Skip to main content
← Back to A Definitions

Advanced price to earnings

What Is Advanced Price to Earnings?

Advanced Price to Earnings refers to a family of sophisticated valuation metrics designed to provide a more nuanced perspective than the basic price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. These advanced metrics, falling under the broader category of financial ratios, adjust for factors that the traditional P/E ratio overlooks, such as cyclicality in earnings, varying inflation rates, or specific industry characteristics. By smoothing out temporary fluctuations or incorporating forward-looking data, Advanced Price to Earnings aims to offer a more stable and reliable indicator of a company's true earnings power and its relative value in the stock market. Investors often use these measures to gain deeper insights into a company's potential for future growth and profitability, aiding in more informed investment decisions.

History and Origin

The concept of adjusting the basic P/E ratio for various factors gained prominence as financial analysts and economists recognized its limitations, particularly during periods of significant economic cycles. One of the most notable developments in Advanced Price to Earnings is the Cyclically Adjusted Price-to-Earnings (CAPE) ratio, also known as the Shiller P/E. This metric was popularized by Nobel laureate Robert Shiller and John Campbell. Their work, particularly in the late 20th century, highlighted how standard P/E ratios could be misleading due to the inherent volatility of annual corporate earnings. Shiller's research underscored the importance of a longer-term perspective, leading to the development of the CAPE ratio, which averages real (inflation-adjusted) earnings over a 10-year period to smooth out these fluctuations5. The publicly available data and research from Professor Shiller's work at Yale University have significantly contributed to its widespread adoption and study.4

Key Takeaways

  • Advanced Price to Earnings metrics, such as the CAPE ratio, offer a more stable valuation measure by accounting for earnings volatility and cyclical influences.
  • They provide a deeper insight into a company's or market's long-term earnings power compared to the standard P/E ratio.
  • These ratios are particularly useful for assessing whether a broad market or individual stock is historically undervalued or overvalued.
  • Advanced P/E ratios consider factors like inflation and historical earnings trends, which are often ignored by simpler valuation multiples.
  • While offering enhanced insights, these metrics still have limitations and should be used in conjunction with other financial analysis tools.

Formula and Calculation

The most prominent example of an Advanced Price to Earnings metric is the Cyclically Adjusted Price-to-Earnings (CAPE) ratio. Its formula is:

CAPE Ratio=Current Real Stock Price10-Year Average Real Earnings Per Share\text{CAPE Ratio} = \frac{\text{Current Real Stock Price}}{\text{10-Year Average Real Earnings Per Share}}

Where:

  • Current Real Stock Price: The current share price adjusted for inflation using a consumer price index.
  • 10-Year Average Real Earnings Per Share: The average of the company's or market's earnings per share (EPS) over the past 10 years, also adjusted for inflation.

To calculate the 10-year average real EPS, one typically:

  1. Obtains annual EPS data for the past 10 years.
  2. Adjusts each year's EPS for inflation to convert it into real terms (e.g., using a base year's purchasing power).
  3. Calculates the arithmetic average of these 10 inflation-adjusted EPS figures.

This averaging process is crucial for smoothing out the transient effects of market volatility and specific business cycle phases on earnings.

Interpreting the Advanced Price to Earnings

Interpreting Advanced Price to Earnings metrics involves understanding that a higher ratio generally suggests a more expensive valuation, while a lower ratio may indicate undervaluation. For instance, a high CAPE ratio for a broad market index could suggest that future returns might be lower, as investors are paying a premium for current earnings. Conversely, a low CAPE ratio might imply higher expected future returns.

Unlike the standard P/E, which can be heavily skewed by a single year's unusually high or low earnings, the smoothed nature of the CAPE ratio makes it a more reliable indicator of long-term valuation trends. Analysts often compare a current Advanced Price to Earnings reading to its historical averages to gauge the present market's valuation relative to its past. This context is vital for discerning whether the current level is an anomaly or part of a sustained trend. For a comprehensive understanding, these ratios should be analyzed in conjunction with a company's financial statements, including the income statement and balance sheet, to gain a holistic view of financial health.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a hypothetical company, "InnovateTech Inc."

  • Current Real Stock Price: $150
  • 10-Year Average Real EPS: $5.00

To calculate InnovateTech's CAPE ratio:

CAPE Ratio=$150$5.00=30\text{CAPE Ratio} = \frac{\$150}{\$5.00} = 30

Now, let's say a competitor, "SteadyGrowth Corp.," has:

  • Current Real Stock Price: $120
  • 10-Year Average Real EPS: $6.00

SteadyGrowth's CAPE ratio would be:

CAPE Ratio=$120$6.00=20\text{CAPE Ratio} = \frac{\$120}{\$6.00} = 20

In this hypothetical example, InnovateTech's CAPE ratio of 30 suggests that the market is willing to pay 30 times its average real earnings, indicating a higher valuation, perhaps due to expectations of higher future growth. SteadyGrowth's CAPE ratio of 20 suggests a relatively lower valuation. An investor might consider if InnovateTech's future prospects justify its higher Advanced Price to Earnings multiple, or if SteadyGrowth presents a more attractive value opportunity based on its historical earnings power and current price. Examining the cash flow statement for both companies could further inform this analysis.

