Skip to main content
← Back to A Definitions

Adjusted discounted present value

What Is Adjusted Discounted Present Value?

Adjusted Discounted Present Value (ADPV) is a valuation methodology used in corporate finance that breaks down the valuation of a project or company into two main components: the value of the project or company as if it were entirely equity-financed, and the present value of any financing side effects, most notably the tax shield from debt. This approach falls under the broader category of valuation methods within financial analysis. ADPV is particularly useful in situations where the capital structure changes significantly over time, such as in leveraged buyouts or project financing, making traditional valuation methods less straightforward. The adjusted discounted present value method is also known as Adjusted Present Value (APV).

History and Origin

The Adjusted Present Value (APV) method was introduced by Stewart C. Myers, a prominent finance academic, in his 1974 paper titled "Interactions of Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions: Implications for Capital Budgeting." Myers's work sought to address limitations of the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) method when a company's debt levels or tax shield benefits were not constant. His 1984 paper, "The Capital Structure Puzzle," further cemented the importance of separating investment and financing decisions in valuation11, 12, 13. The Harvard Business School has also published notes and cases on the APV method, highlighting its application and comparison to WACC in capital budgeting and restructuring scenarios8, 9, 10.

Key Takeaways

  • Adjusted Discounted Present Value (ADPV) is a valuation method that separates the value of operations from the value of financing side effects.
  • It is particularly useful for valuing projects or companies with changing capital structures or significant tax shields.
  • The primary component of ADPV is the unlevered net present value of free cash flows.
  • A crucial adjustment in ADPV is the present value of the interest tax shield, which represents the tax savings from deductible interest payments.
  • ADPV offers flexibility by allowing for explicit modeling of various financing side effects.

Formula and Calculation

The formula for Adjusted Discounted Present Value (ADPV) is:

ADPV=NPVunlevered+NPVfinancing side effects\text{ADPV} = \text{NPV}_{\text{unlevered}} + \text{NPV}_{\text{financing side effects}}

Where:

  • (\text{NPV}_{\text{unlevered}}) is the Net Present Value of the project or firm, assuming it is financed entirely by equity. This is calculated by discounting the free cash flows to firm (FCFF) at the unlevered cost of equity (also known as the cost of assets or business risk discount rate).
  • (\text{NPV}_{\text{financing side effects}}) is the Net Present Value of all financing-related benefits or costs. The most common and significant financing side effect is the interest tax shield. Other potential side effects could include the present value of subsidized financing or costs of financial distress.

The interest tax shield is calculated as:

Interest Tax Shield=Interest Expense×Corporate Tax Rate\text{Interest Tax Shield} = \text{Interest Expense} \times \text{Corporate Tax Rate}

The present value of the interest tax shield is then the sum of the discounted annual tax shields. The discount rate for the tax shield can be the cost of debt or the unlevered cost of equity, depending on the specific assumptions about the risk of the tax savings.

Interpreting the Adjusted Discounted Present Value

Interpreting the Adjusted Discounted Present Value involves understanding that it represents the total value of an investment or entity, considering both its operational value and the specific benefits (or costs) derived from its financing structure. A positive ADPV indicates that the project or company is expected to generate enough value to cover its initial investment and provide a return that exceeds the cost of capital, making it a potentially worthwhile endeavor. Conversely, a negative ADPV suggests that the project may not be financially viable. The ADPV approach allows analysts to clearly see how financing choices contribute to or detract from the overall value, which is particularly insightful when evaluating projects with dynamic debt financing arrangements or significant tax benefits.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a new project that a company is evaluating. The project requires an initial investment of $1,000,000 and is expected to generate unlevered free cash flows to firm (FCFF) of $300,000 per year for five years. The unlevered cost of equity for this project is 10%. The company plans to finance part of the project with a $400,000 loan at an interest rate of 5% per year, and the corporate tax rate is 25%.

