Skip to main content
← Back to A Definitions

Adjusted free swap

What Is Adjusted Free Swap?

An Adjusted Free Swap represents the valuation of a derivative contract, typically an interest rate swap, that has been modified from its theoretical fair value to account for additional costs and benefits associated with its funding and execution in real-world trading. This concept falls under the broader category of derivatives valuation. Unlike a purely theoretical fair value that assumes risk-free funding, an Adjusted Free Swap incorporates factors such as the cost of funding the trade, the benefit of collateral received, and capital charges. This adjustment is particularly relevant for financial institutions dealing with large portfolios of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, where bilateral agreements often involve complex funding and collateral arrangements. The term "Adjusted Free Swap" emphasizes that the valuation is "free" of certain theoretical assumptions, reflecting actual market and institutional realities.

History and Origin

The concept of adjustments to derivative valuations, such as those implied by an Adjusted Free Swap, gained significant prominence after the 2008 financial crisis. Before the crisis, the valuation of derivatives often primarily focused on theoretical risk-neutral pricing, where a single, universally applicable risk-free rate was assumed. However, the crisis exposed vulnerabilities in the over-the-counter (OTC) market, highlighting the importance of factors like counterparty risk, funding costs, and collateral management.

Regulators and financial institutions began to scrutinize the systemic implications of uncollateralized or poorly managed derivatives exposures. Post-crisis reforms, notably those stemming from the G20 agreement, aimed to reduce systemic risk and increase transparency in OTC derivatives markets by promoting central clearing and imposing stricter margin and capital requirements.10,9 This shift necessitated a more comprehensive approach to valuation, leading to the development and widespread adoption of various valuation adjustments (XVAs), including Funding Value Adjustment (FVA), Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA), and Debt Valuation Adjustment (DVA). An Adjusted Free Swap reflects this evolution, where the "free" aspect refers to the inclusion of these real-world market frictions and costs that move beyond the initial theoretical framework. The Financial Stability Board (FSB) has reported on the implementation progress of these OTC derivatives market reforms, underscoring their significance in the financial landscape.8

Key Takeaways

  • An Adjusted Free Swap considers the actual cost of funding and other real-world factors beyond theoretical fair value.
  • It is particularly relevant for financial institutions engaged in over-the-counter (OTC) market derivative transactions.
  • The adjustments reflect market frictions, such as varying funding rates and the impact of collateral agreements.
  • The concept evolved significantly after the 2008 financial crisis, driven by regulatory reforms aimed at strengthening financial stability.
  • An Adjusted Free Swap aims to provide a more accurate picture of a derivative's value from the perspective of a trading desk or financial institution, incorporating profit and loss considerations.

Formula and Calculation

The valuation of an Adjusted Free Swap incorporates several components beyond the basic fair value of the underlying swap. While there isn't a single universal formula for "Adjusted Free Swap," it typically integrates the traditional risk-neutral valuation with various valuation adjustments (XVAs). The primary adjustment often considered within the context of an Adjusted Free Swap is the Funding Value Adjustment (FVA).

The Funding Value Adjustment (FVA) accounts for the funding costs or benefits associated with hedging an uncollateralized derivative position. It can be calculated as the present value of the expected future funding costs or benefits over the life of the derivative.7

A simplified representation of how an Adjusted Free Swap might be conceptualized, integrating FVA, is:

Adjusted Free Swap Value=Fair Value of Swap+FVA+Other XVAs\text{Adjusted Free Swap Value} = \text{Fair Value of Swap} + \text{FVA} + \text{Other XVAs}

Where:

  • Fair Value of Swap: The theoretical value of the swap calculated under risk-neutral pricing assumptions, typically discounting expected cash flows at a risk-free rate.

  • FVA (Funding Value Adjustment):

    FVA=0TDF(t)(Funding Spread)EE(t)dt\text{FVA} = \int_{0}^{T} DF(t) \cdot (\text{Funding Spread}) \cdot \text{EE}(t) \, dt

    Where:

    • (DF(t)) represents the discount factor at time (t).
    • Funding Spread: The difference between the institution's actual funding rate and the risk-free rate, reflecting its cost of borrowing.
    • EE(t) (Expected Exposure): The expected positive exposure of the derivative at time (t), representing the potential loss if the counterparty defaults.
    • (T) is the maturity of the derivative contract.
  • Other XVAs: This can include, but is not limited to:

    • CVA (Credit Valuation Adjustment): An adjustment for the potential loss due to counterparty default.
    • DVA (Debt Valuation Adjustment): An adjustment reflecting the benefit to the institution from its own credit risk.
    • KVA (Capital Valuation Adjustment): An adjustment for the cost of regulatory capital required to hold the derivative.
    • MVA (Margin Valuation Adjustment): An adjustment for the funding cost of initial margin.

