Skip to main content

Are you on the right long-term path? Get a full financial assessment

Get a full financial assessment
← Back to A Definitions

Anchoring bias

What Is Anchoring Bias?

Anchoring bias is a cognitive bias where individuals rely too heavily on the first piece of information offered (the "anchor") when making decisions. This initial piece of information, even if arbitrary or irrelevant, significantly influences subsequent judgments and estimations. As a core concept within behavioral finance, anchoring bias highlights how human psychology can lead to deviations from purely rational decision-making, impacting financial outcomes and various other aspects of life. It demonstrates how initial figures can serve as a powerful reference point, causing individuals to adjust their final conclusions insufficiently. This often results in a final decision that is skewed towards the initial anchor, even when new information becomes available13.

History and Origin

The concept of anchoring bias was first introduced and extensively studied by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky in their seminal 1974 paper, "Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases." Their groundbreaking research, which earned Kahneman a Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, laid much of the foundation for modern economic theory and the field of behavioral economics11, 12. Through a series of experiments, Kahneman and Tversky demonstrated how people tend to make estimates by starting from an initial value (the anchor) and then adjusting it to yield a final answer. They showed that these adjustments are often insufficient, leading to biased results influenced by the arbitrary starting point. One notable experiment involved participants spinning a "wheel of fortune" marked with numbers from 0 to 100, then asking them to estimate the percentage of African countries in the United Nations. Participants whose wheel landed on a higher number gave significantly higher estimates than those who landed on a lower number, despite the randomness of the wheel, illustrating the profound impact of the initial anchor10.

Key Takeaways

  • Anchoring bias is a cognitive bias where initial information disproportionately influences subsequent decisions.
  • It causes individuals to rely on a starting "anchor" and make insufficient adjustments away from it, even if the anchor is irrelevant.
  • This bias can lead to suboptimal outcomes in negotiations, pricing, and investment strategies.
  • Awareness of anchoring bias is crucial for improving critical thinking and objective assessment in financial and everyday contexts.
  • The bias was first identified by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky in 1974.

Interpreting the Anchoring Bias

Interpreting anchoring bias involves recognizing its pervasive influence on human judgment. It means understanding that the first piece of information encountered can subtly, yet powerfully, shape one's perception of value, probability, or quantity. For instance, in financial markets, an investor's initial purchase price for a stock can become an unconscious anchor, affecting their willingness to sell or buy more shares, irrespective of current market fundamentals or the company's performance9. This bias suggests that even experienced professionals can be swayed by irrelevant starting points. To mitigate its effects, one must actively question the relevance of initial figures and seek out diverse perspectives and independent risk assessment before finalizing a decision.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investor, Sarah, who purchased shares of "Tech Innovations Inc." at $75 per share. A few months later, the stock's value drops to $50 per share due to broader market volatility and some company-specific negative news. Despite new information suggesting continued challenges for Tech Innovations, Sarah finds herself reluctant to sell. Her decision is anchored to the original $75 purchase price, which she unconsciously perceives as the "true" value of the stock. She believes the stock should eventually return to $75, even though a rational analysis based on current fundamentals might suggest selling to cut losses or reallocating capital to more promising opportunities. This fixation on the initial $75 stock valuation prevents her from making an objective decision based on the present reality.

Practical Applications

Anchoring bias manifests in numerous practical scenarios across finance and everyday life. In negotiation, the party making the first offer often sets the anchor, influencing the range and direction of subsequent counteroffers8. For example, a car salesperson who quotes a high initial price anchors the buyer's perception of the vehicle's worth, even if the actual fair value is much lower7.

In investing, anchoring bias can lead to poor portfolio management decisions. Investors might hold onto losing stocks because they are anchored to the original purchase price, hoping the stock will return to that level rather than assessing its current intrinsic value. Conversely, they might sell winning stocks too early if they are anchored to a small initial gain. Real estate agents, for instance, often use anchoring by showing clients a few overpriced properties first, making subsequent, more reasonably priced homes seem like a better deal6.

