Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to A Definitions

Adjusted growth value

What Is Adjusted Growth Value?

Adjusted Growth Value is an investment philosophy within investment valuation that merges elements of traditional growth investing and value investing. This approach seeks to identify companies with strong potential for future growth while simultaneously applying a rigorous valuation discipline, often incorporating various qualitative and quantitative "adjustments" to determine a more precise intrinsic worth or expected return. Unlike a singular focus on rapid expansion or purely low price multiples, Adjusted Growth Value aims for a balanced perspective, recognizing that growth at any price can be speculative, and cheap assets may be cheap for good reason. It falls under the broader financial category of portfolio management and investment strategy. Investors employing an Adjusted Growth Value approach typically look beyond surface-level financial metrics to understand a company's true earning power and sustainability.

History and Origin

The concept of integrating growth and value principles has evolved over time, stemming from the historical debate between proponents of pure value investing and pure growth investing. While Benjamin Graham, the father of value investing, emphasized a "margin of safety" through acquiring assets below their intrinsic value, and early growth investors sought companies with high revenue and earnings expansion, the limitations of each became apparent. Periods like the dot-com bubble in the late 1990s vividly demonstrated the risks of unchecked growth speculation, where companies with little to no earnings were valued at exorbitant prices. Conversely, strict value investing could sometimes overlook companies with significant future potential simply because their current metrics appeared "expensive."

The emergence of Adjusted Growth Value reflects a maturation in equity valuation methodologies, recognizing that a company's future growth prospects are a critical component of its value, but only when purchased at a sensible price. Academic research and market observation have contributed to this synthesis. For instance, studies by firms like Research Affiliates have frequently analyzed the performance of value versus growth stocks, highlighting periods where one style outperforms the other due to factors like relative valuation or "revaluation" of growth stocks becoming more expensive compared to value stocks.5 This ongoing analysis underscores the dynamic nature of market preferences and the rationale for an adjusted approach that adapts to evolving conditions rather than strictly adhering to one style.

Key Takeaways

  • Adjusted Growth Value is an investment approach that combines the pursuit of growth companies with a disciplined valuation framework.
  • It seeks to avoid overpaying for growth while also recognizing the potential of high-quality, expanding businesses.
  • The "adjustments" can include qualitative factors like management quality, competitive advantages, or industry trends, as well as quantitative metrics like risk or market conditions.
  • This approach aims to provide a more comprehensive view of a company's true worth and long-term investment potential.
  • It serves as a middle-ground strategy, mitigating some of the inherent risks associated with extreme pure growth or pure value philosophies.

Formula and Calculation

While there isn't a single universal formula for "Adjusted Growth Value," as it represents a conceptual framework rather than a fixed metric, the process involves a blend of quantitative analysis and qualitative judgment. Instead of a rigid calculation, investors employing this approach conceptually adjust traditional valuation metrics to account for growth prospects and various influencing factors.

The core idea revolves around valuing a company based on its expected future cash flows, similar to a discounted cash flow (DCF) model, but with critical adjustments. Conceptually, one might consider:

[
\text{Adjusted Growth Value} = \text{Intrinsic Value} \times (1 + \text{Growth Premium Adjustment}) - \text{Risk Discount Adjustment}
]

Where:

  • Intrinsic Value: Calculated using traditional valuation models (e.g., DCF, asset-based, or comparable company analysis). This establishes a baseline value.
  • Growth Premium Adjustment: This factor increases the intrinsic value based on a company's projected sustainable growth rate, quality of growth, and competitive advantages. Companies with higher, more predictable earnings per share growth might receive a higher premium.
  • Risk Discount Adjustment: This factor reduces the value based on identified risks such as high debt, volatile market cycles, poor management, or industry-specific threats. Higher risk might lead to a larger discount.

In practice, these adjustments are often implicit, influencing the assumptions made within a DCF model (e.g., higher discount rates for riskier growth or more optimistic long-term growth rates for companies with strong moats) or in the selection of comparable companies for a price-to-earnings ratio analysis.

Interpreting the Adjusted Growth Value

Interpreting the Adjusted Growth Value involves understanding that it's not merely about finding "cheap" stocks or "fast-growing" stocks, but rather about identifying companies where the growth potential is not yet fully reflected in the price, after accounting for various risks and qualitative strengths. When an investor arrives at an Adjusted Growth Value that is significantly higher than the current market price, it suggests a potential buying opportunity. Conversely, if the market price exceeds the Adjusted Growth Value, the asset may be considered overvalued, even if it exhibits strong growth.

A key aspect of interpretation involves comparing a company's growth trajectory and its underlying fundamental analysis with its current valuation. For instance, a technology company growing revenue at 20% annually might seem like a growth stock, but an Adjusted Growth Value approach would ask: Is this growth sustainable? What are the associated risks? Is the market adequately discounting future earnings, or is it overly optimistic? The presence of factors like a strong competitive moat or exceptional capital allocation by management would positively influence the adjusted value, justifying a higher price than a similar company without these advantages.

Hypothetical Example

Consider two hypothetical technology companies, InnovateTech and SteadyFlow, both operating in the software industry.

InnovateTech:

  • Current market price: $100 per share
  • Projected annual earnings growth: 25% for the next five years
  • Traditional P/E ratio: 40x (high, typical of a growth stock)

SteadyFlow:

  • Current market price: $70 per share
  • Projected annual earnings growth: 10% for the next five years
  • Traditional P/E ratio: 15x (lower, typical of a value stock)

A purely growth-oriented investor might prefer InnovateTech due to its higher growth rate. A purely value-oriented investor might lean towards SteadyFlow for its lower P/E.

