Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to A Definitions

Adjusted commission

What Is Adjusted Commission?

Adjusted commission refers to the actual compensation received by a broker or financial professional after accounting for various deductions, fees, or other forms of remuneration that influence the final payout for executing a securities transaction. In the realm of investment compensation, this adjusted amount reflects the net earnings a broker retains from a client's trade, distinguishing it from the gross amount charged to the client. It typically considers factors such as chargebacks, trading costs, internal firm allocations, or even external payments like rebates received from trading venues. Understanding adjusted commission is crucial for assessing the true profitability of a broker's activities and for clients to comprehend the underlying economics of their transactions.

History and Origin

Historically, brokerage commissions were often fixed and non-negotiable, a practice that prevailed for over a century in the United States. For example, the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) operated under a fixed commission system rooted in the 1792 Buttonwood Agreement, which established a standard commission rate for brokers. This system ensured a predictable revenue stream for brokers and simplified pricing for clients, but it also limited competition and often resulted in high transaction costs for investors7.

A pivotal moment in the evolution of commissions occurred on May 1, 1975, a date famously known as "May Day" in the financial industry. On this day, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) mandated the abolition of fixed commission rates, forcing exchanges to allow competitive, negotiated rates6. This deregulation spurred significant changes, leading to increased competition among broker-dealers and the emergence of discount brokers, which drastically reduced trading costs for investors over time5. The shift from fixed to negotiated rates meant that the commission initially charged to a client might no longer be the sole determinant of a broker's ultimate compensation. As markets evolved, and new forms of revenue and expenses emerged, the concept of an adjusted commission became increasingly relevant to capture the net financial impact on the broker.

Key Takeaways

  • Adjusted commission represents the net compensation a broker receives after all deductions and additional revenue streams.
  • It provides a more accurate picture of a broker's actual earnings from a specific transaction or set of transactions.
  • Factors influencing adjusted commission can include internal firm policies, payment for order flow, rebates, and regulatory fees.
  • Understanding adjusted commission is important for assessing broker profitability and potential conflicts of interest.
  • Regulatory bodies like FINRA and the SEC emphasize transparency in broker compensation to protect investors.

Formula and Calculation

The calculation of adjusted commission typically starts with the gross commission earned on a trade and then subtracts or adds various components. While there isn't one universal "adjusted commission" formula, a generalized representation could be:

Adjusted Commission=Gross Commission−Firm Overheads−Deductions+Other Remuneration\text{Adjusted Commission} = \text{Gross Commission} - \text{Firm Overheads} - \text{Deductions} + \text{Other Remuneration}

Where:

  • Gross Commission: The total fee charged to the client for executing a trade. This is the initial fee collected by the broker.
  • Firm Overheads: The portion of the gross commission retained by the brokerage firm to cover operational expenses, administrative costs, and infrastructure. This can be a significant percentage and varies widely between firms.
  • Deductions: Any specific charges or fees applied to the broker's payout, such as regulatory fees, exchange fees, or chargebacks for canceled trades.
  • Other Remuneration: Additional payments or benefits received by the broker or firm that might not be directly reflected in the gross commission but affect the net take. This could include liquidity rebates from exchanges, payment for order flow (PFOF), or other incentives.

For instance, if a broker earns a gross commission, a portion is often allocated back to the firm to cover various expenses. This internal allocation impacts the final adjusted commission the individual broker receives.

Interpreting the Adjusted Commission

Interpreting the adjusted commission provides insight into the actual profitability of a financial professional's efforts and the underlying cost structure of brokerage services. A higher adjusted commission per transaction implies greater efficiency or a more favorable revenue-sharing model for the broker within their firm. Conversely, a low adjusted commission might indicate significant internal firm allocations, high transaction costs for the brokerage, or less lucrative client activity.

For clients, understanding that the commission they pay is not necessarily what the individual broker retains helps to demystify brokerage compensation. It also highlights the different layers of fees and revenue streams within the financial markets that contribute to the overall cost of a transaction, including both explicit costs and potentially less transparent implicit costs. Regulators, such as the SEC and FINRA, frequently emphasize the importance of fee transparency for investors to make informed decisions and evaluate the value provided by their brokers.

Hypothetical Example

Consider Sarah, an equities broker at "Global Trade Securities." Her firm charges clients a flat commission of $10 per equity trade. For each trade Sarah executes, her firm has an internal compensation structure.

Let's say Sarah executes 50 trades in a month for her clients:

  1. Gross Commission Earned: 50 trades * $10/trade = $500
  2. Firm's Share (Overheads/Payout Grid): Global Trade Securities retains 60% of the gross commission to cover its operational expenses, research, technology, and support staff.
    • Firm's share = 60% of $500 = $300
  3. Broker's Initial Payout: This is the portion of the gross commission allocated to Sarah before any further adjustments.
    • Broker's initial payout = $500 - $300 = $200
  4. Deductions (Compliance/Regulatory Fees): For the month, Sarah incurs $15 in regulatory and compliance fees allocated to her.
    • Net payout after deductions = $200 - $15 = $185
  5. Other Remuneration (Exchange Rebates): Due to the volume of orders Sarah routed to a particular exchange, Global Trade Securities received a $25 rebate. The firm's policy is to pass on 50% of these rebates to the originating broker.
    • Sarah's share of rebates = 50% of $25 = $12.50
  6. Adjusted Commission:
    • Adjusted Commission = $185 (net payout after deductions) + $12.50 (rebates) = $197.50

In this hypothetical example, while Sarah's clients paid a total of $500 in gross commissions, her actual adjusted commission for that month's trading activity was $197.50. This figure provides a more accurate representation of her personal earnings from those trades, demonstrating how various internal and external factors influence a broker's final take-home compensation.

