Skip to main content
← Back to D Definitions

Deposit guarantee schemes

What Are Deposit Guarantee Schemes?

Deposit guarantee schemes (DGSs) are a critical component of financial regulation designed to protect depositors' funds in the event of a bank failure. These schemes operate as an insurance system, reassuring individuals and businesses that their deposits up to a certain limit are secure, even if a financial institution becomes insolvent. By safeguarding deposits, DGSs play a vital role in maintaining public confidence in the banking system and mitigating the risk of widespread bank runs, which can destabilize an economy. These mechanisms are a cornerstone of modern financial stability, preventing panic-driven withdrawals that could otherwise trigger a broader financial crisis.

History and Origin

The concept of protecting bank depositors gained significant traction following periods of severe financial instability and widespread bank failures. In the United States, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was established in 1933 during the Great Depression as part of the Banking Act of 1933 (also known as the Glass-Steagall Act). This creation was a direct response to the massive loss of savings and the erosion of public trust caused by over 9,000 bank failures between 1929 and 1933, and it immediately helped restore confidence in the nation's financial system25. Before this, various state-sponsored deposit insurance plans had often proven unsuccessful24.

Globally, the idea of deposit protection evolved, with many countries adopting their own schemes. The Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998 further highlighted the need for robust depositor protection, leading many governments to provide blanket guarantees to stabilize their financial systems23. In Europe, the Deposit Guarantee Scheme Directive (DGSD) has harmonized national schemes, requiring all European Union (EU) member states to ensure bank customers' deposits are guaranteed up to a certain amount, and setting standards for payout periods and funding22. The latest directive, 2014/49/EU, improved the legal framework, mandating that all EU credit institutions join a DGS and laying down rules for their functioning21.

Key Takeaways

  • Deposit guarantee schemes protect depositors' savings up to a specified limit in the event of a bank's insolvency.
  • They are crucial for maintaining public confidence and preventing bank runs, thereby contributing to overall financial stability.
  • Most schemes are funded by premiums paid by member banks, not by taxpayers.
  • Coverage limits and types of deposits covered vary by jurisdiction, though international standards promote harmonization.
  • DGSs are a key part of the broader regulatory framework and financial safety net.

Interpreting Deposit Guarantee Schemes

Deposit guarantee schemes serve as a crucial backstop for individual and corporate depositors. Their primary interpretation is that funds held in an insured financial institution are safe up to the stated coverage limit, even if the institution itself fails. This assurance significantly reduces the incentive for a depositor to participate in a bank run, which is a mass withdrawal of funds driven by fear or lack of confidence. The existence of a robust DGS is often seen as a sign of a country's commitment to financial stability and effective prudential supervision within its banking sector.

For instance, in the European Union, the standard coverage is €100,000 per depositor per bank. 19, 20This means that if an individual has multiple accounts at the same bank, all their combined deposits are covered up to this single limit. For joint accounts, the limit typically applies per depositor, effectively doubling the coverage for two co-owners. 17, 18Understanding these limits and how they apply across different types of accounts and financial institutions is essential for depositors to manage their risk exposure.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a hypothetical depositor, Maria, who has funds spread across several accounts.

  1. Checking Account: $75,000
  2. Savings Account: $50,000
  3. Certificate of Deposit (CD): $100,000

All three accounts are held at "Secure Bank." In a country with a deposit guarantee scheme covering up to $250,000 per depositor per bank, Maria's total deposits at Secure Bank amount to $225,000 ($75,000 + $50,000 + $100,000).

If Secure Bank were to experience a bank failure, Maria would be fully reimbursed for her entire $225,000, as this amount falls below the $250,000 coverage limit. The DGS would step in to ensure Maria receives her funds, preventing any direct loss of her insured deposits due to the bank's insolvency. This protection gives Maria confidence in her choice of financial institutions, allowing her to save without constant worry about institutional solvency.

Practical Applications

Deposit guarantee schemes are fundamental to the operation of modern financial markets and investor confidence. They are integral to consumer banking, ensuring that everyday savings and checking accounts are protected. Beyond individual depositors, DGSs also support the broader economic landscape by underpinning the stability of financial institutions.

