Skip to main content
← Back to A Definitions

Amortized net stable funding ratio

What Is Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR)?

The Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) is a crucial regulatory metric within banking regulation that assesses the stability of a financial institution's funding profile over a one-year time horizon. It falls under the broader category of liquidity management and aims to reduce the risk of funding shocks by requiring banks to maintain sufficient stable funding to support their assets and off-balance sheet activities. The NSFR helps prevent over-reliance on short-term, volatile wholesale funding, thereby enhancing the resilience of individual banks and the financial system as a whole.

History and Origin

The concept of the Net Stable Funding Ratio emerged from the lessons learned during the 2007–2008 financial crisis. During this period, many banks, despite meeting existing capital requirements, faced severe liquidity risk due to their excessive reliance on unstable short-term funding. The crisis highlighted the critical importance of liquidity to the proper functioning of financial markets and the banking sector. As a direct response, the G20 launched an overhaul of global banking regulation, known as Basel III.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) introduced the NSFR as one of two new global liquidity standards, complementing the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR), which focuses on short-term liquidity. The BCBS initially proposed the NSFR in 2010 and released its final version in October 2014. T32, 33his standard was designed to limit excessive maturity transformation risk in the banking sector and promote funding stability. While the BCBS does not have the authority to issue legally binding regulations, it sets international standards that national authorities implement into their own regulatory frameworks. The NSFR became a minimum standard effective January 1, 2018, though implementation timelines varied across jurisdictions. I30, 31n the United States, federal banking agencies, including the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), finalized their rule to implement the NSFR in October 2020, with an effective date of July 1, 2021, for covered institutions. T27, 28, 29his US rule aimed to align with the international Basel III NSFR standard, with adjustments for specific characteristics of US markets.

25, 26## Key Takeaways

  • The Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) is a regulatory measure ensuring banks maintain stable funding for at least a one-year horizon.
  • It is a core component of the Basel III reforms, designed to prevent liquidity crises and reduce reliance on short-term wholesale funding.
  • The NSFR requires banks to have a minimum ratio of available stable funding (ASF) to required stable funding (RSF) of at least 100%.
  • Available stable funding comprises capital and liabilities deemed reliable over one year, while required stable funding is based on the liquidity characteristics of assets and off-balance sheet exposures.
  • The NSFR complements the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR), which focuses on shorter-term liquidity needs.

Formula and Calculation

The Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) is calculated as the ratio of a bank's Available Stable Funding (ASF) to its Required Stable Funding (RSF). The minimum regulatory requirement for the NSFR is typically 1.0 (or 100%), meaning ASF must be greater than or equal to RSF.

22, 23, 24The formula is expressed as:

NSFR=Available Stable Funding (ASF)Required Stable Funding (RSF)1.0\text{NSFR} = \frac{\text{Available Stable Funding (ASF)}}{\text{Required Stable Funding (RSF)}} \ge 1.0

Where:

  • Available Stable Funding (ASF): This represents the portion of a bank's equity and liabilities that is expected to be stable and reliable over a one-year time horizon. Different categories of funding sources are assigned "stable funding factors" (SFFs) based on their perceived stability. For instance, regulatory capital, preferred stock with no maturity, and retail deposits from small businesses are generally considered highly stable.
    *20, 21 Required Stable Funding (RSF): This is the minimum amount of stable funding a bank is required to hold, determined by the liquidity characteristics and residual maturities of its financial assets and off-balance sheet exposures. Various asset classes are assigned "required stable funding factors" (RSFFs) based on how easily they can be liquidated or their need for stable funding. For example, less liquid assets or those with longer maturities require more stable funding.

18, 19The calculation involves applying these factors to the carrying values of specific balance sheet and off-balance sheet items. Assets and liabilities, including those measured at amortized cost, are inputs into this calculation, as their carrying values contribute to determining the total ASF and RSF.