An investor using an Adjusted Growth Value approach would conduct deeper analysis:

  1. InnovateTech Analysis:

    • Qualitative Adjustment: InnovateTech has a groundbreaking new product but faces intense competition and has a relatively unproven management team. Its high growth depends heavily on market adoption of a single product. Its risk management appears less robust.
    • Quantitative Adjustment: A detailed DCF model might reveal that, even with 25% growth, the company's intrinsic value, when factoring in the significant execution risk and a higher discount rate due to its less stable position, is closer to $85 per share. The high price-to-earnings ratio is deemed to overstate its adjusted worth.

  2. SteadyFlow Analysis:

    • Qualitative Adjustment: SteadyFlow operates in a mature but essential niche, boasting a diversified client base, strong recurring revenue, and highly experienced management known for prudent capital allocation. Its competitive position is strong, indicating sustainable growth.
    • Quantitative Adjustment: While its growth rate is lower, a DCF model, considering its stability, high free cash flow conversion, and lower business risk, might assign an intrinsic value of $75 per share. Despite the seemingly modest growth, its adjusted value indicates it's slightly undervalued relative to its market price when considering its quality and sustainability.

In this scenario, the Adjusted Growth Value investor might conclude that SteadyFlow, despite its lower growth rate, presents a more compelling opportunity because its valuation is more favorable once all qualitative and quantitative adjustments are considered.

Practical Applications

Adjusted Growth Value finds practical application in various facets of investing and market analysis, helping investors make more informed decisions by looking beyond simple labels.

  1. Stock Selection: Investors utilize this approach to screen for companies that offer a blend of reasonable growth prospects and attractive valuations. This often involves identifying "growth at a reasonable price" (GARP) opportunities, where the company's growth rate justifies its current valuation without being excessively speculative. For instance, an analyst might apply a series of qualitative checks, such as assessing the strength of a company's competitive advantages or the quality of its governance, to adjust its perceived value.
  2. Portfolio Construction: Incorporating Adjusted Growth Value principles can lead to a more diversified asset allocation. Instead of concentrating solely on high-flying growth stocks or deeply discounted value plays, a portfolio can balance both, potentially smoothing returns across different market cycles. This strategy recognizes that while interest rates impact market valuations, the degree to which they affect different sectors and companies can vary, prompting adjustments in valuation models.4
  3. Risk Management: By explicitly factoring in qualitative and quantitative adjustments for risk, investors can potentially mitigate downside exposure. This means recognizing when a stock's price embodies an overly optimistic future that is not supported by its fundamentals or market realities. Periods of significant market overvaluation, particularly in certain sectors like technology, highlight the importance of such adjustments.3 An "Adjusted Growth Value" perspective encourages caution when broad market valuations appear stretched.
  4. Private Equity and M&A: In the valuation of private companies for mergers, acquisitions, or private placements, the concept of Adjusted Growth Value is highly relevant. Since private companies lack publicly traded share prices, their valuation heavily relies on a thorough assessment of their growth potential, market position, and inherent risks, which are then adjusted against comparable public companies or industry benchmarks.2 The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) also provides guidance on aspects of valuation, particularly in the context of initial public offerings (IPOs), emphasizing the importance of detailed disclosures that allow investors to assess the offering price against various factors.1

Limitations and Criticisms

While Adjusted Growth Value offers a nuanced approach to investing, it is not without its limitations and criticisms.

  1. Subjectivity of Adjustments: A primary challenge lies in the subjective nature of the "adjustments." Assigning a precise quantitative value to qualitative factors like management quality, brand strength, or competitive moats can be difficult and prone to bias. Different analysts may apply different adjustment factors or weights, leading to varying Adjusted Growth Value conclusions for the same company. This inherent subjectivity means the process is less formulaic and more art than science.
  2. Forecasting Difficulty: The core of Adjusted Growth Value relies heavily on accurate forecasting of future growth rates and profitability. Predicting long-term growth, especially for companies in rapidly evolving industries, is inherently challenging and susceptible to errors. Unforeseen market shifts, technological disruptions, or economic downturns can significantly alter a company's growth trajectory, rendering previous adjustments obsolete.
  3. Market Inefficiency Assumptions: The premise that one can consistently identify mispriced growth or value opportunities through adjustment implies a degree of market inefficiency. While markets are not perfectly efficient, consistently outperforming them by applying such adjustments requires superior analytical skill and access to information, which may not be universally available to all investors.
  4. Opportunity Cost: Focusing too narrowly on finding "adjusted" opportunities might lead to overlooking simpler, more obvious investment cases or cause investors to miss out on significant gains from pure growth or pure value plays during periods when those specific styles are strongly in favor. For instance, during prolonged periods of rapid technological advancement, pure growth stocks may significantly outperform, making an adjusted approach seem conservative. Critics might argue that over-analysis can lead to inaction or suboptimal capital allocation.

Adjusted Growth Value vs. Growth Investing

Adjusted Growth Value differs from pure growth investing primarily in its explicit emphasis on valuation and risk. Growth investing typically prioritizes companies demonstrating above-average revenue and earnings growth, often at the expense of current profitability or traditional valuation metrics. Growth investors are willing to pay a premium for high growth rates, believing that future expansion will justify the current elevated share price. Their focus is on innovation, market share expansion, and future potential.

In contrast, Adjusted Growth Value maintains that while growth is desirable, it must be acquired at a sensible price, factoring in the sustainability and quality of that growth, as well as associated risks. It bridges the gap between the two styles, recognizing that unchecked growth can lead to speculative bubbles, and undervalued companies may have fundamental flaws that justify their low prices. The "adjusted" component refers to the analytical process of modifying a company's perceived worth by considering factors beyond just its growth rate, such as balance sheet strength, competitive landscape, management effectiveness, and broader economic influences.