Skip to main content
← Back to A Definitions

Adjusted long term assets

What Is Adjusted Long-Term Assets?

Adjusted long-term assets refer to the value of a company's non-current tangible and intangible resources reported on its balance sheet, after accounting for various adjustments that reflect their true economic worth or adherence to specific accounting standards. This concept falls under the broad field of financial accounting, which dictates how companies record, summarize, and report financial transactions. Unlike current assets that are expected to be converted into cash within one year, long-term assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, are held for more than one operating cycle and are crucial for a business's ongoing operations and future revenue generation. The "adjusted" aspect accounts for factors like depreciation, amortization, impairment losses, and potentially revaluations, providing a more current and relevant valuation than their original acquisition cost.

History and Origin

The concept of adjusting asset values evolved alongside accounting standards, driven by the need for financial statements to provide more transparent and relevant information to investors and other stakeholders. Historically, assets were primarily valued at their historical cost, meaning the original purchase price paid. This approach provided objectivity and verifiability but often failed to reflect an asset's current economic value, especially for long-lived assets that could fluctuate significantly in worth due to market conditions, wear and tear, or technological obsolescence.

The introduction of systematic accounting methods like depreciation and amortization aimed to allocate the cost of tangible and intangible assets over their useful lives, providing a more accurate picture of their diminishing value. Later, the development of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) in the United States and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) globally further refined asset valuation. IFRS, in particular, introduced the concept of the revaluation model for certain tangible assets, allowing for upward adjustments to fair value under specific conditions, which differs from GAAP's general reliance on historical cost. International Accounting Standard (IAS) 16, issued by the International Accounting Standards Committee (predecessor to the IASB) in December 1993, specifically addresses the accounting treatment for property, plant, and equipment, including their recognition, carrying amounts, depreciation, and impairment losses.,13 The debate between historical cost and fair value accounting continues, with some arguing that fair value provides more up-to-date financial information and transparency, while others contend that it introduces volatility and subjectivity.12

Key Takeaways

  • Adjusted long-term assets present a company's non-current resources after accounting for reductions like depreciation and impairment, and sometimes revaluations.
  • The adjustments aim to provide a more accurate representation of an asset's current economic value on the balance sheet.
  • Key adjustments include accumulated depreciation, accumulated amortization, and impairment losses, which reflect the consumption or loss of an asset's economic benefits.
  • Under IFRS, certain long-term tangible assets may also be revalued upwards to their fair value, introducing a revaluation surplus.
  • Understanding adjusted long-term assets is crucial for assessing a company's financial health, operational capacity, and investment potential.

Formula and Calculation

The calculation of adjusted long-term assets depends on the specific accounting standards followed (GAAP or IFRS) and the nature of the asset.

Under GAAP, the general formula for tangible long-term assets (like Property, Plant, and Equipment) is:

Adjusted Long-Term Assets=Original CostAccumulated DepreciationAccumulated Impairment Losses\text{Adjusted Long-Term Assets} = \text{Original Cost} - \text{Accumulated Depreciation} - \text{Accumulated Impairment Losses}

For intangible assets, the formula typically involves amortization instead of depreciation:

Adjusted Long-Term Assets (Intangible)=Original CostAccumulated AmortizationAccumulated Impairment Losses\text{Adjusted Long-Term Assets (Intangible)} = \text{Original Cost} - \text{Accumulated Amortization} - \text{Accumulated Impairment Losses}

Under IFRS, companies have an option for certain tangible assets:

  • Cost Model: Same as GAAP, using historical cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment.
  • Revaluation Model: Assets are carried at a revalued amount, which is their fair value at the revaluation date, less any subsequent accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. This means the formula could incorporate a revaluation surplus.

Where:

  • Original Cost: The initial cost incurred to acquire or construct the long-lived assets and bring them to their intended use. This includes the purchase price and directly attributable costs.11
  • Accumulated Depreciation: The total amount of an asset's cost that has been expensed over its useful life up to a specific point in time, reflecting the asset's wear and tear or obsolescence.
  • Accumulated Amortization: Similar to depreciation, but applied to intangible assets, representing the systematic reduction of their value over their useful lives.
  • Accumulated Impairment Losses: A reduction in the carrying amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) to its recoverable amount, if that amount is less than its original carrying amount, indicating a significant decline in its value.
  • Revaluation Surplus: The amount by which an asset's fair value exceeds its carrying amount under the cost model, recognized in other comprehensive income under IFRS.

