Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to A Definitions

Adjusted expected accrual

What Is Adjusted Expected Accrual?

Adjusted Expected Accrual refers to the portion of a company's total accruals that is considered normal, predictable, and directly tied to its fundamental operating activities, as estimated through various financial accounting models. It represents the non-discretionary component of accruals, stripping away any potential influence of management discretion or unusual events. This concept is fundamental in Financial Accounting and plays a critical role in assessing the quality of a company's reported earnings.

Accruals are non-cash items in financial statements that recognize revenues when earned and expenses when incurred, regardless of when cash is exchanged. The accurate determination of Adjusted Expected Accrual helps financial analysts and investors differentiate between legitimate accruals arising from ordinary business operations and those that might indicate aggressive earnings management. By isolating the expected portion, an analyst can better scrutinize the remaining, or "discretionary," accruals for signs of manipulation. The Adjusted Expected Accrual provides a baseline against which actual reported accruals can be compared to identify anomalies.

History and Origin

The concept of disaggregating accruals into expected (or non-discretionary) and discretionary components gained prominence in accounting research, particularly with the rise of studies on earnings quality and managerial opportunism. Early models, like the original Jones model (1991) and its subsequent modifications, sought to estimate the portion of total accruals that is non-discretionary, meaning it's driven by normal changes in sales, property, plant, and equipment (PPE), or other operational factors. These models provided a framework for calculating an "expected" level of accruals.

Over time, researchers recognized that these initial models might not fully capture the influence of genuine economic performance on accruals, leading to potential misclassification of legitimate accruals as discretionary. This led to the development of "performance-adjusted" models, such as the modified Jones model adjusted for return on assets (ROA) or gross profit, to create a more refined estimate of what constitutes "expected" or "normal" accruals for a given firm. The aim was to adjust the expectation based on a company's specific operating context. The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) has been a hub for such economic research, with studies exploring how firms rationally adjust their investment, which ties into the nature of accruals6. The ongoing refinement of these models reflects the continuous effort to improve the detection of earnings manipulation and enhance financial reporting quality.

Key Takeaways

  • Adjusted Expected Accrual represents the normal and predictable portion of a company's total accruals, estimated through models.
  • It serves as a benchmark for identifying unusual or "discretionary" accruals, which can signal earnings management.
  • The calculation typically involves regressing total accruals against operational variables and performance metrics.
  • A significant deviation of actual accruals from the Adjusted Expected Accrual can indicate potential issues with the quality of reported earnings.
  • It is a key tool for financial analysts and investors evaluating a company's true economic performance.

Formula and Calculation

The calculation of Adjusted Expected Accrual typically involves a multi-step regression analysis designed to estimate the non-discretionary component of total accruals. The general approach often builds upon variations of the Jones model, which aims to isolate the portion of accruals that is not subject to management discretion.

Total Accruals (TA) are typically calculated as the difference between Net Income and Cash Flow from Operations:

TAt=NIt−CFOtTA_t = NI_t - CFO_t

Where:

  • (TA_t) = Total Accruals in period (t)
  • (NI_t) = Net Income in period (t)
  • (CFO_t) = Cash Flow from Operations in period (t)

The Adjusted Expected Accrual ((AEA_t)), often synonymous with Non-Discretionary Accruals (NDA) in performance-adjusted models, is then estimated using a regression model. A common form, such as a modified Jones model, might look like this:

AEAt=β0+β1(1At−1)+β2(ΔREVtAt−1)+β3(PPEtAt−1)+β4(ROAtAt−1)AEA_t = \beta_0 + \beta_1 \left( \frac{1}{A_{t-1}} \right) + \beta_2 \left( \frac{\Delta REV_t}{A_{t-1}} \right) + \beta_3 \left( \frac{PPE_t}{A_{t-1}} \right) + \beta_4 \left( \frac{ROA_t}{A_{t-1}} \right)

Where:

