Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to C Definitions

Concession agreements

What Are Concession Agreements?

A concession agreement is a contract granting a party the right to operate a specific business or provide a service within a defined area or for a set period, often granted by a government or public entity. These agreements are a crucial component of project finance, enabling large-scale developments, particularly in infrastructure where the upfront capital expenditure is substantial. Through a concession agreement, the private entity typically funds, builds, operates, and maintains an asset, recovering its costs and earning profit through user fees or other revenue streams generated by the asset, or through payments from the granting authority. This mechanism facilitates the development of public services and utilities by leveraging private sector efficiency and capital.

History and Origin

The concept of granting rights for public works and services has historical roots, with early forms of concessions appearing in various societies for endeavors like building roads, bridges, or operating markets. A notable example, though not a modern concession agreement, that shares operational similarities is the construction and operation of the Panama Canal. France initially began excavating for a canal in 1881, but the project faced severe difficulties and ultimately went bankrupt. The United States later took over the project in 1904, completing the canal in 1914. Under the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty of 1903, the United States was granted a 10-mile wide strip of land for the canal, paying Panama a one-time $10 million and an annual annuity. This arrangement, effectively a long-term grant of control and operational rights, allowed the U.S. to build and manage the critical waterway for decades. The canal, symbolizing U.S. technological prowess and economic power, remained under U.S. control until its gradual transfer to Panama, culminating in full Panamanian control in 1999.4

Key Takeaways

  • Concession agreements are contractual arrangements where a government or public authority grants a private entity the right to operate a public service or facility.
  • They are prevalent in infrastructure development, allowing the private sector to finance, build, operate, and maintain assets.
  • The private entity typically generates revenue through user fees or government payments.
  • These agreements involve significant risk transfer from the public to the private sector.
  • Successful concession agreements require a robust regulatory framework and clear terms to protect both public and private stakeholders.

Interpreting Concession Agreements

Interpreting a concession agreement involves understanding the allocation of rights, obligations, and risks between the granting authority and the concessionaire. Key aspects include the duration of the concession, the scope of services to be provided, performance standards, fee structures (e.g., tolls, tariffs), mechanisms for revenue sharing, and provisions for dispute resolution. For the concessionaire, the agreement must offer a viable financial return on investment over the concession period. For the public authority, it must ensure the delivery of essential services at acceptable quality and cost, while safeguarding public interest.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a hypothetical scenario where the City of Metropolis wants to build a new light rail system to alleviate traffic congestion but lacks the immediate funds and expertise. The city issues a request for proposals for a 30-year concession agreement. OmniTransit Corp., a private company specializing in public transportation, wins the bid.

Under the concession agreement, OmniTransit Corp. is responsible for:

  1. Financing and Construction: Raising the necessary capital through debt and equity from capital markets to design and construct the entire light rail network, including tracks, stations, and rolling stock.
  2. Operation and Maintenance: Managing daily operations, including scheduling, ticketing, security, and ongoing maintenance of the infrastructure and trains for the full 30-year term. This includes covering all operating costs.
  3. Revenue Collection: Collecting fares directly from passengers. The agreement might include a tiered fare structure and provisions for fare adjustments based on inflation or ridership targets.

In return, the City of Metropolis retains ownership of the underlying land and grants OmniTransit Corp. the exclusive right to operate the light rail service within city limits for 30 years. The agreement might also include performance incentives for OmniTransit, such as bonuses for high on-time performance, and penalties for service disruptions.

Practical Applications

Concession agreements are widely applied across various sectors where public services or assets require significant private capital and operational efficiency. Common areas include:

  • Transportation Infrastructure: Toll roads, bridges, airports, seaports, and railways often operate under concession models. For instance, private companies may be granted concessions to manage airport operations, including commercial spaces and services. JCDecaux, for example, recently secured an exclusive advertising concession for Brussels Airport.3
  • Utilities: Water treatment plants, waste management facilities, and power generation or distribution networks can be managed through concessions.
  • Mining and Natural Resources: Governments may grant concessions to private companies for the exploration, extraction, and processing of natural resources like minerals or oil, typically involving royalty payments or profit-sharing arrangements.
  • Telecommunications: In some regions, the deployment and operation of communication networks might be structured through concession agreements.

These agreements allow governments to develop crucial infrastructure and services without direct budgetary outlays, transferring project risks and leveraging private sector innovation.

Limitations and Criticisms

While beneficial, concession agreements and the broader framework of public-private partnerships (PPPs) face several limitations and criticisms. A primary concern is the potential for significant fiscal policy risks for the government. Although designed to transfer risk to the private sector, governments often retain substantial contingent liabilities, such as minimum revenue guarantees or termination clauses, which can materialize and create unexpected public debt. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has highlighted that while PPPs can ease fiscal constraints, there's a risk they might be used to bypass spending controls and move public investment off-budget, even though the government may still bear most of the associated risks and potential fiscal costs.2

Another criticism revolves around the complexity and transparency of contract negotiation. Long-term concession agreements can be difficult to draft comprehensively, leading to renegotiations that may not always be in the public interest. There can also be challenges in accurately assessing and allocating risks, potentially leading to private entities overestimating risks to secure higher returns, or governments underestimating them, resulting in costly bailouts. Ensuring proper oversight and a robust regulatory framework is critical to mitigate these drawbacks, as poorly managed concessions can undermine public value for money. The OECD also provides recommendations on public governance of PPPs to ensure value for money and prevent ill-designed projects.1

Concession Agreements vs. Public-Private Partnerships

Concession agreements are a specific type of public-private partnership (PPP). While all concession agreements are PPPs, not all PPPs are concession agreements.

  • Public-Private Partnership (PPP): This is a broad term encompassing a range of arrangements where a government and a private entity collaborate to deliver public services or infrastructure. PPPs can include various contractual forms such as management contracts, lease agreements, design-build-finance-operate (DBFO) models, and build-operate-transfer (BOT) arrangements. The key characteristic is the sharing of responsibilities, risks, and rewards over a long term.

  • Concession Agreement: This is a more narrowly defined PPP model. In a concession, the private entity (concessionaire) is granted the right to operate and collect revenue from a public asset for a specified period, typically taking on substantial responsibility for financing, construction, operation, and maintenance. The private entity assumes direct commercial risk related to the demand for the service or asset, and its revenue is often tied directly to user fees. The government usually retains ownership of the underlying asset.

The confusion often arises because concession agreements represent a highly integrated form of PPP, involving a significant transfer of operational and financial responsibility to the private sector.

FAQs

What is the primary purpose of a concession agreement?

The main purpose is to allow a government or public authority to leverage private sector capital, expertise, and efficiency for the development and operation of public services or infrastructure, without requiring direct public funding or management. It enables projects that might otherwise be unaffordable or complex for the public sector alone.

Are concession agreements only used for infrastructure projects?

While very common in infrastructure (like roads, airports, and utilities), concession agreements can also be used in other sectors. This includes resource extraction (mining concessions), commercial operations within public spaces (e.g., retail concessions at airports), and even services like waste management.

Who owns the asset in a concession agreement?

Typically, the public entity or government retains ownership of the underlying asset (e.g., the land, the bridge structure), while the private concessionaire gains the right to operate and generate revenue from it for the term of the agreement. At the end of the concession period, the operational rights usually revert to the granting authority.

What happens at the end of a concession agreement?

At the conclusion of the specified term, the operational rights and often the asset itself (if built by the concessionaire on public land) typically revert to the granting authority. The terms for handover, including asset condition and any ongoing liabilities, are usually detailed in the original government contracts. Sometimes, there may be provisions for renegotiation or renewal of the concession.