Government and policymakers are also increasingly aware of how psychological factors influence public behavior. Behavioral economics insights, including anchoring, are considered when designing consumer disclosures or public policy initiatives to encourage more rational choices5. Financial advisors, too, recognize this bias and work to help clients avoid being swayed by arbitrary reference points, encouraging a focus on long-term financial planning and fundamental analysis instead of historical price anchors4.

Limitations and Criticisms

While widely acknowledged, anchoring bias, like other cognitive bias, has certain limitations and criticisms. The degree to which an anchor influences a decision can vary based on individual expertise, the relevance of the anchor, and the effort individuals put into their decision-making process. Highly experienced individuals might be less susceptible to irrelevant anchors, or at least they may make more sufficient adjustments. Furthermore, the effect of anchoring can be diminished when individuals are prompted to consider multiple viewpoints or engage in thorough independent research to question the anchors.3

Some critiques suggest that laboratory experiments, while useful for isolating the bias, may exaggerate its real-world impact where decisions are often more complex and involve richer information environments. Despite efforts to counteract it, anchoring bias remains a persistent challenge in areas like asset allocation and real estate appraisals, demonstrating that even awareness does not always fully eliminate its influence2. Researchers continue to explore the precise mechanisms through which anchoring operates and how its effects can be systematically mitigated.

Anchoring Bias vs. Framing Effect

Anchoring bias and the framing effect are both prominent cognitive biases that influence human judgment, but they operate through different mechanisms.

Anchoring Bias refers to the tendency to rely heavily on the first piece of information encountered (the "anchor") when making decisions. Subsequent judgments are then made by adjusting from this initial anchor, often insufficiently, even if the anchor is irrelevant. The focus is on the numerical or informational starting point.

Framing Effect, on the other hand, describes how people's choices are affected by the way information is presented, or "framed." A decision can be framed to emphasize potential gains or potential losses, and this framing can lead to different choices, even if the underlying objective information remains the same. The focus here is on the presentation style rather than an initial numerical reference point.

For instance, an investor exhibiting anchoring bias might fixate on a stock's historical high price when evaluating its current worth. In contrast, an investor affected by the framing effect might choose a seemingly safer investment when presented with a "90% chance of success" over an identical investment framed as having a "10% chance of failure." While both biases can lead to irrational financial choices, anchoring is about the initial data point's magnetic pull, whereas framing is about how the context or wording surrounding the data influences perception.

FAQs

How does anchoring bias affect investment decisions?

Anchoring bias can significantly impact investor behavior by causing individuals to fixate on an initial reference point, such as a stock's purchase price or a specific market index level. This can lead to holding onto losing investments too long, hoping they return to the anchored price, or selling winning investments too early, based on insufficient gains relative to the anchor. It can also influence perceptions of fair value, leading to misjudgment of a security's true worth1.

Can anchoring bias be avoided?

While it's difficult to completely eliminate anchoring bias due to its subconscious nature, its effects can be mitigated. Strategies include increasing awareness of the bias, actively seeking out and considering diverse information, critically questioning the relevance of initial figures, conducting independent research, and delaying decision-making to allow for more thorough analysis. Financial professionals often advise clients to focus on fundamental analysis rather than arbitrary historical prices.

Is anchoring bias only relevant to finance?

No, anchoring bias is a general cognitive phenomenon that affects judgments and decisions across many domains beyond finance. It influences negotiations in various fields, pricing strategies in retail, legal judgments (e.g., jury awards), medical diagnoses, and even everyday consumer choices. The bias stems from the fundamental way the human mind processes information and makes estimates by adjusting from an initial starting point.

AI Financial Advisor

Get personalized investment advice

  • AI-powered portfolio analysis
  • Smart rebalancing recommendations
  • Risk assessment & management
  • Tax-efficient strategies

Used by 30,000+ investors