What Is Adjusted Present Value?
Adjusted Present Value (APV) is a valuation method within corporate finance that separates the value of a project or company into two primary components: the value of the unlevered project or firm (as if it were financed entirely by equity financing), and the present value of the financing side effects. This approach is distinct from other discounted cash flow methods like the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) approach because it explicitly accounts for the impact of debt financing on value, particularly the tax shield benefit. APV is particularly useful for complex financing structures, such as those found in leveraged buyout scenarios, or for projects with changing capital structures over time.9,
History and Origin
The Adjusted Present Value (APV) method was introduced by Stewart Myers in 1974. Myers, a prominent finance academic, developed APV as an alternative framework for project valuation that directly incorporates the value of financing decisions, particularly the tax benefits arising from debt. His work built upon seminal theories of capital structure, most notably the Modigliani-Miller theorem, which posited that in perfect capital markets, a firm's value is independent of its capital structure.8 APV provides a mechanism to adjust this theoretical "unlevered" value for the real-world effects of financing, such as tax deductibility of interest.,7,6, Professor Pablo Fernández of IESE Business School further elaborates on the APV approach, highlighting its utility in assessing transactions with significant leverage.
5
Key Takeaways
- Adjusted Present Value (APV) is a valuation method that separates a firm's operating value from its financing effects.
- It calculates the value of a project or company as if it were entirely equity-financed, then adds the present value of any financing benefits or subtracts financing costs.
- The primary financing benefit considered in APV is the tax shield provided by interest payments on debt.
- APV is particularly effective for evaluating projects with complex or changing debt structures, such as leveraged buyouts or certain capital budgeting decisions.
- Unlike the WACC method, APV uses an unlevered cost of equity to discount operating cash flows and discounts financing effects separately.
Formula and Calculation
The Adjusted Present Value (APV) is calculated by summing the net present value (NPV) of a project or firm assuming it is financed solely by equity (often referred to as the unlevered firm value) and the present value of the various financing side effects.
The general formula for APV is:
Where:
- ( NPV_{unlevered} ) = Net Present Value of the project or firm assuming it is all-equity financed. This is calculated by discounting the free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) at the unlevered cost of equity.
- ( PV_{financing , side , effects} ) = Present value of any benefits or costs associated with financing. The most common and significant of these is the interest tax shield. Other effects might include costs of issuing new debt or equity, or subsidized financing.
The Present Value of the Tax Shield ( (PV_{TS}) ) is typically calculated as:
Where:
- ( Interest_t ) = Interest expense in period ( t ).
- ( Tax , Rate_t ) = Corporate tax rate in period ( t ).
- ( Cost , of , Debt_t ) = Cost of debt in period ( t ).
Aswath Damodaran of NYU Stern further details various approaches to calculating the present value of the tax shield based on assumptions about debt levels and risk.
Interpreting the Adjusted Present Value
Interpreting the Adjusted Present Value involves understanding that it represents the total value of an investment opportunity, considering both its operational profitability and the strategic benefits or costs derived from its financing structure. A positive APV suggests that the project or company is expected to create value for shareholders, while a negative APV indicates it would likely destroy value.
4
Unlike methods that embed financing effects into a single discount rate (like WACC), APV clearly delineates the operational value from the financing value. This allows analysts to explicitly see the contribution of the tax shield and other financing decisions to the overall value. For instance, in a capital budgeting decision, a company can evaluate if a project is fundamentally sound on its own before factoring in the specific advantages of its planned debt structure. This separation can provide deeper insights into value drivers and aid in financial decision-making.
Hypothetical Example
Consider a company evaluating a new project that requires an initial investment of $1,000,000. The project is expected to generate unlevered free cash flows (FCFF) of $250,000 per year for 5 years. The company's unlevered cost of equity (the cost of equity if it had no debt) is 10%.
The company plans to finance 40% of the project with debt at a 5% interest rate. The corporate tax rate is 25%.
Step 1: Calculate the NPV of the unlevered project.
Initial Investment = -$1,000,000
Unlevered FCFF = $250,000 for 5 years
Unlevered Cost of Equity = 10%
The unlevered project itself has a negative NPV, meaning it would not be viable if financed purely by equity.
Step 2: Calculate the Present Value of the Tax Shield.
Debt Amount = 40% of $1,000,000 = $400,000
Interest Rate = 5%
Annual Interest Payment = $400,000 * 5% = $20,000
Tax Rate = 25%
Annual Tax Shield = $20,000 * 25% = $5,000
Assuming the debt is fixed for 5 years, and the interest tax shield is discounted at the cost of debt (5%):
Step 3: Calculate the Adjusted Present Value.
In this hypothetical example, even with the tax shield benefits, the Adjusted Present Value is negative, indicating that the project is not financially attractive under these assumptions.
Practical Applications
Adjusted Present Value finds widespread use in various areas of finance, especially when dealing with complex financial structures or when the capital structure of a company is expected to change significantly over the life of a project.