Skip to main content
← Back to C Definitions

Collective farming

What Is Collective Farming?

Collective farming is an agricultural production system in which multiple farmers operate their holdings as a joint enterprise, typically under a centralized management structure. This approach falls under the broader category of agricultural economics, focusing on how land, labor, and capital are organized to produce food and other agricultural goods. In collective farming, resources such as land, machinery, and livestock are often pooled, with members working together and sharing the output or profits. It represents a significant departure from traditional individual farm ownership and decision-making, aiming to achieve economies of scale and greater efficiency through communal effort.35

History and Origin

The concept of collective farming has historical roots in various societies, but it gained widespread prominence in the 20th century, particularly under socialist and communist economic systems. The most notable implementation of collective farming occurred in the Soviet Union. Following the 1917 revolution, the Soviet government began introducing collective farming as a means to modernize agriculture, increase agricultural productivity, and eliminate private land ownership, which was seen as a remnant of feudalism.33, 34 Intensive collectivization began in 1929, forcing peasants to surrender their individual farms and join large collective farms, known as kolkhozy.32 This policy, often accompanied by harsh measures against prosperous peasants (kulaks), aimed to consolidate state control over agricultural output to support rapid industrialization.31

Similarly, in China, collective farming was a central component of economic policy, particularly during the Great Leap Forward (1958–1962). D30uring this period, private land ownership was abolished, and households were compelled into state-operated communes, intended to centralize farming and labor for increased efficiency. Outside of state-socialist models, collective farming has also appeared in other contexts, such as the Israeli kibbutzim, which were founded as voluntary communal settlements based on collective ownership and egalitarian principles, though many have since undergone significant privatization.

28, 29## Key Takeaways

  • Collective farming involves the joint operation of agricultural land and resources by a group of farmers.
  • It often entails the pooling of land, labor, and capital, with shared output or profits.
  • Historically, it has been a core component of centrally planned economy systems, particularly in socialist and communist states, aiming to increase agricultural productivity and state control over food supply.
  • While intended to boost efficiency through economies of scale, collective farming has frequently faced challenges related to a lack of individual incentives and issues of resource allocation.
  • The system significantly alters traditional private property rights in agriculture.

Interpreting Collective Farming

Interpreting collective farming requires an understanding of its underlying economic and political objectives. In most historical instances, especially under socialist and communist regimes, collective farming was less about direct profitability for individual farmers and more about centralized control of agricultural production to meet broader state economic growth targets. The system aimed to ensure a consistent food supply for urban populations and raw materials for industrialization. P27roduction quotas were often set by the state, and the output was sold at fixed prices, reducing market mechanisms and typical supply and demand dynamics. T26he success or failure of collective farming was thus often measured by its ability to provide food security for the nation and contribute to overall economic development, rather than by individual farmer prosperity or a direct return on investment.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a hypothetical country, Agricolia, where the government implements a policy of collective farming. Before the policy, 100 small-scale farmers each owned and cultivated 5 hectares of land independently. Their individual efforts often led to inefficiencies in purchasing seeds, accessing machinery, and marketing their produce.

Under the new collective farming model, the government consolidates these 100 plots into a single 500-hectare collective farm. All farmers become members of this collective. The farm acquires large machinery, such as tractors and combine harvesters, which were unaffordable for individual farmers. A central management committee, appointed by the government, oversees planting schedules, resource allocation, and distribution of the harvest. Farmers work together in brigades, and their labor is compensated based on workdays contributed. The collective aims to achieve higher agricultural productivity through mechanized farming and coordinated efforts, supplying a predetermined quota of grain to the state at a fixed price, with any surplus distributed among the members.

Practical Applications

While large-scale, state-mandated collective farming has largely diminished with the collapse of many communist regimes, certain aspects of collective action in agriculture persist in various forms. In some parts of Europe, agricultural cooperatives, which share some organizational similarities but maintain individual land ownership, hold a significant market share in the food industry. These cooperatives allow farmers to pool resources for purchasing inputs, processing, and marketing, thereby improving their bargaining power in markets and potentially achieving greater economic stability.

