Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to A Definitions

Adjusted free earnings

What Is Adjusted Free Earnings?

Adjusted free earnings is a non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) financial metric that aims to present a company's true operational cash generation capability by modifying traditional earnings or cash flow figures. It belongs to the broader category of financial metrics and represents the cash a company generates after accounting for operational expenses and essential capital investments, further adjusted by management for items deemed non-recurring, non-cash, or non-operational. While not standardized under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), adjusted free earnings seeks to offer a clearer view of a company's sustainable core performance than net income alone, particularly for internal analysis or investor presentations. It emphasizes the cash available for debt repayment, dividends, or strategic initiatives after covering necessary business outlays.

History and Origin

The concept of "adjusted" earnings and cash flow measures, including adjusted free earnings, has evolved alongside the increasing complexity of corporate financial structures and a desire by management to highlight specific aspects of a company's performance. While the statement of cash flows was formally mandated in the U.S. with the issuance of FASB Statement No. 95 in 1987, providing a standardized view of cash generation from operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities, the practice of reporting non-GAAP financial measures gained prominence in the 1990s.5

Companies, particularly in technology and rapidly evolving industries, began providing supplemental disclosures that they argued offered investors improved insight into the "core" or "ongoing" earnings of the business. The motivation was often to exclude certain non-recurring revenues or expenses that might obscure the underlying operational profitability. This proliferation led the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to issue cautionary advice in 2001, warning investors that such measures could be misleading if they obscured GAAP results. Subsequently, as mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC adopted Regulation G in 2003, which established conditions for the disclosure of non-GAAP financial measures and required firms to provide a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.4 Despite regulatory efforts, the use and variety of non-GAAP metrics, including various forms of adjusted free earnings, have continued to expand, often with the aim of providing what management believes is a more relevant picture of performance.

Key Takeaways

  • Adjusted free earnings is a non-GAAP financial metric used by companies to showcase their operational cash-generating ability after accounting for essential investments and specific managerial adjustments.
  • It typically starts with a measure of operating cash flow or earnings and subtracts capital expenditures, then applies further adjustments for non-cash or non-recurring items.
  • The primary purpose of adjusted free earnings is to highlight the cash available for discretionary use, such as reducing debt, paying dividends, or funding growth initiatives.
  • Because it is a non-GAAP measure, its calculation can vary significantly between companies and even within the same company over different periods, making comparability challenging.
  • While it can provide valuable insights into a company's underlying cash performance, users should scrutinize the nature and consistency of the adjustments made to avoid misinterpretation.

Formula and Calculation

The formula for adjusted free earnings is not standardized and can vary significantly from company to company, as it is a non-GAAP measure. However, it generally begins with a measure of operating profitability or cash flow and then applies specific adjustments. A common conceptual approach would be:

Adjusted Free Earnings=Operating Cash Flow−Capital Expenditures±Other Management Adjustments\text{Adjusted Free Earnings} = \text{Operating Cash Flow} - \text{Capital Expenditures} \pm \text{Other Management Adjustments}

Where:

  • Operating Cash Flow: Cash generated from a company's normal business operations before any non-operating or financing activities.
  • Capital Expenditures: Funds used by a company to acquire, upgrade, and maintain physical assets such as property, plants, industrial buildings, or equipment. These are essential investments for maintaining or growing the business.
  • Other Management Adjustments: These are the discretionary modifications made by management. They might include adding back non-cash expenses like depreciation and amortization (if starting from net income), or excluding the impact of one-time gains, losses, restructuring charges, acquisition-related costs, or changes in working capital that management views as non-representative of ongoing operations. The specific nature of these adjustments is crucial for understanding the metric.

Interpreting the Adjusted Free Earnings

Interpreting adjusted free earnings requires a critical eye, as its non-GAAP nature means there's no universal standard for its calculation. Generally, a higher adjusted free earnings figure suggests a company is generating ample cash from its core operations to cover its essential capital needs and has excess cash for other uses. It can indicate strong operational efficiency and self-sufficiency, suggesting the company doesn't need to rely heavily on external financing activities for its ongoing operations and growth.