Interpreting the NSFR

A Net Stable Funding Ratio above 1.0 (or 100%) indicates that a financial institution possesses more stable funding than is required to cover its less liquid assets and activities over a one-year period. This suggests a robust balance sheet and a reduced susceptibility to liquidity shocks. Conversely, an NSFR below 1.0 would signal a potential funding imbalance, indicating an over-reliance on short-term or unstable funding sources relative to the long-term or illiquid nature of its assets.

Regulators typically mandate a minimum NSFR of 100% to ensure that banks maintain a sustainable funding structure. Banks continuously monitor their NSFR to ensure compliance and to inform their asset liability management strategies. It serves as a forward-looking measure, encouraging banks to structure their funding and assets in a way that minimizes future funding risk.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "Horizon Bank," a hypothetical institution reporting its NSFR for regulatory purposes.

Available Stable Funding (ASF) Components:

  • Regulatory Capital: $500 million (100% SFF = $500 million ASF)
  • Retail Deposits (stable portion): $300 million (95% SFF = $285 million ASF)
  • Long-Term Wholesale Funding (maturing in >1 year): $200 million (90% SFF = $180 million ASF)
  • Other Liabilities (reliable over 1 year): $50 million (50% SFF = $25 million ASF)

Total ASF = $500 + $285 + $180 + $25 = $990 million

Required Stable Funding (RSF) Components:

  • High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) (e.g., government bonds): $150 million (5% RSFF = $7.5 million RSF)
  • Performing Loans to Non-Financial Corporates (residual maturity >1 year): $400 million (65% RSFF = $260 million RSF)
  • Securities with residual maturity between 6 months and <1 year: $100 million (50% RSFF = $50 million RSF)
  • Other Assets (requiring stable funding): $200 million (100% RSFF = $200 million RSF)
  • Off-balance sheet derivatives exposures: $50 million (RSFF applied based on exposure = $10 million RSF)

Total RSF = $7.5 + $260 + $50 + $200 + $10 = $527.5 million

Calculate Horizon Bank's NSFR:
NSFR = ASF / RSF = $990 million / $527.5 million = 1.877 (or 187.7%)

In this example, Horizon Bank's NSFR of 187.7% is well above the minimum 100% requirement, indicating a very strong and stable funding profile.

Practical Applications

The Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) is primarily a prudential regulatory tool used by supervisory authorities to ensure the stability of the global banking system. Its practical applications are widespread across financial institutions, especially large, internationally active banks.

  • Regulatory Compliance: Banks must continuously monitor and report their NSFR to national regulators to ensure compliance with global Basel III standards. Failure to meet the minimum NSFR can result in supervisory actions.
    *16, 17 Liquidity Risk Management: The NSFR serves as a key metric for banks' internal risk management frameworks, guiding strategic decisions related to funding sources and asset allocation. It encourages a more sustainable funding structure by penalizing reliance on volatile short-term funding.
  • Strategic Planning: Financial institutions use the NSFR in their long-term strategic planning, influencing decisions on business lines, product offerings, and balance sheet growth. For example, business activities that require a large amount of required stable funding may need to be balanced with adequate stable funding sources.
  • Investor and Analyst Scrutiny: Publicly disclosed NSFRs are scrutinized by investors and financial analysts to assess a bank's financial health, funding sustainability, and resilience to market disruptions. Institutions subject to NSFR requirements are typically required to publicly disclose their NSFR levels.

