Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to E Definitions

Eugene fama

What Is Eugene Fama?

Eugene F. Fama is a Nobel laureate economist widely recognized for his foundational contributions to financial economics, particularly the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) and the development of factor models for asset pricing. His work has profoundly shaped modern portfolio theory and investment strategies. Eugene Fama's research emphasizes that financial markets are highly efficient, meaning asset prices rapidly reflect all available information.

History and Origin

Born in Boston, Massachusetts, in 1939, Eugene Fama received his Ph.D. in Finance and Economics from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business in 1964, where he spent his entire academic career. Fama's early work in the 1960s laid the groundwork for the Efficient Market Hypothesis, suggesting that short-term stock price movements are nearly impossible to predict because new information is almost instantaneously incorporated into prices. This idea challenged traditional notions of active stock-picking and paved the way for passive investing.9

In 2013, Eugene Fama, along with Lars Peter Hansen and Robert J. Shiller, was awarded the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel "for their empirical analysis of asset prices."8,7 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences recognized Fama for his groundbreaking work demonstrating how difficult it is to predict asset prices in the short run due to markets rapidly incorporating new information.6

Key Takeaways

  • Eugene Fama is a Nobel laureate economist renowned for his work on the Efficient Market Hypothesis and asset pricing models.
  • The Efficient Market Hypothesis, heavily influenced by Fama, posits that financial markets reflect all available information, making it challenging to consistently "beat the market."
  • Fama, along with Kenneth French, developed multifactor models, such as the Fama-French Three-Factor Model, to better explain variations in expected returns beyond market beta.
  • His research has significantly contributed to the rise of index funds and passive investment strategy.
  • Fama's work underscores the importance of diversification and a long-term approach to investing.

Formula and Calculation

One of Eugene Fama's most significant contributions, in collaboration with Kenneth French, is the Fama-French Three-Factor Model. This model expands on the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) by adding two additional risk factors to explain portfolio returns: size and value.

The formula for the Fama-French Three-Factor Model is:

E(Ri)=Rf+βi(E(Rm)−Rf)+si(SMB)+hi(HML)E(R_i) = R_f + \beta_i (E(R_m) - R_f) + s_i(SMB) + h_i(HML)

Where:

  • (E(R_i)) = Expected return of asset (i)
  • (R_f) = Risk-free rate
  • (E(R_m)) = Expected return of the market portfolio
  • ((E(R_m) - R_f)) = Market risk premium
  • (\beta_i) = Beta coefficient of asset (i) (sensitivity to market movements)
  • (s_i) = Sensitivity of asset (i) to the small-minus-big (SMB) factor
  • (h_i) = Sensitivity of asset (i) to the high-minus-low (HML) factor
  • (SMB) = Small-Minus-Big: the historical excess return of small-cap stocks over large-cap stocks.
  • (HML) = High-Minus-Low: the historical excess return of high book-to-market (value) stocks over low book-to-market (growth) stocks.

This model suggests that a stock's expected return is not only influenced by its sensitivity to the overall market but also by its exposure to smaller company stocks and value investing-oriented stocks.

Interpreting the Work of Eugene Fama

The core interpretation of Eugene Fama's work lies in understanding market efficiency. If markets are efficient, as Fama's research suggests, then current asset prices fully reflect all publicly available information. This implies that actively trying to find undervalued stocks or predict future price movements based on past data is largely futile because any such information has already been priced in. For investors, this translates into a preference for broad market index funds over actively managed funds, as index funds aim to replicate market returns rather than attempting to outperform them. The implication is that consistently achieving a superior risk-adjusted return through active trading is exceedingly difficult for most participants.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investor, Sarah, who believes she can consistently "beat the market" by spending hours analyzing company financial statements and macroeconomic data to pick individual stocks. According to the principles derived from Eugene Fama's work on the Efficient Market Hypothesis, any publicly available information Sarah uncovers (e.g., strong earnings reports or positive industry trends for a specific company in the stock market) would already be reflected in the stock's current price.

If a company reports unexpectedly high earnings, the market reacts almost immediately. By the time Sarah processes this information and attempts to buy the stock, its price has likely already adjusted to incorporate the news. Sarah's efforts to gain an edge through fundamental analysis are therefore unlikely to consistently generate abnormal returns, suggesting that a passive approach, such as investing in a broad market index fund, might yield comparable or better risk-adjusted results over the long term.