However, the key to proper interpretation lies in understanding the "adjustments" made. Stakeholders should analyze what specific items management has added back or excluded from the GAAP figures. Are these adjustments truly non-recurring, or do they represent regular costs of doing business that management is attempting to deemphasize? Comparing a company's adjusted free earnings to its reported GAAP cash flows from operations and total cash flows can reveal significant disparities. Investors should also compare the trend of adjusted free earnings over several periods, and examine how it aligns with the company's investing activities and strategic goals.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "Tech Innovations Inc.," a hypothetical software company. For the fiscal year, Tech Innovations Inc. reports the following:

  • Net Income: $50 million
  • Depreciation and Amortization: $10 million
  • Change in Working Capital: -$5 million (decrease in working capital)
  • Capital Expenditures: $15 million
  • One-time restructuring charge (non-cash impairment): $8 million
  • One-time gain from asset sale (cash inflow): $3 million

Let's calculate Tech Innovations Inc.'s adjusted free earnings.
First, we'll determine the cash flow from operations, starting from the income statement's net income:

  1. Start with Net Income: $50 million
  2. Add back non-cash expenses:
    • Depreciation and Amortization: +$10 million
    • One-time restructuring charge (non-cash impairment): +$8 million
    • Subtotal for operating cash flow before working capital: $50 + $10 + $8 = $68 million
  3. Adjust for changes in working capital:
    • Decrease in working capital: +$5 million (a decrease in assets or increase in liabilities adds cash)
    • Operating Cash Flow: $68 million + $5 million = $73 million

Now, let's calculate the adjusted free earnings from the operating cash flow:

  1. Operating Cash Flow: $73 million
  2. Subtract Capital Expenditures: -$15 million
    • Subtotal: $73 - $15 = $58 million
  3. Apply "Other Management Adjustments": Assume management considers the one-time gain from asset sale as non-operational for purposes of core free earnings, so they exclude it.
    • One-time gain from asset sale: -$3 million (to exclude it from this operational measure)
    • Adjusted Free Earnings: $58 million - $3 million = $55 million

In this scenario, Tech Innovations Inc.'s adjusted free earnings of $55 million reflects the cash generated by its core operations after necessary investments, excluding items management considers non-representative of ongoing performance. This figure could then be compared against the company's balance sheet and other financial statements for a comprehensive analysis.

Practical Applications

Adjusted free earnings, though a non-GAAP measure, offers several practical applications for investors, analysts, and internal management. Companies often present this metric in earnings releases, investor presentations, or supplemental reports to provide a tailored view of their financial health and operational efficiency. It can be particularly useful for:

  • Valuation Models: Analysts may use adjusted free earnings in various valuation models, such as discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, believing it provides a more accurate representation of the cash flows truly available to the business for distribution or reinvestment.
  • Assessing Operational Performance: Management frequently uses adjusted free earnings internally to assess the performance of core operations, independent of non-recurring events or specific accounting treatments. This helps in strategic planning, budgeting, and evaluating the effectiveness of operational initiatives.
  • Capital Allocation Decisions: A robust adjusted free earnings figure indicates a company's ability to fund its growth, pay down debt, repurchase shares, or issue dividends without external financing. This helps management and boards make informed decisions about capital allocation.
  • Comparative Analysis (with caution): While direct comparisons between different companies using adjusted free earnings can be challenging due to varied calculation methodologies, analysts may use it to compare a company against its own historical performance, adjusting for known changes in reporting.
  • Complementing GAAP Measures: The SEC emphasizes the integral role of the statement of cash flows within a complete set of financial statements, stressing that it should be subject to the same level of scrutiny and audit as other financial statements.3 Adjusted free earnings can complement GAAP measures like earnings per share (EPS) and EBITDA by providing a cash-centric view that purports to strip out "noise" from the GAAP figures.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its potential insights, adjusted free earnings faces significant limitations and criticisms primarily because it is a non-GAAP financial measure. The primary concern is the lack of standardization, which allows companies considerable discretion in its calculation. This can lead to:

