Skip to main content
← Back to A Definitions

Adjusted forecast present value

What Is Adjusted Forecast Present Value?

Adjusted Forecast Present Value (AFPV) is a sophisticated valuation method used in corporate finance to determine the present value of a project, company, or asset by explicitly separating the value of its operations from the value of its financing side effects. This approach falls under the broader category of valuation and is particularly useful when the capital structure of a company is expected to change significantly over time, or when valuing projects with specific financing arrangements. Unlike other methods that embed financing effects into the discount rate, Adjusted Forecast Present Value separates the unlevered value of operations from the present value of the financing benefits, most notably the tax shield from debt.

History and Origin

The Adjusted Present Value (APV) method, the conceptual foundation for Adjusted Forecast Present Value, was primarily developed by Professor Stewart C. Myers in the 1970s. Myers' work at MIT Sloan School of Management offered a flexible alternative to traditional valuation models by disaggregating the value of a project into its core unlevered value and the value added by its financing. This framework became particularly significant for its ability to handle complex financing scenarios and non-constant debt levels, making it a valuable tool in advanced corporate finance. The method's focus on the incremental value of financing effects, such as the interest tax shield, provided a clearer analytical path, especially in situations like mergers and acquisitions (M&A) where capital structures are often restructured. The discount rate plays a crucial role in valuation, converting future earnings into present value by accounting for risk and the time value of money.5,4.

Key Takeaways

  • Adjusted Forecast Present Value (AFPV) calculates value by summing the unlevered project or company value and the present value of financing side effects.
  • It is particularly useful for valuations where the debt level or capital structure changes over the forecast period.
  • The most significant financing side effect captured by AFPV is typically the tax shield arising from tax-deductible interest payments.
  • AFPV offers a flexible alternative to methods like the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) approach, especially in leveraged buyouts or project finance.

Formula and Calculation

The Adjusted Forecast Present Value is calculated by adding the present value of the unlevered free cash flows (FCFF) to the present value of the tax shields and any other financing side effects.

The general formula is:

AFPV=Unlevered Value+PV of Financing Side Effects\text{AFPV} = \text{Unlevered Value} + \text{PV of Financing Side Effects}

Where:

  • Unlevered Value is the present value of the future cash flows of the project or firm, discounted at the unlevered cost of equity (the cost of equity if the company had no debt).
    Unlevered Value=t=1nFCFFt(1+ku)t\text{Unlevered Value} = \sum_{t=1}^{n} \frac{\text{FCFF}_t}{(1 + k_u)^t}
    Where:
    • (\text{FCFF}_t) = Free Cash Flow to the Firm in period t
    • (k_u) = Unlevered cost of equity (cost of capital for an all-equity firm)
    • (n) = Number of forecast periods
  • PV of Financing Side Effects is the present value of the benefits derived from financing, primarily the tax savings from interest payments.
    PV of Financing Side Effects=t=1nTax Shieldt(1+kd)t+PV(Other Financing Effects)\text{PV of Financing Side Effects} = \sum_{t=1}^{n} \frac{\text{Tax Shield}_t}{(1 + k_d)^t} + \text{PV(Other Financing Effects)}
    Where:
    • (\text{Tax Shield}_t = \text{Interest Payment}_t \times \text{Corporate Tax Rate}_t)
    • (k_d) = Cost of Debt (or appropriate discount rate for each specific financing effect)

Interpreting the Adjusted Forecast Present Value

Interpreting the Adjusted Forecast Present Value involves understanding that it represents the total value of a firm or project, built up from its operational earnings power and the specific financial advantages it gains from its chosen capital structure. A higher Adjusted Forecast Present Value suggests a more attractive investment, reflecting strong underlying operations and/or significant financing benefits.

When evaluating a company using Adjusted Forecast Present Value, analysts typically compare the calculated AFPV to the initial investment cost. If the AFPV exceeds the initial cost, the project is considered value-enhancing, similar to how Net Present Value (NPV) is interpreted. This method provides clarity on how much value is generated by the core business versus how much is contributed by financial leverage. Understanding time value of money is fundamental to this interpretation, as all future benefits and costs are brought back to their current worth.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a new project that requires an initial investment of $100 million. The project is expected to generate unlevered free cash flows over three years and will be partially financed with debt, providing a tax shield.

Year 1:

  • Unlevered Free Cash Flow (FCFF): $30 million
  • Interest Payment: $4 million
  • Corporate Tax Rate: 25%
  • Tax Shield: $4 million * 0.25 = $1 million
  • Unlevered Cost of Equity ($k_u$): 10%
  • Cost of Debt ($k_d$): 6%

Year 2:

  • Unlevered Free Cash Flow (FCFF): $40 million
  • Interest Payment: $3 million
  • Corporate Tax Rate: 25%
  • Tax Shield: $3 million * 0.25 = $0.75 million

Year 3:

  • Unlevered Free Cash Flow (FCFF): $50 million
  • Interest Payment: $2 million
  • Corporate Tax Rate: 25%
  • Tax Shield: $2 million * 0.25 = $0.5 million

Step 1: Calculate the Present Value of Unlevered Free Cash Flows

  • PV (Year 1 FCFF) = $30M / (1 + 0.10)^1 = $27.27 million
  • PV (Year 2 FCFF) = $40M / (1 + 0.10)^2 = $33.06 million
  • PV (Year 3 FCFF) = $50M / (1 + 0.10)^3 = $37.57 million
  • Total Unlevered Value = $27.27M + $33.06M + $37.57M = $97.90 million

Step 2: Calculate the Present Value of Tax Shields

  • PV (Year 1 Tax Shield) = $1M / (1 + 0.06)^1 = $0.94 million
  • PV (Year 2 Tax Shield) = $0.75M / (1 + 0.06)^2 = $0.67 million
  • PV (Year 3 Tax Shield) = $0.5M / (1 + 0.06)^3 = $0.42 million
  • Total PV of Tax Shields = $0.94M + $0.67M + $0.42M = $2.03 million

Step 3: Calculate Adjusted Forecast Present Value

  • AFPV = Total Unlevered Value + Total PV of Tax Shields
  • AFPV = $97.90 million + $2.03 million = $99.93 million

In this scenario, the Adjusted Forecast Present Value of $99.93 million is slightly less than the initial investment of $100 million, suggesting that the project, as currently structured, might not create positive value for the firm. This type of detailed financial modeling helps in capital budgeting decisions.

