Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to A Definitions

Aggregate volatility smile

What Is Aggregate Volatility Smile?

The aggregate volatility smile refers to the observed phenomenon in the options market where implied volatility for options with the same expiration date but different strike prices forms a U-shaped or skewed curve when plotted against these strike prices. This pattern deviates from the assumptions of traditional options pricing models like the Black-Scholes model, which posits that implied volatility should be constant across all strike prices for a given expiration. Instead, options that are significantly "out-of-the-money" (OTM) or "in-the-money" (ITM) tend to have higher implied volatilities than "at-the-money" (ATM) options, creating the distinctive "smile" or "smirk" shape. This aggregate volatility smile reflects the market's collective assessment of future price movements and the perceived likelihood of extreme events. It is a key concept within derivatives and reflects the market's evolving understanding of risk.

History and Origin

The concept of the volatility smile, and by extension the aggregate volatility smile, gained prominence after the stock market crash of October 1987, often referred to as "Black Monday." Prior to this event, implied volatilities for equity index options were relatively flat, aligning more closely with the assumptions of the Black-Scholes model21. However, in the aftermath of the crash, market participants began to price out-of-the-money put options (which protect against significant downward movements) and out-of-the-money call options (which profit from large upward movements) with higher implied volatilities than at-the-money options19, 20. This was believed to be a reflection of investors re-assessing the probabilities of extreme, "fat-tail" events, leading to increased demand and thus higher prices (and implied volatilities) for these options. The Federal Reserve History website notes that the 1987 crash triggered a permanent shift in index option prices, and implied volatility curves for equity index options dramatically and permanently steepened afterwards17, 18. Stephen Figlewski, a prominent finance professor at NYU Stern, has extensively documented and researched this phenomenon, highlighting how the market's perception of risk changed after this pivotal event15, 16.

Key Takeaways

  • The aggregate volatility smile illustrates that implied volatility is not constant across all strike prices for options with the same expiration date, contrary to some theoretical models.
  • It typically shows higher implied volatilities for out-of-the-money and in-the-money options compared to at-the-money options, forming a U-shape or skew.
  • This pattern reflects the market's collective perception of future risk, particularly the perceived likelihood of large, unexpected price movements.
  • The existence of the aggregate volatility smile necessitates adjustments to standard financial modeling and options valuation techniques.
  • It is a critical component for professionals engaged in risk management and hedging strategies in the derivatives market.

Formula and Calculation

While there isn't a single "formula" for the aggregate volatility smile itself (as it is an observed market pattern), it is derived from the implied volatility of individual options contracts. Implied volatility is the volatility input that, when plugged into an options pricing model (such as Black-Scholes), yields the current market price of the option. It is typically calculated by iteratively solving the Black-Scholes formula for the volatility term, given the market option premium, strike price, underlying asset price, time to expiration, and risk-free rate.

The Black-Scholes formula for a call option is:
C=S0N(d1)−Ke−rTN(d2)C = S_0 N(d_1) - K e^{-rT} N(d_2)
where:
d1=ln⁡(S0/K)+(r+σ2/2)TσTd_1 = \frac{\ln(S_0/K) + (r + \sigma^2/2)T}{\sigma \sqrt{T}}
d2=d1−σTd_2 = d_1 - \sigma \sqrt{T}
And for a put option:
P=Ke−rTN(−d2)−S0N(−d1)P = K e^{-rT} N(-d_2) - S_0 N(-d_1)
where:

  • (C) = Call option price
  • (P) = Put option price
  • (S_0) = Current price of the underlying asset
  • (K) = Strike price
  • (T) = Time to expiration (in years)
  • (r) = Risk-free interest rate
  • (\sigma) = Implied volatility (the variable to be solved for)
  • (N(x)) = Cumulative standard normal distribution function

To calculate implied volatility, one takes the observed market price (C or P) and the known parameters ($S_0, K, T, r$) and uses numerical methods (like Newton-Raphson) to find the (\sigma) that makes the equation hold true. When these implied volatilities are then plotted against their respective strike prices for a given maturity, the aggregate volatility smile emerges. Indexes like the Cboe Volatility Index (VIX) aggregate these implied volatilities from a wide range of S&P 500 options to provide a forward-looking measure of expected market volatility13, 14.

Interpreting the Aggregate Volatility Smile

The aggregate volatility smile provides insights into market sentiment and the market's assessment of tail risks. A pronounced smile, where OTM and ITM options exhibit significantly higher implied volatilities than ATM options, suggests that market participants perceive a higher probability of large price movements in either direction. For instance, in equity markets, a "skew" where OTM put options have considerably higher implied volatilities than OTM call options often indicates a stronger fear of downside risk (market crashes) than upside potential.

Conversely, a flatter aggregate volatility smile indicates a market that anticipates more normal, less extreme price distributions. Traders and investors interpret the shape and movement of the aggregate volatility smile to gauge overall market uncertainty and to inform their hedging strategies and directional bets. It acts as a barometer for market stress, with steeper smiles often appearing during periods of heightened fear or uncertainty. The smile's dynamics also influence risk-neutral pricing models beyond simple Black-Scholes assumptions.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an aggregate volatility smile observed for a set of options on a broad market index, all expiring in three months.

  • An at-the-money option (strike price equal to current index price of 5,000) has an implied volatility of 18%.
  • An out-of-the-money put option (strike price of 4,700) has an implied volatility of 25%.
  • An out-of-the-money call option (strike price of 5,300) has an implied volatility of 22%.

When these points are plotted, the implied volatility is lowest at the current index price (5,000) and increases as the strike price moves further away in either direction (4,700 and 5,300), creating a U-shape. The fact that the 4,700 strike put has a higher implied volatility (25%) than the 5,300 strike call (22%) indicates a "skew," suggesting that the market is more concerned about a significant downward move in the index than an equally significant upward move. An options trader observing this might infer that investors are willing to pay a higher option premium for protection against a market decline than for participation in a large rally. This information is crucial for crafting specific hedging strategies or speculating on tail risks.

