recurring revenue (ARR).

The formula is as follows:

\text{Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency} = \frac{\text{Net Burn}}{\text{Net New ARR}}

Where:

Net Burn: This represents the net decrease in a company's cash during a specific period, excluding financing activities. It is calculated as cash revenue minus cash operating expenses⁴⁵, ⁴⁶. This can also be thought of as the total expenses minus the total income in a given month⁴⁴.
Net New ARR: This refers to the amount of new recurring revenue a company acquires after accounting for churn, plus any expansion revenue⁴³. It reflects the actual increase in predictable recurring revenue over a period.

For example, if a company's net burn for a quarter is $500,000 and its net new ARR is $300,000, the Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency would be:

\frac{\$500,000}{\$300,000} = 1.67

This indicates that the company is spending $1.67 for every new dollar of recurring revenue it generates⁴².

Interpreting the Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency

Interpreting the Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency involves understanding what the resulting ratio indicates about a company's capital efficiency. Generally, a lower Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency implies a more efficient business model.

Ratio below 1.0: This is considered excellent, suggesting the company is generating more than a dollar of new ARR for every dollar of cash burned. This indicates highly efficient growth.
Ratio between 1.0 and 1.5: This is generally considered good, indicating healthy and efficient growth.
Ratio between 1.5 and 2.0: This may suggest that the company is burning a reasonable amount of cash for its growth, but there might be room for improvement in operational efficiency.
Ratio above 2.0: A higher ratio could signal less efficient growth, where the company is spending a significant amount of cash to acquire new revenue. This might raise concerns for investors, especially in a challenging fundraising environment⁴¹.

The ideal Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency can also depend on the company's stage of development. Early-stage startups, for instance, might have a higher ratio as they invest heavily in product development and market penetration. However, as they mature, the expectation is for the ratio to improve and eventually approach zero as the company achieves profitability ⁴⁰.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "InnovateCo," a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) startup. In the last quarter, InnovateCo had the following financial figures:

Total cash expenses: $800,000
Total cash revenue: $300,000
New Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) added during the quarter: $400,000
Churned ARR (revenue lost from existing customers): $50,000
Expansion ARR (revenue from existing customers, e.g., upgrades): $70,000

First, calculate the Net Burn:

Net Burn = Total Cash Expenses - Total Cash Revenue
Net Burn = $800,000 - $300,000 = $500,000

Next, calculate the Net New ARR:

Net New ARR = New ARR + Expansion ARR - Churned ARR
Net New ARR = $400,000 + $70,000 - $50,000 = $420,000

Now, calculate the Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency:

Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency = Net Burn / Net New ARR
Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency = $500,000 / $420,000 \approx 1.19

In this example, InnovateCo's Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency is approximately 1.19. This suggests that for every dollar of new annual recurring revenue generated, InnovateCo is burning about $1.19 in cash. This indicates relatively efficient growth, as the ratio is closer to 1.0, which is a positive sign for investors assessing the company's financial performance.

Practical Applications

Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency is a vital metric for founders, investors, and financial analysts, particularly in the startup ecosystem and for companies in rapid growth phases.

Venture Capital Funding Decisions: Venture capitalists heavily rely on this metric to evaluate the attractiveness of an investment. A low Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency indicates that a company is efficiently deploying capital to achieve growth, making it a more appealing prospect for funding rounds ³⁸, ³⁹. This becomes even more pronounced in environments where capital is scarce, as seen in periods where venture funding has experienced declines³⁶, ³⁷.
Strategic Planning and Resource Allocation: Companies use this metric to inform strategic decisions regarding resource allocation. A high Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency might prompt management to re-evaluate spending in areas like sales and marketing or product development to improve efficiency³⁴, ³⁵. Conversely, a very low ratio might suggest an opportunity to invest more aggressively in growth initiatives.
Benchmarking Performance: The Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency allows companies to benchmark their performance against industry peers or historical data. For instance, reports from firms like OpenView Venture Partners often provide benchmarks for SaaS companies, enabling businesses to understand how their efficiency compares to others in their sector³⁰, ³¹, ³², ³³. This comparison helps identify areas for improvement and set realistic key performance indicators.
Investor Relations: Transparent reporting of Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency can foster greater confidence among existing and potential investors, demonstrating a commitment to efficient growth and sound financial management ²⁹.

Limitations and Criticisms

While Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency offers valuable insights, it also has limitations and has faced some criticisms.