  • (AEA_t) = Adjusted Expected Accrual in period (t)
  • (\beta_0, \beta_1, \beta_2, \beta_3, \beta_4) = Regression coefficients estimated from cross-sectional or panel data
  • (A_{t-1}) = Total Assets at the end of the prior period (t-1) (used for deflating variables to control for firm size)
  • (\Delta REV_t) = Change in Revenue in period (t)
  • (PPE_t) = Gross Property, Plant, and Equipment in period (t)
  • (ROA_t) = Return on Assets in period (t) (as a performance adjustment)

This formula attempts to capture the portion of accruals that is "expected" given the company's changes in revenue, level of fixed assets, and overall profitability. The residual from this regression (Total Accruals - Adjusted Expected Accrual) would then represent the discretionary or abnormal accruals.

Interpreting the Adjusted Expected Accrual

Interpreting the Adjusted Expected Accrual involves understanding what the modeled, normal level of accruals signifies for a company's financial health and reporting practices. Essentially, it provides a benchmark: if a company's reported total accruals significantly exceed its Adjusted Expected Accrual, it may suggest that management has engaged in upward earnings management. Conversely, if total accruals are substantially lower than the Adjusted Expected Accrual, it might indicate income smoothing or "taking a bath" by recognizing losses or deferring income.

A well-calculated Adjusted Expected Accrual helps investors and analysts assess the sustainability of reported earnings. Earnings primarily driven by a high proportion of discretionary accruals, rather than consistent Adjusted Expected Accrual components, are generally considered lower quality and less persistent. The higher the quality of a company's accruals, meaning they closely align with the Adjusted Expected Accrual based on economic fundamentals, the more reliable its financial statements are perceived to be. This metric aids in evaluating whether a company's accounting practices genuinely reflect its operational performance or if they are being manipulated to meet short-term targets.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "Tech Innovations Inc." (TII), a publicly traded software company. Analysts are interested in evaluating the financial reporting quality of TII. For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024, TII reported:

  • Net Income (NI): $100 million
  • Cash Flow from Operations (CFO): $70 million
  • Total Assets at December 31, 2023 (A_t-1): $500 million
  • Change in Revenue ((\Delta REV_t)) for 2024: $150 million
  • Gross Property, Plant, and Equipment (PPE) at December 31, 2024: $200 million
  • Return on Assets (ROA) for 2024: 0.20

First, calculate TII's Total Accruals:
TA2024=NI2024−CFO2024=$100 million−$70 million=$30 millionTA_{2024} = NI_{2024} - CFO_{2024} = \$100 \text{ million} - \$70 \text{ million} = \$30 \text{ million}

Next, we need the coefficients for our Adjusted Expected Accrual model. Assume, from a reliable industry-specific regression analysis (based on similar firms over several years), the following estimated coefficients:

  • (\beta_0 = 0.02)
  • (\beta_1 = 0.10)
  • (\beta_2 = 0.05)
  • (\beta_3 = 0.03)
  • (\beta_4 = -0.01)

Now, calculate the Adjusted Expected Accrual for TII:

AEA2024=0.02+0.10(1$500 million)+0.05($150 million$500 million)+0.03($200 million$500 million)−0.01(0.20$500 million)AEA_{2024} = 0.02 + 0.10 \left( \frac{1}{\$500 \text{ million}} \right) + 0.05 \left( \frac{\$150 \text{ million}}{\$500 \text{ million}} \right) + 0.03 \left( \frac{\$200 \text{ million}}{\$500 \text{ million}} \right) - 0.01 \left( \frac{0.20}{\$500 \text{ million}} \right)

Correction: The last term for ROA is usually expressed as a ratio, not divided by assets, but the formula given in calculation section has it divided by A_t-1. Let me adjust the hypothetical calculation for clearer interpretation, assuming ROA is already a ratio.