Practical Applications

Adjusted Forecast Present Value is a valuable tool in several real-world financial contexts, particularly where financing decisions play a central role in valuation.

  • Project Finance: For large-scale projects, such as infrastructure development or energy ventures, where specific debt covenants and changing debt levels are common, AFPV allows for a precise valuation by isolating the project's operational value from its complex financing structure.
  • Leveraged Buyouts (LBOs): In LBOs, companies are acquired primarily using borrowed money, leading to significant changes in their capital structure post-acquisition. AFPV is well-suited for valuing targets in LBOs because it can directly account for the tax shields generated by high debt levels and the subsequent reduction in debt over time.
  • Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A): When valuing target companies for acquisition, especially those with different financing policies or when the acquirer plans to drastically alter the target's debt levels, Adjusted Forecast Present Value provides a flexible framework. It allows for the valuation of the target business independent of the acquirer's specific financing plans, and then explicitly adds the value of the synergy-related tax benefits. Business valuation in M&A determines a company's economic value, encompassing tangible and intangible assets, liabilities, and overall market position.3.
  • Capital Budgeting Decisions: Companies use AFPV to evaluate potential investments, especially those with unique or evolving financing plans, enabling a clearer understanding of value creation.

The versatility of Adjusted Forecast Present Value makes it an essential technique for advanced valuation scenarios where financing structure is a critical value driver.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its advantages in handling complex financing structures, Adjusted Forecast Present Value has certain limitations and criticisms. One primary criticism is the difficulty in accurately forecasting the tax shield over an extended period. This requires precise predictions of future debt levels and interest rates, which can be highly uncertain. Errors in these forecasts can lead to significant inaccuracies in the final Adjusted Forecast Present Value.

Another challenge lies in identifying and valuing all "other financing side effects." While the interest tax shield is the most prominent, other effects, such as the costs of financial distress or subsidies, can be harder to quantify and integrate accurately into the model. Misapplication of valuation methods can occur due to various errors, highlighting the need for careful analysis.2.

Furthermore, determining the appropriate discount rate for each component (unlevered value and financing side effects) can be complex. The unlevered cost of equity, in particular, requires assumptions about comparable companies or the removal of leverage effects from a firm's cost of equity. The method also requires a solid understanding of risk management to properly assess the discount rates used for different cash flows.

Adjusted Forecast Present Value vs. Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)

The Adjusted Forecast Present Value (AFPV) method is often compared with the traditional Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) approach, particularly the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) method. Both aim to value a firm or project based on its future cash flows, but they differ fundamentally in how they account for the impact of financing.

FeatureAdjusted Forecast Present Value (AFPV)Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) using WACC
ApproachValues the unlevered assets first, then adds the present value of financing side effects (e.g., tax shield).Discounts levered free cash flows (FCFF) using a single rate that incorporates the effects of debt and equity.
Discount RateUses the unlevered cost of equity for operating cash flows and the cost of debt for tax shields.Uses the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC), which reflects the blend of debt and equity financing.
Capital StructureMore flexible for changing capital structure assumptions, as debt and its benefits are explicitly modeled.Assumes a constant target debt-to-equity ratio or capital structure, as WACC is typically calculated based on a stable financing mix.
Use CasesIdeal for leveraged buyouts, project finance, or situations with varying debt levels.Preferred for mature companies with stable financial policies and predictable debt-to-equity ratios.
ComplexityCan be more complex due to separate calculation and discounting of financing effects.Generally simpler to apply once the WACC is determined, as it uses a single discount rate.

While both methods should theoretically yield similar results under perfect market conditions and consistent assumptions, AFPV offers greater transparency and flexibility when the assumption of a constant capital structure, inherent in the WACC method, is not appropriate. Valuation in finance involves determining the worth of an asset or company, comparing it to market prices, and is essential for various strategic decisions.1,.

FAQs

What is the primary advantage of using Adjusted Forecast Present Value?

The primary advantage of using Adjusted Forecast Present Value is its flexibility in handling complex financing structures, especially when the amount of debt or the capital structure of a company is expected to change significantly over time. It explicitly separates the value derived from operations from the value derived from financing, such as the tax shield.

When is Adjusted Forecast Present Value preferred over WACC?

Adjusted Forecast Present Value is generally preferred over the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) when the debt-to-equity ratio is not constant, such as in leveraged buyouts, project finance, or when there are significant non-debt financing side effects. WACC assumes a stable capital structure, which might not hold true for all valuation scenarios.

What are the main components of Adjusted Forecast Present Value?

The main components of Adjusted Forecast Present Value are the unlevered value of the firm or project (the value of its operations assuming no debt) and the present value of any financing side effects. The most common and significant financing side effect is the tax shield generated by tax-deductible interest payments on debt.

Does Adjusted Forecast Present Value account for risk?

Yes, Adjusted Forecast Present Value accounts for risk by using appropriate discount rates for each component. The unlevered free cash flows are discounted at the unlevered cost of equity, which reflects the business risk of the operations. The tax shields are typically discounted at the cost of debt or a risk-free rate, reflecting the specific risk associated with those financial benefits.