Skip to main content
← Back to A Definitions

Alchian–allen effect

What Is the Alchian–Allen Effect?

The Alchian–Allen effect is a principle within microeconomics and consumer behavior that describes how the consumption of higher-quality goods can increase when a uniform, fixed per-unit cost is added to both high- and low-quality versions of a product. This phenomenon occurs because the addition of the fixed cost decreases the relative price of the higher-quality good, making it comparatively more attractive to consumers. The effect highlights how specific transaction costs can subtly alter purchasing patterns, leading to seemingly counter-intuitive outcomes where consumers "ship the good apples out."

History and Origin

The Alchian–Allen effect was first articulated by economists Armen A. Alchian and William R. Allen in their 1964 textbook, University Economics (later retitled Exchange and Production). Altho5ugh the underlying observation might have existed in economic thought prior, Alchian and Allen formalized the concept and provided clear explanations, including the famous "shipping the good apples out" analogy. This theorem has since become a notable insight in economic theory, demonstrating how seemingly minor additions to cost, such as transportation expenses or specific taxes, can significantly influence consumer choices and market dynamics.

Key Takeaways

  • The Alchian–Allen effect posits that adding a uniform fixed cost to two goods of differing quality causes consumers to favor the higher-quality option.
  • This occurs because the fixed per-unit cost reduces the percentage difference in price between the higher and lower-quality goods.
  • Examples include the tendency for exported goods to be of higher quality or for prohibited substances to become more potent.
  • The effect influences consumer purchasing decisions, international trade patterns, and the outcomes of certain regulatory policies.
  • Understanding the Alchian–Allen effect provides insights into how various transaction costs can shape consumption and production incentives.

Interpreting the Alchian–Allen Effect

The core interpretation of the Alchian–Allen effect lies in the shift of relative price. When a constant per-unit cost is applied to both a low-quality good ($P_L$) and a high-quality good ($P_H$), where $P_H > P_L$, the new prices become $P_L + C$ and $P_H + C$, where $C$ is the common fixed cost. The ratio of the high-quality good's price to the low-quality good's price changes.

Initially, the ratio is (\frac{P_H}{P_L}). After adding the cost (C), the new ratio becomes (\frac{P_H + C}{P_L + C}). Because (P_H > P_L), it can be shown that (\frac{P_H + C}{P_L + C} < \frac{P_H}{P_L}). This mathematical relationship indicates that the higher-quality good becomes relatively cheaper when the fixed cost is introduced.

For instance, if high-quality coffee beans cost $10 per pound and low-quality beans cost $5 per pound, the high-quality beans are twice as expensive. If a shipping cost of $2 per pound is added to both, the prices become $12 and $7. Now, the high-quality beans are only approximately 1.71 times as expensive. This reduction in the relative price differential makes the higher-quality product a more attractive option, encouraging a substitution effect towards it. This effect helps explain consumption patterns where consumers prioritize quality when additional costs are involved.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a scenario involving two types of apples: standard apples costing $1.00 each at the orchard and premium apples costing $2.00 each. At the orchard, a premium apple is twice as expensive as a standard apple.

Now, imagine these apples are shipped to a distant city, incurring a transportation cost of $0.50 per apple, regardless of quality.

  • Original Prices (at orchard):

    • Standard Apple: $1.00
    • Premium Apple: $2.00
    • Relative Price (Premium/Standard): (\frac{$2.00}{$1.00} = 2.0)
  • Prices (in distant city, after fixed shipping cost):

    • Standard Apple: $1.00 + $0.50 = $1.50
    • Premium Apple: $2.00 + $0.50 = $2.50
    • New Relative Price (Premium/Standard): (\frac{$2.50}{$1.50} \approx 1.67)

In this hypothetical example, while both apples are more expensive in the distant city, the premium apple has become relatively cheaper compared to the standard apple (1.67 times instead of 2.0 times). According to the Alchian–Allen effect, consumers in the distant city would tend to purchase a higher proportion of premium apples than consumers at the orchard, as the added fixed cost makes the premium option a relatively better value proposition.

Practical Applications

The Alchian–Allen effect appears in various real-world contexts, particularly in international trade and the impact of taxes or regulations.

