Adjusted market weighted average

Hidden table:

What Is Adjusted Market Weighted Average?

The adjusted market weighted average is a method for constructing a market index or a portfolio where the influence of each component is based on its market capitalization, with adjustments made for factors such as free float. This methodology falls under the broader category of portfolio theory and is a common approach for many major stock market indices globally. In an adjusted market weighted average, companies with larger market capitalizations, and thus more publicly available shares, exert a greater impact on the index's value. This reflects the collective opinion of the market regarding the size and importance of a company.

History and Origin

The concept of weighting index components by their market value dates back to early efforts to create benchmarks that accurately represented the broader market. Early indices, such as the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), were initially price-weighted, meaning that higher-priced stocks had a disproportionate influence regardless of their actual company size⁴⁴. This method proved problematic as stock splits or other corporate actions could artificially alter the index's representation⁴³.

In response to the limitations of price-weighted methodologies, Standard & Poor's sought a way to track the market in aggregate to reflect the collective investment experience more accurately. This led to the development of capitalization-weighted indices, where a company's influence is proportional to its total market value⁴². The S&P 500, established in its current 500-stock, market-capitalization-weighted form in 1957, became a prominent example of this approach⁴¹. Over time, many U.S. indices, including the S&P 500, adopted a "float-adjusted" weighting, which accounts for the proportion of outstanding shares readily available to the public, as opposed to those closely held by insiders or governments. This adjustment ensures that the index more accurately reflects the investable market.

Key Takeaways

• An adjusted market weighted average assigns influence to index components based on their market capitalization, with considerations for free float.
• It is the most common method for constructing major stock market indices globally.
• Companies with larger market capitalizations have a greater impact on the index's performance.
• The methodology aims to provide a broad representation of the market's collective valuation.
• Adjustments for free float ensure the index reflects shares available for public trading.

Formula and Calculation

The calculation of an adjusted market weighted average for an index involves several steps. For each company in the index, its market capitalization is determined by multiplying its current share price by the number of shares outstanding. This market capitalization is then adjusted by a "free-float factor," which represents the percentage of shares available for public trading⁴⁰.

The formula for the adjusted market capitalization of a single company is:

$\text{Adjusted Market Cap} = \text{Share Price} \times \text{Shares Outstanding} \times \text{Free-Float Factor}$

To calculate the adjusted market weighted average of an entire index, the adjusted market capitalization of each component company is summed. This total adjusted market capitalization is then divided by a divisor, which is a number that adjusts the index for corporate actions such as stock splits or changes in index composition, ensuring continuity in the index value over time.

The index value at a given time is typically calculated as:

$\text{Index Value} = \frac{\sum (\text{Adjusted Market Cap of each component})}{\text{Divisor}}$

Interpreting the Adjusted Market Weighted Average

The adjusted market weighted average is interpreted as a reflection of the overall performance of a specific market or market segment. When the value of an index calculated using this method rises, it indicates that the collective market value of its constituent companies has increased, signaling positive performance in that market. Conversely, a decline suggests a decrease in collective market value.

This weighting scheme implies that larger companies, by virtue of their greater market capitalization, will have a more substantial impact on the index's movement. For instance, a small percentage change in a mega-cap company's stock price can move the entire index more significantly than a larger percentage change in a small-cap company's stock price. This characteristic is often seen as a strength, as it naturally aligns the index's behavior with the overall wealth of investors who hold the broader market. It also inherently biases the index towards companies that have grown successfully.

Investors often use these indices as benchmarks to assess the returns of their own portfolio or a mutual fund. The adjusted market weighted average also influences the construction of many passive investment vehicles, such as Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)), which aim to replicate the performance of these indices.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a hypothetical market index, "Diversification 300," which uses an adjusted market weighted average. This index has three component companies: Alpha Corp, Beta Inc., and Gamma Ltd.

Day 1 Data:

• Alpha Corp:
  • Share Price: $100
  • Shares Outstanding: 10 million
  • Free-Float Factor: 0.90 (90% publicly traded)
  • Adjusted Market Cap: $100 * 10,000,000 * 0.90 = $900,000,000
• Beta Inc.:
  • Share Price: $50
  • Shares Outstanding: 20 million
  • Free-Float Factor: 0.80 (80% publicly traded)
  • Adjusted Market Cap: $50 * 20,000,000 * 0.80 = $800,000,000
• Gamma Ltd.:
  • Share Price: $20
  • Shares Outstanding: 50 million
  • Free-Float Factor: 0.95 (95% publicly traded)
  • Adjusted Market Cap: $20 * 50,000,000 * 0.95 = $950,000,000

Assume the initial divisor for the Diversification 300 index is set such that the Day 1 index value is 100.
Total Adjusted Market Cap (Day 1) = $900,000,000 + $800,000,000 + $950,000,000 = $2,650,000,000
Divisor = Total Adjusted Market Cap (Day 1) / Initial Index Value = $2,650,000,000 / 100 = 26,500,000

Day 2 Data:

• Alpha Corp's share price increases to $110.
• Beta Inc.'s share price remains at $50.
• Gamma Ltd.'s share price decreases to $18.

