Skip to main content
← Back to E Definitions

Expected alpha

Expected alpha, within the realm of portfolio performance measurement, represents the anticipated excess return of an investment relative to what would be expected given its level of systematic risk. It is a forward-looking metric, distinct from historical performance, and is often associated with the ability of an investment manager or strategy to outperform a relevant benchmark. Investors and analysts use expected alpha as a key component in assessing the potential value added by active management, aiming to identify opportunities that are predicted to generate returns above those justified by market exposure alone.

Expected alpha is a critical concept for investors seeking to generate risk-adjusted returns that surpass a passive market strategy. Its pursuit forms the core of many investment strategy decisions, influencing capital allocation and the selection of individual securities or managed funds.

History and Origin

The concept of alpha, and by extension, expected alpha, is rooted in the development of modern financial theory, particularly the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). The CAPM, introduced independently by economists and financial theorists such as William Sharpe, John Lintner, and Jan Mossin in the mid-1960s, provided a framework for understanding the relationship between risk and expected return for assets in a diversified portfolio. The model posited that the expected return of an asset should compensate investors only for its systematic risk, which is the risk that cannot be eliminated through diversification.

Building on this foundation, Michael C. Jensen, an economist and professor at Harvard Business School, introduced a risk-adjusted measure of portfolio performance in his seminal 1968 paper, "The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945–1964." This measure, now widely known as "Jensen's Alpha," sought to quantify the portion of a fund's return that was attributable to the manager's forecasting ability, rather than simply compensation for market risk. Jensen's work applied this measure to evaluate the predictive ability of mutual fund managers, providing an early, quantitative approach to assessing whether active management could consistently generate returns higher than those expected for a given level of risk. 25, 26, 27Jensen's study found that, on average, the mutual funds he analyzed were not able to predict security prices well enough to outperform a "buy-the-market-and-hold" policy. 24This research paved the way for the ongoing debate surrounding the value of active management and the realistic expectations of achieving positive alpha.

Key Takeaways

  • Expected alpha is a forward-looking estimate of an investment's return beyond what is predicted by its systematic risk.
  • It is a core concept in portfolio management and active investment strategies.
  • A positive expected alpha suggests a belief in a manager's or strategy's ability to outperform a benchmark.
  • Conversely, a negative expected alpha indicates an expectation of underperformance relative to the benchmark.
  • Expected alpha is distinct from realized or historical alpha, which measures past performance.

Formula and Calculation

Expected alpha is derived from the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), which posits that an asset's expected return is equal to the risk-free rate plus a risk premium based on its beta (finance) and the market risk premium.

The formula for expected return according to the CAPM is:

E(Ri)=Rf+βi(E(Rm)Rf)E(R_i) = R_f + \beta_i (E(R_m) - R_f)

Where:

  • ( E(R_i) ) = Expected return of the investment ( i )
  • ( R_f ) = Risk-free rate
  • ( \beta_i ) = Beta of the investment ( i ) (a measure of its systematic risk)
  • ( E(R_m) ) = Expected return of the market portfolio

Expected alpha is then the difference between the actual expected return of the investment and the expected return predicted by the CAPM:

Expected Alpha=Forecasted Return of Investment[Rf+βi(E(Rm)Rf)]\text{Expected Alpha} = \text{Forecasted Return of Investment} - [R_f + \beta_i (E(R_m) - R_f)]

In practice, forecasting these future returns to calculate expected alpha can be complex, involving econometric models, fundamental analysis, and quantitative strategies.

Interpreting Expected Alpha

Interpreting expected alpha involves evaluating the potential for an investment or investment manager to deliver returns that are not simply a function of taking on market risk. A positive expected alpha suggests that, after accounting for market-related risk, the investment is anticipated to generate additional returns. This is often the goal of active management, where managers seek to identify mispriced securities or exploit market inefficiencies. For instance, a fund manager might believe their specific investment strategy will result in a positive expected alpha, leading investors to allocate capital to that fund.

Conversely, a negative expected alpha implies that the investment is expected to underperform its benchmark, even after adjusting for its risk. An expected alpha of zero indicates that the investment is predicted to earn exactly the return that compensates for its systematic risk, aligning with the predictions of the CAPM and the efficient market hypothesis. The Security Market Line (SML) visually represents this relationship between systematic risk and expected return; investments plotted above the SML suggest a positive expected alpha, while those below suggest a negative expected alpha.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investment firm, "Growth Innovations," evaluating a new technology sector fund.

  • The current risk-free rate (( R_f )) is 3%.
  • The expected return of the overall market (( E(R_m) )) is 10%.
  • The fund's historical beta (( \beta_i )) relative to the market is 1.2.
  • Based on their proprietary research and analysis of the technology sector, Growth Innovations' analysts forecast that their new fund will achieve an average annual return of 13% over the next five years.

First, calculate the expected return for an investment with a beta of 1.2 according to the CAPM:
E(Ri)=Rf+βi(E(Rm)Rf)E(R_i) = R_f + \beta_i (E(R_m) - R_f)
E(Ri)=0.03+1.2(0.100.03)E(R_i) = 0.03 + 1.2 (0.10 - 0.03)
E(Ri)=0.03+1.2(0.07)E(R_i) = 0.03 + 1.2 (0.07)
E(Ri)=0.03+0.084E(R_i) = 0.03 + 0.084
E(Ri)=0.114 or 11.4%E(R_i) = 0.114 \text{ or } 11.4\%

Next, calculate the expected alpha for the Growth Innovations fund:
Expected Alpha=Forecasted Return of InvestmentE(Ri)\text{Expected Alpha} = \text{Forecasted Return of Investment} - E(R_i)
Expected Alpha=0.130.114\text{Expected Alpha} = 0.13 - 0.114
Expected Alpha=0.016 or 1.6%\text{Expected Alpha} = 0.016 \text{ or } 1.6\%

In this hypothetical example, Growth Innovations' new technology fund has an expected alpha of 1.6%. This suggests that the firm anticipates its fund to outperform what would be expected given its market risk by 1.6% annually. This positive expected alpha would be a key selling point for attracting investors interested in active management.