  • Lack of Comparability: Without a universal definition, adjusted free earnings from one company cannot be directly compared to that of another, and even within the same company, the adjustments may change over time. This makes peer analysis and trend analysis difficult and potentially misleading.
  • Potential for Manipulation: The flexibility in making "adjustments" can be exploited by management to present a more favorable financial picture. Companies might consistently exclude recurring expenses or unusual charges that are, in fact, integral to their business operations, thereby inflating their reported adjusted free earnings. Academic research has long debated whether non-GAAP disclosures are primarily informative or opportunistic.2
  • Obscuring Real Performance: By removing certain expenses or revenues, adjusted free earnings might obscure underlying financial issues or the true cost of doing business. For instance, frequently excluding "restructuring costs" might hide persistent operational inefficiencies requiring ongoing overhauls. Similarly, adjusting out costs like depreciation and amortization may overstate cash generation without reflecting the actual consumption of assets that will eventually need replacement.
  • Inconsistency and Opacity: The specific adjustments can be complex and are sometimes not clearly explained, making it difficult for investors to understand the true impact of the exclusions or additions. The SEC's Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) for Non-GAAP Financial Measures emphasize the need for clear labeling, prominent reconciliation to GAAP, and balanced disclosure to mitigate these risks.1

Investors and analysts must exercise caution and thoroughly review the reconciliation of adjusted free earnings to its most comparable GAAP measure to understand the nature and consistency of the adjustments made.

Adjusted Free Earnings vs. Free Cash Flow

Adjusted free earnings and free cash flow (FCF) are closely related financial metrics, both aiming to measure a company's cash-generating ability after covering operational and investment needs. However, the distinction lies in the "adjusted" component.

Free cash flow, in its most common definitions, generally calculates the cash available after deducting capital expenditures from operating cash flow. It represents the cash flow truly available to all providers of capital (both debt and equity) after maintaining or expanding the asset base. While FCF itself is often considered a non-GAAP measure by regulators because it's derived from GAAP figures but not presented as a primary GAAP statement, its calculation tends to be more standardized than "adjusted free earnings."

Adjusted free earnings goes a step further by incorporating additional discretionary "adjustments" determined by management. These adjustments might include adding back or subtracting items that management deems non-recurring, non-cash, or outside the scope of "core" operations, even if they are part of the standard FCF calculation. For example, a company might present adjusted free earnings that excludes the impact of certain litigation settlements or specific one-time gains/losses that would typically remain within the calculation of free cash flow. The intent is often to present a cleaner, more predictable picture of ongoing cash generation, but this added layer of adjustment can also introduce more subjectivity and reduce comparability.

FAQs

What is the primary difference between Adjusted Free Earnings and GAAP earnings?

The primary difference is that GAAP earnings, such as net income, are calculated strictly according to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), providing a standardized and auditable measure of profitability. Adjusted free earnings, conversely, is a non-GAAP metric that modifies GAAP figures (often net income or operating cash flow) by adding back or subtracting items management deems non-recurring or non-operational to present a different view of cash generation.

Why do companies report Adjusted Free Earnings if it's not a GAAP measure?

Companies report adjusted free earnings to provide what they believe is a clearer picture of their core operational cash-generating ability. They might argue that certain GAAP-required expenses or revenues distort the view of their ongoing performance, especially for one-time events. This metric can help management communicate their strategic vision and highlight the cash available for discretionary purposes, such as debt reduction or shareholder distributions, which is not always immediately apparent from the statement of cash flows or GAAP net income.

Is Adjusted Free Earnings audited?

While the underlying components of adjusted free earnings are derived from audited financial statements (like the income statement and statement of cash flows), the adjusted free earnings figure itself, as a non-GAAP measure, is typically not subject to the same level of direct audit scrutiny as GAAP financial statements. Companies are required by the SEC to reconcile non-GAAP measures to their most directly comparable GAAP measure, which provides some level of transparency, but the specific adjustments are largely at management's discretion.

Can Adjusted Free Earnings be negative?

Yes, adjusted free earnings can be negative. A negative figure indicates that a company's cash generated from core operations, after accounting for essential investments and management's adjustments, is insufficient to cover its outlays. This could signal financial distress, excessive capital expenditures relative to cash generation, or a period of significant operational challenges, even after applying management's intended "clean-up" adjustments.