Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to C Definitions

Clearing process

What Is Clearing Process?

The clearing process is a crucial part of financial market infrastructure, serving as the series of steps that take place between the execution of a trade and its settlement. It involves verifying the terms of a transaction, calculating the respective obligations of the buyer and seller, and managing the associated risk management elements to ensure the trade can be completed. This process is fundamental in mitigating counterparty risk by ensuring that both parties to a transaction are able to fulfill their obligations. The clearing process centralizes and standardizes these steps, reducing operational complexities and enhancing market efficiency.

History and Origin

The origins of the clearing process trace back to the 18th century with the establishment of bank cheque clearing houses. One of the earliest examples, the London Clearing-House, emerged between 1750 and 1770 to streamline the daily exchange of cheques and bills among bankers. This innovation replaced a cumbersome system where clerks had to visit each bank individually. In the United States, the first bank clearinghouse was established in New York in 1853, which initially simplified the complex settlement processes among the city's banks.16,

As financial markets evolved, particularly with the growth of commodities futures and stock exchanges, the need for robust clearing mechanisms became evident. By the latter part of the 19th century, these exchanges began adopting clearing houses to manage their transactions. The New York Clearing House, for instance, played a significant role in stabilizing the monetary system during times of financial panic before the creation of the Federal Reserve System in 1913.,15 The development of centralized clearing, particularly through the advent of central counterparty (CCP) organizations, further intensified after the 2008 financial crisis. Global leaders and regulatory bodies recognized that a lack of transparency and a mismanagement of counterparty risk in over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets exacerbated financial instability, leading to calls for mandatory central clearing of standardized derivatives.14,13

Key Takeaways

  • The clearing process occurs between trade execution and settlement, involving verification, calculation of obligations, and risk mitigation.
  • It primarily functions to reduce counterparty risk and enhance market integrity by interposing a neutral party.
  • Key components include netting of obligations and the collection of margin and collateral.
  • Regulatory bodies worldwide have increasingly mandated central clearing for certain financial instruments to promote financial stability.
  • While enhancing safety, the concentration of risk within CCPs requires robust default fund and liquidity arrangements.

Formula and Calculation

While the clearing process itself is a series of operational steps rather than a single formula, a core aspect involves the calculation of net obligations through a process called netting. Netting significantly reduces the number of payments and deliveries required between parties.

Consider two parties, Firm A and Firm B, who have multiple trades with each other. Without netting, each trade would require a separate settlement. With netting, these obligations are aggregated.

For example, if Firm A owes Firm B $100 for one trade and Firm B owes Firm A $70 for another, the net obligation is Firm A owing Firm B $30.

Net Obligation=∑(Buy Obligations)−∑(Sell Obligations)\text{Net Obligation} = \sum (\text{Buy Obligations}) - \sum (\text{Sell Obligations})

Additionally, a critical calculation within the clearing process is the determination of margin requirements. Margin is collateral posted by participants to cover potential future losses on their positions. This calculation often involves complex risk models, but conceptually, it aims to cover a certain confidence level of potential price movements.

Initial Margin=Value at Risk (VaR)×Confidence Level\text{Initial Margin} = \text{Value at Risk (VaR)} \times \text{Confidence Level}

This formula is a simplified representation, as actual margin models are proprietary and more sophisticated, considering factors like volatility, correlation, and position size across various securities and derivatives. The goal is to ensure that the CCP holds sufficient funds to cover potential losses if a participant defaults.

Interpreting the Clearing Process

The effectiveness of the clearing process is interpreted by its ability to streamline transactions and insulate the broader financial system from individual defaults. A well-functioning clearing process enhances market liquidity by increasing confidence among participants, as they no longer face direct counterparty risk to their trading partners but rather to a highly capitalized and regulated CCP. This allows market participants to engage in higher volumes of trade execution with reduced concern about the creditworthiness of individual counterparties.

The robustness of the clearing process, particularly through CCPs, is also a key indicator of systemic resilience. In times of market stress, the ability of CCPs to manage defaults and continue operations is critical to maintaining financial stability and preventing contagion.

Hypothetical Example

Imagine two investment firms, Alpha Investments and Beta Capital, agree to trade 1,000 shares of XYZ Corp. stock.

  1. Trade Execution: Alpha Investments buys 1,000 shares of XYZ Corp. from Beta Capital at $50 per share.
  2. Pre-Clearing: The trade execution details (price, quantity, parties) are sent to a clearinghouse.
  3. Clearing Process:
    • The clearinghouse steps in as the central counterparty (CCP). It becomes the buyer to Beta Capital (now owing Beta $50,000 for the shares) and the seller to Alpha Investments (now expecting $50,000 from Alpha for the shares).
    • The clearinghouse performs credit checks on both Alpha and Beta.
    • It calculates and collects margin from both firms. For instance, it might require 10% of the trade value as initial margin, so Alpha and Beta each post $5,000 in collateral. This margin serves as a buffer against potential price movements before settlement process is complete.
    • If Alpha and Beta had other trades, the clearinghouse would apply netting to their overall obligations, reducing the total amount of cash and securities that need to be exchanged.
  4. Settlement Preparation: The clearinghouse prepares the final instructions for the transfer of shares and cash.
  5. Settlement: On the agreed settlement date (e.g., T+2, two business days after the trade), the shares are transferred from Beta's account to the clearinghouse, then to Alpha's account. The cash flows from Alpha to the clearinghouse, then to Beta.

