Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to A Definitions

Allocation method

What Is Rebalancing?

Rebalancing is the process of realigning a portfolio's asset allocation back to its original target percentages. As market conditions cause the value of different investments to fluctuate, the initial distribution of assets, such as stocks, bonds, and cash equivalents, can drift significantly. Rebalancing is a key component of effective portfolio management and falls under the broader financial category of portfolio theory. By periodically adjusting the portfolio, investors maintain a level of risk exposure consistent with their financial objectives and risk tolerance. The goal of rebalancing is not necessarily to boost returns but to control risk by ensuring the portfolio remains aligned with its intended strategic asset allocation.

History and Origin

The concept of rebalancing is inherently tied to the principles of modern portfolio theory, which emphasizes the importance of managing a portfolio as a whole rather than focusing solely on individual securities. This foundational approach to investing was largely popularized by Harry Markowitz. In 1952, Markowitz published his seminal essay "Portfolio Selection," followed by his 1959 book "Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification," which laid out the mathematical framework for selecting portfolios based on expected return and risk9. His work, for which he later received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1990, demonstrated that investors could optimize their portfolios by considering the correlation between assets, leading to the broader adoption of diversification and risk assessment in financial investments8. While Markowitz's initial work focused on constructing optimal portfolios, the natural consequence of market fluctuations on these optimal allocations necessitated the practice of rebalancing to maintain the desired risk-return profile.

Key Takeaways

  • Rebalancing restores a portfolio's asset allocation to its target percentages.
  • It primarily serves as a risk management tool, preventing unintended shifts in exposure.
  • The process typically involves selling overweight assets and buying underweight assets.
  • Rebalancing helps maintain a portfolio aligned with an investor's long-term financial goals and risk tolerance.
  • Frequency and method of rebalancing can vary based on individual preferences and market conditions.

Interpreting Rebalancing

Rebalancing is interpreted as a disciplined approach to managing investment risk and adhering to a predefined investment strategy. When a portfolio's asset classes deviate from their target weights, the overall risk profile can change. For example, if stocks experience significant gains, the portfolio's equity exposure may become higher than initially desired, increasing its overall volatility. Conversely, if an asset class underperforms, its weight might shrink, potentially reducing the portfolio's expected risk-adjusted returns. Rebalancing corrects these drifts, ensuring the investor's exposure aligns with their chosen asset allocation based on their time horizon and capacity for risk.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investor, Alex, who sets up a portfolio with an initial target asset allocation of 60% stocks and 40% bonds. Alex invests $100,000, with $60,000 in stocks and $40,000 in bonds.

After one year, due to strong market performance, the stock portion of the portfolio grows to $75,000, while the bond portion remains at $40,000. The total portfolio value is now $115,000.

Alex's new allocation is approximately:

  • Stocks: (\frac{$75,000}{$115,000} \approx 65.2%)
  • Bonds: (\frac{$40,000}{$115,000} \approx 34.8%)

To rebalance back to the 60/40 target, Alex needs to:

  1. Sell some stocks: Alex would sell stocks worth ($75,000 - (0.60 \times $115,000) = $75,000 - $69,000 = $6,000).
  2. Buy more bonds: Alex would use the $6,000 from selling stocks to buy more bonds, bringing the bond allocation up to ($40,000 + $6,000 = $46,000).

After rebalancing, the portfolio would be:

  • Stocks: $69,000 (60% of $115,000)
  • Bonds: $46,000 (40% of $115,000)

This step-by-step process ensures Alex's portfolio risk profile is realigned with the original strategic plan.

Practical Applications

Rebalancing is a common practice across various aspects of financial planning and investing. It is routinely applied in individual investment accounts, retirement plans such as 401(k)s and IRAs, and by institutional investors managing large endowments or pension funds.

  • Individual Investing: Retail investors often employ rebalancing to keep their personal portfolios in line with their long-term financial goals, particularly as they approach life milestones like retirement. For example, a younger investor with a higher risk tolerance might maintain a higher equity allocation, gradually reducing it through rebalancing as they age7.
  • Target-Date Funds: Many mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) operate on an automatic rebalancing schedule, especially target-date funds, which automatically adjust their asset allocation to become more conservative as the target retirement date approaches6.
  • Financial Advising: Financial professionals use rebalancing to manage client portfolios, ensuring that their investment strategies remain consistent with the agreed-upon risk parameters and objectives. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Investor.gov provides resources for understanding asset allocation and the importance of rebalancing for investors5.
  • Tax Considerations: Rebalancing can have tax implications. Investors often prioritize rebalancing within tax-deferred accounts like 401(k)s or IRAs, as transactions within these accounts typically do not trigger immediate capital gains taxes4.

Limitations and Criticisms

While rebalancing is a widely accepted practice for risk management in portfolio management, it does have limitations and criticisms. One common critique is that strict rebalancing can potentially cap upside gains during strong bull markets, as it requires selling winning assets. Conversely, it can also lead to buying more of underperforming assets, which may continue to decline in value, a concept sometimes referred to as "averaging down."

Another point of contention revolves around the frequency of rebalancing. While some advocate for annual or semi-annual rebalancing, others argue that too-frequent rebalancing can lead to excessive transaction costs, especially in taxable accounts where it could trigger capital gains taxes2, 3. Moreover, the effectiveness of rebalancing heavily relies on the initial asset allocation strategy. If the underlying assumptions about asset class returns and correlations are flawed, rebalancing a suboptimal allocation will not necessarily lead to desired outcomes. Some research suggests that relying solely on historical returns for setting asset allocation expectations, which then drives rebalancing, can be problematic as future returns may not mirror past performance1.

Rebalancing vs. Asset Allocation

Asset allocation and rebalancing are closely related but distinct concepts in portfolio management. Asset allocation is the strategic decision of how to divide an investment portfolio among different asset classes, such as stocks, bonds, and cash equivalents, based on an investor's time horizon, risk tolerance, and financial goals. It is the initial blueprint for the portfolio's structure.

In contrast, rebalancing is the ongoing tactical process of maintaining that chosen asset allocation. Over time, market movements will cause the actual proportions of assets in a portfolio to drift away from the target allocation. Rebalancing is the act of restoring those percentages, typically by selling assets that have grown to become an overweight portion of the portfolio and buying those that have become underweight. While asset allocation sets the long-term investment strategy, rebalancing ensures the portfolio consistently adheres to that strategy amidst market fluctuations.

FAQs

What is the primary purpose of rebalancing?

The primary purpose of rebalancing is to manage and control the risk tolerance of a portfolio. It ensures that the portfolio's actual asset allocation remains aligned with the investor's desired risk level, preventing unintended concentration in certain asset classes.

How often should a portfolio be rebalanced?

The ideal frequency for rebalancing varies. Many investors opt for time-based rebalancing, such as annually or semi-annually. Others prefer threshold-based rebalancing, where the portfolio is adjusted only when an asset class deviates by a certain percentage from its target weight. The most appropriate frequency depends on an individual's preference, the portfolio's volatility, and tax considerations.

What are the two main methods of rebalancing?

The two main methods are time-based rebalancing and threshold-based rebalancing. Time-based involves rebalancing at fixed intervals (e.g., once a year), while threshold-based involves rebalancing only when an asset class's weight deviates by a predetermined percentage (e.g., +/- 5%) from its target.

Can rebalancing negatively impact returns?

While rebalancing aims to control risk, it can sometimes lead to selling assets that are performing well, potentially reducing overall returns compared to a "buy and hold" strategy in certain market conditions. However, it also prevents excessive exposure to high-volatility assets, which could protect against significant losses during market downturns, thus contributing to better long-term risk-adjusted returns.