Skip to main content
← Back to C Definitions

Conventional biofuels

What Are Conventional Biofuels?

Conventional biofuels are liquid transportation fuels produced from common agricultural crops, primarily starch-based feedstocks like corn or sugarcane for ethanol, and oilseed crops such as soybeans or rapeseed for biodiesel. These first-generation biofuels are a key component of renewable energy initiatives, falling under the broader category of renewable energy finance. Their development aims to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and mitigate carbon emissions in the transportation sector.

History and Origin

The concept of using biological materials for fuel dates back over a century, but the modern era of conventional biofuels gained significant traction in the early 21st century. Governments worldwide began promoting their use to enhance energy security and address environmental concerns. In the United States, the Energy Policy Act of 2005 established the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), mandating increasing volumes of renewable fuel to be blended into the nation's transportation fuel supply. This initial program, often referred to as RFS1, primarily focused on conventional biofuels like corn ethanol. The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 significantly expanded the RFS program, setting more ambitious targets and defining categories of renewable fuels, including conventional biofuel.6

Similarly, the European Union implemented directives, such as the Renewable Energy Directive, to promote the use of renewable energy sources, including conventional biofuels, to meet climate and energy targets.5

Key Takeaways

  • Conventional biofuels are liquid fuels derived from common food crops like corn, sugarcane, or soybeans.
  • The primary examples are ethanol (from starches/sugars) and biodiesel (from vegetable oils/animal fats).
  • They are developed as alternatives to fossil fuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance energy independence.
  • Government mandates and incentives, like the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard and the EU's Renewable Energy Directive, have been crucial to their widespread adoption.
  • Their production has led to debates regarding environmental impact, such as land use change and food security.

Interpreting Conventional Biofuels

In financial and energy markets, the prevalence and pricing of conventional biofuels are influenced by several factors, including agricultural commodities prices, government policies, and global crude oil prices. Higher crop prices directly impact the cost of producing ethanol and biodiesel, while fluctuating oil prices affect their competitiveness as an alternative fuel. Policy frameworks, such as blend mandates and crop subsidies, create a demand floor, providing a degree of market stability for producers and investors in the sector.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a hypothetical country, "Greenlandia," aiming to reduce its carbon footprint. Greenlandia implements a national biofuel blending mandate requiring 10% of all gasoline sold to be ethanol derived from locally grown corn.

A large agricultural cooperative, "HarvestFuel Corp," decides to invest heavily in corn-to-ethanol conversion plants. HarvestFuel's financial performance will depend on:

  1. Corn Prices: If global corn prices rise due to adverse weather or increased demand for food, HarvestFuel's feedstock costs will increase, potentially squeezing profit margins.
  2. Gasoline Prices: If crude oil prices fall significantly, making conventional gasoline much cheaper, the economic incentive for consumers and blenders to use ethanol (beyond the mandate) might diminish, affecting demand and pricing.
  3. Government Policy: Any changes to Greenlandia's blending mandate or crop subsidies for corn would directly impact HarvestFuel's revenue and cost structure.

This scenario illustrates how the financial viability of conventional biofuel production is intrinsically linked to agricultural market dynamics and regulatory support.

Practical Applications

Conventional biofuels find their primary application in the transportation sector, where they are blended with petroleum-based fuels like gasoline and diesel. Ethanol is commonly blended with gasoline, typically as E10 (10% ethanol, 90% gasoline), or in higher concentrations like E85 in flex-fuel vehicles. Biodiesel is used as a blend component in diesel fuel, often as B5 or B20.

In financial markets, conventional biofuels are relevant to investors interested in energy commodities, sustainable investing, and the agricultural sector. Companies involved in corn milling, soybean processing, and biofuel production benefit from the demand created by blending mandates. For instance, in 2022, U.S. fuel ethanol production reached over 15 billion gallons, while U.S. biodiesel production exceeded 1.6 billion gallons, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.4 These volumes demonstrate the significant scale of conventional biofuel production and their integration into national energy supplies, influenced by policies like the Renewable Fuel Standard.3

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite their role in reducing reliance on fossil fuels, conventional biofuels face several limitations and criticisms:

  • Food vs. Fuel Debate: A prominent concern is the diversion of food crops for fuel production, which can impact global food prices and food security. This debate highlights the competition for arable land between growing crops for food consumption and for energy production.2
  • Land Use Change: The expansion of conventional biofuel feedstock cultivation can lead to indirect land use change (ILUC), where forests or grasslands are converted to agricultural land elsewhere to replace food crops diverted for fuel. This can result in significant carbon emissions, potentially offsetting some of the greenhouse gas benefits of biofuels. The European Union's Renewable Energy Directive has introduced measures to account for and limit biofuels associated with high ILUC-risk.1
  • Net Energy Gain: Concerns exist about the net energy gain of some conventional biofuels, questioning whether the energy input required for cultivation, fertilization, harvesting, and processing outweighs the energy output of the fuel itself.
  • Environmental Impact: Beyond land use, the production of conventional biofuels can involve intensive agricultural practices, including the use of fertilizers and pesticides, which may contribute to water pollution and soil degradation.

These criticisms underscore the complex interplay between biofuels policy, environmental sustainability, and economic growth.

Conventional Biofuels vs. Advanced Biofuels

Conventional biofuels are often contrasted with advanced biofuels. The key distinction lies in their feedstocks and production methods:

FeatureConventional BiofuelsAdvanced Biofuels
FeedstocksFood crops (e.g., corn, sugarcane, soybeans)Non-food sources (e.g., cellulosic biomass, algae, waste)
Primary OutputEthanol, BiodieselCellulosic ethanol, renewable diesel, biojet fuel
TechnologyEstablished, commercially matureEmerging, often more complex conversion processes
EnvironmentalCriticized for "food vs. fuel" and land use impactsGenerally lower lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions

While conventional biofuels derive from readily available agricultural commodities, advanced biofuels utilize non-food biomass, aiming to mitigate the land-use change and food security concerns associated with their conventional counterparts. Policies often differentiate between the two, with greater incentives sometimes offered for advanced biofuel development.

FAQs

What are the main types of conventional biofuels?

The main types are ethanol, primarily made from corn or sugarcane, and biodiesel, produced from vegetable oils or animal fats.

How do conventional biofuels differ from fossil fuels?

Conventional biofuels are derived from recently living organic matter (biomass) and are considered renewable, whereas fossil fuels are formed over millions of years from ancient organic matter and are non-renewable. The use of biofuels can also lead to lower net carbon emissions compared to fossil fuels, depending on the feedstock and production process.

Are conventional biofuels considered sustainable?

The sustainability of conventional biofuels is a subject of ongoing debate. While they offer a renewable alternative to fossil fuels and can reduce certain emissions, concerns exist regarding their impact on food prices, land use change, and the overall net energy gain required for their production.

What role do governments play in the conventional biofuels market?

Governments often play a significant role through mandates, such as blend requirements (e.g., the Renewable Fuel Standard), tax incentives, and crop subsidies. These policies aim to stimulate demand, support the domestic agricultural sector, and achieve environmental goals.

AI Financial Advisor

Get personalized investment advice

  • AI-powered portfolio analysis
  • Smart rebalancing recommendations
  • Risk assessment & management
  • Tax-efficient strategies

Used by 30,000+ investors