Skip to main content
← Back to D Definitions

Derivatives trading strategy

What Is a Straddle?

A straddle is a neutral options strategy that involves simultaneously buying a call option and a put option on the same underlying asset, with the same strike price and expiration date. This strategy is employed by traders who anticipate a significant price movement in the underlying asset but are uncertain about the direction of that movement. The straddle aims to profit from large changes in the underlying asset's price, regardless of whether it goes up or down.

History and Origin

The concept of options trading, the broader financial category to which a straddle belongs, has roots dating back centuries, with early forms observed in various markets. However, the modern, standardized exchange-traded options contract originated with the founding of the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) in 1973. The CBOE was established by the Chicago Board of Trade to create a centralized, regulated marketplace for options, moving away from the previously fragmented over-the-counter (OTC) market. This standardization, coupled with the development of the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model, revolutionized the options market by providing increased transparency and liquidity.10 Joe Sullivan, CBOE's founding president, played a pivotal role in this transformation, leading to the exchange's opening on April 26, 1973.9 The advent of exchange-traded options facilitated the development and widespread adoption of complex strategies like the straddle, as traders could now more easily buy and sell both calls and puts with standardized terms.

Key Takeaways

  • A straddle involves simultaneously buying both a call and a put option on the same underlying asset, with identical strike prices and expiration dates.
  • This strategy is best suited for scenarios where a significant price movement in the underlying asset is expected, but the direction of that movement is unknown.
  • The maximum potential loss for a long straddle is limited to the total premium paid for both options.
  • Profits from a long straddle are potentially unlimited if the underlying asset's price moves significantly above or below the strike price.
  • Short straddles, which involve selling both options, are profitable when the underlying asset's price remains stable and exhibit unlimited loss potential.

Formula and Calculation

For a long straddle, profit or loss depends on the underlying asset's price at expiration relative to the common strike price. The strategy has two breakeven points:

Upper Breakeven Point:

Upper Breakeven Point=Strike Price+Total Premium Paid\text{Upper Breakeven Point} = \text{Strike Price} + \text{Total Premium Paid}

Lower Breakeven Point:

Lower Breakeven Point=Strike PriceTotal Premium Paid\text{Lower Breakeven Point} = \text{Strike Price} - \text{Total Premium Paid}

The total profit or loss ((P/L)) at expiration for a long straddle can be expressed as:

If (S_T > \text{Upper Breakeven Point}):

P/L=ST(Strike Price+Total Premium Paid)P/L = S_T - (\text{Strike Price} + \text{Total Premium Paid})

If (S_T < \text{Lower Breakeven Point}):

P/L=(Strike PriceST)Total Premium PaidP/L = (\text{Strike Price} - S_T) - \text{Total Premium Paid}

If (\text{Lower Breakeven Point} \leq S_T \leq \text{Upper Breakeven Point}):

P/L=Total Premium PaidP/L = - \text{Total Premium Paid}

Where:

  • (S_T) = Price of the underlying asset at expiration
  • Strike Price = The agreed-upon price at which the underlying asset can be bought or sold
  • Total Premium Paid = The sum of the premiums paid for the call option and the put option

Interpreting the Straddle

Interpreting a straddle primarily revolves around anticipating volatility. A long straddle is a bullish bet on volatility, meaning the trader expects the underlying asset to experience a significant price swing, either upward or downward. The larger the move away from the strike price, the greater the profit potential. Conversely, a short straddle is a bearish bet on volatility, where the trader expects the underlying asset's price to remain relatively stable and close near the strike price at expiration. The profitability of a straddle is highly sensitive to the market's implied volatility and how it evolves over the life of the options.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investor who believes that Company XYZ, currently trading at $100 per share, is about to release a major announcement (e.g., earnings report or a new product launch). They are unsure if the news will be overwhelmingly positive or negative, but expect a significant price reaction.

The investor decides to implement a long straddle strategy:

  • They buy a call option with a $100 strike price for a premium of $5.00.
  • They also buy a put option with a $100 strike price for a premium of $4.50.
  • Both options have the same expiration date.

The total premium paid for this straddle is $5.00 + $4.50 = $9.50.

The breakeven points for this straddle are:

  • Upper Breakeven Point: $100 + $9.50 = $109.50
  • Lower Breakeven Point: $100 - $9.50 = $90.50

Scenario 1: Significant upward movement
If Company XYZ's stock price surges to $115 at expiration due to positive news:

  • The call option is in-the-money by $15.00 ($115 - $100), yielding a gross profit of $15.00.
  • The put option expires worthless.
  • Net profit = $15.00 (call profit) - $9.50 (total premium paid) = $5.50.

Scenario 2: Significant downward movement
If Company XYZ's stock price plummets to $85 at expiration due to negative news:

  • The put option is in-the-money by $15.00 ($100 - $85), yielding a gross profit of $15.00.
  • The call option expires worthless.
  • Net profit = $15.00 (put profit) - $9.50 (total premium paid) = $5.50.

