Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to A Definitions

Adjusted economic profit efficiency

What Is Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency?

Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency is a sophisticated metric within Corporate Finance that evaluates how effectively a company generates wealth beyond its total cost of capital, considering both explicit and implicit costs. Unlike traditional accounting measures, this efficiency metric refines the concept of Economic Profit by incorporating adjustments for various factors that can distort reported earnings or capital employed, providing a clearer picture of true value creation. It measures the extent to which a business utilizes its capital and resources to produce profits in excess of its minimum required return, encompassing the Opportunity Cost of all capital used. By doing so, Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency aims to offer a more accurate assessment of a firm's long-term Financial Performance and operational effectiveness.

History and Origin

The concept of economic profit, which forms the foundation of Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency, has roots in classical economic theory, distinguishing between accounting costs and the full economic costs including opportunity costs. However, its modern application in corporate finance gained significant traction with the development and popularization of metrics like Economic Value Added (EVA). Joel Stern and Bennett Stewart of Stern Stewart & Co. are widely credited with developing and trademarking EVA in the early 1990s, aiming to provide a measure that more accurately reflected value creation for shareholders by deducting a charge for the use of capital.5,4

The evolution from basic economic profit to Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency stems from the recognition that a company's reported financial statements often require significant adjustments to truly reflect its economic reality. These adjustments aim to correct for accounting conventions that may obscure a business's actual profitability and capital utilization. The continuous refinement of such metrics reflects the ongoing quest by analysts and executives for a more precise and comprehensive understanding of corporate performance.

Key Takeaways

  • Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency assesses how effectively a company generates profit beyond its total capital costs, including both explicit and implicit costs.
  • It refines traditional economic profit by incorporating various accounting adjustments for a more accurate view of value creation.
  • This metric is crucial for evaluating a firm's true financial performance and its effectiveness in utilizing capital.
  • A positive Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency indicates that a company is creating wealth for its shareholders.
  • It supports informed decision-making in capital allocation, strategic planning, and performance management.

Formula and Calculation

The calculation of Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency begins with Net Operating Profit After Tax (NOPAT) and subtracts a capital charge. However, it extends this by applying a series of adjustments to both NOPAT and the invested capital.

The general formula for Adjusted Economic Profit (AEB) is:

AEB=NOPATadjusted−(Invested Capitaladjusted×WACC)AEB = NOPAT_{adjusted} - (Invested\ Capital_{adjusted} \times WACC)

Where:

  • (NOPAT_{adjusted}) represents the Net Operating Profit After Tax, adjusted for non-cash expenses, certain reserves, and other accounting distortions. These adjustments often aim to convert accounting profit closer to a cash-based economic profit by adding back or subtracting items like non-cash depreciation, goodwill amortization, or capitalizing R&D expenses that are expensed for accounting purposes but have long-term benefits.
  • (Invested\ Capital_{adjusted}) is the total capital employed by the business, also adjusted for various accounting treatments, such as capitalizing certain operating leases or previously expensed R&D. This aims to provide a truer measure of the capital base generating the NOPAT.
  • (WACC) is the Weighted Average Cost of Capital, representing the average rate of return a company expects to pay to all its security holders (debt and equity) to finance its assets.

These adjustments typically aim to align reported financial figures more closely with economic reality, for example, by treating certain Explicit Costs or Implicit Costs differently than standard accounting practices. The efficiency aspect often comes from comparing this adjusted profit to the adjusted capital base or against a target, showing how effectively the capital is deployed.

Interpreting the Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency

Interpreting Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency involves assessing whether a company is generating returns above its economic cost of capital, thereby creating Shareholder Value. A positive Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency indicates that the company's operations are producing more than enough profit to cover its cost of financing, including the opportunity cost of equity capital. This suggests efficient utilization of resources and successful Investment Decisions.

Conversely, a negative Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency implies that the company is destroying value, as its profits are insufficient to cover the cost of the capital it employs. Such a situation signals to management and investors that the current strategies may not be sustainable or that the company needs to re-evaluate its Risk Management and operational effectiveness. Analysts often look at trends in this metric over time to gauge improvements or deteriorations in a company's economic performance.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "AlphaTech Inc.," a software development company that recently invested heavily in a new product line.

  • Initial Accounting Data:
    • NOPAT (before adjustments): $20 million
    • Book Value of Invested Capital (before adjustments): $100 million
    • WACC: 10%
  • Adjustments Identified:
    • AlphaTech expensed $5 million in R&D for the new product, which analysts believe has long-term asset characteristics. This $5 million is capitalized for economic profit calculation.
    • AlphaTech has an operating lease, treated as an expense, but its present value of future lease payments is $10 million, which is added to invested capital for an economic view.

Calculation:

  1. Adjusted NOPAT: The $5 million R&D expense is added back to NOPAT because it's being capitalized as an asset.
    NOPATadjusted=$20 million+$5 million=$25 millionNOPAT_{adjusted} = \$20\ million + \$5\ million = \$25\ million
  2. Adjusted Invested Capital: The capitalized R&D and the present value of operating leases are added to the book value of invested capital.
    Invested Capitaladjusted=$100 million+$5 million+$10 million=$115 millionInvested\ Capital_{adjusted} = \$100\ million + \$5\ million + \$10\ million = \$115\ million
  3. Adjusted Economic Profit:
    Adjusted Economic Profit=$25 million−($115 million×0.10)Adjusted\ Economic\ Profit = \$25\ million - (\$115\ million \times 0.10)
    Adjusted Economic Profit=$25 million−$11.5 million=$13.5 millionAdjusted\ Economic\ Profit = \$25\ million - \$11.5\ million = \$13.5\ million

In this scenario, AlphaTech Inc. achieved an Adjusted Economic Profit of $13.5 million. This positive figure indicates that after accounting for a more comprehensive view of its capital and earnings, the company is effectively generating value above its true cost of capital. This provides a clearer insight into the success of its Capital Allocation efforts compared to just looking at unadjusted accounting profit.