Recalculate Adjusted Market Caps for Day 2:

• Alpha Corp: Adjusted Market Cap: $110 * 10,000,000 * 0.90 = $990,000,000
• Beta Inc.: Adjusted Market Cap: $50 * 20,000,000 * 0.80 = $800,000,000
• Gamma Ltd.: Adjusted Market Cap: $18 * 50,000,000 * 0.95 = $855,000,000

Total Adjusted Market Cap (Day 2) = $990,000,000 + $800,000,000 + $855,000,000 = $2,645,000,000

Calculate Diversification 300 Index Value for Day 2:

Index Value (Day 2) = Total Adjusted Market Cap (Day 2) / Divisor = $2,645,000,000 / 26,500,000 = 99.81

In this example, despite Alpha Corp's gain, the index experienced a slight decrease due to Gamma Ltd.'s larger adjusted market capitalization at the start and its subsequent price drop. This demonstrates how the adjusted market weighted average reflects the proportional impact of its constituents.

Practical Applications

The adjusted market weighted average is fundamental to the construction and analysis of many prominent financial indices, such as the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ Composite³⁹. These indices serve as vital benchmarks for professional investors, financial analysts, and individual investors to gauge market performance and allocate assets.

One of the primary applications is in passive investing strategies, particularly through index funds and Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)). These investment vehicles aim to replicate the performance of a specific adjusted market weighted index by holding securities in the same proportions as the index³⁷, ³⁸. This approach offers investors broad market exposure and often lower expense ratios compared to actively managed funds.

Regulators, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)), also utilize market data, including that derived from market-weighted methodologies, to oversee financial markets, ensure transparency, and protect investors³³, ³⁴, ³⁵, ³⁶. The SEC's role in promoting fair and efficient markets is supported by the availability and analysis of such data, which helps them monitor for market manipulation or fraud³¹, ³².

Limitations and Criticisms

While widely adopted, the adjusted market weighted average approach has several limitations and criticisms. A primary concern is that it inherently allocates more weight to companies with higher market capitalizations, meaning that large companies disproportionately influence the index's performance³⁰. Critics argue that this can lead to a distorted view of the overall market, as the index may become overly concentrated in a few dominant companies or sectors²⁸, ²⁹.

This concentration can also introduce a "momentum bias," where the index tends to overweight stocks that have recently performed well and underweight those that have underperformed, regardless of their underlying fundamental value²⁶, ²⁷. This can lead to situations where the index is heavily invested in potentially overvalued assets, as it continues to increase its allocation to winning stocks without a "sanity check" based on fundamentals like earnings or revenues²⁵. Some researchers contend that this systematic overweighting of companies destined to underperform and underweighting of those poised to outperform can be an inherent flaw²⁴.

Another criticism is that this method can lead to increased volatility, especially during periods of market exuberance or decline. When large, highly-weighted companies experience significant price swings, their impact on the overall index is amplified, potentially leading to more pronounced market fluctuations²², ²³. For example, studies have indicated that stock markets can be more volatile than what underlying fundamentals suggest, partly due to the amplified effects of large, slow-moving investors like index funds on prices²¹.

Furthermore, some argue that while passive investing in adjusted market weighted indices offers broad diversification, it might not always provide optimal risk-adjusted returns. Alternative weighting schemes, such as fundamentally weighted or equal-weighted indices, have emerged to address some of these perceived shortcomings by considering factors beyond market capitalization or by assigning equal weight to all constituents¹⁹, ²⁰. Research Affiliates, for example, has published on the potential for traditional cap-weighted indices to buy high and sell low due to their rebalancing mechanisms¹⁸.

Adjusted Market Weighted Average vs. Price-Weighted Index

The adjusted market weighted average and the price-weighted index are two distinct methodologies for constructing market indices, differing primarily in how they assign influence to their constituent securities.

The primary point of confusion often arises because both are "weighted" averages. However, the basis of that weighting is fundamentally different. The adjusted market weighted average seeks to represent the actual economic scale of companies within the market, while the price-weighted index gives more significance to the nominal price of a share.

FAQs

What is the purpose of adjusting a market-weighted average?

The purpose of adjusting a market weighted average, typically through a "free-float" adjustment, is to ensure that the index accurately reflects the portion of a company's shares that are readily available for public trading. ⁵This excludes shares held by insiders, governments, or other strategic investors, providing a more realistic representation of the investable market.

How does the adjusted market weighted average relate to passive investing?

The adjusted market weighted average is the cornerstone of many passive investing strategies. Index funds and Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)) that aim to track broad market indices typically employ this weighting methodology. By investing in these funds, investors gain exposure to the overall market proportional to the market value of its constituents, aligning with the "Boglehead" philosophy of broad diversification and low costs.
³, ⁴

Is an adjusted market weighted average always the best way to measure market performance?

While widely used and effective for broad market representation, an adjusted market weighted average is not universally considered the "best" in all scenarios. Its inherent bias towards larger companies means that the performance of a few dominant stocks can heavily influence the index. ²Other methodologies, such as equal-weighted or fundamentally weighted indices, exist and may be preferred by some investors seeking different risk-return characteristics or to mitigate certain market anomalies. ¹The choice depends on an investor's specific goals and investment philosophy, including their preferred asset allocation.