What Is Adjusted Economic Expense?
Adjusted Economic Expense refers to a comprehensive measure of the true cost of resources consumed in a business operation or economic decision, going beyond conventional accounting figures. Unlike a typical accounting expense, which primarily records explicit cash outlays, adjusted economic expense incorporates both these explicit costs and implicit costs. This broader perspective falls under Microeconomics, as it seeks to evaluate the complete economic impact of production and consumption choices. The aim of calculating an adjusted economic expense is to provide a more accurate representation of the resource allocation and true economic burden, enabling better decision-making for individuals, firms, and governments. It often involves recalculating certain costs, such as depreciation, based on economic realities rather than just historical accounting methods.
History and Origin
The concept of economic cost, foundational to understanding adjusted economic expense, emerged from classical economic theory to distinguish it from mere monetary outlays. Economists have long recognized that the true cost of any action or production includes not only the direct payments made but also the value of the best alternative foregone, known as opportunity cost. For instance, if an entrepreneur uses their own building for a business, the explicit accounting cost might be zero for rent, but the economic cost includes the rent they could have earned by leasing the building to someone else.
Over time, as economic analysis became more sophisticated, particularly in the mid-20th century, the need to adjust accounting figures to reflect economic realities gained prominence. This was especially true for long-lived assets. The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) in the United States, for example, developed measures of "consumption of fixed capital," which represent the economic depreciation of capital assets at current cost, differing from business accounting depreciation based on historical cost6. This economic measure of depreciation provides a more accurate picture of the true decline in the value of capital assets over time, which is crucial for calculating adjusted economic expense and understanding national income.
Key Takeaways
- Adjusted economic expense includes both explicit (out-of-pocket) costs and implicit (opportunity) costs.
- It provides a more complete picture of the true cost of an economic activity or decision than standard accounting figures.
- Key adjustments often involve re-evaluating non-cash expenses like depreciation based on current economic value.
- Understanding adjusted economic expense is crucial for accurate profit maximization and efficient resource use.
- It is a concept widely used in economic analysis for strategic planning and investment appraisal.
Formula and Calculation
The calculation of adjusted economic expense stems from the fundamental economic cost formula. While "Adjusted Economic Expense" is not a single, universally standardized formula, it typically refers to the total economic cost, which is then "adjusted" by using more economically relevant valuations for its components.
The general formula for Economic Cost is:
[
\text{Economic Cost} = \text{Explicit Costs} + \text{Implicit Costs}
]
Where:
- Explicit Costs: These are the direct, out-of-pocket monetary payments made for inputs, such as wages, rent, utilities, and raw materials. These are the costs typically recorded in a company's financial statements.
- Implicit Costs: These represent the opportunity cost of resources already owned by the firm or individual and used in the business. They are not direct cash payments. Examples include the foregone income from using one's own building, the salary an entrepreneur could earn elsewhere, or the return on capital invested in the business that could have been earned by investing it elsewhere.
The "adjustment" in adjusted economic expense often comes into play when calculating specific implicit costs, especially depreciation. Instead of using accounting depreciation based on historical cost and arbitrary schedules, economic depreciation might be used, reflecting the actual decline in an asset's market value over a period due to wear and tear, obsolescence, or other economic factors. For example, the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) calculates consumption of fixed capital at current cost, which is an economic measure of depreciation, contrasting it with business accounting methods5. This ensures that the true economic consumption of fixed assets is reflected in the expense.
Interpreting the Adjusted Economic Expense
Interpreting the adjusted economic expense involves understanding that it represents the total value of all sacrifices made to undertake a particular action or production process. A business, for example, might calculate its adjusted economic expense to determine if it is truly profitable after considering all implicit costs. If the revenue generated does not cover the adjusted economic expense, the firm is incurring an economic loss, even if it shows an accounting profit. This indicates that the resources could be better utilized elsewhere, providing a higher return.
