Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to A Definitions

Adjusted long term irr

What Is Adjusted Long-Term IRR?

Adjusted Long-Term Internal Rate of Return (IRR) refers to a modified form of the traditional Internal Rate of Return (IRR) that seeks to overcome some of its inherent limitations, particularly when evaluating projects with extended time horizons or complex Cash Flow patterns. This metric is primarily used within the realm of Capital Budgeting and Investment Analysis, aiming to provide a more realistic measure of a project's profitability over its entire lifespan. While the standard IRR assumes that all positive interim cash flows are reinvested at the project's calculated IRR, the Adjusted Long-Term IRR acknowledges that such an assumption is often unrealistic for multi-year ventures. Instead, it typically employs a more practical Reinvestment Rate, often the firm's Cost of Capital or a specified market rate. This adjustment provides a clearer picture of the actual economic return generated by a long-term investment.

History and Origin

The concept of the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) has been a cornerstone of Project Valuation for decades, providing a single percentage figure that represents a project's expected annual return. However, as financial analysis grew more sophisticated, particularly with the advent of longer-term and more complex investments such as infrastructure projects, limitations of the traditional IRR became apparent. A significant critique centered on its unrealistic assumption that intermediate cash flows generated by a project could be reinvested at the same high rate as the project's IRR itself. This "reinvestment rate assumption" often led to an overestimation of a project's true profitability, especially for long-duration endeavors15.

To address these shortcomings, financial theorists and practitioners began developing alternative metrics and adjustments. The Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR) emerged as a prominent solution, allowing for the explicit specification of a reinvestment rate that aligns more closely with real-world market conditions. This development was crucial for accurately evaluating long-term ventures, where the compounding effect of reinvested cash flows significantly impacts the overall return. The need for such adjustments was further highlighted in analyses of large-scale public and private investments, where robust and realistic appraisal methodologies are paramount for sound decision-making, as emphasized by organizations like the OECD in their guidelines for effective public investment14.

Key Takeaways

  • Realistic Reinvestment: The Adjusted Long-Term IRR typically assumes that interim cash flows are reinvested at a realistic rate, such as the cost of capital, rather than the project's own high IRR.
  • Long-Term Focus: It is particularly useful for evaluating projects with long durations, where the compounding effect of reinvested funds significantly impacts overall returns.
  • Addresses IRR Flaws: This metric aims to correct some of the inherent limitations of the traditional IRR, such as the potential for multiple IRRs or unrealistic reinvestment assumptions.
  • Improved Comparability: By using a more realistic reinvestment rate, the Adjusted Long-Term IRR offers a more accurate basis for comparing diverse investment opportunities, especially those with different scales and timelines.
  • Better Decision-Making: It provides a more dependable measure for capital budgeting decisions, leading to a more informed allocation of resources for long-term growth.

Formula and Calculation

The Adjusted Long-Term IRR is not a single, universally defined formula, but rather a conceptual improvement on the traditional IRR, often implemented through methodologies like the Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR). The MIRR addresses the critical flaw of the traditional IRR by allowing for explicit control over the reinvestment rate of positive cash flows and the financing rate of negative cash flows.

The calculation of MIRR typically involves three steps:

  1. Calculate the Present Value (PV) of all cash outflows (initial investment and any future negative cash flows) using the financing rate. This rate represents the cost of borrowing capital for the project.
  2. Calculate the Future Value (FV) of all cash inflows (positive cash flows) compounded to the end of the project's life, using the explicit reinvestment rate. This rate is generally the firm's cost of capital or a more conservative estimated market rate.
  3. Calculate the MIRR using the following formula:
MIRR=(FVpositive Cash FlowsPVnegative Cash Flows)1n−1MIRR = \left( \frac{FV_{positive \ Cash \ Flows}}{PV_{negative \ Cash \ Flows}} \right)^{\frac{1}{n}} - 1

Where:

  • (FV_{positive \ Cash \ Flows}) = Future value of all positive cash flows compounded at the Reinvestment Rate to the end of the project.
  • (PV_{negative \ Cash \ Flows}) = Present value of all negative cash flows (including initial investment) discounted at the Cost of Capital.
  • (n) = Number of periods (years) in the project's life.

This approach provides a single, unambiguous rate of return that more accurately reflects the project's profitability under realistic financial assumptions.

Interpreting the Adjusted Long-Term IRR

Interpreting the Adjusted Long-Term IRR involves understanding its nature as a refined profitability metric. Unlike the simple Return on Investment (ROI), which provides a total growth figure, the Adjusted Long-Term IRR, particularly through the MIRR, offers an annualized percentage return that accounts for the Time Value of Money (TVM) and a realistic reinvestment assumption.

