Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to C Definitions

Common enterprise

What Is Common Enterprise?

Common enterprise is a crucial element of the Howey Test, a legal standard established by the U.S. Supreme Court to determine if a transaction qualifies as an investment contract and, consequently, a security under federal securities law. In the context of the Howey Test, a common enterprise signifies a pooling of investors' funds or assets, where the fortunes of individual investors are intertwined with the success or failure of the overall venture or the efforts of a promoter or third party. This concept is fundamental to the regulatory oversight exercised by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over various financial products and schemes.

History and Origin

The concept of common enterprise originates from the landmark 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case, SEC v. W.J. Howey Co. The case involved the sale of tracts of citrus groves in Florida, coupled with optional service contracts where the Howey Company cultivated, harvested, and marketed the fruit, remitting the net proceeds to the investors. The key legal question was whether these transactions constituted an "investment contract" subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933.8

The Supreme Court established a four-pronged test, now known as the Howey Test, defining an investment contract as an "investment of money in a common enterprise with a reasonable expectation of profits to be derived from the efforts of others."7 In the Howey case, the Court found that a common enterprise existed because the investors' fortunes were directly tied to the overall success of the orange grove operation, which was managed and operated by the Howey Company, not the individual investors themselves. This ruling underscored that the substance and economic reality of a transaction, rather than its mere form, determine whether it falls under the purview of securities regulation.6

Key Takeaways

  • Common enterprise is one of four elements of the Howey Test, used to identify an investment contract.
  • It implies a collective venture where investors' fortunes are linked.
  • Courts typically assess common enterprise through "horizontal commonality" or "vertical commonality."
  • The determination of common enterprise is crucial for classifying a digital asset or other financial scheme as a security.
  • The presence of a common enterprise subjects the offering to federal securities laws and disclosure requirements.

Interpreting the Common Enterprise

The interpretation of common enterprise in legal rulings often revolves around two main approaches: horizontal commonality and vertical commonality.

  • Horizontal Commonality: This is the most widely accepted interpretation. It exists when there is a pooling of investors' assets, and all investors share proportionately in the profit and loss of the enterprise. In essence, the success or failure of each individual investor is directly linked to the success or failure of the entire collective investment scheme. For instance, a commodity pool where many investors' funds are combined into a single account, and profits or losses are allocated based on their contributions, exhibits horizontal commonality.5

  • Vertical Commonality: This interpretation focuses on the relationship between the investor and the promoter of the scheme.

    • Broad Vertical Commonality: The investor's fortunes are tied to the promoter's efforts, but not necessarily to other investors' fortunes. If the promoter's efforts determine the success or failure of the investment for all investors, vertical commonality may be found.
    • Strict Vertical Commonality: The investor's fortunes are directly tied to the fortunes of the promoter. If the promoter's return on investment rises and falls with the investor's, strict vertical commonality may exist.

Courts have generally emphasized the pooling aspect, or horizontal commonality, when assessing the common enterprise element. The presence of a common enterprise is essential to establish an investment contract under the Howey Test, distinguishing it from a mere sale of property or a bilateral contract.4

Hypothetical Example

Consider a hypothetical scenario where "InnovateCo" offers "digital units" representing a fractional interest in a portfolio of early-stage technology startups. InnovateCo solicits funds from numerous individuals, promising that the pooled capital will be used by its expert team to identify, invest in, and nurture these startups. Investors are told that their returns will be based on the overall performance and exits of the startup portfolio.

In this situation, a common enterprise would likely exist. The investors' money is pooled to form a single fund, and their expected returns are not dependent on their individual efforts but rather on the collective performance of the startup portfolio managed by InnovateCo. The success or failure of one investor's digital units is directly tied to the success or failure of the entire fund, demonstrating horizontal commonality. This collective investment model contrasts sharply with, for example, an individual directly investing in a single startup and managing their own stake.

Practical Applications

The concept of common enterprise is primarily applied in securities regulation, particularly by the SEC, to determine whether various financial arrangements, including novel ones, are subject to federal securities laws.

One of the most significant modern applications of the common enterprise element is in the context of cryptocurrency and other digital assets. The SEC utilizes the Howey Test to assess if an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) or the sale of a token constitutes an offering of securities. For digital assets, the common enterprise element is often met when investors' funds are pooled to finance the development of a blockchain network or project, and the value of their tokens is dependent on the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of the developers or a central entity.3 The SEC has repeatedly applied this framework in its enforcement actions.2 For example, a token sold to fund the creation of a new decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol, where the token's value is expected to rise with the protocol's adoption and development by the founding team, would likely satisfy the common enterprise prong.

Limitations and Criticisms

While common enterprise is a foundational concept in securities law, its application, especially to new financial technologies like digital assets, can be complex and subject to debate. Critics often point to the differing judicial interpretations of commonality (horizontal vs. vertical) as a source of legal uncertainty. Some decentralized cryptocurrencies, particularly those with fully functional networks and no identifiable central promoter, may argue they do not meet the common enterprise criteria, as each investor's gain or loss is independent.

Furthermore, the "solely from the efforts of others" prong of the Howey Test, in conjunction with common enterprise, creates a challenge for innovative financial schemes where investors might also contribute to the network (e.g., staking, governance). Determining the precise degree of dependence on a central entity's efforts versus distributed community efforts remains a contentious area in legal analysis. The flexibility of the Howey Test, while intended to capture various investment schemes, also introduces interpretive nuances that can lead to regulatory uncertainty and ongoing litigation, particularly concerning decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and other evolving blockchain structures.1

Common Enterprise vs. Horizontal Commonality

While "common enterprise" is a broad term encompassing the collective nature of an investment scheme, "horizontal commonality" is a specific legal interpretation often used to establish its presence. The confusion arises because horizontal commonality is the most frequently applied and strongest form of common enterprise.

Horizontal commonality specifically requires a pooling of investors' assets where all investors share proportionately in the profits and losses of the venture. It emphasizes the direct interconnectedness of the investors' financial fortunes. In contrast, common enterprise is the overarching requirement that there be a single, unified venture. Courts use horizontal commonality as a key test to verify that this collective nature exists, ensuring that the investors are not merely engaging in separate transactions with a single promoter, but are indeed participating in a shared investment pool. Without this pooled risk, the argument for a common enterprise, and thus an investment contract, weakens.

FAQs

What does "common enterprise" mean in simple terms?

In simple terms, common enterprise means that a group of people put their money or assets into a single venture, and the success or failure of their investment depends on the overall success or failure of that collective venture, often managed by someone else.

Why is common enterprise important for investors?

Understanding common enterprise helps investors identify if a financial instrument they are considering is likely to be classified as a security. If it is a security, it falls under specific federal laws designed to protect investors through disclosure requirements and regulatory oversight by bodies like the SEC.

Does every investment have a common enterprise?

No. Many investments, such as directly purchasing a piece of real estate or individual stocks on an exchange (where your profit depends on the specific stock's performance and market forces, not necessarily a pooled venture with other stock purchasers through a promoter's efforts), do not involve a common enterprise in the legal sense of the Howey Test. The concept applies more specifically to schemes where investors' fortunes are intertwined in a collective pool managed by others.