One common application is observed in global commerce. When goods are transported across borders, specific trade barriers such as freight costs, tariffs, or customs duties act as uniform per-unit additions to the price. This leads to the phenomenon of "shipping the good apples out," where a higher proportion of exported goods are of superior quality because the added transportation costs make higher-quality goods comparatively more attractive in distant markets. Research on global trade patterns, such as the quality of goods shipped over distance, often confirms this effect.

Another notable 4application is in the context of prohibition or sin taxes. When a fixed per-unit tax or a high fixed cost associated with illegality (like the risk of arrest) is applied to goods with varying qualities or potencies, consumers tend to shift towards the higher-quality or more potent versions. For example, historical studies suggest that during alcohol prohibition, consumers shifted towards higher-proof spirits, and similarly, law enforcement efforts against illicit drugs have been observed to lead to an increase in drug potency. This demonstrates3 how such costs can unintentionally incentivize higher-quality or more concentrated consumption.

Limitations and Criticisms

While the Alchian–Allen effect offers valuable insights into consumer behavior and market dynamics, it is not without limitations or criticisms. One primary critique is that the effect assumes consumers base their choices strictly on relative prices after the fixed cost is applied, potentially overlooking the impact of absolute prices or total cost. Critics argue that the model's simplicity may not fully account for other influential factors such as individual preferences, income effects, or the availability of information.

Furthermore, the A2lchian–Allen effect is most robust when the goods are close substitute goods and the fixed cost is genuinely uniform per unit. In real-world scenarios, regulations or taxes may not always impose a truly common unit cost, or producers might adjust product quality in response to such costs, which could complicate the predicted outcome. Despite these points,1 the Alchian–Allen effect remains a powerful tool for understanding how uniform per-unit costs can influence demand for differentiated products.

Alchian–Allen Effect vs. Law of Demand

The Alchian–Allen effect is often colloquially referred to as the "third law of demand," which can lead to confusion with the fundamental law of demand. The basic law of demand states that, ceteris paribus (all else being equal), as the price of a good increases, the quantity demanded for that good decreases. This is a proposition about the relationship between the price of a single good and its quantity demanded.

In contrast, the Alchian–Allen effect deals with how changes in a uniform fixed cost affect the relative consumption of two or more substitute goods that differ in quality or initial price. It doesn't contradict the law of demand; rather, it highlights a specific implication of fixed costs on consumer choice within a multi-good framework. While the law of demand focuses on the inverse relationship between price and quantity for a single good, the Alchian–Allen effect explains a shift in the composition of demand between different qualities of goods when a common per-unit cost is introduced. It's a more nuanced application of price theory, specifically demonstrating how a fixed addition to cost can change the perceived opportunity cost of consuming the higher-quality item.

FAQs

Why is it called "shipping the good apples out"?

This phrase is a famous analogy used to explain the Alchian–Allen effect. If it costs the same to ship a low-quality apple as it does a high-quality apple, the shipping cost represents a smaller percentage of the high-quality apple's total price. This makes the high-quality apple relatively more attractive to distant buyers, so a higher proportion of "good apples" are shipped farther away.

Does the Alchian–Allen effect apply to services?

Yes, the principles of the Alchian–Allen effect can extend beyond physical goods to services where a fixed per-unit cost or barrier exists. For example, if a service has a fixed booking fee, regardless of the service package (standard vs. premium), the premium package becomes relatively cheaper in percentage terms. This could encourage clients to opt for the higher-tier service. The effect is broader than just physical transportation costs.

How does this affect supply and demand?

The Alchian–Allen effect primarily impacts the demand side of the market by altering consumers' preferences between different qualities of goods. It can lead to a shift in the demand curve for higher-quality goods relative to lower-quality ones when a fixed per-unit cost is introduced. Producers might then adjust their supply in response to this change in consumer preferences, potentially increasing the supply of higher-quality items for markets where such fixed costs are prevalent.

Can the Alchian–Allen effect be intentionally used in policy?

Policymakers and businesses can consider the implications of the Alchian–Allen effect when designing taxes, subsidies, or pricing strategies. For instance, a flat per-unit tax on a product category could inadvertently encourage the consumption of higher-quality versions within that category. Understanding this effect allows for a more informed assessment of how such policies might influence market outcomes and consumer choices.