These components are crucial for institutions to accurately price and manage the profit and loss (P&L) associated with their derivatives portfolios.

Interpreting the Adjusted Free Swap

Interpreting an Adjusted Free Swap involves understanding that its value moves beyond a purely theoretical construct to reflect the true economic cost or benefit for a financial institution. When a bank quotes a price for an Adjusted Free Swap, it incorporates its own funding costs, collateral agreements, and regulatory capital requirements. A positive Adjusted Free Swap value from the perspective of the financial institution implies that, after accounting for all these real-world factors, the transaction is expected to be profitable for the dealer. Conversely, a negative value would indicate an expected loss.

The interpretation also considers the impact of risk management practices. For example, if a swap is fully collateralized with high-quality liquid assets, the funding costs associated with that position might be lower, leading to a smaller FVA and thus an Adjusted Free Swap value closer to its theoretical fair value. The level of transparency and standardization in the over-the-counter (OTC) market for derivatives also influences how these adjustments are calculated and applied.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a financial institution, "Global Bank," entering into an interest rate swap with a corporate client, "TechCorp." The swap has a notional value of $100 million and a maturity of five years.

Scenario 1: Fair Value Calculation
Initially, Global Bank calculates the theoretical fair value of the swap based on prevailing market interest rates and discounting at a theoretical risk-free rate. Let's assume this fair value is calculated to be $1 million in favor of TechCorp (meaning Global Bank would owe TechCorp $1 million if the swap were terminated today, based purely on interest rate differentials).

Scenario 2: Adjusted Free Swap Calculation
Now, Global Bank needs to consider its own funding costs and other operational realities to determine the Adjusted Free Swap value:

  1. Funding Costs (FVA): Due to its credit rating and market conditions, Global Bank's internal funding rate is 50 basis points (0.50%) higher than the risk-free rate used in the fair value calculation. This difference in funding creates a cost for Global Bank over the life of the swap, especially if the swap tends to be "in the money" for the client (i.e., Global Bank has a positive exposure to the client). Let's assume, after modeling expected exposure, the present value of this funding cost (FVA) is determined to be $200,000 for Global Bank.
  2. Collateral: TechCorp is a new client and provides only partial collateral, leaving a portion of the exposure uncollateralized. This increases Global Bank's counterparty risk and associated capital charges.
  3. Other Adjustments (e.g., KVA, MVA): Global Bank also factors in the cost of the regulatory capital it must hold against the uncollateralized exposure (KVA) and the funding cost of any initial margin received (MVA). Suppose these sum to an additional $50,000 cost.

Calculation:
Adjusted Free Swap Value = Fair Value of Swap + FVA (cost) + Other XVAs (cost)
Adjusted Free Swap Value = -$1,000,000 (owed to client) - $200,000 (FVA cost) - $50,000 (Other XVAs cost)
Adjusted Free Swap Value = -$1,250,000

In this hypothetical example, the Adjusted Free Swap value for Global Bank is -$1,250,000. This means that while the theoretical fair value indicates an outflow of $1 million, the actual economic cost to Global Bank, considering its funding and regulatory burdens, is $1.25 million. This Adjusted Free Swap value guides Global Bank in pricing the swap to its client and managing its overall risk management strategy.

Practical Applications

The concept of an Adjusted Free Swap, encompassing the various valuation adjustments, is crucial in several practical aspects of financial markets, particularly within large financial institutions.

  1. Derivative Pricing and Quoting: Financial institutions use the Adjusted Free Swap value to determine the actual price at which they can offer over-the-counter (OTC) market derivatives to clients. This ensures that the price reflects the bank's true economic cost, including its funding, collateral requirements, and regulatory capital.
  2. Profit and Loss (P&L) Attribution: Traders and risk managers rely on Adjusted Free Swap valuations to accurately attribute P&L to different aspects of a derivatives trade. This helps in understanding whether profits or losses stem from market movements, funding costs, or credit risk.
  3. Risk Management and Capital Allocation: By incorporating various XVA components into the Adjusted Free Swap, institutions gain a more comprehensive view of their overall risk management exposure. This informs decisions on capital allocation, helping banks hold appropriate levels of regulatory capital as mandated by frameworks like Basel III. Basel III, a global regulatory framework, includes specific provisions for capital requirements and collateral for derivatives exposures.6
  4. Hedge Effectiveness: When institutions use other derivatives for hedging purposes, understanding the Adjusted Free Swap of their underlying positions allows them to assess the true effectiveness of their hedges, taking into account funding and credit considerations.
  5. Strategic Business Decisions: The Adjusted Free Swap helps in evaluating the profitability of different business lines or client segments. For instance, clients who provide full collateral or have high credit quality might generate more favorable Adjusted Free Swap values for the bank, influencing client relationship strategies. The Financial Stability Board (FSB) has continued to monitor and report on the implementation of OTC derivatives market reforms, underscoring the ongoing impact of these adjustments on market practices.5