Practical Applications

The aggregate volatility smile is integral to several aspects of modern finance, particularly within the realm of derivatives.

  1. Options Pricing and Valuation: While the Black-Scholes model assumes constant volatility, the observed aggregate volatility smile necessitates adjustments for accurate pricing. Practitioners use more advanced models, such as stochastic volatility models or local volatility models, that account for this varying implied volatility across strike prices and maturities. These models ensure that theoretical option prices align more closely with actual market prices.
  2. Risk Management and Hedging: The shape of the aggregate volatility smile informs risk management by highlighting the market's perception of tail risks. For example, a steep left-hand side of the smile (higher implied volatility for OTM puts) indicates strong demand for downside protection, implying market participants are concerned about significant drops. Portfolio managers use this information to fine-tune their hedging strategies, potentially by purchasing out-of-the-money puts to guard against large market downturns. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) provides guidance for investors considering options trading, emphasizing the risks associated with market volatility12.
  3. Arbitrage Identification: Discrepancies in the aggregate volatility smile across different exchanges or instruments can present arbitrage opportunities for sophisticated traders who can exploit temporary mispricings.
  4. Volatility Trading: Specialized traders and funds actively trade volatility itself, often using volatility indexes like the Cboe Volatility Index (VIX). The VIX is calculated by aggregating the weighted prices of a wide range of S&P 500 put options and call options, effectively reflecting the aggregate volatility smile for the broad market11. This allows investors to directly speculate on or hedge against changes in the overall market's expected volatility. The Federal Reserve also monitors broader market volatility as part of its financial stability assessments9, 10.

Limitations and Criticisms

While the aggregate volatility smile is a crucial empirical observation in options pricing and risk assessment, it also presents several limitations and criticisms. Primarily, its existence highlights the shortcomings of foundational models like Black-Scholes model, which assume constant volatility and log-normal distribution of asset returns8. This assumption is often violated in real markets, where asset returns tend to exhibit "fat tails" (more frequent extreme events) and skewness. As a result, using a single volatility input from Black-Scholes can lead to mispricing of out-of-the-money or in-the-money options.

Another criticism is that the aggregate volatility smile is a reflection of supply and demand dynamics, market sentiment, and perceived risks, rather than a direct physical property of the underlying asset's volatility7. It can be influenced by large institutional orders, hedging strategies of market makers, or even speculative demand for certain options, leading to shapes that aren't perfectly symmetrical or "smile-like"6. For instance, a "volatility smirk" where out-of-the-money puts have significantly higher implied volatilities than out-of-the-money calls is more commonly observed in equity markets than a perfect smile4, 5.

Furthermore, the interpretation of the smile can be complex. While it reflects the market's collective view, it does not guarantee future price movements or provide definitive trading signals. Attempting to arbitrage opportunities based on perceived mispricings within the smile can be challenging due to transaction costs, liquidity issues, and the dynamic nature of implied volatilities. The aggregate volatility smile is a model, and its observed shape can vary due to external market factors3. Research continues into more sophisticated financial modeling techniques, including the use of artificial intelligence and deep learning, to better forecast and understand the dynamic evolution of the volatility surface1, 2.

Aggregate Volatility Smile vs. Volatility Skew

The terms "aggregate volatility smile" and "volatility skew" are closely related concepts in options pricing, often used interchangeably, but with a subtle distinction.

The aggregate volatility smile describes the general U-shaped or curved pattern observed when plotting implied volatility against the strike prices for a given expiration date across a range of options. It implies that both very high and very low strike prices (out-of-the-money or deep in-the-money options) exhibit higher implied volatilities compared to at-the-money options. The name "smile" comes from this symmetric or semi-symmetric U-shape.

In contrast, volatility skew describes a situation where the implied volatility pattern is asymmetric, or "skewed," rather than a symmetrical smile. This is particularly common in equity markets, where OTM put options typically trade at significantly higher implied volatilities than OTM call options with the same distance from the current price. This results in a downward-sloping implied volatility curve as strike prices decrease, forming more of a "smirk" or "frown" shape rather than a symmetric smile. The skew reflects a stronger market demand for downside protection and a perceived higher risk of significant downward movements compared to upward ones. Therefore, a volatility skew is a specific, asymmetric form that the broader aggregate volatility smile can take, especially in equity indices where crash fears are prevalent.

FAQs

What causes the aggregate volatility smile?

The aggregate volatility smile is primarily caused by market participants' expectations of future price movements, particularly the likelihood of extreme events (known as "fat tails" in statistical terms), and the supply and demand dynamics for options at different strike prices. Investors are often willing to pay more option premium for protection against large losses (OTM puts) or to profit from huge gains (OTM calls), which drives up their implied volatility compared to at-the-money options.

How does the aggregate volatility smile affect options trading?

The aggregate volatility smile means that options with different strike prices for the same expiration do not share the same implied volatility. This is crucial for traders because it impacts how they value options, structure complex trades, and implement hedging strategies. Traders must account for the smile when analyzing potential profits and losses, as ignoring it could lead to mispricing or incorrect risk assessments.

Is the aggregate volatility smile always U-shaped?

No, while "smile" implies a U-shape, the pattern of implied volatility is not always a perfect U. In equity markets, it often exhibits a "smirk" or "skew" where out-of-the-money put options have significantly higher implied volatilities than out-of-the-money call options. This reflects a greater concern about downside risks. The specific shape can vary depending on the underlying asset, market conditions, and time to expiration. This broader concept is often referred to as the volatility surface.