Skip to main content
← Back to C Definitions

Core deposits

What Are Core Deposits?

Core deposits represent a stable and generally low-cost source of funds for financial institutions, such as banks and credit unions. Within the broader field of Bank Funding, these deposits are considered highly reliable because they typically originate from established customer relationships, often within a bank's local market. They encompass accounts like checking accounts, savings accounts, and money market accounts, as well as smaller Certificates of Deposit (CDs) below the deposit insurance limit. This stability is a key advantage, as it provides banks with a consistent base for lending and investment activities, contributing significantly to their overall liquidity and financial health.

History and Origin

The concept of banking, involving the acceptance of deposits and the lending of funds, dates back millennia, with early forms evident in ancient Mesopotamia and the Roman Empire20. However, the modern understanding and regulatory treatment of core deposits began to solidify in the wake of significant financial turmoil. A pivotal moment for deposit stability in the United States was the Great Depression. The widespread bank run phenomena of the early 1930s, where depositors rushed to withdraw their funds due to fear of bank insolvency, led to thousands of bank failures and a profound loss of public trust18, 19.

In response to this crisis, the U.S. government established the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) in 1933 through the Banking Act of 193316, 17. The FDIC's creation introduced deposit insurance, initially covering up to $2,500 per depositor, which fundamentally changed the nature of deposits by providing a government guarantee against loss14, 15. This insurance mechanism significantly bolstered depositor confidence and differentiated insured, stable deposits—which would come to be known as core deposits—from more volatile forms of funding.

Key Takeaways

  • Core deposits are stable and typically low-cost funding sources for banks, including checking, savings, and smaller time deposits.
  • They are primarily distinguished by their stickiness and sensitivity to interest rates.
  • A strong base of core deposits reduces a bank's reliance on more volatile funding, enhancing its financial stability.
  • Regulators view core deposits as crucial for assessing a bank's resilience and liquidity risk.

Interpreting Core Deposits

Core deposits are a critical indicator of a financial institution's funding strength and customer relationships. A high proportion of core deposits within a bank's total deposit base signals a stable and predictable funding environment. This stability is highly valued because it allows banks to engage in long-term loan growth and other investments with greater confidence, reducing their exposure to sudden funding shocks. For instance, a bank heavily reliant on core deposits is generally less susceptible to rapid outflows triggered by market fluctuations compared to one funded predominantly by wholesale or rate-sensitive deposits. Regulators and analysts closely examine a bank's core deposit ratio to assess its resilience and ability to withstand economic stress, underscoring their importance in sound banking practices.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "Community Bank," a regional institution, and "MegaCorp Bank," a large national player. Community Bank primarily serves local businesses and individual depositors, holding 80% of its total deposits as core deposits from long-standing customers. MegaCorp Bank, while also serving retail customers, sources a larger proportion of its funding from institutional investors and money market funds, with only 50% classified as core deposits.

During a period of rising interest rates, Community Bank finds its funding costs increase more slowly because its core deposit base is less sensitive to market rate changes. This allows it to maintain a healthy net interest margin. MegaCorp Bank, however, experiences faster increases in its funding costs as its institutional depositors, who are more rate-sensitive, demand higher returns or move their funds elsewhere. This scenario illustrates how a robust core deposit base provides a competitive advantage and greater resilience to financial institutions.

Practical Applications

Core deposits are fundamental to the operational strategy and regulatory oversight of financial institutions. From a strategic perspective, banks actively pursue and cultivate core deposits through various means, including community engagement, competitive product offerings, and personalized customer service. Th13ese efforts aim to build lasting relationships that translate into stable funding, which in turn supports a bank's ability to extend credit, fund mortgages, and invest in its local economy.

In terms of analysis, the proportion of core deposits to total deposits is a key metric for assessing a bank's funding stability. Banks with a higher percentage of core deposits are generally viewed as less risky by investors and rating agencies. This stability also influences how central banks implement monetary policy. For instance, if banks primarily rely on stable core deposits, changes in policy rates might transmit differently through the banking system than if funding were more sensitive to market rates. The importance of core deposits was highlighted during recent periods of stress, such as the 2023 U.S. regional banking crisis, where institutions with a higher reliance on uninsured or less stable funding experienced significant deposit outflows.

#11, 12# Limitations and Criticisms

While core deposits are generally considered a stable funding source, their stability is not absolute and can be challenged under certain circumstances. The notion of "stickiness" has evolved, with some research indicating that even insured deposits can exhibit "flightiness" during periods of severe financial distress, especially if large, uninsured deposits are also present in a bank's funding mix.

A10 key criticism or limitation arises when unforeseen events trigger widespread fear, potentially leading to a bank run even on seemingly stable deposits. The concept of "deposit flight" gained prominence during the March 2023 U.S. banking crisis, where several regional banks faced rapid withdrawals, driven by concerns over asset-liability mismatches and the perceived safety of uninsured funds. Th8, 9is demonstrated that while deposit insurance provides a strong backstop, severe liquidity crises can still materialize, impacting even components traditionally considered core. Furthermore, competition for core deposits can become intense, particularly in rising interest rates environments, pushing up funding costs for banks. Th7e structure of deposit insurance itself, while critical for stability, can also introduce moral hazard, potentially influencing bank risk-taking behavior.

#6# Core Deposits vs. Brokered Deposits

The distinction between core deposits and brokered deposits is crucial for banks and regulators due to their differing characteristics and implications for a bank's financial health.

FeatureCore DepositsBrokered Deposits
OriginFunds obtained directly from a bank's local or target market, typically from individuals and small businesses, often with established relationships.Funds obtained through a third-party intermediary (a "deposit broker") on behalf of clients, often for a fee. These can include large institutional funds or aggregated smaller deposits.
StabilityGenerally considered stable and less sensitive to changes in interest rates or market conditions. They are seen as a reliable, long-term funding base.Generally considered less stable and more volatile. These depositors are often "rate shoppers" and may move their funds quickly in response to better rates elsewhere, or perceived risk. 5
CostTypically lower-cost funding for banks due to the strong customer relationship and often lower explicit interest paid compared to wholesale funding.Often higher-cost funding as banks must pay competitive rates to attract these deposits via brokers.
Regulatory ViewPreferred by regulators as a foundation for a bank's liquidity and overall capital requirements. Banks are encouraged to grow their core deposit base.Viewed with more scrutiny by regulators due to their potential for rapid withdrawal. Banks that are less than "well capitalized" are often restricted from accepting brokered deposits. 4

The primary area of confusion arises because both are forms of deposits and contribute to a bank's funding. However, their underlying characteristics—the nature of the depositor relationship, price sensitivity, and stability—are fundamentally different, leading to distinct regulatory treatment and risk profiles for financial institutions.

FAQs

What types of accounts are typically considered core deposits?

Core deposits typically include checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, and smaller-denomination time deposits (like CDs under the FDIC insurance limit). These are generally held by individuals and businesses that have an ongoing relationship with the bank.

Wh3y are core deposits important for banks?

Core deposits are crucial because they provide banks with a stable, predictable, and often lower-cost source of funding. This stability allows banks to make long-term loans and investments, supporting loan growth and overall profitability. They are a key component of a bank's [liquidity] strategy.

How does the FDIC influence the concept of core deposits?

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insures deposits up to a certain limit ($250,000 per depositor, per institution). This insurance makes insured deposits, a significant portion of which constitute core deposits, much more stable because depositors are protected from loss in the event of a bank failure. The FDIC's regulations and definitions often distinguish core deposits from other, less stable funding sources for supervisory purposes.1, 2