Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to A Definitions

Adjusted growth present value

What Is Adjusted Growth Present Value?

Adjusted Growth Present Value is a valuation approach that combines the principles of present value with explicit consideration and potential adjustment of growth assumptions within a project or firm's cash flows, often in scenarios involving unique financing structures. This concept falls under the broader umbrella of Corporate Finance and Valuation methodologies. While not a universally standardized term with a single formula, Adjusted Growth Present Value typically refers to a systematic method for calculating the present-day worth of future cash flows that are expected to grow, while also accounting for the specific financial side effects, such as the benefits of debt financing or other non-operating factors.

The core idea is to move beyond a simple Discount Rate application to future Cash Flow streams by isolating and explicitly valuing components like growth opportunities and the impact of capital structure decisions. This method allows analysts to assess the value of assets or projects with complex characteristics, where future growth is a significant driver of value and financing plays a distinct role.

History and Origin

The foundational concept of Present Value has deep historical roots, with early forms of discounting future sums appearing as far back as the 13th century in the works of Leonardo Pisano, also known as Fibonacci, who discussed such ideas in his Liber abbaci.10 Over centuries, the concept evolved, becoming a cornerstone of modern finance with significant contributions from economists like Irving Fisher in the early 20th century.9

The specific methodology of separating a firm's operating value from its financing effects, which is central to the "adjusted" aspect of Adjusted Growth Present Value, was formalized with the introduction of the Adjusted Present Value (APV) method in 1974 by Stewart Myers. Myers's innovation provided a framework for valuing projects or companies by first calculating their value as if they were entirely equity-financed (unlevered), and then adding the present value of financing side effects, most notably the Tax Shield from interest deductions.

Concurrently, the treatment of growth in valuation models also developed, leading to concepts like the present value of a growing annuity or growing perpetuity, which explicitly incorporate a Growth Rate into the discounting process for a stream of payments.8 Adjusted Growth Present Value represents an advanced application of these valuation principles, where both the growth characteristics of the underlying Cash Flow and the "adjustments" for financing or other specific factors are explicitly considered to arrive at a more precise Investment Analysis. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has also provided conceptual guidance on using cash flow information and present value in accounting measurements, emphasizing their role in financial reporting.7

Key Takeaways

  • Adjusted Growth Present Value is a valuation technique that combines growth assumptions with specific financing adjustments to determine present value.
  • It typically involves calculating the unlevered value of a growing stream of cash flows and then adding or subtracting the present value of financing side effects.
  • This method is particularly useful for projects or companies with significant debt, changing Capital Structure, or complex financing arrangements.
  • It provides a flexible framework, allowing for separate analysis of operational value drivers and the impact of financial decisions.
  • The accuracy of Adjusted Growth Present Value is highly sensitive to the assumptions made about future growth rates and the timing and magnitude of financing effects.

Formula and Calculation

The Adjusted Growth Present Value approach builds upon the Adjusted Present Value (APV) framework, adapting it to scenarios where cash flows exhibit a distinct growth pattern. Instead of a single, universally recognized formula for "Adjusted Growth Present Value," the calculation involves two primary components:

  1. Present Value of Unlevered Cash Flows with Growth: This component calculates the Present Value of the projected Cash Flow streams, assuming the project or firm is financed solely by equity (i.e., no debt). The key here is that these cash flows are expected to grow over time. This can be calculated using models for growing annuities or growing perpetuities, discounted by the unlevered cost of equity or the cost of assets.

    For a period of discrete, growing cash flows:
    PVunlevered, growing=∑t=1NFCFFt(1+ru)tPV_{\text{unlevered, growing}} = \sum_{t=1}^{N} \frac{FCFF_t}{(1 + r_u)^t}
    Where:

    • (FCFF_t) = Free Cash Flow to Firm in period (t), incorporating growth.
    • (r_u) = Unlevered cost of equity (cost of capital for an all-equity firm).
    • (N) = Number of periods.

