Disruptive technology

What Is Disruptive Technology?

Disruptive technology refers to an innovation that significantly alters the way consumers, industries, or businesses operate, often by introducing a new value proposition that was previously overlooked or inaccessible. It belongs to the broader category of Business Strategy, impacting how companies compete, allocate resources, and approach innovation. Unlike incremental improvements, a disruptive technology typically starts by serving a simpler, less demanding, or entirely new market segment, offering a more affordable and accessible solution. Over time, it improves and moves upmarket, eventually challenging and displacing established incumbent companies and their dominant products or services.

History and Origin

The concept of disruptive technology was popularized by Harvard Business School professor Clayton Christensen in his 1997 book, The Innovator's Dilemma. Building on his 1995 Harvard Business Review article co-authored with Joseph L. Bower, Christensen defined disruptive innovation as a process where a smaller company, with fewer resources, successfully challenges established businesses¹², ¹³. These new entrants typically gain a foothold by delivering more suitable functionality, often at a lower price, to overlooked segments of the market¹¹. Incumbents, focused on their most profitable customers, tend not to respond vigorously to these initial low-end or new-market threats. However, as the disruptive technology evolves and improves, it eventually meets the needs of mainstream customers, leading to a significant shift in market share and profitability for the new entrants.

Key Takeaways

• Disruptive technology reshapes existing markets or creates entirely new ones by offering simpler, more affordable, or more accessible solutions.
• It typically targets overlooked or underserved customer segments before moving upmarket to challenge established players.
• Successful disruptive technologies often involve a new business model rather than just a superior product.
• Incumbent firms frequently struggle to adapt to disruptive technologies due to their focus on existing profitable customers and sustaining innovations.
• Understanding disruptive forces is crucial for strategic planning and effective risk management in competitive landscapes.

Interpreting Disruptive Technology

Interpreting the potential of a disruptive technology involves recognizing its capacity to fundamentally change an industry's competitive landscape, rather than merely enhancing existing offerings. It's about identifying innovations that promise to make products or services more affordable, simpler, or widely accessible to a new or underserved population. For investors and strategists, this means looking beyond immediate performance metrics and evaluating the long-term potential for market transformation and shifts in value proposition. Recognizing a true disruptive technology often requires foresight, as its initial market appeal might be limited, and its trajectory of improvement could be exponential, making it a significant factor in future investment decisions.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a hypothetical financial technology (fintech) startup, "ClearPay," that introduces a peer-to-peer payment system designed for small, informal transactions among individuals in emerging markets. Initially, ClearPay focuses on remote villages where traditional banking infrastructure is minimal, offering a simple mobile app that allows users to send and receive small sums with very low fees, far less than what traditional banks might charge for similar services or what informal money lenders provide.

Established banks, with their focus on high-value corporate clients and urban retail banking, might initially dismiss ClearPay as too niche or unprofitable. They would see its user base as low-income and not worth the capital expenditure required to serve. However, ClearPay continually improves its platform, adding features like micro-loans and digital savings accounts tailored to the needs of its growing user base. As mobile phone penetration increases and ClearPay's network effects strengthen, its services become robust enough to attract urban users who are tired of high fees and complex processes at traditional banks, even for larger transactions. Eventually, ClearPay's simple, low-cost model begins to erode the traditional banks' retail customer base, demonstrating how a disruptive technology can start small and gradually capture significant market share.

Practical Applications

Disruptive technology has profound practical applications across various sectors, influencing market entry strategies, competitive dynamics, and regulatory responses. In investing, identifying potential disruptors early can offer significant opportunities, while incumbents that fail to adapt may see a decline in their return on investment and overall market standing.

A classic example of disruptive technology's impact is the rise of Netflix and the decline of Blockbuster. Blockbuster, once a dominant force in video rentals, focused on its physical store model and late fees, failing to fully embrace the digital revolution¹⁰. Netflix, beginning with DVD-by-mail with no late fees, appealed to a less demanding segment—those willing to wait for DVDs in exchange for convenience. As broadband internet became widespread, Netflix transitioned to streaming, offering an even more convenient and cost-effective entertainment solution. ⁹Blockbuster's inability to pivot effectively to this new, disruptive business model led to its bankruptcy, while Netflix became a global entertainment powerhouse. This case highlights how disruptive forces can fundamentally reshape industries and is often cited as a prime example of "creative destruction" in economics.
⁸

Limitations and Criticisms

While often lauded for driving progress and creating new economic value, disruptive technology also faces limitations and criticisms. One common critique is the oversimplification or misapplication of the term itself, with "disruption" sometimes used broadly to describe any innovation that shakes up an industry, rather than adhering to Christensen's specific definition of starting at the low end or in a new market. ⁷This broad usage can lead to misdiagnosing competitive threats or misallocating resources.

Furthermore, disruptive technologies can have significant societal implications, including job displacement and widening income inequality, as new automated processes or platforms replace traditional labor. ⁶For example, the shift from film to digital photography, though a disruptive technology pioneered by Kodak itself, ultimately contributed to the company's downfall as it struggled to transition from its highly profitable film business model. ⁵Despite inventing the digital camera, Kodak's management failed to fully appreciate the disruptive potential of filmless photography, clinging to their legacy operations and missing a decade-long window to adapt. ², ³, ⁴This highlights a limitation where incumbents, due to their existing economies of scale and established processes, find it challenging to pivot to new disruptive technologies even when they are aware of them.

Disruptive Technology vs. Sustaining Innovation

The distinction between disruptive technology and sustaining innovation is critical for understanding market dynamics and competitive strategy. Sustaining innovations are improvements to existing products or services that make them better for current customers, often in terms of performance, features, or quality. These innovations typically target more demanding or profitable customers and reinforce the market position of incumbent companies. Examples include faster microprocessors, higher-resolution television screens, or more efficient car engines.

In contrast, disruptive technology, as defined, introduces a product or service that is initially simpler, less expensive, and often perceived as inferior by mainstream customers, but appeals to a new or underserved market. Over time, its performance improves, making it attractive to mainstream customers and allowing it to displace existing offerings. The key confusion arises because both types of innovation can lead to significant market shifts. However, sustaining innovations maintain the existing value network, while disruptive technologies create a new value network, often making the old one obsolete. A company that focuses solely on sustaining innovations, while neglecting potential disruptive technologies, risks being outmaneuvered by new entrants who fundamentally change the basis of competition.

FAQs

What defines a disruptive technology?

A disruptive technology is an innovation that initially serves a niche or new market with a simpler, more affordable, or more accessible solution, and then evolves to challenge and eventually displace established market leaders. It often creates a new competitive advantage by redefining market expectations.

How does disruptive technology affect industries?

Disruptive technology can fundamentally reshape industries by introducing new business models, creating new markets, or significantly altering the competitive landscape. It can lead to the decline of incumbent firms that fail to adapt, while opening up opportunities for new entrants and driving economic growth through novel solutions and increased adaptability.

Is artificial intelligence (AI) a disruptive technology?

Many aspects of artificial intelligence (AI) are considered disruptive technologies because they enable new applications and create value by making complex capabilities more accessible and affordable. ¹AI can automate tasks, analyze vast amounts of data, and drive efficiencies in ways that fundamentally change existing processes and create new market segments, influencing how businesses approach forecasting and operations.

Can established companies create disruptive technologies?

While disruptive technologies are often associated with startups, established companies can also create them. However, it is challenging because their existing organizational structures, customer relationships, and emphasis on profitability often lead them to prioritize sustaining innovations over potentially less profitable, initially lower-performing disruptive ventures. It requires a dedicated effort to explore new market segments and develop distinct business models.