Interpreting the Adjusted Long-Term Assets

Interpreting adjusted long-term assets provides insights into a company's operational capacity and financial position. A high value of adjusted long-term assets relative to a company's total assets can indicate a capital-intensive business model, such as manufacturing or utilities, which rely heavily on substantial investments in property, plant, and equipment. Conversely, a service-oriented company might have lower adjusted long-term assets but higher current assets.

Analyzing the trend of adjusted long-term assets over time can reveal a company's investment strategy. An increasing trend might suggest ongoing capital expenditure for expansion or modernization, while a declining trend could indicate asset disposals, underinvestment, or significant impairment charges. The relationship between adjusted long-term assets and revenue generated can also provide insights into asset utilization efficiency. When comparing companies, it is important to consider the accounting policies used, particularly whether they follow GAAP's cost model or IFRS's potential for revaluation, as this can significantly impact the reported values of assets.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "TechInnovate Inc.," a fictional technology company. At the beginning of 2024, TechInnovate's balance sheet showed the following for its long-term assets:

  • Original Cost of Equipment: $5,000,000
  • Accumulated Depreciation on Equipment: $1,500,000
  • Original Cost of Patents (Intangible): $1,000,000
  • Accumulated Amortization on Patents: $200,000

To calculate the adjusted long-term assets at the beginning of 2024:

  • Adjusted Equipment Value = $5,000,000 - $1,500,000 = $3,500,000
  • Adjusted Patent Value = $1,000,000 - $200,000 = $800,000

Total Adjusted Long-Term Assets = $3,500,000 (Equipment) + $800,000 (Patents) = $4,300,000

During 2024, TechInnovate faces new competition, leading to a revised estimate of future cash flows from its patent. An impairment test indicates that the patent's recoverable amount is now $600,000, triggering an impairment loss.

Additionally, the company incurs another $300,000 in depreciation for the equipment and $100,000 in amortization for the patents during 2024.

At the end of 2024:

  • New Accumulated Depreciation on Equipment = $1,500,000 + $300,000 = $1,800,000

  • New Adjusted Equipment Value = $5,000,000 - $1,800,000 = $3,200,000

  • Original Patent Cost: $1,000,000

  • Accumulated Amortization: $200,000 (initial) + $100,000 (2024) = $300,000

  • Patent's Carrying Amount before Impairment: $1,000,000 - $300,000 = $700,000

  • Recoverable Amount: $600,000

  • Impairment Loss = $700,000 - $600,000 = $100,000

  • New Adjusted Patent Value = $600,000 (after impairment)

Total Adjusted Long-Term Assets at end of 2024 = $3,200,000 (Equipment) + $600,000 (Patents) = $3,800,000.

This example illustrates how adjusted long-term assets can change due to ongoing depreciation, amortization, and one-time impairment events, providing a more up-to-date picture of the company's asset base.

Practical Applications

Adjusted long-term assets are a fundamental component in various aspects of financial analysis, investment, and regulatory compliance.

  • Financial Analysis: Analysts use adjusted long-term assets to calculate critical financial ratios that assess a company's efficiency and leverage. For instance, the asset turnover ratio, which measures how efficiently a company uses its assets to generate revenue, relies on this adjusted value. The property, plant, and equipment turnover ratio specifically focuses on the efficiency of long-term operational assets.
  • Investment Decisions: Investors scrutinize a company's adjusted long-term assets reported in its financial statements to gauge its operational scale, future growth potential, and capital intensity. A strong, well-maintained base of long-term assets often suggests a robust operational foundation, while signs of asset impairment or underinvestment might raise concerns. Publicly traded companies in the U.S. are required to file comprehensive financial reports, such as the 10-K, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), providing detailed information on their assets and other financial data.10,9 A "Beginner's Guide to Financial Statements" published by the SEC offers an introduction to interpreting these important documents.8
  • Valuation: When valuing a company, especially through asset-based valuation methods, adjusted long-term assets serve as a starting point. While market capitalization often exceeds the book value of assets, the reported values provide a tangible base for assessing underlying worth.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Both GAAP and IFRS provide detailed guidance on the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of long-term assets. Companies must adhere to these standards to ensure their financial reporting is accurate and comparable. For example, IAS 16 outlines specific requirements for property, plant, and equipment under IFRS, including rules for revaluation.7
  • Loan Covenants and Debt Management: Lenders often include covenants in loan agreements that relate to a company's asset base, such as requirements for minimum asset values or asset-to-debt ratios. Adjusted long-term assets play a role in monitoring compliance with these covenants and assessing a company's capacity to take on new liabilities.

Limitations and Criticisms

While providing a more current view than pure historical cost, adjusted long-term assets still face certain limitations and criticisms, primarily concerning the subjectivity involved in some of the adjustments and their reflection of true economic value.

