Skip to main content
← Back to A Definitions

Adjusted growth stock

What Is Adjusted Growth Stock?

An Adjusted Growth Stock refers to a Growth Stock whose financial metrics have been modified from their originally reported figures, often by analysts or investors, to provide a different perspective on its performance and potential. These adjustments are typically made to illuminate underlying operational trends, remove the impact of non-recurring events, or align reported figures more closely with a company's economic reality, especially within the context of Financial Analysis and Valuation. While companies report financial results according to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), these adjusted figures, often called Non-GAAP Metrics, aim to offer a clearer view of a company's sustainable earnings power and growth trajectory.

History and Origin

The concept of growth investing gained prominence in the mid-20th century, with figures like Thomas Rowe Price Jr. often credited as the "father of growth investing" for his pioneering work in the 1950s with the T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund20,,. Initially, identifying growth stocks primarily involved looking at strong revenue and earnings expansion. However, as business models became more complex, particularly with the rise of technology and highly acquisitive companies, the need for a more nuanced view of financial performance emerged.

The practice of making "adjustments" to standard financial statements by analysts and, increasingly, by companies themselves, grew significantly. This was often driven by a desire to present operational results free from the distortions of one-time events, non-cash charges, or specific accounting rules that might obscure a company's underlying profitability or growth. The proliferation of these adjusted financial metrics, especially during periods like the dot-com boom of the late 1990s, led to increased scrutiny by regulators like the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which has since issued guidance on the use and presentation of non-GAAP measures19. The SEC also defines "Emerging Growth Companies," which are allowed reduced disclosure requirements, sometimes leading to a greater reliance on adjusted figures in the early stages of a company's public life18,17,16,15.

Key Takeaways

  • An Adjusted Growth Stock is a growth-oriented company whose financial figures are modified to reflect core operational performance.
  • Adjustments aim to remove the impact of non-recurring items, non-cash expenses, or other elements that may obscure a company's true growth.
  • These adjustments are commonly made by financial analysts for [Valuation] purposes or presented by management as [Non-GAAP Metrics].
  • While they can provide useful insights, adjusted figures are subjective and can potentially be misleading if not properly understood and scrutinized.
  • Understanding the rationale behind specific adjustments is crucial for informed investment decisions.

Formula and Calculation

There isn't a single, universally defined formula for an "Adjusted Growth Stock," as the term refers to the application of various adjustments to a company's standard financial metrics. Instead, the "calculation" involves taking reported GAAP figures and modifying them for specific items. Analysts typically make these adjustments to derive metrics like adjusted net income, adjusted Earnings per Share, or adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization).

Common adjustments may include:

  • Excluding one-time or non-recurring items: This could involve unusual gains or losses from asset sales, legal settlements, restructuring charges, or natural disaster impacts14,13.
  • Adding back non-cash expenses: Such as stock-based compensation, depreciation, and amortization, particularly when analyzing Cash Flow or EBITDA12,11.
  • Normalizing discretionary expenses: For privately held growth companies, this might involve adjusting owner salaries or personal expenses run through the business to reflect market rates10.
  • Accounting for significant accounting policy changes or unusual currency effects: To ensure comparability across periods or with peers9.

For example, to calculate an adjusted net income, an analyst might start with the reported Income Statement net income and then add back or subtract the financial impact of specific items deemed non-operational or non-recurring:

Adjusted Net Income=Reported Net Income±Impact of Non-Recurring Items±Impact of Non-Cash Charges (if applicable)\text{Adjusted Net Income} = \text{Reported Net Income} \pm \text{Impact of Non-Recurring Items} \pm \text{Impact of Non-Cash Charges (if applicable)}

Each adjustment requires careful analysis and judgment, as different items may be considered for adjustment depending on the industry and the specific context of the company.

Interpreting the Adjusted Growth Stock

Interpreting an Adjusted Growth Stock requires a deep understanding of why adjustments were made and their impact on the company's perceived financial health and future prospects. The goal of using adjusted metrics is often to gain a clearer picture of a company's operational performance, free from distortions that GAAP accounting might present, especially for rapidly expanding businesses.