    If cash flows are expected to grow at a constant rate (g) indefinitely after a certain point (terminal value):
    TV=FCFFN+1(ru−g)TV = \frac{FCFF_{N+1}}{(r_u - g)}
    Where (TV) is the Terminal Value, discounted back to present.

  2. Present Value of Financing Effects (Adjustments): This component calculates the Present Value of the financial benefits or costs associated with the specific Capital Structure. The most common adjustment is the Tax Shield generated by interest payments on debt, as interest expenses are typically tax-deductible.

    PVTax Shield=∑t=1N(Interest Expenset×Tax Rate)(1+kd)tPV_{\text{Tax Shield}} = \sum_{t=1}^{N} \frac{(\text{Interest Expense}_t \times \text{Tax Rate})}{(1 + k_d)^t}
    Where:

    • (\text{Interest Expense}_t) = Interest paid on debt in period (t).
    • (\text{Tax Rate}) = Corporate income tax rate.
    • (k_d) = Cost of debt.

    The overall Adjusted Growth Present Value is then:
    Adjusted Growth Present Value=PVunlevered, growing+PVTax Shield+Other Financing Effects\text{Adjusted Growth Present Value} = PV_{\text{unlevered, growing}} + PV_{\text{Tax Shield}} + \text{Other Financing Effects}

Other financing effects might include the Present Value of subsidized debt, costs of financial distress, or specific grants. Each of these components is valued separately and then summed to determine the overall Adjusted Growth Present Value.

Interpreting the Adjusted Growth Present Value

Interpreting the Adjusted Growth Present Value involves understanding its components and what the final calculated value signifies. A positive Adjusted Growth Present Value suggests that the project or company, considering its growing operational Cash Flow and specific financing advantages (like Tax Shields), is expected to generate value in excess of its costs. Conversely, a negative value indicates that it may destroy value.

This metric provides a clear picture of how much value is created by the underlying business operations (represented by the unlevered cash flows) and how much additional value, or erosion, stems from financing decisions. Unlike the Net Present Value method that often uses the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) to discount all cash flows, the Adjusted Growth Present Value explicitly separates the impact of financing. This separation allows analysts to evaluate the project's intrinsic profitability independent of its funding mix, then layer in the specific advantages or disadvantages of its chosen Capital Structure. It is especially insightful when dealing with dynamic financing situations, such as those where debt levels change over time. By isolating these effects, decision-makers can gain deeper insights into the drivers of value and make more informed capital budgeting and Project Finance decisions.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "GreenTech Innovations," a startup developing a new energy-efficient appliance. The company is evaluating a new production line project expected to generate growing free cash flows to the firm (FCFF) over five years, after which growth is expected to stabilize. GreenTech plans to finance part of this project with debt, leading to tax shield benefits.

Assumptions:

  • Initial Investment: $1,000,000
  • Unlevered Cost of Equity ((r_u)): 15%
  • Cost of Debt ((k_d)): 8%
  • Corporate Tax Rate: 25%
  • Projected Annual FCFF (unlevered):
    • Year 1: $200,000 (growing at 10% per year for the first 3 years, then 5% for years 4 and 5)
    • Year 2: $220,000 ($200,000 * 1.10)
    • Year 3: $242,000 ($220,000 * 1.10)
    • Year 4: $254,100 ($242,000 * 1.05)
    • Year 5: $266,805 ($254,100 * 1.05)
  • Debt Structure: $400,000 in debt at 8% interest for the first 3 years, then paid down to $200,000 for years 4 and 5.