1. Calculate Unlevered NPV:
The present value of the unlevered free cash flows is:
Year 1: $300,000 / (1 + 0.10)^1 = $272,727.27
Year 2: $300,000 / (1 + 0.10)^2 = $247,933.88
Year 3: $300,000 / (1 + 0.10)^3 = $225,394.44
Year 4: $300,000 / (1 + 0.10)^4 = $204,904.04
Year 5: $300,000 / (1 + 0.10)^5 = $186,276.40

Sum of PV of FCFF = $272,727.27 + $247,933.88 + $225,394.44 + $204,904.04 + $186,276.40 = $1,137,236.03

(\text{NPV}{\text{unlevered}} = \text{Sum of PV of FCFF} - \text{Initial Investment})
(\text{NPV}
{\text{unlevered}} = $1,137,236.03 - $1,000,000 = $137,236.03)

2. Calculate the Present Value of the Interest Tax Shield:
Annual Interest Expense = $400,000 * 5% = $20,000
Annual Interest Tax Shield = $20,000 * 25% = $5,000

Assuming the tax shield is discounted at the cost of debt (5%):
PV of Tax Shield (Year 1) = $5,000 / (1 + 0.05)^1 = $4,761.90
PV of Tax Shield (Year 2) = $5,000 / (1 + 0.05)^2 = $4,535.14
PV of Tax Shield (Year 3) = $5,000 / (1 + 0.05)^3 = $4,319.18
PV of Tax Shield (Year 4) = $5,000 / (1 + 0.05)^4 = $4,113.50
PV of Tax Shield (Year 5) = $5,000 / (1 + 0.05)^5 = $3,917.62

Total PV of Interest Tax Shield = $4,761.90 + $4,535.14 + $4,319.18 + $4,113.50 + $3,917.62 = $21,647.34

3. Calculate Adjusted Discounted Present Value (ADPV):
(\text{ADPV} = \text{NPV}_{\text{unlevered}} + \text{Total PV of Interest Tax Shield})
(\text{ADPV} = $137,236.03 + $21,647.34 = $158,883.37)

In this hypothetical example, the project's adjusted discounted present value is $158,883.37. Since this value is positive, the project appears financially attractive.

Practical Applications

Adjusted Discounted Present Value (ADPV) is a versatile valuation tool with several practical applications across various financial domains. It is frequently employed in situations where standard valuation methods, such as the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model using WACC, may be less appropriate due to fluctuating capital structures.

One key application of ADPV is in mergers and acquisitions (M&A), particularly for valuing target companies with significant changes in debt levels post-acquisition, such as in leveraged buyouts (LBOs). In LBOs, the debt structure is typically aggressive and changes rapidly as the acquired company pays down debt, making the ADPV approach more suitable for accurately reflecting the evolving financing costs.

Furthermore, ADPV is valuable in project finance, where specific projects may have unique debt arrangements and tax benefits that differ from the parent company's overall capital structure. It also finds use in evaluating government-subsidized projects, where the benefits of low-cost financing can be explicitly incorporated into the valuation. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has specific disclosure requirements for financial statements in M&A transactions, emphasizing the importance of accurate valuation methods like ADPV in such deals6, 7. When valuing a company for M&A, courts have also shown a preference for discounted cash flow valuation methods, which include the principles underlying ADPV5.

Limitations and Criticisms

While the Adjusted Discounted Present Value (ADPV) method offers distinct advantages, particularly in situations with complex financing, it also has limitations and faces criticisms. One significant drawback, shared with other financial modeling techniques, is its sensitivity to the assumptions used for future cash flows and the discount rate3, 4. Even minor changes in these assumptions can lead to substantial differences in the final valuation.

Another point of contention arises when determining the appropriate discount rate for the interest tax shield. While Myers initially suggested using the cost of debt, some academics argue for discounting the tax shield at the unlevered cost of equity, as the tax savings are ultimately as risky as the project's operating cash flows. This choice can materially affect the valuation.

