Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to B Definitions

Binomial_lattice

What Is Binomial Lattice?

A binomial lattice, often referred to as a binomial tree, is a discrete-time model used in financial modeling for valuing derivative securities, particularly options. It graphically represents the possible paths that the price of an underlying asset might take over a period of time, moving either up or down at each discrete step. This model falls under the broader category of Financial Modeling and Derivatives Valuation. The binomial lattice is widely applied because of its intuitive nature and ability to price options with complex features, such as American options, where early exercise is possible.

History and Origin

The foundational work for the binomial lattice model, specifically the Cox-Ross-Rubinstein (CRR) binomial options pricing model, was formalized by John Cox, Stephen Ross, and Mark Rubinstein in their seminal 1979 paper, "Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach."5 While William Sharpe first proposed a binomial approach in 1978, the CRR model provided a comprehensive and widely adopted framework for option valuation.4, This model offered a practical alternative to the more complex Black-Scholes model, particularly for options where the Black-Scholes formula did not easily apply. The CRR model simplified the understanding of option pricing by demonstrating how an arbitrage-free environment could be used to determine the fair value of an option in a discrete-time setting.

Key Takeaways

  • A binomial lattice is a visual, discrete-time model for valuing options and other derivatives.
  • It simplifies price movements of the underlying asset into upward or downward steps over defined time intervals.
  • The model is highly effective for pricing American options due to its iterative backward induction process.
  • It demonstrates the no-arbitrage principle, which is fundamental to derivatives valuation.
  • The binomial lattice converges to results similar to the continuous-time Black-Scholes model as the number of time steps increases.

Formula and Calculation

The binomial lattice model calculates option prices by working backward from the option's expiration date. For each node in the lattice, the option's value is determined by taking the discounted expected value of its future payoffs. The key components include:

  • Up factor (u): The multiplier for an upward price movement.
  • Down factor (d): The multiplier for a downward price movement.
  • Risk-neutral probability (p): The probability of an upward movement in a risk-neutral world.

The up and down factors are typically derived from the volatility of the underlying asset and the length of the time step.

The risk-neutral probability (pp) is calculated as:

p=erΔt−du−dp = \frac{e^{r\Delta t} - d}{u - d}

Where:

  • ee = the base of the natural logarithm
  • rr = the risk-free rate
  • Δt\Delta t = the length of a single time step (Time to expiration / Number of steps)
  • dd = down factor
  • uu = up factor

The value of an option at a given node (CtC_t for a call, PtP_t for a put) is then found using backward induction:

Ct=e−rΔt[p⋅Cu+(1−p)⋅Cd]C_t = e^{-r\Delta t} [p \cdot C_{u} + (1-p) \cdot C_{d}] Pt=e−rΔt[p⋅Pu+(1−p)⋅Pd]P_t = e^{-r\Delta t} [p \cdot P_{u} + (1-p) \cdot P_{d}]

Where:

  • CuC_u and CdC_d are the call option values at the next up and down nodes, respectively.
  • PuP_u and PdP_d are the put option values at the next up and down nodes, respectively.

For American options, at each node, the calculated value is compared to the value if exercised immediately. The higher of the two values is chosen.

Interpreting the Binomial Lattice

Interpreting the binomial lattice involves understanding the evolution of the underlying asset's price and the corresponding option value at each node. Each node in the tree represents a potential price for the underlying asset at a specific point in time, leading to a branching structure that illustrates future possibilities. By observing the values calculated at various nodes within the binomial lattice, financial professionals can assess the option's sensitivity to changes in the underlying asset's price over time. This step-by-step valuation process allows for clear insight into how factors like time to expiration and potential early exercise impact an option's fair value.

Hypothetical Example

Consider valuing a 1-year American call option on a stock with a current price of $100 and a strike price of $100. Assume the annual volatility is 20%, and the risk-free rate is 5%. We will use a two-step binomial lattice.

Step 1: Calculate Up and Down Factors
Let's simplify for this example. Assume:
Up factor (uu) = 1.2 (stock goes up by 20%)
Down factor (dd) = 0.8 (stock goes down by 20%)
Time step (Δt\Delta t) = 0.5 years (two steps for 1 year)

Step 2: Construct the Binomial Price Tree

  • Time 0: Stock Price = $100
  • Time 0.5 years:
    • Up path: $100 * 1.2 = $120
    • Down path: $100 * 0.8 = $80
  • Time 1 year:
    • From $120 (Up-Up path): $120 * 1.2 = $144
    • From $120 (Up-Down path): $120 * 0.8 = $96
    • From $80 (Down-Up path): $80 * 1.2 = $96
    • From $80 (Down-Down path): $80 * 0.8 = $64

Step 3: Calculate Risk-Neutral Probability

p=e0.05×0.5−0.81.2−0.8=1.0253−0.80.4=0.22530.4≈0.56325p = \frac{e^{0.05 \times 0.5} - 0.8}{1.2 - 0.8} = \frac{1.0253 - 0.8}{0.4} = \frac{0.2253}{0.4} \approx 0.56325

So, 1−p≈0.436751-p \approx 0.43675

Step 4: Calculate Option Value at Expiration (Time 1 Year)
The call option payoff is Max(Stock Price - Strike Price, 0).