Scenario 3: Limited movement
If Company XYZ's stock price remains near the strike price, say $102, at expiration:

  • The call option is in-the-money by $2.00 ($102 - $100), yielding a gross profit of $2.00.
  • The put option expires worthless.
  • Net loss = $2.00 (call profit) - $9.50 (total premium paid) = -$7.50.

This example illustrates how the straddle benefits from substantial price movements in either direction, but incurs a loss if the price remains relatively unchanged.

Practical Applications

Straddles are commonly used by traders and investors in several real-world scenarios within derivatives markets. One primary application is during periods of anticipated high volatility, such as before major corporate events like earnings announcements, FDA drug approvals, or significant economic data releases. Traders employ long straddles to capitalize on the expected large price swing, regardless of its direction, without taking a directional stance on the underlying asset.

Another practical application is for speculation on market-wide volatility, particularly through index options. For instance, traders might use straddles on the S&P 500 Index (SPX) if they expect significant market turbulence. The CBOE (Chicago Board Options Exchange) provides extensive data on options trading, including volume statistics for various products, which can reflect periods of increased straddle activity.8,7,6 For example, Cboe Global Markets reported record options trading volume in March, with proprietary index options setting new records, indicating active engagement in strategies like straddles.5,4

Furthermore, while less common, straddles can sometimes be part of a broader risk management strategy, or adjusted as part of a delta-neutral portfolio. They allow a trader to express a view solely on the magnitude of price movement rather than its direction, which can be useful when specific directional forecasts are unreliable.

Limitations and Criticisms

While a powerful strategy for anticipating volatility, the straddle has notable limitations and criticisms. The primary drawback of a long straddle is the significant cost of purchasing both a call and a put option. For the strategy to be profitable, the underlying asset's price must move beyond either the upper or lower breakeven point by expiration, covering the total premiums paid. If the expected price movement does not materialize, or if the price remains relatively stable, the straddle buyer will incur a loss, up to the full amount of the premiums paid.

Another criticism relates to the timing of the price movement. Even if a substantial move occurs, if it happens too early or too late in the option's life, time decay (theta) can erode the value of the options, making it harder to realize a profit. Furthermore, declining implied volatility after the straddle is established can also negatively impact its profitability, even if the underlying asset moves. Academic research has explored the profitability of straddle strategies, with studies examining the characteristics that impact profitability and the influence of underlying asset volatility.3,2 Some research suggests that while straddles offer unlimited profit potential, the actual long-term profitability can be challenging due to factors like the cost of premiums and the need for significant price deviations.1

For short straddles, the main criticism is the unlimited risk. If the underlying asset moves significantly in either direction, the seller faces potentially unlimited losses, as they are obligated to fulfill the terms of the expiring in-the-money option. This makes short straddles a high-risk strategy, often employed by experienced traders with robust hedging mechanisms.

Straddle vs. Strangle

Both the straddle and the strangle are neutral options strategies designed to profit from volatility, but they differ in their construction and risk/reward profiles.

A straddle involves buying (or selling) a call option and a put option with the same strike price and expiration date. This makes it a more aggressive bet on volatility, as the underlying asset needs to move a relatively smaller distance from the strike price to reach a breakeven point. The premiums paid for a long straddle are typically higher because both options are at-the-money.

In contrast, a strangle involves buying (or selling) a call option and a put option with the same expiration date but different strike prices. Typically, the call option has a strike price above the current market price (out-of-the-money), and the put option has a strike price below the current market price (out-of-the-money). This construction means the initial cost (premiums paid) for a long strangle is lower than for a straddle. However, the underlying asset must move a greater distance to reach the breakeven points, as it needs to move beyond two distinct strike prices plus the total premiums. This makes the strangle a less aggressive, but also less expensive, volatility play.

The choice between a straddle and a strangle depends on the trader's conviction about the magnitude of the expected price movement and their tolerance for the initial cost and the required breakeven distance.

FAQs

What is a long straddle?

A long straddle is an options strategy where an investor buys both a call option and a put option with the same strike price and expiration date. It profits when the underlying asset moves significantly in either direction.

What is a short straddle?

A short straddle is the inverse of a long straddle, where an investor sells both a call option and a put option with the same strike price and expiration date. This strategy profits if the underlying asset's price remains stable and does not move much by expiration. It carries substantial risk due to potentially unlimited losses.

When should you use a straddle?

A straddle is typically used when an investor anticipates a significant price movement in an underlying asset but is unsure of the direction. Common scenarios include upcoming corporate earnings reports, major economic announcements, or pending regulatory decisions that could cause a large price swing.

What is the maximum loss for a long straddle?

The maximum loss for a long straddle is limited to the total premium paid for both the call and put options. This loss occurs if the underlying asset's price at expiration is exactly equal to the common strike price, rendering both options worthless.