Let's re-state the formula for easier hypothetical example calculation and standard practice where ROA is not deflated by assets again:

AEAt=β0+β1(1At−1)+β2(ΔREVtAt−1)+β3(PPEtAt−1)+β4(ROAt)AEA_t = \beta_0 + \beta_1 \left( \frac{1}{A_{t-1}} \right) + \beta_2 \left( \frac{\Delta REV_t}{A_{t-1}} \right) + \beta_3 \left( \frac{PPE_t}{A_{t-1}} \right) + \beta_4 (ROA_t)

Using simplified coefficients for demonstration, relative to assets:

  • (\beta_0 = 0.01)
  • (\beta_1 = 0.05) (for the 1/A term)
  • (\beta_2 = 0.10) (for (\Delta REV_t / A_{t-1}))
  • (\beta_3 = 0.08) (for (PPE_t / A_{t-1}))
  • (\beta_4 = -0.02) (for (ROA_t))

Calculate normalized variables:

  • (1/A_{t-1} = 1 / $500 \text{ million} = 0.002 \text{ (per million)})
  • (\Delta REV_t / A_{t-1} = $150 \text{ million} / $500 \text{ million} = 0.30)
  • (PPE_t / A_{t-1} = $200 \text{ million} / $500 \text{ million} = 0.40)
  • (ROA_t = 0.20)

Now, calculate (AEA_{2024}) as a percentage of assets:
(AEA_{2024}) (as a ratio of (A_{t-1})) = (0.01 + 0.05(0.002) + 0.10(0.30) + 0.08(0.40) - 0.02(0.20))
(AEA_{2024}) = (0.01 + 0.0001 + 0.03 + 0.032 - 0.004)
(AEA_{2024}) = (0.0881) or 8.81% of beginning assets.

To get the Adjusted Expected Accrual in dollars:
(AEA_{2024}) in dollars = (0.0881 \times $500 \text{ million} = $44.05 \text{ million})

In this hypothetical example, Tech Innovations Inc.'s Total Accruals were $30 million, while its Adjusted Expected Accrual was $44.05 million. This suggests that TII's actual accruals were lower than what would be expected given its operational performance and assets. This could indicate conservative accounting or perhaps even income minimization rather than aggressive income maximization. The difference of ($30 \text{ million} - $44.05 \text{ million} = -$14.05 \text{ million}) would be considered the firm's discretionary accruals.

Practical Applications

Adjusted Expected Accrual is a vital tool for various stakeholders in the financial world. Primarily, it's used by analysts and investors to assess the sustainability and quality of reported earnings. By understanding the normal, expected component of accruals, they can better identify if a company's reported profits are truly backed by economic activities or if they are potentially inflated through aggressive accounting choices.

Regulators, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), also utilize sophisticated models to detect potential accounting fraud and financial misstatements. The SEC, for instance, has focused on accounting fraud cases and developed tools like its "Accounting Quality Model" to identify anomalous filings by comparing a registrant's numbers to its peers5. Large deviations between reported accruals and Adjusted Expected Accrual can trigger closer scrutiny from auditors and regulatory bodies, leading to investigations into internal controls and compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).

Furthermore, academic researchers widely employ Adjusted Expected Accrual models to study various aspects of corporate finance, including the impact of corporate governance on financial reporting, the effectiveness of auditing, and the market's reaction to different types of earnings information. These models help quantify the "discretionary" element of accruals, providing a quantifiable proxy for earnings management behavior that can be tested empirically.

Limitations and Criticisms

While Adjusted Expected Accrual models are valuable analytical tools, they are not without limitations and criticisms. A primary concern is that these models rely on statistical estimations and assumptions, meaning the "expected" component is inherently an approximation. Model misspecification can lead to inaccurate estimates of Adjusted Expected Accrual, inadvertently classifying legitimate accruals as discretionary or vice versa. This can result from omitted variables, non-linear relationships, or industry-specific nuances not fully captured by the model. Research has explored the quality of accruals and earnings based on accrual estimation errors, highlighting that accruals involve assumptions and estimates about future cash flows, which can introduce noise4.