For instance, a growth stock might report a GAAP loss, but its adjusted earnings could show a profit after excluding large, one-time investments in research and development or acquisition-related costs. This adjusted view aims to highlight the core business's profitability and its potential for sustainable growth. Investors and analysts use these adjusted figures to assess a company's underlying efficiency, its ability to generate recurring revenue, and its long-term potential for increasing Earnings per Share and Return on Equity. By normalizing figures, it becomes easier to compare a growth stock against its peers or against its own historical performance, leading to a more informed [Valuation].

Hypothetical Example

Consider a hypothetical technology startup, "InnovateTech Inc.," which is a promising [Growth Stock] aiming to disrupt the market.

InnovateTech Inc. (Year 3 Financials)

  • Revenue: $100 million
  • GAAP Net Income: -$5 million (a loss)

A quick look at the GAAP net income might suggest the company is struggling. However, a financial analyst decides to create an adjusted view:

Adjustments identified from footnotes and analyst calls:

  1. One-time Acquisition Cost: InnovateTech spent $8 million on acquiring a small competitor during the year, which is a non-recurring expense directly impacting the [Income Statement].
  2. Stock-Based Compensation (Non-cash): The company issued $3 million in stock options to key employees, a non-cash expense that dilutes future equity but doesn't directly affect current [Cash Flow].

Calculation of Adjusted Net Income:
The analyst would adjust the GAAP net income:

Adjusted Net Income=GAAP Net Income+Acquisition Cost (one-time)+Stock-Based Compensation (non-cash)\text{Adjusted Net Income} = \text{GAAP Net Income} + \text{Acquisition Cost (one-time)} + \text{Stock-Based Compensation (non-cash)} Adjusted Net Income=$5 million+$8 million+$3 million=$6 million\text{Adjusted Net Income} = -\$5 \text{ million} + \$8 \text{ million} + \$3 \text{ million} = \$6 \text{ million}

In this scenario, while InnovateTech reported a GAAP net loss of $5 million, its adjusted net income is a positive $6 million. This adjusted figure provides a different narrative, suggesting that the core operations are profitable and the loss was primarily due to strategic, one-time investments and non-cash expenses reflected on its [Balance Sheet] through changes in equity and assets. This adjusted view can be critical for investors evaluating the company's operational strength beyond simple GAAP reporting.

Practical Applications

Adjusted financial metrics for growth stocks find wide application in the world of [Investment Strategy], market analysis, and corporate reporting. Investors and analysts frequently utilize these figures to:

  • Improve Comparability: By stripping out unique or non-recurring events, adjusted financials allow for more meaningful comparisons between companies, especially across industries or different stages of growth. This helps in benchmarking performance metrics like [Return on Equity] or profit margins.
  • Assess Core Operational Performance: For a rapidly expanding company, reported GAAP earnings might be depressed by heavy investments in research and development, marketing, or one-time acquisition costs. Adjusted figures aim to reveal the profitability of the ongoing business, providing a truer picture of its operational efficiency and potential for sustained growth8.
  • Enhance [Forecasting]: By normalizing historical data, analysts can develop more reliable financial models and future growth projections for an Adjusted Growth Stock. This aids in better predicting future [Cash Flow] and earnings.
  • Inform [Valuation] Models: Discounted cash flow (DCF) models and other valuation techniques often rely on normalized earnings or cash flows. Adjustments help feed more representative figures into these models, leading to potentially more accurate valuations.
  • Management Compensation and Targets: Companies often use adjusted metrics (e.g., adjusted EBITDA or adjusted [Earnings per Share]) as key performance indicators (KPIs) for internal management targets and executive compensation, arguing they better reflect operational success7.
  • Communication with Investors: Companies, particularly those focused on rapid expansion, may present adjusted results in earnings calls and investor presentations to highlight what they consider the "true" financial health and growth trajectory of the business, often citing that GAAP does not fully capture their unique business dynamics6.

However, the use of these adjustments is not without debate, underscoring the need for careful scrutiny from investors.

Limitations and Criticisms

While intended to provide clearer insights, the use of adjusted financial metrics for an Adjusted Growth Stock faces significant limitations and criticisms. A primary concern is their subjectivity5. Since there are no standardized rules governing how these adjustments are made (unlike [Generally Accepted Accounting Principles]), companies and analysts have considerable discretion. This can lead to inconsistencies in reporting and make comparisons challenging, even between companies in the same industry4.