Practical Applications

Adjusted commission is a vital metric in several areas of the financial industry. For brokerage firms, it's essential for managing profitability and designing effective compensation plans for their registered representatives. By analyzing adjusted commission metrics, firms can evaluate the efficiency of their trading operations, assess the true cost of client acquisition, and optimize their revenue-sharing models. This analysis directly impacts a firm's bottom line and its ability to compete in the market.

For individual financial professionals, understanding their adjusted commission allows them to gauge their actual earning potential and identify factors that might reduce their take-home pay, such as high overhead allocations or transaction-related expenses. It also sheds light on how different types of client activity or product sales might contribute differently to their net income.

Furthermore, adjusted commission implicitly relates to regulatory oversight. Regulatory bodies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), have increasingly focused on enhancing fee transparency and ensuring that brokers act in their clients' best interests, as outlined in rules like Regulation Best Interest4. The SEC requires brokers to disclose how they handle customer orders, including information about rebates they receive and fees they pay to different trading venues3. This information, while not directly detailing an individual broker's adjusted commission, contributes to a broader understanding of how various revenue streams and costs impact the overall value proposition for investors.

Limitations and Criticisms

While the concept of adjusted commission provides a more granular view of a broker's earnings, it also presents several limitations and criticisms, primarily concerning its lack of universal definition and the potential for opaque practices. One significant challenge is the varying methodologies firms use to calculate and present internal adjusted commission figures, making direct comparisons between brokers or firms difficult. These internal calculations are often complex, factoring in a multitude of charges, bonuses, and internal expense allocations that are not standardized across the industry.

A major point of contention arises from how certain revenue streams, such as payment for order flow (PFOF) or exchange rebates, influence a broker's effective compensation without being directly charged to the client as a gross commission. Critics argue that these "hidden" or implicit costs can create conflicts of interest, potentially incentivizing brokers to route client orders to venues that offer higher payments to the firm rather than necessarily achieving the best execution price for the client2. Although such rebates are often accounted for at the firm level, they can indirectly influence a broker's adjusted compensation package.

Regulatory bodies like FINRA and the SEC have continuously pushed for greater transparency in all forms of broker compensation. FINRA Rule 2121, often referred to as the "5% Policy," serves as a guideline to ensure that commissions and markups charged to customers are fair and reasonable, taking into account various circumstances including expenses and the value of services rendered1. Despite these efforts, the intricate web of fees, internal allocations, and indirect payments can still make it challenging for both clients and external observers to fully grasp the true adjusted commission a broker receives and the incentives that might influence their recommendations.

Adjusted Commission vs. Gross Commission

The distinction between adjusted commission and gross commission is fundamental to understanding the economics of brokerage services. Gross commission refers to the total fee that a client is charged for a securities transaction. This is the amount that appears on a client's trade confirmation or statement, representing the upfront cost of executing the trade. It is the initial revenue generated from the client's activity.

In contrast, adjusted commission represents the actual amount of that gross commission, or other related revenue, that an individual broker or financial advisor ultimately receives after internal firm allocations, deductions, and additional forms of revenue are considered. For example, a brokerage firm might collect a $50 gross commission from a client's trade. However, the firm may have a payout grid where the broker only receives 40% of that gross amount, with the rest retained by the firm to cover overhead. Furthermore, other factors such as regulatory fees, technology charges, or even performance bonuses can further modify the broker's net take. Therefore, while the gross commission is what the client pays, the adjusted commission is what the broker effectively earns on that particular transaction or as part of their overall compensation structure. The Gross Commission is a client-facing charge, while the Adjusted Commission is an internal accounting of a broker's earnings.

FAQs

What exactly is the difference between an adjusted commission and a standard commission?

A standard, or gross, commission is the fee charged directly to a client for a service, such as executing a trade. An adjusted commission is the actual amount a broker receives after internal firm deductions, expense allocations, and any additional revenue streams or fees, like rebates from exchanges, are factored in.

Why is adjusted commission important for a broker?

For a broker, the adjusted commission reflects their true take-home earnings from their efforts. It helps them understand the profitability of their book of business after all internal and external factors impacting their compensation are considered.

Do clients see the adjusted commission on their statements?

No, clients typically only see the gross commission or fees charged to their account. The adjusted commission is an internal metric used by brokerage firms and their financial professionals to manage compensation and profitability.

What factors can reduce a broker's adjusted commission from the gross amount?

Factors that can reduce an adjusted commission include the brokerage firm's payout grid (the percentage of gross commission retained by the firm for overhead), internal administrative fees, regulatory charges, or chargebacks for returned or canceled services.

Can an adjusted commission be higher than the gross commission?

In some specific cases, the adjusted commission a firm or broker receives from a transaction could be effectively higher than the direct client-paid gross commission, primarily due to indirect revenue streams like liquidity rebates or payment for order flow. However, these are often considered separate revenue streams that influence overall profitability rather than directly increasing the "commission" itself. The concept of adjusted commission generally refers to the net amount retained from the initially charged fee.

How do regulations like FINRA Rule 2121 relate to adjusted commission?

FINRA Rule 2121 (the 5% Policy) focuses on ensuring that the gross commissions and markups charged to customers are fair and reasonable. While it doesn't directly regulate the adjusted commission a broker receives, the transparency requirements and fairness principles underpinning such rules indirectly encourage firms to maintain reasonable internal compensation structures that align with client interests.