Another criticism is that the "discretionary" portion, derived from the Adjusted Expected Accrual, might not always be indicative of intentional manipulation. It could reflect legitimate business judgments or changes in a company's operating environment that the model fails to fully account for. For instance, a strategic investment or a significant one-time event might lead to accruals that appear abnormal but are entirely justifiable. Therefore, relying solely on this metric without further qualitative analysis can lead to misleading conclusions about a company's financial reporting quality.

Moreover, companies facing financial distress may exhibit abnormal accrual patterns as they try to manage earnings to avoid violating debt covenants or to influence stock prices. However, these patterns do not necessarily imply fraudulent activity but rather responses to genuine economic pressures. A high degree of management judgment is inherent in accrual accounting under both GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), which provides flexibility that can be used opportunistically or for efficiency gains3. The Wirecard scandal, where a €1.9 billion hole in its balance sheet led to its collapse, serves as a stark example of how accounting manipulation can occur, underscoring the challenges of relying solely on financial statements without deeper scrutiny.
2

Adjusted Expected Accrual vs. Discretionary Accruals

Adjusted Expected Accrual and Discretionary Accruals are two sides of the same coin in the analysis of accrual-based earnings. They are inextricably linked, yet represent distinct concepts.

Adjusted Expected Accrual refers to the portion of a company's total accruals that is considered normal, predicted, and attributable to the company's ordinary operating activities and performance. It is the component of accruals that is not considered to be influenced by managerial choices aimed at altering reported earnings. This figure is typically estimated using statistical models that control for legitimate economic factors and changes in a company's operations. It serves as a baseline or benchmark for what accruals should be, given a firm's characteristics.

Discretionary Accruals, on the other hand, are the residual component. They represent the difference between a company's actual total accruals and its Adjusted Expected Accrual. This remaining portion is theorized to be the part of accruals that management has the ability to influence through their accounting judgments and choices, within the bounds of accounting standards. A higher level of discretionary accruals, particularly when positive, is often interpreted as a potential indicator of aggressive earnings management or attempts to inflate reported profits. Conversely, negative discretionary accruals might suggest income minimization or conservative accounting. The distinction is crucial because while Adjusted Expected Accrual reflects the fundamental accounting necessities, discretionary accruals highlight the areas where managerial opportunism or unique business circumstances might be at play.

FAQs

What are accruals in accounting?

Accruals in accounting refer to revenues earned and expenses incurred, regardless of when the cash transaction occurs. They are crucial for adherence to the revenue recognition principle and the matching principle under accrual basis accounting, providing a more accurate picture of a company's financial performance than cash basis accounting.

1### Why is Adjusted Expected Accrual important?

Adjusted Expected Accrual is important because it helps financial analysts and investors distinguish between normal, business-driven accruals and potentially manipulated or "discretionary" accruals. By understanding what accruals should be based on a company's operations, stakeholders can better assess the quality and sustainability of reported earnings and identify potential accounting irregularities.

How does it relate to earnings management?

Adjusted Expected Accrual is a key component in detecting earnings management. The difference between a company's total reported accruals and its Adjusted Expected Accrual is often used as a proxy for discretionary accruals, which are the portion thought to be influenced by management's intent to smooth or boost earnings. Large positive discretionary accruals can be a red flag for aggressive accounting practices.

Is a high Adjusted Expected Accrual good or bad?

Adjusted Expected Accrual itself is neither inherently good nor bad; it simply represents the normal, predictable portion of a company's accruals given its operations. What matters is how a company's actual total accruals compare to its Adjusted Expected Accrual. If total accruals significantly exceed the Adjusted Expected Accrual, it suggests high discretionary accruals, which can raise concerns about earnings quality.

What are some examples of items that contribute to Adjusted Expected Accrual?

Items contributing to Adjusted Expected Accrual include normal changes in accounts receivable (revenue earned but not yet collected), accounts payable (expenses incurred but not yet paid), inventory, and depreciation. These are the accruals that naturally arise from a company's regular sales activities, purchasing of goods or services, and asset usage, as factored into the estimation model.