Ignores Gross Margin Differences: The original Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency, focused on Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR), may not fully account for variations in gross margins across different business models. For instance, a SaaS company typically has higher gross margins than a marketplace business, which could lead to an apples-to-oranges comparison if not adjusted. Craft Ventures, the creator of the metric, acknowledged this and proposed a modified version for marketplace businesses that uses annualized gross profit growth instead of ARR growth in the denominator to normalize these differences²⁸.
Seasonality and Fluctuations: For businesses with significant seasonality or unpredictable revenue streams, calculating the Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency on a quarterly basis might lead to distorted or even negative results, particularly during seasonal troughs. This can make the metric less meaningful for understanding true efficiency in such cases, prompting the need for a yearly version or other time-period adjustments²⁷.
Focus on Growth, Not Profitability: While the metric emphasizes efficient growth, it doesn't directly measure profitability. A company could have a seemingly good Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency while still operating at a significant net loss. Eventually, businesses need to reach positive cash flow from operations and sustained profitability to be truly sustainable, and the Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency alone does not guarantee this outcome.
Potential for Manipulation: Like any metric, the Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency can be influenced by aggressive accounting practices or short-term decisions that prioritize a favorable ratio over long-term strategic health. Companies might cut essential investments or engage in unsustainable cost-cutting measures solely to improve the ratio. This highlights the importance of analyzing the metric in conjunction with a comprehensive review of the company's financial statements, including the statement of cash flows, which the SEC emphasizes as critical for investor understanding²⁴, ²⁵, ²⁶.

Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency vs. Cash Burn Rate

Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency and cash burn rate are both crucial financial metrics, especially for startups and growth-stage companies, but they measure different aspects of a company's financial health. Understanding their distinctions is key to a complete financial picture.

Feature	Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency	Cash Burn Rate
What it Measures	How much cash a company burns for each dollar of new revenue generated. Efficiency of capital deployment for growth.²², ²³	The rate at which a company consumes its cash reserves. Focuses on the depletion of cash over time.²⁰, ²¹
Formula Components	Net Burn and Net New Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR)¹⁹.	Gross Burn (total expenses) or Net Burn (expenses minus revenue)¹⁸.
Purpose	Assesses the quality of growth; whether spending is effectively driving revenue.¹⁶, ¹⁷	Indicates how long a company can survive before needing additional funding (cash runway).¹³, ¹⁴, ¹⁵
Interpretation	Lower ratio is generally better (more efficient growth).¹²	Can be expressed as a monthly dollar amount or months of runway.¹⁰, ¹¹
Key Question	"How efficiently are we growing?"	"How fast are we running out of cash?"

While the cash burn rate tells a company how quickly its cash reserves are depleting, the Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency provides a qualitative layer by assessing whether that cash depletion is leading to proportionate and efficient revenue growth. A company might have a high cash burn rate due to aggressive expansion, but if its Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency is low, it suggests that the spending is yielding significant new revenue, potentially justifying the high burn. Conversely, a high cash burn rate coupled with a high Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency could signal inefficient spending and unsustainable growth.

FAQs

What is a good Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency?

A "good" Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency generally falls below 1.5, with ratios below 1.0 being considered excellent. This indicates that the company is generating at least $1 of new annual recurring revenue (ARR) for every $1.50 or less of cash burned. The optimal ratio can vary based on industry and stage of growth; very early-stage companies might have a higher ratio as they invest heavily in customer acquisition and product development⁸, ⁹.

Why is Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency important for startups?

Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency is crucial for startups because it offers insights into the sustainability of their growth. Since many startups are not yet profitable, they rely on external funding. This metric helps investors evaluate how effectively the company uses its capital to acquire new revenue, indicating whether their spending is leading to valuable, efficient growth rather than simply depleting cash reserves⁶, ⁷.

How does seasonality affect Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency?

Seasonality can affect Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency by causing fluctuations in revenue that may distort the quarterly metric. For businesses with significant seasonal peaks or troughs, a quarterly calculation might show an artificially low or high (or even negative) ratio. In such cases, it may be more appropriate to analyze the Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency on a yearly basis or over a longer period to account for these seasonal variations and provide a more accurate picture of efficiency⁵.

Can Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency be negative?

Theoretically, Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency could be negative if a company has positive net burn (meaning it's losing cash) but experiences a negative net new ARR (meaning it's losing more revenue than it's gaining). This scenario would indicate a severe decline in the business, where the company is both burning cash and shrinking its recurring revenue base. However, for practical analytical purposes, discussions typically focus on positive values of Net New ARR, and a negative Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency is generally disregarded as not meaningful for efficiency analysis⁴.

How can a company improve its Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency?

A company can improve its Adjusted Cash Burn Efficiency by either reducing its net burn or increasing its net new ARR, or both. Strategies include optimizing operating expenses (e.g., re-evaluating marketing spend, controlling headcount costs), improving sales and marketing effectiveness to boost new customer acquisition, focusing on customer retention to minimize churn, and exploring opportunities for expansion revenue from existing customers¹, ², ³.