24, 25For example, farmer-based organizations (FBOs) in developing countries, though not strictly collective farms, demonstrate the benefits of farmers working together to overcome market failures and high transaction costs. These groups facilitate access to agricultural extension services, finance, and technology, contributing to improved farm efficiency and rural development. T23he Israeli kibbutz, while undergoing significant changes, originally served as a model for communal living and collective agriculture, demonstrating how shared resources and collective decision-making could support a community, even evolving into diverse industries beyond farming.

21, 22## Limitations and Criticisms

Collective farming, particularly in its state-mandated forms, has faced significant limitations and criticisms. A primary concern has been the issue of incentives. When individual ownership and direct personal gain from labor are diminished, farmers may have less motivation to work diligently or innovate, leading to decreased output and overall agricultural productivity. T18, 19, 20his "free-rider" problem can result in lower quality of work and reduced efficiency compared to private farming.

17Historically, the forced collectivization in the Soviet Union and China led to widespread peasant resistance, destruction of crops and livestock, and devastating famines, most notably the Holodomor in Ukraine and the Great Chinese Famine during the Great Leap Forward. T16hese events highlight severe economic mismanagement and the human cost of policies that disregarded individual autonomy and market mechanisms. Even in contexts where collective farming aimed for social equality, like the kibbutzim, economic pressures and internal debates eventually led to significant privatization, recognizing the need for differential wages and individual property rights to address economic challenges. C15ritics often argue that centrally planned economic systems inherently struggle with efficient resource allocation and responsiveness to local conditions, leading to inefficiencies and suppressed economic growth in the agricultural sector.

14## Collective Farming vs. Cooperative Farming

While both collective farming and cooperative farming involve groups of farmers working together, a fundamental distinction lies in the ownership of land and the degree of individual autonomy.

In collective farming, land and other means of production are typically owned collectively by the group or, more commonly in historical contexts, by the state. Individual farmers relinquish their private property rights over land, which is then managed centrally. Decisions about production, resource allocation, and distribution are often made by a governing body, sometimes with government oversight.

12, 13In contrast, cooperative farming generally maintains individual ownership of land. Farmers voluntarily pool specific resources or engage in joint activities, such as purchasing inputs, using shared machinery, or marketing their produce. Members retain control over their individual plots, and profits are often distributed based on land contributed or work performed, alongside shared benefits from the cooperative's activities. This model emphasizes voluntary collaboration for mutual benefit rather than a complete surrender of individual ownership.

8, 9, 10, 11## FAQs

What is the main goal of collective farming?

The main goal of collective farming has typically been to increase agricultural productivity and consolidate state control over food production by pooling land, labor, and resources, often aiming to support broader industrialization goals within a planned economy.

7### What are some historical examples of collective farming?
Prominent historical examples include the kolkhozy (collective farms) in the Soviet Union and the people's communes during China's Great Leap Forward. The Israeli kibbutzim also represent a form of collective farming, albeit based on voluntary association and different ideological underpinnings.

6### Why did some collective farming initiatives fail?
Many collective farming initiatives failed due to a lack of individual incentives for farmers, resistance to forced collectivization, poor resource allocation, and inefficient central planning. This often led to decreased agricultural productivity and severe food security issues.

3, 4, 5### How is income distributed in a collective farm?
In a collective farm, income distribution can vary, but traditionally, members might receive compensation based on the quantity and quality of their labor contributed, rather than direct ownership of land or sales from their specific plot. Sometimes, surplus produce beyond state quotas might be distributed among members or sold in limited markets.

2### Does collective farming exist today?
Large-scale, state-mandated collective farming is less common today. However, principles of collective action, such as farmers forming agricultural cooperatives for shared resources and marketing, are widely practiced globally.1