Step-by-Step Calculation of Adjusted Growth Present Value:

1. Calculate Present Value of Unlevered Growing FCFF:

  • Year 1: $200,000 / (1 + 0.15)^1 = $173,913.04
  • Year 2: $220,000 / (1 + 0.15)^2 = $166,482.49
  • Year 3: $242,000 / (1 + 0.15)^3 = $159,380.70
  • Year 4: $254,100 / (1 + 0.15)^4 = $145,283.43
  • Year 5: $266,805 / (1 + 0.15)^5 = $132,192.83

Total PV of Unlevered Growing FCFF = $173,913.04 + $166,482.49 + $159,380.70 + $145,283.43 + $132,192.83 = $777,252.49

2. Calculate Present Value of Tax Shield:

  • Year 1 Interest: $400,000 * 0.08 = $32,000
    • Tax Shield: $32,000 * 0.25 = $8,000
    • PV of Year 1 Tax Shield: $8,000 / (1 + 0.08)^1 = $7,407.41
  • Year 2 Interest: $32,000
    • Tax Shield: $8,000
    • PV of Year 2 Tax Shield: $8,000 / (1 + 0.08)^2 = $6,858.71
  • Year 3 Interest: $32,000
    • Tax Shield: $8,000
    • PV of Year 3 Tax Shield: $8,000 / (1 + 0.08)^3 = $6,350.66
  • Year 4 Interest: $200,000 * 0.08 = $16,000
    • Tax Shield: $16,000 * 0.25 = $4,000
    • PV of Year 4 Tax Shield: $4,000 / (1 + 0.08)^4 = $2,940.12
  • Year 5 Interest: $16,000
    • Tax Shield: $4,000
    • PV of Year 5 Tax Shield: $4,000 / (1 + 0.08)^5 = $2,722.33

Total PV of Tax Shield = $7,407.41 + $6,858.71 + $6,350.66 + $2,940.12 + $2,722.33 = $26,279.23

3. Calculate Adjusted Growth Present Value:

Adjusted Growth Present Value = (Total PV of Unlevered Growing FCFF) + (Total PV of Tax Shield) - (Initial Investment)

Adjusted Growth Present Value = $777,252.49 + $26,279.23 - $1,000,000 = -$196,468.28

In this hypothetical example, the Adjusted Growth Present Value is negative. Despite the growing cash flows and the benefits from the Tax Shield, the project's overall value, when accounting for the initial outlay and discounted at the appropriate rates, does not exceed its cost. This suggests that GreenTech Innovations should reconsider or modify the project. This structured Financial Modeling provides clear insights into the project's viability.

Practical Applications

Adjusted Growth Present Value is particularly valuable in situations where the growth of future Cash Flows is a significant factor, and the financing structure is complex or expected to change over time. Its applications span several areas of Corporate Finance and Investment Analysis:

  • Highly Leveraged Transactions: In deals like a Leveraged Buyout (LBO), where the debt structure is intricate and typically changes significantly over the life of the investment, Adjusted Growth Present Value allows for a clearer assessment of value. The method can separately model the benefits of substantial Tax Shields arising from high interest payments.5, 6
  • Project Finance: For large-scale projects, especially those with non-constant debt levels or unique subsidy arrangements, this approach can provide a more granular valuation. It helps determine the viability of a project by explicitly considering both its operational growth potential and the specific financial support or costs associated with its funding.
  • Companies with Evolving Capital Structures: Businesses that anticipate significant shifts in their Capital Structure, perhaps due to future debt issuance, repayment plans, or changes in tax laws, can use Adjusted Growth Present Value to model these effects more accurately than methods relying on a static Weighted Average Cost of Capital.
  • Valuation of Growth Companies: When valuing companies where a substantial portion of their present value is derived from expected future growth, particularly if that growth is tied to specific investment or financing activities, this method can offer a more nuanced perspective.
  • Economic Forecasting and Policy Analysis: While not directly used by large international organizations like the IMF for their macroeconomic forecasts, the underlying principles of discounting future economic activity and considering various factors are present. The IMF, for instance, employs complex macroeconomic models for its "World Economic Outlook," although limitations in their forecasting methods have been noted.4

This method's ability to isolate and analyze the impact of growth and financing effects makes it a flexible and robust tool for complex financial decision-making.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its advantages in handling complex scenarios, Adjusted Growth Present Value has several limitations and criticisms that analysts must consider.