14, 15## Limitations and Criticisms

While the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) is a significant step forward in strengthening bank liquidity, it has faced certain limitations and criticisms:

  • Complexity and Implementation Challenges: The calculation of the NSFR can be complex, involving numerous asset and liability categories, each with specific stable funding factors. This complexity can pose implementation challenges for banks, particularly smaller institutions or those with diverse balance sheet structures. D12, 13ifferences in national implementation also exist, leading to variations globally.
  • Potential Impact on Lending: Some critics argue that stringent NSFR requirements could inadvertently restrict banks' ability to engage in maturity transformation, a fundamental function of banking where short-term deposits are used to fund longer-term loans. This could potentially reduce the availability of long-term credit for businesses and households, impacting economic growth.
  • Calibration Concerns: The assigned stable funding factors (SFFs) and required stable funding factors (RSFFs) are standardized and may not perfectly capture the actual liquidity characteristics or funding stability for every unique situation or market. While designed for broad applicability, a "one-size-fits-all" approach may not always reflect specific market conditions or business models.
    *11 Interaction with Other Regulations: The NSFR operates alongside other regulatory capital and liquidity requirements, such as the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR). Ensuring these different regulations work cohesively without creating unintended conflicts or excessive burdens is an ongoing challenge for both regulators and banks.
  • Data Reporting Burden: Complying with the NSFR necessitates extensive data collection and reporting, adding to the operational burden for financial institutions.

Net Stable Funding Ratio vs. Liquidity Coverage Ratio

The Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) and the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) are both key liquidity standards introduced under Basel III, but they address different aspects of a bank's liquidity profile. They are designed to be complementary, not interchangeable.

8, 9, 10| Feature | Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) | Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) |
| :---------------- | :------------------------------------------------------------- | :-------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Time Horizon | Long-term (one year or more) | Short-term (30 calendar days) |
| Primary Focus | Structural funding stability; limits maturity transformation. | Short-term resilience to acute liquidity stress. |
| Objective | Ensures sufficient stable funding for illiquid assets. | Ensures sufficient High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) for outflows. |
| Components | Available Stable Funding (ASF) vs. Required Stable Funding (RSF) | High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) vs. Net Cash Outflows (NCO) |
| Purpose | Promotes sustainable funding structures over the long run. | Ensures capacity to meet short-term liquidity needs in a stress scenario. |
| Relationship | Complements LCR by focusing on longer-term funding stability. | Complements NSFR by addressing immediate liquidity risks. |

While the LCR focuses on a bank's ability to withstand a significant short-term liquidity stress event by holding enough high-quality liquid assets, the NSFR ensures that a bank maintains a stable funding profile over a longer horizon. The NSFR directly discourages an over-reliance on short-term wholesale funding to finance long-term assets, a practice that contributed to the 2008 financial crisis.

7## FAQs

What is the primary goal of the Net Stable Funding Ratio?

The primary goal of the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) is to promote the long-term funding stability of banks. It aims to reduce the likelihood that disruptions to a bank's regular funding sources will erode its liquidity position and potentially lead to broader systemic stress.

5, 6### Who is required to comply with the NSFR?
Generally, large and complex financial institutions, particularly internationally active banks, are required to comply with the NSFR. Specific thresholds for asset size and other risk factors determine applicability, as defined by national regulatory bodies implementing the Basel III standards.

3, 4### How does the NSFR relate to amortized cost accounting?
The NSFR is a regulatory ratio that uses the carrying values of assets and liabilities, which may be measured at amortized cost under accounting standards like IFRS 9. While "amortized cost" is an accounting measurement method for financial liabilities and assets, it influences the numerical inputs (carrying values) that go into the NSFR calculation for Required Stable Funding (RSF) and Available Stable Funding (ASF). The NSFR itself is not "amortized"; rather, the assets contributing to its calculation might be accounted for using the amortized cost method.

What happens if a bank's NSFR falls below 100%?

If a bank's NSFR falls below the minimum 100% requirement, it indicates a funding shortfall. Regulators may impose supervisory measures to compel the bank to improve its liquidity and funding profile. This could involve requiring the bank to increase its stable funding sources or reduce its holdings of less liquid assets.

2### Is the NSFR a global standard?
Yes, the Net Stable Funding Ratio is a global minimum standard developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision as part of the Basel III framework. While the core principles are consistent internationally, there can be some variations in how individual countries implement the standard into their domestic regulations.1