Adjusted cost p e ratio

What Is Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio?

The Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio is a valuation metric that modifies the traditional price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio by accounting for specific non-recurring or non-operating items within a company's earnings. This aims to provide a more normalized and sustainable view of a company's profitability, making it a more refined tool in financial analysis. Unlike the standard P/E, which uses reported earnings per share (EPS) directly from the income statement, the Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio seeks to exclude items that are not indicative of a company's core operational performance, such as one-time gains, restructuring charges, or significant asset write-downs.

History and Origin

The concept of adjusting earnings to gain a clearer picture of a company's underlying performance has long been a practice among analysts and investors. While the standard P/E ratio is a fundamental tool, its reliance on a single period's reported earnings can be skewed by unusual events or accounting conventions. The push for "adjusted" or "non-GAAP financial measures" gained significant traction as companies increasingly presented their own modified earnings figures in press releases and investor calls.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has provided extensive guidance on the use of non-GAAP measures, requiring companies to reconcile them to the most comparable Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) measure and explain why they believe the non-GAAP figures provide useful information to investors.⁸ This regulatory oversight reflects the growing prevalence and importance of adjusted earnings metrics in corporate financial reporting. The broader idea of smoothing earnings to account for economic cycles and provide a more stable valuation has roots in academic work, notably with the Cyclically Adjusted Price-to-Earnings (CAPE) ratio popularized by Nobel laureate Robert Shiller, which uses a 10-year average of inflation-adjusted earnings.⁷

Key Takeaways

• The Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio refines the standard P/E by removing non-recurring or non-operational items from earnings.
• It aims to provide a clearer, more sustainable measure of a company's core profitability.
• This ratio is particularly useful when comparing companies with different accounting practices or those undergoing significant one-time events.
• Adjustments can include items like restructuring costs, litigation settlements, or gains/losses on asset sales.
• While offering deeper insight, the Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio requires careful scrutiny of the adjustments made, as they are often discretionary.

Formula and Calculation

The formula for the Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio is:

Where:

• Current Market Price per Share: The current trading price of a company's stock.
• Adjusted Earnings per Share (EPS): This is the company's reported EPS, modified by adding back or subtracting out specific non-recurring or non-operating items. The adjustments vary by company and industry but commonly include:
  • Excluding one-time gains or losses (e.g., sale of an asset).
  • Excluding restructuring charges.
  • Excluding impairment charges for assets.
  • Adjusting for non-cash expenses like stock-based compensation, depreciation, or amortization of acquired intangibles, if considered non-operational for the specific adjustment purpose.

For example, if a company reports GAAP EPS but analysts believe certain capital expenditures or litigation expenses were truly extraordinary and non-recurring, they might calculate an adjusted EPS by adding those expenses back to the reported earnings.

Interpreting the Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio

Interpreting the Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio involves understanding that a lower ratio generally suggests a more attractive valuation relative to its adjusted earnings, while a higher ratio may imply the opposite. However, the interpretation is not absolute and must be done in context.

When evaluating the Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio, investors should consider:

• Industry Benchmarks: How does the company's adjusted P/E compare to its industry peers? Different industries have different typical valuation ranges.
• Historical Trends: How does the current adjusted P/E compare to the company's own historical average? A sudden spike or drop might indicate a change in underlying performance or a market mispricing.
• Quality of Adjustments: Critically examine what adjustments have been made to the earnings. Are they truly non-recurring, or are they regular operating costs that management is attempting to remove to present a more favorable picture? The SEC has expressed concerns about non-GAAP measures that exclude normal, recurring, cash operating expenses.⁶
• Growth Prospects: Companies with higher anticipated growth might justify a higher Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio, as future earnings are expected to increase.

This ratio helps shareholders and potential investors gain a more consistent view of a company's earnings power, stripped of transient effects.

Hypothetical Example

Consider Company A, a software firm, and its recent financial results:

• Current Stock Price: $100 per share
• Reported GAAP Earnings per Share (EPS): $5.00

Upon reviewing the income statement and disclosures, you find that Company A incurred a one-time restructuring charge of $1.50 per share due to streamlining operations in a specific division. This charge is unlikely to recur in the foreseeable future.

To calculate the Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio:

1. Calculate Adjusted EPS:

   • Reported GAAP EPS: $5.00
   • Add back one-time restructuring charge: $1.50
   • Adjusted EPS = $5.00 + $1.50 = $6.50

2. Calculate Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio:

   • Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio = Current Stock Price / Adjusted EPS
   • Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio = $100 / $6.50 ≈ 15.38x

In comparison, the unadjusted P/E ratio would be $100 / $5.00 = 20x. The Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio of 15.38x provides a different perspective, suggesting that once the non-recurring charge is accounted for, the company's core earnings yield a more favorable valuation than the GAAP P/E alone might imply.