One of the primary drawbacks is its sensitivity to assumptions, particularly those related to the future Growth Rate of cash flows and the specific financing effects. Small changes in projected growth can lead to significant variations in the calculated Adjusted Growth Present Value, as the effect compounds over time. Similarly, assumptions about future interest rates, debt levels, and tax rates directly impact the Tax Shield component, and inaccuracies here can skew the final valuation. Financial models built on this method require meticulous and well-justified inputs.

Another criticism revolves around complexity. Compared to simpler Net Present Value or Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) models that rely solely on the Weighted Average Cost of Capital, Adjusted Growth Present Value demands more detailed financial projections and a deeper understanding of the interplay between operating and financing activities. This complexity can increase the potential for errors in calculation and make the model harder to audit or explain to non-experts.

Furthermore, accurately forecasting long-term growth is inherently challenging. As Research Affiliates, an investment management firm, has highlighted, relying heavily on historical returns to forecast the future can lead to unrealistic expectations, emphasizing that "starting yields matter to future returns" and acknowledging the challenges of yield-based signals in valuation.2, 3 This applies to growth assumptions as well; while growth is a key value driver, sustaining high growth rates over extended periods is rare, and models often struggle to predict economic slowdowns.

Finally, while the method aims for precision by separating financing effects, the conceptual linkage between operating cash flows and financing decisions can sometimes be blurred in practice. For instance, the exact "unlevered" cost of equity can be difficult to determine with absolute certainty, impacting the discount rate applied to the growing operating Cash Flows.

Adjusted Growth Present Value vs. Adjusted Present Value (APV)

While the terms are closely related, "Adjusted Growth Present Value" can be considered a specific application or emphasis within the broader "Adjusted Present Value (APV)" framework.

Adjusted Present Value (APV) is a widely recognized Valuation method introduced by Stewart Myers. Its core principle is to value a project or company as if it were entirely equity-financed, and then to add or subtract the Present Value of all financing side effects. The most prominent of these financing effects is the Tax Shield provided by interest payments on debt. APV is highly flexible, especially for projects with changing Capital Structure or subsidized debt.1

Adjusted Growth Present Value, as discussed, places a specific emphasis on the growth aspect of the underlying Cash Flow streams within this APV framework. While APV inherently discounts projected cash flows (which may or may not include growth assumptions), the "Growth" in "Adjusted Growth Present Value" highlights that the cash flows being unlevered and then adjusted are explicitly modeled with a Growth Rate, such as in the case of a growing annuity or a growing perpetuity. The "adjustment" still refers to the financing side effects, similar to APV.

The confusion arises because APV models can and often do incorporate growth into the underlying free cash flow projections. However, "Adjusted Growth Present Value" specifically calls out and focuses on the dynamic nature of these growing cash flows, suggesting a scenario where growth is a particularly prominent or complex feature requiring careful consideration and perhaps even specific adjustments to the growth assumptions themselves or to the present value of the growing cash flow streams. In essence, Adjusted Growth Present Value is a more descriptive term for an APV application where the growth trajectory of the project's Cash Flows is a central component of the valuation.

FAQs

What is the core idea behind Adjusted Growth Present Value?

The core idea is to determine the current worth of a future stream of Cash Flows that are expected to grow, while also making specific adjustments for the financial impacts of how the project or company is financed. It separates operational value from financing value.

How is a "tax shield" relevant to this valuation?

A Tax Shield is a reduction in taxable income due to deductible expenses, most commonly interest paid on debt. In Adjusted Growth Present Value, the Present Value of these tax savings is calculated separately and added to the unlevered value of the growing cash flows, as they represent a financial benefit of debt financing.

When is Adjusted Growth Present Value most useful?

This method is particularly useful for complex Valuation scenarios where a project or company has a non-standard or changing Capital Structure, such as in Leveraged Buyouts, or when evaluating projects where the growth pattern of cash flows needs explicit and flexible modeling.

How does it differ from a standard Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model?

A standard Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model typically uses a single Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) to discount all future cash flows. Adjusted Growth Present Value, however, first discounts unlevered cash flows (often with growth built in) using the unlevered cost of equity, and then adds the Present Value of specific financing benefits like Tax Shields. This provides more granular insight into the sources of value.