Skip to main content
← Back to E Definitions

Economic price to sales

What Is Economic Price to Sales?

Economic Price to Sales refers to a refined approach to the traditional price-to-sales (P/S) ratio that aims to provide a more economically realistic valuation of a company by looking beyond mere reported revenue figures. While the conventional P/S ratio is a straightforward valuation metric comparing a company's market capitalization to its revenue, Economic Price to Sales emphasizes the underlying economic substance and sustainability of those sales. It falls under the broader category of investment analysis, particularly within the realm of financial ratio analysis, to offer a deeper insight into a company's true value. This perspective encourages analysts to consider qualitative factors and potential adjustments that impact the quality and predictability of sales, thus offering a more holistic view of a company's financial health.

History and Origin

The concept of using sales as a valuation metric gained prominence in the late 20th century, particularly with the work of financial experts who sought alternatives to earnings-based multiples. The traditional P/S ratio was notably championed by Kenneth L. Fisher in his 1984 book Super Stocks, offering a way to evaluate companies that might not yet be profitable but were generating substantial revenue9, 10.

While the direct term "Economic Price to Sales" isn't tied to a singular historical invention, it evolved from the recognition of the limitations inherent in simply dividing market price by reported sales. As business valuation practices matured, especially after the dot-com bubble when many revenue-rich but profit-poor companies were highly valued, analysts increasingly emphasized the need for "economic adjustments" to financial figures. This analytical shift acknowledged that reported sales can sometimes mask underlying economic realities, such as unsustainable revenue streams, aggressive accounting practices, or significant differences in the cost structure to generate that revenue. The push for more economically sound valuation reflects a broader trend in finance to incorporate a deeper understanding of a company's operational and market context beyond its simple income statement.

Key Takeaways

  • Economic Price to Sales is an enhanced interpretation of the Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio, focusing on the underlying economic reality and sustainability of a company's revenue.
  • It helps assess companies, especially growth stocks or those with fluctuating or negative earnings per share, by valuing sales rather than profits.
  • This approach considers factors like revenue quality, recurring vs. non-recurring sales, and industry-specific nuances that impact the economic value of sales.
  • A lower Economic Price to Sales generally suggests a more attractive valuation, but context within the industry and broader economic conditions is crucial for accurate interpretation.
  • It requires qualitative judgment and potential adjustments to reported sales to reflect their true economic contribution.

Formula and Calculation

The fundamental calculation for Economic Price to Sales begins with the standard Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio formula. However, the "economic" aspect comes from the qualitative and quantitative adjustments made to the revenue component to reflect its true economic substance.

The basic formula for the Price-to-Sales Ratio is:

P/S Ratio=Market CapitalizationTotal Sales (or Revenue)\text{P/S Ratio} = \frac{\text{Market Capitalization}}{\text{Total Sales (or Revenue)}}

Alternatively, on a per-share basis:

P/S Ratio=Current Share PriceSales Per Share\text{P/S Ratio} = \frac{\text{Current Share Price}}{\text{Sales Per Share}}

For Economic Price to Sales, the "Total Sales (or Revenue)" figure would ideally be adjusted to represent economically sustainable or quality revenue. This might involve:

  • Excluding non-recurring or unsustainable revenue streams.
  • Adjusting for specific revenue recognition policies that might inflate reported sales.
  • Considering the mix of products or services sold and their inherent profit margins.

While there isn't a universally standardized formula for these "economic" adjustments, the goal is to arrive at a "Normalized Economic Revenue" figure that better reflects the ongoing, quality revenue-generating capacity of the business.

Interpreting the Economic Price to Sales

Interpreting the Economic Price to Sales involves analyzing the ratio in conjunction with a deep understanding of a company's business model, industry dynamics, and the economic environment. A low Economic Price to Sales ratio suggests that investors are paying less for each dollar of a company's economically adjusted sales, which could indicate an undervalued opportunity. Conversely, a high ratio might imply that the market has high expectations for the company's future revenue growth or quality, potentially signaling an overvalued stock.

Unlike the simple P/S ratio, the economic interpretation requires a critical assessment of the components. For example, a company with high reported sales but declining liquidity or an unfavorable risk profile due to aggressive sales tactics or non-recurring items might have a misleadingly low P/S ratio. The Economic Price to Sales framework prompts analysts to scrutinize such factors, ensuring that the revenue used in the calculation truly represents the firm's sustainable economic activity. This allows for more informed comparisons between companies, especially those with varying business models or accounting methodologies.

Hypothetical Example

Consider two hypothetical software-as-a-service (SaaS) companies, TechCo A and InnovateCorp.

TechCo A:

  • Market Capitalization: $500 million
  • Reported Annual Revenue: $100 million
  • Analysis: Upon closer inspection for Economic Price to Sales, 20% of TechCo A's revenue ($20 million) comes from one-time, non-renewable project consulting, which is highly unlikely to recur. The remaining $80 million is stable, recurring subscription revenue.

InnovateCorp:

  • Market Capitalization: $700 million
  • Reported Annual Revenue: $120 million
  • Analysis: All of InnovateCorp's revenue is derived from recurring software subscriptions, which are highly stable and have high retention rates.

Traditional P/S Ratio Calculation:

  • TechCo A P/S: $500M / $100M = 5x
  • InnovateCorp P/S: $700M / $120M ≈ 5.83x

Based on the traditional P/S ratio, TechCo A appears slightly more attractive.