Practical Applications

Eugene Fama's theories have numerous practical applications across financial markets and investment management:

  • Passive Investing: The most direct impact of the Efficient Market Hypothesis is the proliferation and popularity of index funds and Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). If markets are efficient, trying to beat them is costly and often unsuccessful, making passive investing a cost-effective alternative. This shift has democratized investing by lowering fees and simplifying portfolio construction for individual investors.5
  • Asset Management: Professional asset managers utilize Fama-French factor models to explain portfolio performance and construct portfolios. Instead of relying solely on market beta, they consider exposures to size and value factors, aiming to capture associated premiums. For instance, a manager seeking to replicate a specific investment style might use these factors to analyze and adjust their portfolio's characteristics.
  • Performance Evaluation: Fama's framework provides a benchmark for evaluating investment performance. If a fund manager consistently underperforms a relevant market index or a benchmark adjusted for Fama-French factors, it suggests they are not generating alpha (excess returns) but rather failing to capture the expected market or factor premiums.
  • Academic Research: His work provided a robust empirical foundation that spurred further research in asset pricing, market anomalies, and the microstructure of financial markets. The 1992 paper "The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns," co-authored with Kenneth French, demonstrated that market beta alone does not explain all variations in average stock returns, introducing size and book-to-market equity as significant factors.4

Limitations and Criticisms

While Eugene Fama's work on the Efficient Market Hypothesis and factor models has been incredibly influential, it is not without limitations and criticisms. A primary critique revolves around the assumption of perfectly rational investors and the rapid dissemination of information. Real-world phenomena, such as speculative bubbles and market crashes, are often cited as evidence against strong forms of market efficiency, suggesting that investor psychology and irrational behavior can lead to asset prices deviating from their fundamental values.3

The rise of behavioral finance offers a counter-narrative, proposing that cognitive biases and emotions can significantly influence investor decisions and, consequently, market prices. Economists like Robert J. Shiller, who shared the Nobel Prize with Fama, have extensively researched and documented these deviations, highlighting instances where markets appear to exhibit "excess volatility" or irrational exuberance.2,1 While Fama's models provide powerful explanations for a significant portion of asset return variation, they do not fully account for all market anomalies or the extreme price movements sometimes observed during periods of market euphoria or panic.

Eugene Fama vs. Robert Shiller

Eugene Fama and Robert J. Shiller, despite sharing the 2013 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences, represent contrasting perspectives within financial economics regarding the functioning of markets. Fama is most closely associated with the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH), which posits that financial markets are highly efficient, meaning asset prices fully reflect all available information. His research suggests that it is nearly impossible for investors to consistently achieve abnormal returns because any new information is instantly incorporated into prices.

Conversely, Robert Shiller is a leading figure in behavioral finance. His work challenges the EMH by arguing that psychological factors, investor sentiment, and irrational behaviors can lead to market inefficiencies, bubbles, and crashes. Shiller's research demonstrates that asset prices can deviate significantly from their fundamental values over extended periods, driven by factors beyond rational expectations. While Fama's models excel at explaining expected returns based on systematic risk, Shiller's work provides insights into the "irrational" aspects of market behavior, particularly in explaining market volatility and phenomena like the dot-com bubble or housing market crises. Their joint Nobel recognition underscored the importance of both empirical analysis of asset prices and a deeper understanding of the forces that drive market fluctuations, whether rational or behavioral.

FAQs

What is the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)?

The Efficient Market Hypothesis, a concept heavily advanced by Eugene Fama, states that asset prices in financial markets reflect all available information. This implies that it is very difficult to consistently "beat the market" because new information is immediately factored into prices, making it impossible to profit from it. The EMH has weak, semi-strong, and strong forms, each positing different levels of information reflected in prices.

How did Eugene Fama influence investing?

Eugene Fama's work profoundly influenced investing by providing the academic foundation for passive investing strategies. His research on market efficiency suggested that attempting to actively pick stocks to outperform the market is often futile and costly. This led to the widespread adoption of index funds, which aim to replicate the performance of a broad market index, offering a low-cost and diversified approach to investing.

What are the Fama-French models?

The Fama-French models are a series of multi-factor asset pricing models developed by Eugene Fama and Kenneth French. The most well-known, the Three-Factor Model, expands on the traditional Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) by including factors for company size (small-cap stocks tend to outperform large-cap stocks) and value (high book-to-market ratio stocks tend to outperform low book-to-market ratio stocks). These risk factors help explain a greater proportion of the variation in stock returns than market risk alone.