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its importance in practical derivatives valuation, the Adjusted Free Swap concept, particularly its constituent valuation adjustments, faces several limitations and criticisms:

  1. Model Dependency and Complexity: The calculation of various XVAs, especially Funding Value Adjustment (FVA), relies heavily on complex models for expected exposure, default probabilities, and correlation assumptions. These models can be highly sensitive to input parameters and may not perfectly capture real-world market dynamics, leading to significant model risk.4
  2. Lack of Market Consistency: While the concept of an Adjusted Free Swap is widely adopted internally by financial institutions, there can be inconsistencies in methodologies across different firms. This makes it challenging to compare valuations or create a truly transparent market for these adjusted prices, particularly in the opaque over-the-counter (OTC) market.
  3. Arbitrage Opportunities: Some critics argue that incorporating funding costs (FVA) into the derivative price can create theoretical arbitrage opportunities for sophisticated market participants if there are differences in funding rates or collateralization capabilities between institutions. This can lead to conflicts between theoretical fair value principles and the practical need to recover funding costs.3
  4. Accounting Treatment Discrepancies: The inclusion of adjustments like FVA can sometimes create discrepancies with traditional accounting standards, which often emphasize fair value based on observable market inputs. This can lead to challenges in reporting and reconciling internal valuations with external financial statements.
  5. Double Counting Concerns: There have been debates regarding the potential for "double counting" of certain risks when multiple XVAs are applied, especially where credit risk and funding costs might overlap in their impact on the derivative's value.
  6. Regulatory Scrutiny: While regulators have pushed for more comprehensive risk management, the specific treatment and calculation of each XVA remain areas of ongoing discussion and evolving guidance, particularly under frameworks like Basel III.2

Adjusted Free Swap vs. Funding Value Adjustment (FVA)

While closely related, "Adjusted Free Swap" and "Funding Value Adjustment (FVA)" refer to distinct concepts in derivatives valuation. The Funding Value Adjustment (FVA) is a specific component that quantifies the cost or benefit of funding an uncollateralized derivative position. It accounts for the difference between a financial institution's actual funding rate and the theoretical risk-free rate used in traditional derivative pricing.1

An Adjusted Free Swap, on the other hand, is the broader term for the overall valuation of a swap that has been modified from its theoretical fair value to reflect real-world market frictions. This comprehensive adjustment includes FVA, but may also incorporate other valuation adjustments, such as Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA), Debt Valuation Adjustment (DVA), Capital Valuation Adjustment (KVA), and Margin Valuation Adjustment (MVA). Therefore, FVA is a crucial part of what constitutes an Adjusted Free Swap, but the Adjusted Free Swap encompasses a wider array of adjustments beyond just funding costs. The "free" aspect implies that the valuation is "free" from the strict theoretical assumptions, making it more reflective of the actual economic cost or benefit to the trading entity.

FAQs

What is the primary purpose of an Adjusted Free Swap?

The primary purpose of an Adjusted Free Swap is to provide a more realistic and economically accurate valuation of a derivative for a financial institution, moving beyond theoretical fair value by incorporating real-world factors like funding costs, collateral benefits, and regulatory capital requirements.

Why did the concept of adjustments like Adjusted Free Swap become important?

The concept became increasingly important after the 2008 financial crisis, which exposed the significant impact of counterparty risk and funding costs on derivative valuations, especially in the over-the-counter (OTC) market. Regulators and market participants sought more robust and comprehensive valuation methodologies.

Does an Adjusted Free Swap apply to all types of financial instruments?

While the principles of valuation adjustments can be applied to various financial instruments, the concept of an Adjusted Free Swap is most commonly and significantly applied to over-the-counter (OTC) market derivatives, such as interest rate swaps, due to their bilateral nature and the associated funding and credit risks.

Is the Adjusted Free Swap a standardized industry term?

While the underlying adjustments (XVAs) are widely recognized and discussed within the financial industry, "Adjusted Free Swap" might be a more generalized term used to describe the overall adjusted valuation of a swap, rather than a strictly standardized calculation methodology. The specific components and their calculation can vary between institutions.