Practical Applications

The Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio is widely used in various facets of finance to gain a more nuanced understanding of a company's true earning power and subsequently its valuation.

• Equity Valuation: Investors and financial analysis professionals use the Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio to compare the relative attractiveness of different stocks, particularly when companies report significant one-time events that distort their GAAP earnings. This helps in making more informed investment decisions.
• Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A): In M&A deals, buyers often analyze the adjusted earnings of target companies to assess their sustainable profitability, independent of specific pre-acquisition expenses or accounting irregularities. This helps in determining a fair acquisition price.
• Credit Analysis: Lenders and credit rating agencies may look at adjusted earnings to gauge a company's ability to generate stable cash flows for debt repayment, excluding non-operational items that don't reflect ongoing operational strength.
• Executive Compensation: Increasingly, companies link executive bonuses and incentives to non-GAAP financial metrics, including adjusted earnings. This practice is under scrutiny, with some groups arguing it can lead to higher executive pay even when GAAP earnings are lower, raising questions about alignment with shareholders interests.

⁵## Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its utility, the Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio has notable limitations and faces criticism. The primary concern revolves around the discretionary nature of the adjustments. Companies have considerable leeway in determining what items to exclude from their GAAP earnings to arrive at an "adjusted" figure.

• Lack of Standardization: Unlike Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), there are no universal accounting standards governing what constitutes an "adjusted cost." This lack of standardization can make it difficult to compare the Adjusted Cost P/E Ratios across different companies or even for the same company over different periods if the adjustment methodology changes.
  *⁴ Potential for Manipulation: Management might be incentivized to present a more optimistic view of profitability by consistently excluding expenses that, while deemed "non-recurring," are in fact somewhat regular in nature, such as frequent restructuring charges or impairment write-downs. This "cherry-picking" of numbers can distort the true financial picture.
  *³ Obscuring Underlying Issues: By adjusting away certain costs, the ratio might inadvertently mask ongoing operational inefficiencies or recurring problems that are significant to a company's long-term health. For instance, frequently incurred "one-time" charges for product recalls or legal settlements could indicate systemic issues.
• Investor Confusion: The proliferation of various non-GAAP measures can lead to investor confusion and make it harder for the public to discern a company's true financial performance. Regulators, including the SEC, frequently comment on non-GAAP disclosures, emphasizing the need for clear reconciliation and prominence of GAAP measures.,
  ^{2
  1}## Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio vs. Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio

The Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio and the Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio are both valuation metrics, but they differ significantly in their approach to a company's earnings.

The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio is the most common and fundamental valuation multiple, calculated by dividing a company's current market price per share by its reported earnings per share (EPS), typically the trailing 12 months (TTM) GAAP EPS. It offers a quick snapshot of how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of a company's earnings. Its strength lies in its simplicity and universal application, as GAAP earnings are standardized. However, its major limitation is that reported GAAP earnings can be volatile or distorted by one-time events, making it less indicative of sustainable earning power.

The Adjusted Cost P/E Ratio, conversely, attempts to rectify this by using an "adjusted" EPS that removes specific non-recurring or non-operating items. The goal is to provide a more stable and representative measure of core profitability. While it can offer deeper insight into a company's operational performance, its primary drawback is the subjectivity involved in determining which items to adjust and the potential for management to use these adjustments to present a more favorable financial picture. Therefore, analysts and investors often use both ratios in conjunction to get a comprehensive view.

FAQs

Q: Why do companies report adjusted earnings?
A: Companies often report adjusted earnings to provide a clearer view of their core operational profitability, excluding items they deem non-recurring or unrelated to their ongoing business activities. They believe these adjustments help investors better understand how management assesses performance and forecasts future prospects.

Q: Are adjusted earnings audited?
A: Generally, "non-GAAP financial measures," including adjusted earnings, are not subject to the same level of external audit scrutiny as GAAP financial statements, which are rigorously audited. However, the SEC requires companies to reconcile non-GAAP measures to their closest GAAP equivalent in official filings, and audit committees are increasingly reviewing these disclosures.

Q: How do I find a company's adjusted earnings?
A: Companies typically disclose adjusted earnings in their quarterly earnings press releases and investor presentations. In official SEC filings (like 10-K or 10-Q reports), they must provide a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most comparable Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) figures, usually within the Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) section.

Q: Can adjusted earnings be misleading?
A: Yes, adjusted earnings can be misleading if the adjustments are not genuinely non-recurring or if they exclude normal, recurring operating expenses. Regulators like the SEC actively monitor and issue guidance on the proper use of non-GAAP measures to prevent them from misleading investors. It is crucial for users to critically evaluate the nature of the adjustments.