Bear marked

The search for a Reuters/FT article directly on the dot-com bubble's historical event is still challenging to find a perfect primary source that isn't an aggregated article or behind a paywall.
However,⁸ "The growing risk hidden in the S&P 500 and what investors can do about it - Financial Post" mentions the dot-com bubble and links directly to the Financial Times, stating "Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication. Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account." This implies it might require a subscription. I need to be careful with this.

Let's re-evaluate the search results and prioritize direct, free, and verifiable sources.
⁷ "The Late 1990s Dot-Com Bubble Implodes in 2000 - Goldman Sachs" (Goldman Sachs's own history section) is a very good, credible source. It's not a news outlet, but a financial institution's historical account, which is fine. I'll use this one.

So, the refined external link pool:

External Links:

1. Origin of Term: IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks (from⁶ in previous search, Creative Commons, accessible). Anchor text: "16th-century proverb"
2. 2008 Financial Crisis: SEC.gov (from⁵ in previous search, direct SEC report). Anchor text: "global financial crisis of 2008"
3. Dot-com Bubble: Goldman Sachs (from⁴ in current search, Goldman Sachs historical overview). Anchor text: "dot-com bubble"
4. Behavioral/Limitations: DiVA portal (Stockholm School of Economics) (from in previous search, academic PDF, open access). Anchor text: "investor behavior"

Now I will populate the internal LINK_POOL and then write the article.

Internal LINK_POOL (15 unique terms):

1. Stock market
2. Market volatility
3. Recession
4. Economic growth
5. Market sentiment
6. Portfolio diversification
7. Asset allocation
8. Risk management
9. Valuation
10. Earnings
11. Interest rates
12. Inflation
13. Short selling
14. Contrarian investing
15. Bull market (for RELATED_TERM)

All set to proceed with article writing.
Term: Bear market
Related Term: Bull market
Term Category: Market Cycles / Investment Analysis

Constraint Checklist & Confidence Score:

1. 15 INTERNAL LINKS: Yes, brainstormed and listed above. (Confidence: 5/5)
2. 4 EXTERNAL LINKS: Yes, verified and listed above. (Confidence: 5/5)
3. EXTERNAL LINKS ARE REAL, LIVE, READABLE: Yes, double-checked. (Confidence: 5/5)
4. EXTERNAL LINKS FROM >=3 DOMAINS: Yes (IU Indianapolis, SEC.gov, Goldman Sachs, DiVA portal). (Confidence: 5/5)
5. Forbidden sources avoided: Yes. (Confidence: 5/5)
6. ARTICLE STRUCTURE: Yes, will follow all sections. (Confidence: 5/5)
7. H1 title format: Not applicable (DO NOT write this title). (Confidence: 5/5)
8. Define [TERM] first sentence: Yes. (Confidence: 5/5)
9. Introduce [TERM_CATEGORY]: Yes. (Confidence: 5/5)
10. Mention [TERM] >=4 times: Yes, will ensure this. (Confidence: 5/5)
11. Link 3-5 internal concepts in intro: Yes. (Confidence: 5/5)
12. History & Origin narrative: Yes. (Confidence: 5/5)
13. History & Origin external source: Yes, [IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks]. (Confidence: 5/5)
14. Key Takeaways 3-5 bullets: Yes. (Confidence: 5/5)
15. Formula section only if applicable: Yes, will omit. (Confidence: 5/5)
16. Interpreting section: Yes, link >=2 internal. (Confidence: 5/5)
17. Hypothetical Example: Yes, 1-2 internal links. (Confidence: 5/5)
18. Practical Applications: Yes, 2-3 internal, 1 external. (Confidence: 5/5)
19. Limitations & Criticisms: Yes, 2-3 internal, 1 external (if possible). (Confidence: 5/5)
20. [TERM] vs. [RELATED_TERM]: Yes, clarify differences, link to [RELATED_TERM]. (Confidence: 5/5)
21. FAQs 3-5 questions: Yes, 2-3 internal links. (Confidence: 5/5)
22. Neutral tone, third-person: Yes. (Confidence: 5/5)
23. SEC marketing rules: Yes. (Confidence: 5/5)
24. Avoid financial advice/opinion/exaggeration: Yes. (Confidence: 5/5)
25. Forbidden phrases: Yes, will check. (Confidence: 5/5)
26. Vary section styles: Yes. (Confidence: 5/5)
27. Define all jargon: Yes. (Confidence: 5/5)
28. No LINK_POOL in output: Yes. (Confidence: 5/5)
29. Markdown clean/complete: Yes. (Confidence: 5/5)
30. All links appear once only: Yes, will track carefully. (Confidence: 5/5)
31. Correct link format: Yes. (Confidence: 5/5)
32. No repeated anchor texts: Yes. (Confidence: 5/5)
33. No broken/fictional URLs: Yes. (Confidence: 5/5)
34. No omitted required links: Yes. (Confidence: 5/5)
35. Math in LaTeX: Yes, but no formula section. (Confidence: 5/5)

Confidence Score: 5/5

Strategizing complete. I will now generate the article.

¹²³