Critics argue that adjustments can sometimes be used to flatter financial results or obscure underlying weaknesses. For instance, excluding "non-recurring" expenses that happen frequently, or consistently adding back significant stock-based compensation (a real cost of doing business for many growth companies), can lead to an inflated view of profitability3. The former chairman of the SEC, Mary Jo White, highlighted concerns about the increasing prominence and potential misuse of non-GAAP measures, suggesting they could mislead investors2.

Furthermore, an overreliance on adjusted figures might cause investors to overlook critical financial health indicators found in GAAP statements, such as true net income or the company's overall [Capital Structure]. For example, a high adjusted earnings figure might mask substantial debt or continuous [Equity Financing] needed to sustain growth.

Investors must exercise caution and thoroughly understand the nature of each adjustment. It is crucial to reconcile adjusted figures back to their GAAP equivalents to identify what has been excluded or added, and to critically evaluate whether the adjustments truly represent a better measure of sustainable performance or merely an attempt to present a more favorable picture1.

Adjusted Growth Stock vs. Non-GAAP Metrics

The terms "Adjusted Growth Stock" and "Non-GAAP Metrics" are closely related but refer to different concepts.

An Adjusted Growth Stock is a type of company or, more accurately, a view of a [Growth Stock] whose financial performance is analyzed using metrics that have been modified or "adjusted" from standard [Generally Accepted Accounting Principles] (GAAP) reporting. It speaks to the investment approach of evaluating growth companies through a lens that often filters out certain accounting nuances to focus on perceived core operational trends. For example, an investor might analyze an Adjusted Growth Stock by looking at its earnings before certain one-time charges.

Non-GAAP Metrics, on the other hand, are the specific financial measures themselves that deviate from GAAP. These are the tools used to create the "adjusted" view. Common examples include adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income, or free [Cash Flow]. Companies often present these metrics in their earnings reports and investor presentations alongside their GAAP results, providing a reconciliation between the two. The purpose of Non-GAAP Metrics is to offer supplemental information that management believes provides a more accurate or relevant picture of the company's ongoing business performance.

In essence, an Adjusted Growth Stock is what you are analyzing, while Non-GAAP Metrics are the specific calculations or figures you are using for that analysis. The latter is a component of understanding the former.

FAQs

Why are adjustments made to growth stock metrics?

Adjustments are made to growth stock metrics primarily to provide a clearer view of a company's underlying operational performance. For rapidly growing companies, GAAP figures can sometimes be distorted by significant one-time events, non-cash expenses like stock-based compensation, or substantial investments in expansion. Adjustments aim to remove these distortions to help analysts and investors understand the sustainable profitability and growth potential of the core business.

Are adjusted growth stock metrics more accurate than GAAP?

Not necessarily "more accurate," but they can offer a different, often more operationally focused, perspective. GAAP provides a standardized framework, ensuring consistency and comparability across companies. Adjusted metrics, being subjective, can highlight specific aspects of a business but are prone to manipulation or inconsistent application. Investors should always compare adjusted figures with the reported [Generally Accepted Accounting Principles] results.

What are common adjustments for growth stocks?

Common adjustments include excluding one-time acquisition costs, restructuring charges, gains or losses from asset sales, and non-cash expenses such as stock-based compensation or large impairment charges. The goal is to isolate the performance that is expected to recur from the company's regular operations. For example, a company might exclude the impact of a large legal settlement from its earnings to show what its profitability would have been otherwise.

Can adjusted growth stock metrics be misleading?

Yes, adjusted metrics can be misleading if not scrutinized carefully. Because companies define and calculate these metrics themselves, there's a risk they might selectively exclude expenses or include income in a way that inflates performance or disguises underlying issues. For instance, repeatedly excluding "non-recurring" expenses that occur every few years can paint an overly optimistic picture of profitability. Investors should always review the reconciliation to [Generally Accepted Accounting Principles] provided by the company and understand the rationale behind each adjustment.

How do investors use adjusted growth stock metrics?

Investors use adjusted growth stock metrics as supplementary tools for [Financial Analysis] and [Valuation]. They help in assessing the company's true earnings power, its ability to retain earnings for reinvestment, and its potential for future [Equity Financing]. For example, adjusted figures can be used in calculating a company's effective [Price-to-Earnings Ratio] or evaluating its ability to grow without relying on excessive debt, or its approach to [Dividend Payout Ratio].