Economic Price to Sales Calculation:

  • TechCo A's Economically Adjusted Revenue: $100 million - $20 million (non-recurring) = $80 million
  • TechCo A's Economic Price to Sales: $500 million / $80 million = 6.25x
  • InnovateCorp's Economically Adjusted Revenue: $120 million (no adjustments needed) = $120 million
  • InnovateCorp's Economic Price to Sales: $700 million / $120 million ≈ 5.83x

By applying the Economic Price to Sales perspective, InnovateCorp, despite a higher traditional P/S, demonstrates a more favorable Economic Price to Sales ratio because its revenue is entirely recurring and economically sustainable, unlike TechCo A's. This highlights how an economic lens provides a more accurate picture of how much investors are truly paying for a dollar of quality sales. This deeper dive is crucial for comprehensive financial analysis.

Practical Applications

Economic Price to Sales is particularly useful in several practical scenarios within finance and investing. It is often applied when valuing companies that are in early growth stages, or those in cyclical industries, where profitability may be inconsistent or non-existent. For such entities, revenue figures tend to be more stable and less prone to accounting adjustments than earnings, providing a reliable baseline for asset valuation.

F7, 8or instance, in the technology sector, many startups focus on rapid market share acquisition and revenue growth, deferring profitability. Traditional metrics like the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio would be inapplicable for these unprofitable firms. The Economic Price to Sales approach allows investors to gauge how the market values the company's ability to generate revenue, with the added benefit of scrutinizing the quality and sustainability of that revenue. This could involve assessing the percentage of recurring revenue versus one-time project sales, or the diversification of the customer base.

Furthermore, economists and policymakers may examine how factors like product revenue influence price setting and the transmission of monetary policy, suggesting that sales figures are more than just accounting entries; they are fundamental economic indicators. Un6derstanding the true economic value of sales can also influence decisions regarding fiscal adjustments and their impact on economic output.

Limitations and Criticisms

While the Economic Price to Sales offers a more nuanced perspective than the traditional P/S ratio, it still carries inherent limitations. A primary criticism, common to all revenue multiples, is that they do not inherently account for profitability or cost structures. A 4, 5company can generate substantial revenue, but if its costs are disproportionately high, leading to low or negative profit margins, its economic value might be significantly overstated by a sales-based multiple alone. Th2, 3e Economic Price to Sales aims to address this by considering the quality of revenue, but it doesn't directly incorporate the expense side of the balance sheet.

Another drawback is the subjectivity involved in determining what constitutes "economic adjustments" to revenue. Unlike standardized accounting metrics, there's no universally agreed-upon methodology for adjusting sales for their economic quality or sustainability. This can lead to inconsistencies in analysis, making direct comparisons between different analysts' "Economic Price to Sales" figures challenging. Additionally, these ratios may not fully capture a company's debt load or its enterprise value comprehensively, which are crucial aspects of a company's overall financial picture. Therefore, relying solely on this metric, even with economic adjustments, can lead to incomplete or potentially misleading conclusions about a company's true worth.

#1# Economic Price to Sales vs. Price-to-Sales Ratio

The distinction between Economic Price to Sales and the standard Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio lies in the depth of analysis applied to the revenue component. The traditional price-to-sales (P/S) ratio is a straightforward quantitative metric that simply compares a company's market value to its top-line revenue as reported on its financial statements. It provides a quick snapshot of how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of sales, making it easy to calculate and compare across companies, especially in high-growth sectors where profitability might be volatile or non-existent.

In contrast, Economic Price to Sales represents a more qualitative and adjusted interpretation. While it uses the same foundational formula, the "economic" aspect implies a critical evaluation of the revenue itself. This involves assessing factors such as the sustainability of sales, the presence of recurring revenue streams, the impact of one-time events, or the underlying economic conditions influencing revenue generation. For example, an analyst applying an Economic Price to Sales perspective might discount revenue from non-core operations or extraordinary sales, aiming to derive a more stable and representative "economic revenue" figure. The goal is to provide a valuation that reflects the company's long-term earning potential stemming from its core, high-quality sales, moving beyond superficial revenue figures to deeper economic realities.

FAQs

What does "Economic Price to Sales" tell investors?

Economic Price to Sales helps investors understand how much the market values each dollar of a company's sustainable and high-quality revenue. It aims to provide a more realistic valuation by accounting for factors that might make reported sales less economically meaningful, such as one-time boosts or aggressive accounting. This can be particularly useful for business valuation of companies without consistent profits.

Why is it important to consider economic factors when looking at sales?

Sales figures alone can be misleading. Economic factors, such as whether revenue is recurring, the risk profile associated with generating those sales, or if sales are inflated by unsustainable practices, can significantly impact a company's true long-term value. Incorporating these economic considerations provides a more accurate picture of a company's underlying financial health and earning potential.

When is Economic Price to Sales most useful?

Economic Price to Sales is most useful when evaluating companies that are not yet profitable, have highly volatile earnings, or are in industries with significant variations in revenue recognition. It's especially valuable for growth stocks where investors are buying into future potential rather than current profits. It acts as a complementary tool to other valuation methods like discounted cash flow analysis.

How does Economic Price to Sales differ from Enterprise Value to Sales?

Both are sales-based multiples. The traditional Price-to-Sales ratio uses market capitalization (equity value) as the numerator. Enterprise value to Sales, on the other hand, uses enterprise value, which accounts for both equity and debt (minus cash), providing a more comprehensive view of the company's total value, regardless of its capital structure. Economic Price to Sales focuses more on the quality and sustainability of the revenue figure in the denominator, regardless of whether the numerator is market cap or enterprise value.