For government entities, interpreting adjusted economic expense helps in evaluating the true burden and efficiency of public projects. When considering production costs for public services, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) includes compensation, goods and services consumed, and depreciation of capital, providing a more holistic view than just direct expenditures4. This comprehensive cost assessment is vital for informed policy decisions and effective public financial management.
Hypothetical Example
Consider a small bakery owner, Sarah, who calculates her monthly expenses.
Explicit Costs (Accounting Expense):
- Flour, sugar, ingredients: $2,000
- Utilities (electricity, water): $500
- Employee wages: $3,000
- Rent for the bakery space: $1,500
- Loan payments for oven: $300
- Total Accounting Expense: $7,300
Sarah's accountant tells her she made a monthly accounting profit of $2,700 from $10,000 in revenue.
Implicit Costs (for Adjusted Economic Expense):
Sarah also works full-time in the bakery but doesn't pay herself a salary. She could earn $4,000 per month working as a head baker for another company. This is an opportunity cost.
The oven she bought last year has an accounting depreciation of $100 per month based on its historical cost and a straight-line method. However, due to rapid advancements in oven technology and market conditions, an economic appraisal suggests its actual decline in market value (economic depreciation) is closer to $200 per month.
Calculating Adjusted Economic Expense:
- Explicit Costs: $7,300
- Implicit Cost (Sarah's foregone salary): $4,000
- Adjustment for Depreciation: The accounting depreciation was $100, but the economic depreciation is $200. The adjustment for economic expense here means using the true economic depreciation.
- Let's reframe: The explicit cost for the oven is the loan payment. The economic cost should capture the use of the oven. If the depreciation is the relevant cost for the use of the asset, then the $200 figure should be used.
Let's assume the $300 loan payment covers principal and interest, and the depreciation is a separate consideration for the asset's use.
Original calculation: Accounting Expense included $100 (depreciation part of loan or separate). Let's assume accounting depreciation of $100 is part of the original calculation.
Revised Calculation of Adjusted Economic Expense:
- Explicit Costs (excluding accounting depreciation, as we'll use economic depreciation): $7,300 - $100 (assuming this was part of the original $7300 or a separate non-cash charge in accounting books) = $7,200 (for ingredients, utilities, wages, rent, loan interest/principal).
- Economic Depreciation: $200
- Implicit Cost (Sarah's foregone salary): $4,000
Total Adjusted Economic Expense = Explicit Costs + Economic Depreciation (as the economic measure of the cost of using the asset) + Implicit Costs
Total Adjusted Economic Expense = $7,200 + $200 + $4,000 = $11,400
In this example, Sarah's Adjusted Economic Expense is $11,400. With $10,000 in revenue, she is experiencing an economic loss of $1,400 per month ($10,000 revenue - $11,400 adjusted economic expense). This analysis suggests that while her bakery might appear profitable from an accounting perspective, it is not generating enough to cover her implicit costs, leading to a negative economic profit. This insight is critical for her long-term viability and profitability analysis.
Practical Applications
Adjusted economic expense finds various practical applications across different sectors of the economy:
- Business Strategy and Investment: Companies use adjusted economic expense to make informed decisions about new investments, expansion plans, and product lines. By considering implicit costs and true asset consumption, they can accurately assess the long-term viability and profitability of different ventures. This allows for more effective capital budgeting and strategic portfolio management.
- Government Policy and Public Projects: Governments often employ adjusted economic expense principles, typically through rigorous cost-benefit analysis, when evaluating large-scale public infrastructure projects, social programs, or regulatory changes. This ensures that the full societal costs, including environmental impacts or foregone private sector opportunities, are considered. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) emphasizes robust public investment management frameworks, including the assessment of benefits and costs, to avoid cost overruns and maximize social and economic benefits from public spending3.
- Pricing Decisions: Businesses can use adjusted economic expense to set more competitive and sustainable prices for their goods and services. If prices only cover explicit costs, a business might unknowingly be making an economic loss. Understanding the full economic cost allows for pricing strategies that ensure true market efficiency and long-term sustainability.