This process ensures that even if one firm faces financial difficulties before settlement, the clearinghouse, backed by its members' contributions and margin calls, can step in to complete the trade, preventing disruptions to the other party and the wider market.

Practical Applications

The clearing process is integral to the functioning of almost all modern financial markets, providing a critical layer of security and efficiency.

  • Securities Markets: In equity and bond markets, clearinghouses ensure the orderly exchange of securities for cash. They manage the risks associated with these transactions, providing confidence for investors.
  • Derivatives Markets: Central clearing is particularly vital in derivatives markets, including futures, options, and interest rate swaps. Following the 2008 financial crisis, regulatory bodies globally pushed for mandatory clearing of standardized over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives to reduce systemic risk.12,11 The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in the U.S., for instance, has established rules mandating that certain swaps be cleared through approved Derivatives Clearing Organizations (DCOs).10,9
  • Treasury Markets: More recently, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted rule changes in December 2023, expanding central clearing requirements to a significant portion of the $26 trillion U.S. Treasury market, covering both cash and repurchase agreements.8,7 This aims to reduce systemic risk and enhance the transparency and resilience of what is considered one of the world's deepest and most liquid markets.6
  • Foreign Exchange: While traditionally bilateral, some segments of the foreign exchange market, especially those involving non-deliverable forwards, are also subject to central clearing.

These applications underscore how the clearing process, through the centralization provided by CCPs, enhances market integrity and reduces the potential for cascading defaults.

Limitations and Criticisms

While the clearing process through central counterparties significantly reduces counterparty risk for individual market participants, it concentrates systemic risk within the CCPs themselves. This centralization means that if a large CCP were to fail, the consequences could be catastrophic for the entire financial system. Critics highlight that CCPs, by standing between all buyers and sellers, become "too big to fail" and thus pose a concentrated risk point.5

Ensuring the adequacy of a CCP's default fund and its ability to manage extreme market events remains a continuous challenge. Debates persist regarding the optimal level of capital and liquidity CCPs should hold, and how potential losses should be absorbed beyond a defaulting member's margin and the CCP's own resources.4,3 The Financial Stability Board (FSB), for instance, continues to develop and promote global standards for the resolution of systemically important CCPs to ensure continuity of critical functions and mitigate adverse effects on financial stability should a resolution become necessary.2,1 The complexity of these resolution frameworks and the potential for moral hazard or market disruption during a CCP's distress are ongoing areas of scrutiny.

Clearing Process vs. Settlement Process

The terms "clearing process" and "settlement process" are often used interchangeably, but they refer to distinct, albeit sequential, stages of a financial transaction.

The clearing process involves all the activities that occur after a trade has been executed and before it is settled. Its primary functions include verifying the trade details, calculating the obligations of both parties (such as the net amount of money or securities to be exchanged), and managing the associated risks, often through the collection of margin. The clearing process essentially determines what needs to be exchanged and who owes what to whom, mitigating counterparty risk in the interim.

In contrast, the settlement process is the final stage where the actual exchange of cash and securities takes place, thereby fulfilling the obligations determined during clearing. This is when legal ownership of assets is transferred and payments are finalized. While clearing is about validating and preparing, settlement is about the definitive and irrevocable conclusion of the transaction.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary goal of the clearing process?

The primary goal of the clearing process is to mitigate counterparty risk in financial transactions. By stepping in between the buyer and seller, typically through a central counterparty (CCP), it ensures that even if one party defaults, the trade can still be completed, thereby maintaining market integrity and stability.

Q2: What is a Central Counterparty (CCP)?

A central counterparty (CCP) is a financial institution that interposes itself between the two original parties to a trade. It effectively becomes the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer. This novation process centralizes risk and streamlines the clearing process, significantly reducing counterparty risk for market participants.

Q3: How does the clearing process reduce risk?

The clearing process reduces risk primarily through netting and margin requirements. Netting allows for the aggregation of multiple trades between parties, reducing the total number of transactions and the principal amount at risk. Margin, which is collateral posted by participants, provides a financial buffer to cover potential losses if a participant fails to meet their obligations.

Q4: Is the clearing process mandatory for all trades?

No, the clearing process is not mandatory for all trades, but regulations increasingly require central clearing for certain types of standardized derivatives and, more recently, for U.S. Treasury securities. Regulatory bodies like the CFTC and SEC have mandated clearing for specific financial instruments and market participants to enhance financial stability and reduce systemic risk.

Q5: What happens if a party defaults during the clearing process?

If a party defaults during the clearing process, the central counterparty (CCP) steps in to absorb the loss and ensure the completion of the trade. The CCP uses various layers of protection, starting with the defaulting party's margin, then its own capital, and finally, a default fund contributed by all its members, to cover the obligations and prevent disruption to the non-defaulting party or the wider market.