Skip to main content
← Back to B Definitions

Backdated real gap

What Is Backdated Real Gap?

A "Backdated Real Gap" refers to the artificial financial advantage created when the effective grant date of stock options is retroactively adjusted to an earlier date with a lower market price. This practice, commonly associated with the broader issue of stock option backdating, aims to provide recipients, typically executives, with a greater immediate or potential executive compensation benefit. It falls under the umbrella of corporate governance concerns, as it often involves a lack of transparency and can mislead shareholders regarding a company's true financial condition and executive compensation practices. The "gap" represents the difference between the lower, backdated strike price and the higher market price on the actual date the option was granted or exercised.

History and Origin

The practice of stock option backdating, which creates the "Backdated Real Gap," gained prominence during the technology boom of the late 1990s and early 2000s. During this period, numerous companies retrospectively chose grant dates for stock options that corresponded to a low point in their stock's value, effectively making the options immediately in-the-money. This allowed executives to profit more significantly when they eventually exercised these options. The widespread nature of this practice came to light around 2006, triggering numerous investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). The SEC launched investigations into suspicious timing and pricing of stock options at over one hundred companies.10 Prior to 2006, it was not explicitly illegal if properly disclosed, but the probes revealed that such disclosures were rarely made. The scandal led to enforcement actions and criminal charges against several former executives.9,8

Key Takeaways

  • A Backdated Real Gap is the beneficial difference between an option's strike price and the market price on a retroactively chosen grant date.
  • This practice became a significant concern during the stock option backdating scandal of the early 2000s, primarily involving executive compensation.
  • The "gap" aims to increase the intrinsic value of stock options granted to recipients without clear disclosure to shareholders.
  • It highlights issues in financial reporting and internal controls within corporations.
  • Regulatory reforms, particularly the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), aimed to curb such practices.

Interpreting the Backdated Real Gap

The existence of a Backdated Real Gap indicates that a stock option was granted with a strike price that was lower than the actual market price on the date the grant decision was made. This immediately provides the option holder with an intrinsic value, making the option in-the-money from the outset. For example, if a company's stock was trading at $50 on the day an option was decided upon, but the grant date was backdated to a time when the stock was $30, the "Backdated Real Gap" would effectively be $20 per share (the difference between $50 and $30 at the time of exercise or the intrinsic value at the effective grant date). This artificial reduction in the strike price aims to enhance the potential profit for the option recipient, regardless of future stock performance from the actual grant date.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "InnovateTech Inc.," whose board of directors decides on June 15, 2005, to grant 10,000 stock options to its CEO. On June 15, the company's stock is trading at $60 per share. To create a Backdated Real Gap, the company's records are manipulated to show the grant date as April 1, 2005, when the stock price was $40 per share.

In this scenario:

  • Actual Grant Date: June 15, 2005 (Stock Price: $60)
  • Backdated Grant Date: April 1, 2005 (Stock Price: $40)
  • Strike Price (as per backdating): $40

The CEO now holds options with a strike price of $40, when on the actual grant day, the price was $60. This effectively creates an immediate $20 "Backdated Real Gap" or intrinsic value per share for the CEO. If the CEO later exercises these options when the stock is at $70, their profit is ( $70 - $40 = $30 ) per share, instead of ( $70 - $60 = $10 ) per share had the option been granted at the actual market price. This manipulation aims to maximize the recipient's personal wealth.

Practical Applications

The concept of the Backdated Real Gap is primarily relevant in discussions of past instances of corporate misconduct and ongoing efforts to ensure transparent executive compensation and sound corporate governance. While the act of backdating stock options to create such a gap is largely considered illegal and unethical today, its practical implications are seen in several areas:

  • Regulatory Enforcement: The SEC continues to monitor and bring enforcement actions against companies and individuals involved in manipulating grant dates or engaging in similar forms of financial fraud. The SEC's "Spotlight on Stock Options Backdating" page provides historical context and a list of related enforcement actions.7
  • Auditing and Compliance: Corporate auditors and internal compliance teams must implement robust internal controls to prevent and detect any attempts to create a Backdated Real Gap. This includes strict adherence to accounting standards regarding option grants and their reporting.
  • Investor Due Diligence: Investors analyze companies' financial statements and proxy statements for any signs of irregular compensation practices or potential manipulation that could obscure the true value of executive pay.
  • Corporate Accountability: The scandals surrounding backdating reinforced the need for strong independent boards of directors and compensation committees to ensure fairness and transparency in setting executive pay. Despite previous scandals and new regulations, some studies suggest that forms of stock option manipulation, including backdating and similar practices like "spring-loading" (granting options just before positive news) and "bullet-dodging" (granting options just after negative news), may persist in more subtle forms.6

Limitations and Criticisms

The primary criticism of a Backdated Real Gap is that it represents an illicit and often fraudulent manipulation designed to enrich executives at the expense of shareholders. It distorts financial reporting by misrepresenting the true cost of executive compensation and can lead to restatements of financial statements.5

Critics argue that such practices undermine investor confidence and the integrity of capital markets. When companies engage in backdating, they often violate their own internal controls and fail to comply with accounting standards, potentially leading to significant legal and reputational damage. From an economic perspective, while the immediate financial benefit to the option holder is clear, the overall impact on the company's valuation or long-term performance is negative due to increased scrutiny, legal costs, and diminished trust. Some analyses suggest that the reported value of backdated options, particularly their strike price discounts, significantly overstated the actual Black-Scholes value gain per share, implying that executives sought to reduce the apparent value of options to report lower compensation to shareholders while still gaining substantial economic value.4,3 This highlights how the practice could be driven by a desire to mask compensation levels.

Backdated Real Gap vs. Stock Option Backdating

The term "Backdated Real Gap" specifically describes the outcome or effect of stock option backdating.

  • Stock Option Backdating: This refers to the act or practice itself. It is the process of retroactively assigning a grant date to a stock option that is earlier than the actual date the option was approved or issued. The purpose of this practice is typically to select a date when the company's market price was lower, thereby setting a lower strike price for the option.
  • Backdated Real Gap: This refers to the financial advantage or intrinsic value created because of stock option backdating. It is the quantifiable difference between the artificially lowered strike price chosen through backdating and the stock's actual market price on the date the option was genuinely granted (or its value at a later exercise date). The "gap" represents the immediate profit potential realized by the option holder due to the retroactive dating.

In essence, stock option backdating is the action, and the Backdated Real Gap is the resultant favorable condition or financial benefit derived from that action.

FAQs

Is a Backdated Real Gap legal?

No, the creation of a Backdated Real Gap through stock option backdating, particularly without proper disclosure, is generally illegal under U.S. securities laws. It can constitute financial fraud, lead to accounting misstatements, and violate various regulations, including provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Companies are required to expense stock options at their fair value on the grant date, which is the date the option is communicated and legally binding.2 Manipulating this date misrepresents the true expense under accrual accounting.

How does it affect a company's financial statements?

When a Backdated Real Gap is created through undisclosed stock option backdating, it leads to misstatements in a company's financial statements. Specifically, the executive compensation expense related to the stock options is understated. This can result in inflated earnings and inaccurate reported profits, misleading shareholders and regulators. Companies often have to restate their earnings once such practices are uncovered.1

Who typically benefits from a Backdated Real Gap?

The primary beneficiaries of a Backdated Real Gap are usually corporate executives, including CEOs, CFOs, and other senior management, as well as sometimes other key employees, who receive the stock options. By gaining options with a lower strike price than the actual market price on the grant date, they immediately accrue an artificial profit potential, enhancing their overall compensation package.