Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to B Definitions

Base erosion

What Is Base Erosion?

Base erosion refers to the practice by which multinational corporations reduce their taxable income in a particular tax jurisdiction, often by making deductible payments to related entities in other countries. This practice aims to lower the amount of income subject to corporate income tax in the country where economic activity occurs, thus eroding the tax base of that country. Base erosion is a key component of a broader issue known as Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS), which falls under the umbrella of international taxation and global tax policy.

History and Origin

The concept of base erosion gained significant international attention in the early 21st century as globalization accelerated and multinational corporations expanded their cross-border operations. Companies increasingly exploited gaps and mismatches in national tax regulations to minimize their global tax liabilities. This led to concerns among governments about the fairness and integrity of their tax systems and significant revenue losses.

In response to these growing concerns, the G20 group of major economies requested the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to address the issue. In 2013, the OECD launched its comprehensive Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project, an unprecedented international effort aimed at developing solutions to combat tax avoidance strategies employed by multinationals. This initiative resulted in a 15-point Action Plan designed to equip governments with domestic and international instruments to ensure that profits are taxed where economic activity and value creation take place.7,6 The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has also conducted extensive research on BEPS, highlighting its significant impact, particularly on developing countries that are often more reliant on corporate income tax revenues.5,4

Key Takeaways

  • Base erosion is a strategy used by multinational corporations to reduce their taxable income in high-tax jurisdictions.
  • It typically involves making deductible payments, such as royalties or interest payments, to related entities in low-tax jurisdictions.
  • This practice diminishes the tax base of the country where profits are genuinely earned.
  • Base erosion is a core element of the broader Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) phenomenon.
  • International organizations like the OECD and IMF have spearheaded efforts to combat base erosion through global tax reforms.

Interpreting Base Erosion

Base erosion is primarily interpreted as a reduction in a country's tax base due to specific tax planning strategies. When a company engages in base erosion, it artificially lowers its reported profits in a given jurisdiction, leading to a diminished amount on which income tax can be levied. For tax authorities, a high degree of base erosion indicates a vulnerability in their tax system, potentially resulting in substantial revenue losses. The interpretation often revolves around identifying the mechanisms used, such as excessive deductible payments or mischaracterization of income. The goal of international tax reforms, like the OECD's BEPS project, is to ensure that the tax base reflects the true substance of economic activities, preventing companies from exploiting differences in national tax rules.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "GlobalTech Inc.," a multinational technology company with its headquarters in Country A (a high-tax jurisdiction) and a subsidiary in Country B (a low-tax jurisdiction that also serves as a tax haven). GlobalTech Inc. develops valuable intellectual property (IP) in Country A. To reduce its tax bill in Country A, GlobalTech Inc. might legally transfer the ownership of this IP to its subsidiary in Country B.

Subsequently, the Country A entity, which generates significant sales and revenue from products developed with this IP, is required to pay substantial "royalty" fees to the Country B subsidiary for the use of the IP. These royalty payments are considered deductions in Country A, reducing GlobalTech Inc.'s taxable income there. In Country B, where the subsidiary officially "owns" the IP, the received royalties are taxed at a much lower rate, or not at all, due to favorable tax laws. This artificial shifting of income from Country A to Country B through deductible royalty payments constitutes base erosion, as it shrinks Country A's tax base even though the core profit-generating activities occur there.

Practical Applications

Base erosion issues are highly relevant in the sphere of international finance and public policy, particularly concerning the taxation of large multinational enterprises.