Practical Applications

Expected alpha is a theoretical construct with significant practical implications in the financial industry. It serves as a guiding principle for asset managers and investors pursuing strategies designed to outperform market benchmarks.

  • Fund Selection: Investors often look for fund managers who can demonstrate a credible approach to generating positive expected alpha. This is particularly relevant for mutual fund and hedge fund investments, where the fees are typically higher, and investors expect managers to justify these costs through superior performance.
  • Active vs. Passive Investment: The debate between active management and passive investing fundamentally hinges on the belief in the ability to consistently achieve positive expected alpha. Proponents of passive investing, such as those who favor index fund strategies, argue that markets are largely efficient, making it difficult for active managers to consistently outperform after accounting for costs.
    21, 22, 23* Performance Benchmarking: While expected alpha is forward-looking, it relies on a robust understanding of how performance is measured against benchmarks. Investment professionals often use models like the CAPM to establish a baseline expected return, against which any potential alpha is calculated.
  • Capital Allocation: Institutions and high-net-worth individuals may allocate capital to various strategies based on their assessment of the expected alpha offered by different investment vehicles. This involves a rigorous due diligence process to evaluate the methodologies and track records of managers claiming to generate alpha. For example, Morningstar's Active/Passive Barometer report frequently analyzes the success rates of active managers in various categories, providing insights into the challenge of outperforming passive alternatives over time.
    17, 18, 19, 20

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its theoretical appeal, the concept of expected alpha, and the pursuit of it, faces several limitations and criticisms within financial markets.

One primary criticism stems from the assumptions underlying the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), which forms the basis for calculating alpha. The CAPM relies on simplified assumptions, such as rational investors, homogeneous expectations, and the absence of transaction costs, which do not fully reflect real-world market conditions. 16Critics argue that because the market portfolio, a theoretical construct that includes all assets, is unobservable, proxying it with a stock index can lead to inaccuracies in beta calculation and, consequently, in alpha estimates.

Furthermore, consistently achieving positive expected alpha through active management has proven to be challenging for many investment professionals. Studies, such as those conducted by Morningstar through their Active/Passive Barometer, frequently show that a significant majority of actively managed funds underperform their passive benchmarks over extended periods, especially after accounting for fees. 12, 13, 14, 15These fees, which include management fees and other operating expenses, can significantly erode any potential alpha generated by active strategies. 9, 10, 11Even small differences in fees can lead to substantial differences in investment returns over time. 7, 8The difficulty in outperforming market averages is a persistent theme in financial literature and discussions among investors, with many proponents of passive investing highlighting the cost-efficiency of broad-market index fund investments.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
The concept of efficient market hypothesis also poses a significant challenge to the consistent generation of expected alpha. If markets are efficient, all available information is already reflected in asset prices, making it exceedingly difficult for any investor to consistently identify mispriced securities and thus achieve returns beyond those justified by risk.

Expected Alpha vs. Realized Alpha

Expected alpha and realized alpha are closely related yet distinct concepts in portfolio performance measurement. The fundamental difference lies in their temporal nature: expected alpha is a forward-looking projection, while realized alpha is a backward-looking measurement of actual performance.

Expected Alpha refers to the anticipated excess return an investor or manager hopes to achieve above a benchmark, given the investment's systematic risk. It is a theoretical prediction, often derived from a manager's investment thesis, market outlook, or a quantitative model. When an investor chooses an active management strategy, they do so with the expectation of generating a positive expected alpha.

Realized Alpha (also known as actual alpha or historical alpha) is the actual excess return an investment achieved over its benchmark during a specific past period, after accounting for its risk. It is calculated retrospectively using historical data. Realized alpha provides a tangible measure of a manager's past success (or lack thereof) in outperforming a risk-adjusted benchmark. A positive realized alpha indicates that the manager successfully added value, while a negative realized alpha suggests underperformance.

The confusion between the two often arises because investors may infer expected alpha from past realized alpha. However, past performance is not indicative of future results, and a manager who has generated positive realized alpha in the past may not be able to do so consistently in the future. The challenge for investors is to identify managers with a genuine ability to generate expected alpha, rather than simply chasing past realized alpha which may have been due to luck or specific market conditions.

FAQs

What does positive expected alpha mean for an investor?

A positive expected alpha means that an investment or strategy is anticipated to generate returns higher than what would be expected for its level of systematic risk, according to models like the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). For an investor, it suggests the potential for outperformance relative to a passive benchmark.

How is expected alpha different from beta?

Expected alpha is a measure of anticipated outperformance or underperformance relative to a benchmark after accounting for risk, while beta (finance) is a measure of an investment's sensitivity to overall market movements. Beta quantifies the systematic risk an investment contributes to a diversified portfolio, whereas expected alpha quantifies the additional return predicted beyond that systematic risk.

Can expected alpha be guaranteed?

No, expected alpha cannot be guaranteed. It is a forward-looking estimate or prediction based on various analyses and assumptions about future market conditions and management skill. Actual investment outcomes can differ significantly from expectations, and the ability to consistently achieve positive alpha through active management is widely debated and often challenging to demonstrate.