Practical Applications

Advanced Price to Earnings metrics are widely used in several areas of finance and investing:

  • Macroeconomic Analysis: Economists and strategists use CAPE ratios for broad market indexes (like the S&P 500) to gauge overall market valuation. A high CAPE ratio for the market may signal potential overvaluation and lower future equity returns, as discussed in research on the equity risk premium.3
  • Long-Term Portfolio Management: Long-term investors and fund managers use these ratios to make strategic asset allocation decisions, potentially adjusting their equity exposure based on whether the market is historically expensive or cheap.
  • Academic Research: Advanced P/E ratios form a cornerstone of academic studies on market efficiency, asset pricing, and return predictability. Researchers investigate their ability to forecast future returns and understand deviations from fundamental value.
  • Investment Due Diligence: While often applied at the market level, sophisticated investors may adapt the methodology for individual stock analysis, particularly for companies with highly cyclical earnings, to get a more stable picture of their underlying profitability. For public companies, detailed earnings data is available through regulatory filings like the 10-K report, which provides comprehensive financial information.2 This allows for thorough forecasting and analysis.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite their advantages, Advanced Price to Earnings metrics are not without limitations. A primary critique is that they are backward-looking, relying on historical earnings data, which may not always be indicative of future performance, particularly in rapidly changing industries or during structural economic shifts. While adjustments for inflation are made, the underlying accounting standards and corporate payout policies (e.g., increased share repurchases over dividends) can still influence the reported earnings figures over time.1

Furthermore, the "average" period chosen (e.g., 10 years for CAPE) can be arbitrary, and different periods might yield different signals. Some argue that changes in interest rates or the prevailing discount rate in the market should also be factored in, as they affect the present value of future earnings. Critics also point out that while a high CAPE ratio may suggest lower future returns, it does not reliably predict the timing of market corrections or crashes. The ratio can remain elevated for extended periods, making it a poor short-term market timing tool. Moreover, comparing Advanced Price to Earnings across different industries or countries requires careful consideration due to varying accounting practices, growth prospects, and economic structures.

Advanced Price to Earnings vs. Price-to-Earnings Ratio

The primary distinction between Advanced Price to Earnings (represented most notably by the CAPE ratio) and the standard Price-to-Earnings Ratio lies in how they treat earnings.

FeatureAdvanced Price to Earnings (e.g., CAPE Ratio)Standard Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio
Earnings Used10-year average, inflation-adjusted real earningsTrailing 12-month (TTM) or forward 12-month earnings
VolatilitySmoothed, less susceptible to short-term fluctuationsHighly sensitive to recent earnings volatility
PerspectiveLong-term, cyclical trendsShort-term snapshot
PurposeAssess fundamental valuation, predict long-term returnsQuick valuation snapshot, compare within industry
Market ConditionBetter for cyclical industries, volatile marketsCan be distorted by temporary earnings issues

The standard P/E ratio is calculated by dividing the current share price by the most recent annual or trailing 12-month earnings per share. While simple and widely used for quick comparisons, its reliance on a single period's earnings can lead to misleading conclusions, especially if that period includes unusual expenses, non-recurring income, or is at a peak or trough of an economic cycle. Advanced Price to Earnings aims to mitigate this "noise" by providing a more stable and historically informed measure of a company's or market's true earnings power. The confusion often arises because both attempt to relate price to earnings, but they do so using vastly different time horizons and adjustments.

FAQs

Why is the standard P/E ratio sometimes considered insufficient?

The standard P/E ratio can be insufficient because it uses only a single period's (typically the last 12 months) earnings, which can be highly volatile and not representative of a company's long-term profitability. This can lead to a distorted picture of its true valuation if earnings were unusually high or low due to one-off events or cyclical factors.

What makes the CAPE ratio "cyclically adjusted"?

The CAPE ratio is "cyclically adjusted" because it uses the average of real (inflation-adjusted) earnings over a 10-year period. This extended averaging period helps to smooth out the fluctuations in corporate profits that naturally occur over various economic cycles, providing a more stable and representative earnings base.

Can Advanced Price to Earnings predict market crashes?

While a high Advanced Price to Earnings ratio, like the CAPE, has historically been associated with lower future long-term returns, it is not a precise market timing tool and does not reliably predict the exact timing of market crashes. It suggests an elevated risk environment but does not offer short-term predictive power for market volatility.

Is Advanced Price to Earnings only for broad market analysis?

While Advanced Price to Earnings, especially the CAPE ratio, is most famously applied to broad market indexes like the S&P 500, its methodology can be adapted for individual stocks, particularly those in cyclical industries. However, the calculation requires consistent historical earnings per share (EPS) data over the chosen averaging period.

How does inflation affect Advanced Price to Earnings?

Inflation affects Advanced Price to Earnings by requiring the conversion of both the current price and historical earnings into "real" (inflation-adjusted) terms. This ensures that the ratio compares values with consistent purchasing power, preventing inflation from artificially skewing the reported earnings figures and providing a more accurate historical comparison.