- Economic Research and Analysis: Economists rely on adjusted economic expense to study market behavior, measure productivity, and analyze economic growth. Measures like "consumption of fixed capital" provided by agencies such as the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis are crucial for national income accounting and understanding the true depreciation of the nation's capital stock2.
Limitations and Criticisms
While providing a more comprehensive view of costs, calculating adjusted economic expense is not without its limitations and criticisms:
- Difficulty in Quantifying Implicit Costs: The most significant challenge lies in accurately measuring implicit costs, particularly opportunity costs. Assigning a precise monetary value to foregone alternatives, an entrepreneur's time, or the use of self-owned capital can be subjective and difficult to verify. Unlike explicit costs, which are often recorded transactions, implicit costs require estimation and assumptions.
- Subjectivity in Valuation: Determining economic depreciation or the current market value of assets for adjustment purposes can also be subjective. Unlike accounting depreciation, which follows established rules, economic depreciation aims to reflect true economic decline, which can fluctuate with market conditions, technological advancements, and usage patterns. While institutions like the BEA provide economic depreciation rates, applying them at a micro-level can be complex1.
- Data Availability: For smaller businesses or individuals, obtaining the necessary data to perform these complex adjustments, especially for nuanced economic depreciation or precise opportunity costs, can be challenging or impractical. Accounting systems are designed for explicit cost tracking, not for implicit cost estimation.
- Lack of Universal Standards: Unlike financial accounting, which adheres to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), there isn't a single, universally accepted standard for calculating "adjusted economic expense." This can lead to inconsistencies in analysis across different contexts or researchers.
Adjusted Economic Expense vs. Accounting Expense
The primary distinction between adjusted economic expense and accounting expense lies in their scope and purpose. Accounting expense represents the explicit, out-of-pocket costs and recorded non-cash expenses (like depreciation based on historical cost) incurred by a business. It focuses on historical transactions and is used for financial reporting, tax purposes, and traditional profit calculations. Accounting expense is tangible, verifiable, and easily trackable in financial ledgers.
In contrast, adjusted economic expense provides a more holistic view by incorporating both explicit costs and implicit costs, such as the opportunity cost of resources owned and used by the firm. It often involves adjusting non-cash items, like depreciation, to reflect their true economic consumption rather than just their historical cost. Economists use this broader measure to understand the true cost of production, inform strategic planning, and guide resource allocation. While accounting expense indicates financial profitability, adjusted economic expense reveals economic profitability, which considers all costs, including the value of foregone alternatives.
FAQs
What is the main difference between economic cost and accounting cost?
The main difference is that economic cost includes both explicit (out-of-pocket) costs and implicit (opportunity) costs, while accounting cost primarily focuses on explicit costs, which are the direct monetary outlays recorded in financial statements.
Why is it important to consider adjusted economic expense?
It's important because it provides a more accurate picture of the true cost of an activity or decision. By considering implicit costs and actual economic consumption of assets, it helps individuals, businesses, and governments make better resource allocation decisions and evaluate true profitability or efficiency.
Does adjusted economic expense include depreciation?
Yes, adjusted economic expense typically includes depreciation, but often in an "adjusted" form. Instead of relying solely on accounting depreciation based on historical cost, it uses economic depreciation, which reflects the actual decline in an asset's market value over time due to use, obsolescence, or other economic factors.
Is adjusted economic expense used in everyday business?
While the full, formal calculation of adjusted economic expense might be more common in strategic planning, large-scale project evaluation, and economic analysis, the underlying principles (like considering opportunity costs) are implicitly used in good business decision-making, especially when evaluating significant investments or ventures.
Can a business have an accounting profit but an economic loss?
Yes, a business can have an accounting profit but an economic loss. This occurs when the explicit costs are covered by revenue, resulting in an accounting profit, but the revenue is not sufficient to cover the implicit costs (like the owner's foregone salary or the return on capital that could be earned elsewhere). If a business is incurring an economic loss, it means its resources could generate a higher return in an alternative use.