  1. Government Policy and Legislation: Governments worldwide are actively enacting legislation to counter base erosion. This includes implementing new anti-avoidance rules, strengthening transfer pricing regulations, and participating in multilateral agreements aimed at tax transparency and cooperation. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in the United States, for instance, provides extensive guidance for international businesses to ensure compliance and combat aggressive tax planning.3
  2. Corporate Tax Planning: For multinational corporations, understanding base erosion and the evolving global tax landscape is crucial for strategic tax planning. Companies must ensure their structures and intercompany transactions comply with new international standards to avoid penalties and reputational damage.
  3. Economic Development: For developing economies, tackling base erosion is particularly vital as they often rely heavily on corporate income tax revenues. The erosion of their tax base can significantly impede public service funding and economic growth.
  4. Investor Relations and ESG: Increasingly, investors and the public are scrutinizing corporate tax practices as part of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations. Companies perceived as engaging in aggressive base erosion may face negative public sentiment and investor pressure.

The global effort to address base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) has transformed how international businesses document, report, and file taxes, necessitating new compliance strategies.2

Limitations and Criticisms

While the efforts to combat base erosion, primarily led by the OECD's BEPS project, are widely lauded for promoting tax fairness and stability, they also face limitations and criticisms. One challenge is the complexity of implementing global solutions across diverse national tax systems. Achieving consensus among over 140 countries and jurisdictions on detailed tax treaty modifications and domestic legislative changes is an ongoing process.

Critics also point to the potential for unintended consequences. Some argue that overly stringent anti-BEPS measures could stifle legitimate cross-border investment or place undue compliance burdens on businesses, particularly smaller ones operating internationally. There's also debate about the allocation of taxing rights, especially concerning the digital economy, where traditional notions of physical presence for taxation are challenged.

Furthermore, while the BEPS framework aims to ensure profits are taxed where value is created, determining precisely where "value" resides in a highly integrated global supply chain, especially concerning intangible assets, remains a complex area. Some strategies, though targeted by BEPS actions, may still operate within the letter of the law due to persistent loopholes or difficulties in enforcement. An IMF working paper notes that quantifying the revenue cost of base erosion and profit shifting has always been elusive, making it difficult to fully assess the effectiveness of countermeasures.1

Base Erosion vs. Profit Shifting

While often used together under the acronym BEPS, "base erosion" and "profit shifting" refer to distinct, though related, aspects of corporate tax avoidance.

Base erosion focuses on the reduction of the taxable base within a country. This typically involves a multinational corporation claiming significant deductions in a high-tax jurisdiction for payments made to a related entity in a low-tax or no-tax jurisdiction. These payments, such as interest, royalties, or service fees, legitimately reduce the income subject to tax in the country where the primary economic activity takes place. The "base" (taxable income) is thus eroded.

Profit shifting, on the other hand, specifically refers to the artificial relocation of taxable profits from a high-tax country to a low-tax or no-tax jurisdiction. This is often achieved through mechanisms like manipulating transfer pricing for intercompany goods, services, or intellectual property to ensure profits are recorded in the lower-tax entity. While base erosion is a method of reducing a local tax base, profit shifting is the outcome of moving profits away from where they were generated. In essence, base erosion describes how the tax base is reduced through deductions, while profit shifting describes where the untaxed profits end up. Both contribute to a diminished overall tax revenue for the countries where true value is created.

FAQs

What causes base erosion?

Base erosion is typically caused by multinational corporations utilizing differences in national tax laws, loopholes, or mismatches in tax rules to reduce their taxable income in high-tax jurisdictions. Common methods include excessive deductions for payments to related entities in low-tax countries.

Is base erosion illegal?

Most strategies that lead to base erosion are not illegal; rather, they exploit the existing legal frameworks and inconsistencies in international tax regulations. The global effort against Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) aims to address these legal loopholes rather than criminalizing the practices.

How does base erosion affect countries?

Base erosion significantly affects countries by reducing their corporate income tax revenues. This can diminish government funds available for public services and infrastructure, potentially leading to increased budget deficits or the need to raise taxes on other segments of the economy. Developing countries are often disproportionately affected.

What is the OECD's role in addressing base erosion?

The OECD, in collaboration with the G20, launched the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project. This initiative developed a 15-point Action Plan providing governments with tools and recommendations to combat base erosion and ensure that profits are taxed where economic activity and value creation occur.