When evaluating a project using Adjusted Long-Term IRR, a higher percentage generally indicates a more attractive investment. The figure should be compared against a company's hurdle rate or required rate of return. If the Adjusted Long-Term IRR exceeds this benchmark, the project is typically considered financially viable. For example, in valuing infrastructure investments, which are inherently long-term, this adjusted metric helps assess whether the project's returns adequately compensate for the capital invested over extended periods, reflecting practical scenarios where cash flows are not reinvested at exceptionally high rates. It offers a more dependable basis for ranking and selecting among competing Mutually Exclusive Projects.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a hypothetical infrastructure company, "Bridge Builders Inc.," evaluating a 30-year toll road project requiring an initial Capital Expenditure of $500 million. The project is expected to generate varying annual net cash flows over its lifetime.

Traditional IRR analysis might yield a high rate, say 18%, assuming all generated cash is reinvested at 18%. However, Bridge Builders Inc. knows that its realistic Reinvestment Rate for positive cash flows is closer to its Cost of Capital of 8%, and any necessary financing for negative cash flows (e.g., major repairs in later years) would also be at 8%.

Here’s how they might use an Adjusted Long-Term IRR (MIRR) for evaluation:

  • Year 0: Initial Outflow = -$500,000,000
  • Years 1-10: Annual Cash Inflow = +$40,000,000
  • Years 11-20: Annual Cash Inflow = +$55,000,000
  • Year 21: Major Maintenance Outflow = -$20,000,000
  • Years 22-30: Annual Cash Inflow = +$60,000,000
  • Project End (Year 30): Terminal Value (e.g., salvage value or sale of asset) = +$100,000,000

Steps for Adjusted Long-Term IRR (MIRR) calculation:

  1. Present Value of Outflows:

    • Initial Outflow: -$500,000,000 (already at PV)
    • Year 21 Outflow: -$20,000,000 / (1 + 0.08)^21 = -$3,972,700 (approx.)
    • Total PV of Outflows = -$500,000,000 + (-$3,972,700) = -$503,972,700

  2. Future Value of Inflows: Each positive cash flow is compounded at the 8% reinvestment rate to Year 30. This would involve calculating the future value of an annuity for each segment of positive cash flows and then the future value of the terminal value.

    • FV of Years 1-10 inflows compounded to Year 30.
    • FV of Years 11-20 inflows compounded to Year 30.
    • FV of Years 22-30 inflows compounded to Year 30.
    • Terminal Value at Year 30.
    • Summing these would yield a substantial positive future value. Let's assume, for simplicity, this sums to approximately $5,000,000,000.

  3. Calculate MIRR:

    MIRR=($5,000,000,000$503,972,700)130−1MIRR = \left( \frac{\$5,000,000,000}{\$503,972,700} \right)^{\frac{1}{30}} - 1 MIRR≈(9.921)130−1≈1.0792−1≈0.0792 or 7.92%MIRR \approx (9.921)^{\frac{1}{30}} - 1 \approx 1.0792 - 1 \approx 0.0792 \text{ or } 7.92\%

This Adjusted Long-Term IRR of approximately 7.92% provides a more conservative and realistic estimate of the project's annual return, given the assumed reinvestment and financing rates. This contrasts sharply with the higher, potentially misleading, traditional IRR that presumes reinvestment at its own high rate.

Practical Applications

The Adjusted Long-Term IRR, often in the form of the Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR), holds significant practical applications across various financial sectors, particularly for projects characterized by long durations and complex Cash Flow profiles.