  • Subjectivity of Estimates: The determination of depreciation, amortization, and particularly impairment losses relies heavily on management's estimates, such as useful lives, salvage values, and future cash flows. These estimates can introduce subjectivity, potentially leading to variations in reported values between companies or over different periods for the same company. The use of unobservable inputs in fair value measurements, especially for Level 3 assets, introduces subjectivity and can lead to concerns about manipulation and reliability in financial reporting.6,5
  • Fair Value Volatility (IFRS Revaluation Model): While the revaluation model under IFRS allows assets to be carried at fair value, it can introduce volatility to the balance sheet and shareholders' equity as asset values fluctuate with market conditions. Critics argue that this volatility may not always reflect a company's underlying operational performance but rather market sentiment. The 2008 financial crisis brought fair value accounting under scrutiny, with some arguing it exacerbated market declines.4,3
  • Historical Cost Basis Remains (GAAP): Under GAAP, the primary measurement basis for most property, plant, and equipment remains historical cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. This means that even adjusted long-term assets may not reflect the current market value or replacement cost of older assets, potentially understating the true economic value of a company's asset base, especially in inflationary environments. While fair value accounting has gained traction, a historical review reveals ongoing debate about its appropriateness versus historical cost.2 As noted by Charles Lee, a professor of accounting at Stanford Graduate School of Business, fair-value accounting might introduce more uncertainty into financial reporting and could even create opportunities for corporate fraud.1
  • Omission of Unrecognized Assets: Adjusted long-term assets generally do not include internally generated intangible assets (like brand recognition or proprietary knowledge) unless they are acquired through a business combination or meet strict capitalization criteria. This can lead to an undervaluation of companies in knowledge-intensive industries.

Adjusted Long-Term Assets vs. Net Book Value

Adjusted long-term assets and net book value are closely related terms, often used interchangeably, but there's a subtle distinction that depends on context and accounting standards.

Net Book Value typically refers to the original cost of an asset minus its accumulated depreciation and accumulated amortization. It represents the asset's carrying amount on the balance sheet under the historical cost model. This is the most straightforward calculation of an asset's remaining value based on its acquisition cost and the systematic allocation of that cost over time.

Adjusted Long-Term Assets encompasses net book value but can also include additional adjustments beyond simple depreciation and amortization. Specifically, it accounts for:

  • Impairment Losses: A significant reduction in an asset's value below its net book value due to unexpected events or changes in circumstances. When an asset's recoverable amount (the higher of its fair value less costs to sell and its value in use) is less than its carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized, further reducing its reported value.
  • Revaluation Surpluses (under IFRS): For entities applying the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), certain tangible assets may be revalued upwards to their fair value. This revaluation leads to a "revaluation surplus" recognized in other comprehensive income, increasing the adjusted long-term asset value beyond what would be reflected by mere historical cost less depreciation.

Therefore, while net book value is a component of adjusted long-term assets, the latter provides a broader, more encompassing measure that incorporates all material reductions (like impairment) and, under IFRS, potential increases (like revaluations) to an asset's carrying amount. The confusion often arises because, under GAAP's cost model, adjusted long-term assets for many tangible assets are simply their net book value after considering any impairment.

FAQs

What types of assets are considered long-term assets?

Long-term assets are resources a company expects to use for more than one year to generate income. Common types include tangible assets like property, plant, and equipment (e.g., land, buildings, machinery, vehicles) and intangible assets (e.g., patents, copyrights, trademarks, goodwill).

Why are long-term assets "adjusted"?

Long-term assets are adjusted to reflect their consumption, obsolescence, or changes in market value over time, providing a more accurate representation of their current economic worth on the balance sheet. The primary adjustments are depreciation (for tangible assets) and amortization (for intangible assets), which systematically reduce the asset's value over its useful life. Additionally, impairment losses may be recognized if an asset's value significantly declines below its carrying amount.

How do accounting standards (GAAP vs. IFRS) affect adjusted long-term assets?

The two main accounting standards, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), treat the adjustment of long-term assets differently. GAAP primarily uses the historical cost model, meaning assets are reported at their original cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. IFRS allows for both the cost model and a revaluation model for certain tangible assets, where assets can be revalued to their fair value, leading to a "revaluation surplus" and potentially higher adjusted asset values on the balance sheet.

Can adjusted long-term assets ever increase?

Under U.S. GAAP, adjusted long-term assets generally do not increase above their historical cost less depreciation, even if their market value rises, unless a specific accounting treatment for fair value applies (which is rare for property, plant, and equipment). However, under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and if a company elects the revaluation model, the adjusted value of tangible long-term assets can increase if their fair value rises, with the increase recognized as a revaluation surplus in other comprehensive income.