In the aftermath of the 2007-2009 global financial crisis, many countries enhanced their deposit insurance systems, including raising coverage levels and ensuring faster payouts. 16These schemes are also vital in managing systemic risk, as they help prevent the contagion that can occur when the failure of one bank triggers widespread panic and withdrawals from others. 15Regulatory bodies, such as the International Association of Deposit Insurers (IADI), publish core principles that serve as an international standard for effective deposit insurance systems, guiding jurisdictions in designing and assessing their frameworks. 13, 14These principles emphasize the importance of DGSs in preserving financial stability and protecting depositors globally.
12

Limitations and Criticisms

While deposit guarantee schemes offer significant benefits in protecting depositors and promoting financial stability, they are not without limitations and criticisms. A primary concern is the concept of moral hazard. This occurs because the protection offered by a DGS can reduce the incentive for both depositors and banks to monitor risk. Depositors, knowing their funds are insured up to a certain limit, may become less vigilant about the financial health of their chosen bank, while banks might be tempted to take on excessive risk, knowing that a significant portion of their liabilities (insured deposits) is protected by the scheme.
10, 11
Research suggests that more generous deposit insurance schemes, particularly those with very high coverage relative to a country's economic output, may be more susceptible to moral hazard. 9Critics argue that this can lead to an increase in risky behavior by financial institutions, as the potential profits from higher risk-taking are privatized, but the losses are socialized through the DGS. 8However, it is also argued that in developed jurisdictions with strong institutional environments and robust regulatory frameworks, the adverse incentives created by deposit insurance can be offset by effective prudential regulation and supervision. 7The design of a DGS, including features like risk-sensitive premiums and clear coverage limits, can help mitigate these moral hazard issues.
5, 6

Deposit Guarantee Schemes vs. Bank Run

Deposit guarantee schemes are directly intended to counteract the phenomenon of a bank run. A bank run occurs when a large number of depositors simultaneously withdraw their money from a bank due to fears about its solvency, often leading to the bank's collapse, even if it was initially solvent but illiquid. This can have a ripple effect, causing panic and withdrawals across the entire banking system.

The fundamental difference lies in their nature: a bank run is a crisis event driven by a loss of confidence, while a deposit guarantee scheme is a preventative measure and a safety net. DGSs provide assurance to depositors that their money is safe, thereby removing the primary incentive for participating in a run. By guaranteeing deposits up to a specific amount, DGSs instill confidence, ensuring that even if other depositors are withdrawing funds, insured individuals have no reason to panic, thus stabilizing the system and preventing widespread contagion. 4Without DGSs, the banking system would be far more vulnerable to liquidity risk and systemic shocks.

FAQs

What is the purpose of a deposit guarantee scheme?

The primary purpose of a deposit guarantee scheme (DGS) is to protect depositors' savings in case their bank fails and to maintain confidence in the overall banking system. This helps prevent widespread panic and bank runs.

How much money is typically protected by a deposit guarantee scheme?

The amount protected varies by country. For example, in the United States, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insures deposits up to $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank, for each account ownership category. In the European Union, the standard coverage is €100,000 per depositor per bank.

#2, 3## Who funds deposit guarantee schemes?
Deposit guarantee schemes are typically funded by premiums or contributions from the member financial institutions themselves. This ensures that the cost of protecting depositors is borne by the banking industry, rather than taxpayers.

#1## Are all types of accounts covered by a deposit guarantee scheme?
Generally, DGSs cover common deposit accounts like checking accounts, savings accounts, and certificates of deposit (CDs). However, they typically do not cover investment products such as stocks, bonds, or mutual funds, as these carry inherent market risk.

What happens if a bank fails and I have more than the insured amount?

If a bank fails and your deposits exceed the coverage limit of the deposit guarantee scheme, you would be reimbursed up to the maximum insured amount. Any amount above that limit would become an uninsured claim, and its recovery would depend on the bank's liquidation process, potentially resulting in a partial or total loss of the uninsured funds.