  • Infrastructure Investment: For large-scale infrastructure projects like roads, bridges, power plants, and public utilities, which involve substantial initial outlays and generate returns over many decades, the Adjusted Long-Term IRR provides a more reliable metric than traditional IRR. These projects frequently involve Public-Private Partnerships, where accurate financial assessment is crucial for both public sector planning and private investor confidence. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) consistently emphasizes the need for robust Project Appraisal methodologies for such investments, moving beyond narrow financial viability to consider broader economic and social impacts,.13
    12* Real Estate Development: In multi-phase real estate developments, especially long-term ventures with staggered income streams and periodic capital injections, the Adjusted Long-Term IRR helps investors gain a clearer understanding of profitability by factoring in realistic reinvestment of rental income or sales proceeds. 11It provides a more nuanced view of the investment's performance compared to simpler metrics that ignore the time value of money or make unrealistic reinvestment assumptions.
    10* Corporate Capital Budgeting: Corporations undertaking large, multi-year strategic projects, such as building new manufacturing facilities, developing new product lines, or expanding into new markets, use the Adjusted Long-Term IRR to make informed Capital Allocation decisions. It helps management evaluate whether a project's expected return, under realistic reinvestment scenarios, meets the company's financial objectives and enhances shareholder value.
  • Government and Public Works: Government agencies and public bodies utilize similar adjusted metrics for evaluating the long-term economic viability and societal benefit of public works projects, ensuring responsible use of taxpayer funds. These analyses often involve comprehensive Economic Analysis and consideration of lifecycle costs.
    9
    These applications highlight the Adjusted Long-Term IRR's utility in providing a more accurate and pragmatic view of a project's true long-term profitability, enabling better strategic and financial decision-making.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its advantages in offering a more realistic assessment, the Adjusted Long-Term IRR, particularly in its MIRR form, is not without limitations or criticisms. One primary critique centers on the subjectivity involved in selecting the appropriate Reinvestment Rate and Financing Rate. While the firm's Cost of Capital is often used, the precise rate can still influence the resulting Adjusted Long-Term IRR, potentially leading to different project rankings or investment decisions.
8
Another limitation is that while it addresses the reinvestment assumption of the traditional Internal Rate of Return (IRR), it may still struggle with projects that have unconventional cash flow patterns, such as multiple sign changes between positive and negative cash flows, which can complicate the calculation of present and future values of cash flows. Furthermore, like IRR, the Adjusted Long-Term IRR does not inherently account for the absolute scale of an investment. A smaller project with a high adjusted rate might appear more attractive than a larger project with a slightly lower, yet still acceptable, adjusted rate, even if the larger project generates significantly more total profit in dollar terms.
7
Some critics also argue that no single rate adequately captures the dynamic and uncertain nature of long-term capital markets. Future reinvestment opportunities and borrowing costs can fluctuate significantly over extended periods, making any fixed assumed rate a potential source of error. As such, even with adjustments, relying solely on a single percentage metric for complex, long-term Investment Opportunities can be risky without considering additional qualitative factors and sensitivity analyses. 6Practitioners often advocate for using the Adjusted Long-Term IRR in conjunction with other metrics, such as Net Present Value (NPV), for a comprehensive assessment.
5

Adjusted Long-Term IRR vs. Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR)

The terms "Adjusted Long-Term IRR" and Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR) are often used interchangeably, or the former can be understood as a conceptual application of the latter specifically for projects with extended durations. The core distinction between them, if any, lies in emphasis rather than fundamental calculation.

The traditional Internal Rate of Return (IRR) calculates the discount rate at which a project's net present value becomes zero, implicitly assuming that all positive interim cash flows are reinvested at this calculated IRR. This assumption is frequently criticized for being unrealistic, especially for Long-Term Investments.

MIRR was developed specifically to overcome this unrealistic reinvestment assumption of the standard IRR. It achieves this by allowing analysts to specify an explicit, external reinvestment rate for positive cash flows (typically the firm's Cost of Capital or a market rate) and a separate financing rate for any negative cash flows. Therefore, MIRR provides a more accurate and economically sound measure of a project's true rate of return.

When financial professionals refer to "Adjusted Long-Term IRR," they are generally implying the application of MIRR or a similar methodology that modifies the traditional IRR calculation to make it more suitable for evaluating projects over extended timeframes, explicitly considering a realistic Reinvestment Rate. The "adjustment" specifically targets the long-term nature of the project, acknowledging that the IRR's inherent flaws become more pronounced over prolonged periods. Thus, MIRR is the most common and robust method used to derive what would be considered an Adjusted Long-Term IRR.

FAQs

Why is a regular IRR not ideal for long-term projects?

The regular Internal Rate of Return (IRR) assumes that all intermediate cash flows generated by a project are reinvested at the same rate as the IRR itself. For long-term projects, this assumption is often unrealistic because the calculated IRR can be very high, and finding consistent investment opportunities at such high rates for many years is improbable. This can lead to an overstatement of the project's true profitability.
4

What is the main benefit of using an Adjusted Long-Term IRR?

The main benefit is that it provides a more realistic and accurate measure of a project's profitability, especially for long-duration investments. By using a more plausible Reinvestment Rate, typically the Cost of Capital, it avoids the upward bias that often plagues the traditional IRR and offers a better basis for Investment Decisions.

Does Adjusted Long-Term IRR always yield a lower value than traditional IRR?

Not always, but in most practical scenarios where the project's IRR is higher than the realistic market reinvestment rate, the Adjusted Long-Term IRR (MIRR) will yield a lower and more conservative value than the traditional IRR. This is because the IRR often assumes an optimistically high reinvestment rate for interim cash flows, while the adjusted version uses a more grounded rate.
3

Can Adjusted Long-Term IRR be calculated in standard spreadsheet software?

Yes, the Adjusted Long-Term IRR, commonly implemented as the Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR), can be easily calculated using financial functions available in spreadsheet software like Microsoft Excel. These functions typically require the cash flow series, a financing rate, and a Reinvestment Rate to perform the calculation.
2

Is Adjusted Long-Term IRR a standalone metric for investment analysis?

While providing a more realistic perspective than traditional IRR, the Adjusted Long-Term IRR should ideally not be used as the sole determinant for complex Financial Modeling and investment decisions. It is best used in conjunction with other capital budgeting techniques, such as Net Present Value (NPV), which offers a measure of the project's total value added in present-day dollars, to provide a comprehensive evaluation.1