Furthermore, accurately forecasting the interest expense and the associated tax shield over the project's life can be challenging, especially for companies with volatile earnings or complex debt repayment schedules. The ADPV model assumes that tax shields are utilized, which may not always be the case if a company experiences periods of unprofitability. Critics also point out that while ADPV conceptually separates investment and financing decisions, in practice, these are often intertwined, and assuming complete independence can oversimplify the real-world scenario1, 2.

Adjusted Discounted Present Value vs. Weighted Average Cost of Capital

The Adjusted Discounted Present Value (ADPV) and Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) are two prominent methods used in investment appraisal and company valuation, but they differ in their approach to incorporating financing effects.

FeatureAdjusted Discounted Present Value (ADPV)Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
ApproachSeparates the value of a project or firm into its unlevered value (as if financed solely by equity) and the present value of financing side effects (e.g., tax shield).Discounts cash flows using a single rate that reflects the blended cost of all capital sources (debt and equity), weighted by their proportion in the capital structure.
Capital StructureMore flexible and preferred when the capital structure or debt-to-equity ratio changes significantly over the project's life. Financing effects are added as separate components.Assumes a constant target capital structure throughout the forecast period. Changes in capital structure require re-calculating WACC for each period, which can be cumbersome.
Tax Shield TreatmentExplicitly calculates the present value of the interest tax shield and adds it to the unlevered value.Incorporates the tax shield indirectly through the after-tax cost of debt in the WACC formula.
Use CasesIdeal for leveraged buyouts, project financing, or situations with changing debt levels, government subsidies, or other specific financing side effects.Commonly used for valuing stable companies with a relatively consistent capital structure and for capital budgeting decisions where the project's risk aligns with the company's overall business risk.
ComplexityCan be more complex due to the need to forecast and discount separate cash flows (unlevered free cash flows and individual financing side effects).Can be simpler to apply when a stable capital structure is assumed, as it involves a single discount rate. However, deriving an accurate WACC can be complex itself.

The main point of confusion often arises because both methods aim to arrive at a value that considers the benefits of debt. However, ADPV does so by adding the financing benefits separately, while WACC embeds these benefits into the discount rate itself. For a firm with a stable capital structure, both methods should theoretically yield similar results. However, when the capital structure is expected to change or when specific financing effects are significant, ADPV often provides a more transparent and robust valuation.

FAQs

What is the primary difference between Adjusted Discounted Present Value and traditional Net Present Value?

The primary difference lies in how financing effects are incorporated. Traditional Net Present Value (NPV) typically uses a single discount rate, such as the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC), which implicitly includes the benefits of debt. Adjusted Discounted Present Value (ADPV) explicitly separates the valuation of the project or company's operations from the valuation of its financing side effects, most notably the interest tax shield, and adds them together.

When is Adjusted Discounted Present Value most useful?

ADPV is particularly useful in situations where a project or company's capital structure is expected to change significantly over time, such as in leveraged buyouts, project financing, or when specific financing arrangements (like subsidized debt) have a material impact on value that is not easily captured by a constant WACC.

Can Adjusted Discounted Present Value be used for real estate valuation?

Yes, ADPV can be applied to real estate valuation, especially for projects with complex financing structures, such as those involving specific non-recourse debt or unique tax incentives. It allows for a clear separation of the property's unlevered operating value from the value added by its financing.

What are the main components of Adjusted Discounted Present Value?

The main components of Adjusted Discounted Present Value are the unlevered net present value of the project's or company's free cash flows (discounted at the unlevered cost of equity) and the present value of the interest tax shield, which represents the tax savings from debt interest deductions. Other financing side effects, if present, would also be added.

Is Adjusted Discounted Present Value always more accurate than WACC?

Not necessarily "always more accurate," but ADPV can be more appropriate and provide greater transparency in specific situations, particularly when the capital structure is not constant or when there are unique financing benefits. For companies with a stable capital structure, both ADPV and WACC should, in theory, yield similar results for the enterprise value.