  • At $144: Max($144 - $100, 0) = $44
  • At $96: Max($96 - $100, 0) = $0
  • At $64: Max($64 - $100, 0) = $0

Step 5: Work Backward to Time 0.5 Years (American Option Considerations)
At each node, compare the discounted expected future value with the intrinsic value (immediate exercise).

  • Node at $120 (after 0.5 years):

    • Intrinsic Value: Max($120 - $100, 0) = $20
    • Expected Future Value: e−0.05×0.5[0.56325×44+0.43675×0]e^{-0.05 \times 0.5} [0.56325 \times 44 + 0.43675 \times 0]
      $$= 0.9753 \times (24.783 + 0) = 0.9753 \times 24.783 \approx $24.17
    • Since $24.17 > $20, the option would not be exercised early. Value at this node is $24.17.

  • Node at $80 (after 0.5 years):

    • Intrinsic Value: Max($80 - $100, 0) = $0
    • Expected Future Value: e−0.05×0.5[0.56325×0+0.43675×0]e^{-0.05 \times 0.5} [0.56325 \times 0 + 0.43675 \times 0]
      $$= 0.9753 \times 0 = $0
    • Since $0 \ge $0, the option would not be exercised early. Value at this node is $0.

Step 6: Work Backward to Time 0 (Present Value)

  • Node at $100 (Time 0):
    • Intrinsic Value: Max($100 - $100, 0) = $0
    • Expected Future Value: e−0.05×0.5[0.56325×24.17+0.43675×0]e^{-0.05 \times 0.5} [0.56325 \times 24.17 + 0.43675 \times 0]
      $$= 0.9753 \times (13.62 + 0) = 0.9753 \times 13.62 \approx $13.29
    • Since $13.29 > $0, the option would not be exercised early.

The estimated present value of the American call option using this two-step binomial lattice is approximately $13.29. This systematic approach, considering potential price movements and exercise decisions, makes the binomial lattice a powerful tool for hedging and valuation.

Practical Applications

The binomial lattice model is a versatile tool with numerous practical applications in finance, especially in the realm of derivatives valuation.

  • Option Valuation: Its primary use is in pricing a wide range of options, including both European options (exercisable only at expiration) and American options (exercisable at any time up to expiration). The iterative nature of the binomial lattice allows it to account for early exercise decisions in American options, a feature that many other models cannot easily accommodate.
  • Complex Derivatives: Beyond vanilla options, the binomial lattice can be adapted to value more complex financial instruments, such as Bermudan options (exercisable on specific dates) and options on dividend-paying stocks.
  • Real Options Analysis: In corporate finance, the binomial lattice is used in real options analysis to value investment opportunities that provide management with flexibility, such as the option to expand, contract, or abandon a project.
  • Risk Management and Hedging: Financial institutions use the binomial lattice for risk assessment and developing hedging strategies. By modeling potential future price paths, they can better understand the exposure of derivative portfolios and implement measures to mitigate risk. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) regularly publishes its Global Financial Stability Report, which highlights systemic issues and vulnerabilities in financial markets, including those related to complex derivatives, underscoring the need for robust valuation models.3
  • Educational Tool: Due to its step-by-step, visual nature, the binomial lattice is an excellent pedagogical tool for illustrating fundamental concepts in option pricing, such as risk-neutral valuation and the no-arbitrage principle, without requiring advanced calculus.

Limitations and Criticisms

While the binomial lattice offers significant advantages, particularly for American options, it also has limitations and criticisms.

  • Computational Intensity: For options with long maturities or when high accuracy is desired, the number of time steps in the binomial lattice can become very large, leading to significant computational demands. Although simpler than some continuous-time models, increasing the number of steps to approach the accuracy of the Black-Scholes model can make it computationally slower.2,
  • Discrete vs. Continuous Time: The fundamental assumption of the binomial lattice is that the underlying asset's price moves in discrete steps. In reality, asset prices move continuously. While the model converges to continuous-time models like Black-Scholes as the number of steps approaches infinity, this approximation introduces a degree of inaccuracy in simpler implementations.1
  • Parameter Sensitivity: The accuracy of the binomial lattice model, like other option pricing models, is sensitive to the inputs, particularly the estimated volatility of the underlying asset. Inaccurate volatility estimates can lead to significant mispricing. Performing a sensitivity analysis is often crucial.
  • Path Dependency Challenges: While versatile, certain highly path-dependent options (where the payoff depends on the entire price history, not just the final price) can be challenging to model accurately with a standard binomial lattice, sometimes requiring alternative methods like Monte Carlo simulation.

Binomial Lattice vs. Black-Scholes Model

The binomial lattice and the Black-Scholes model are two prominent methods for option pricing, often leading to similar results under specific conditions, but they differ fundamentally in their approach.

The Black-Scholes model is a continuous-time model that provides a closed-form analytical solution for pricing European options. It assumes continuous trading, constant volatility, and that the underlying asset's price follows a geometric Brownian motion. Its elegance lies in providing an immediate theoretical price without iterative calculations.

In contrast, the binomial lattice is a discrete-time model that constructs a tree of possible price paths for the underlying asset. It works by moving backward from the option's expiration, calculating the option's value at each node based on the expected value of its future payoffs, discounted at the risk-free rate. A key advantage of the binomial lattice is its ability to handle options with early exercise features, such as American