Practical Applications

Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency is a powerful tool for various financial and strategic applications.

  • Performance Measurement: Companies use this metric to evaluate the true profitability of business units, projects, or the entire enterprise. It goes beyond traditional accounting profit to show if capital is being used efficiently to create wealth.
  • Capital Allocation: It guides management in making better Investment Decisions by identifying which projects or segments generate returns truly above their cost of capital, promoting optimal resource deployment. EY's insights on capital allocation strategies highlight the importance of aligning business strategies with asset portfolios to optimize capital deployment.3
  • Strategic Planning: By providing a clearer picture of value creation, it informs long-term strategic initiatives, helping businesses focus on areas with the highest potential for sustainable economic returns.
  • Valuation: For analysts and investors, Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency can offer a more robust basis for company valuation than relying solely on accounting earnings, which can be influenced by various accounting policies.
  • Incentive Compensation: Linking management incentives to Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency can align managerial decisions with shareholder wealth creation, encouraging value-enhancing behaviors.
  • Corporate Governance: It enhances governance by providing boards of directors with a clearer, less distortable metric to oversee management performance and ensure alignment with shareholder interests. The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco has also explored how corporate profits relate to financing costs, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive understanding of financial performance.2

Limitations and Criticisms

While Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency offers a more comprehensive view of financial performance than traditional accounting measures, it is not without its limitations.

One significant challenge lies in the subjectivity of the adjustments themselves. Determining which accounting items to adjust and by how much often requires significant judgment, potentially leading to inconsistencies in calculation across companies or even within the same company over time. This can make comparisons difficult and introduce opportunities for manipulation if the adjustments are not applied rigorously and transparently.

Another criticism is the complexity of its calculation. Unlike more straightforward metrics, deriving Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency requires detailed knowledge of accounting nuances and potentially extensive data adjustments, which can be resource-intensive for businesses to implement and maintain. This complexity can also make it less accessible or understandable for stakeholders without a strong financial background.

Furthermore, like any single financial metric, relying solely on Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency can lead to a narrow focus, potentially overlooking other important qualitative factors or long-term strategic considerations. As discussions around the pitfalls of relying too heavily on metrics suggest, when a measure becomes a target, it can cease to be a good measure, leading to unintended consequences or "gaming" of the system.1 Companies must ensure that the pursuit of a higher Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency doesn't inadvertently discourage necessary long-term investments, stifle innovation, or compromise other critical aspects of the business, such as market share growth or customer satisfaction. Balancing quantitative Financial Performance indicators with broader strategic objectives is essential for truly effective Measurement systems.

Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency vs. Economic Value Added (EVA)

Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency and Economic Value Added (EVA) are closely related concepts, both aiming to measure true economic profit by deducting a capital charge from operating profits. However, Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency can be seen as a broader category or an enhanced version of EVA.

EVA, as popularized by Stern Stewart & Co., defines specific adjustments to NOPAT and invested capital, often including capitalizing R&D, adjusting for goodwill, and normalizing deferred taxes. It provides a standardized framework for calculating economic profit.

Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency, while often incorporating many of the same adjustments as EVA, implies a potentially more flexible or customized approach to these adjustments. It suggests that a company may perform additional, specific adjustments relevant to its industry, business model, or unique circumstances to derive the most accurate representation of its economic profit. Essentially, all EVA calculations yield a form of adjusted economic profit, but not all adjusted economic profit calculations strictly adhere to the specific, proprietary methodology of EVA. The core difference lies in the degree of standardization versus customization of the accounting adjustments applied.

FAQs

What is the primary purpose of Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency?

The primary purpose of Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency is to provide a more accurate and comprehensive measure of a company's financial performance and its ability to create wealth. It does this by factoring in all economic costs, including the Opportunity Cost of capital, and making adjustments to financial statements to reflect a truer economic reality.

How does Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency differ from traditional accounting profit?

Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency differs from traditional accounting profit because it considers both explicit and implicit costs, especially the cost of equity capital, which accounting profit typically does not. Furthermore, it involves specific adjustments to reported financial figures to remove accounting distortions and better align with economic reality, providing a clearer picture of value creation.

Why are "adjustments" necessary for economic profit?

Adjustments are necessary because standard accounting practices can sometimes obscure the true economic performance of a business. For instance, certain expenditures, like R&D, might be expensed for accounting purposes but represent long-term investments. Adjustments convert these accounting treatments to reflect their economic substance, leading to a more accurate calculation of Economic Profit and a better basis for Capital Allocation decisions.

Can Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency be negative?

Yes, Adjusted Economic Profit Efficiency can be negative. A negative value indicates that the company's operating profit, even after adjustments, is less than the total cost of the capital employed. This signifies that the company is destroying Shareholder Value and is not generating a sufficient return to cover its economic costs.