Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to E Definitions

Experience rating

What Is Experience Rating?

Experience rating is an insurance industry technique within the broader insurance category that adjusts an insured entity's future premium based on their past loss experience. Rather than solely relying on industry-wide averages, this method evaluates an individual or organization's specific claims history to determine a more accurate reflection of their risk management capabilities and inherent hazard. The goal of experience rating is to incentivize policyholders to reduce losses by offering lower premiums for favorable claims records and imposing higher premiums for unfavorable ones, thus promoting safer practices and more effective risk control. It is a key component of the underwriting process for various commercial insurance lines.

History and Origin

The concept of experience rating emerged as the insurance industry matured and recognized the disparities in risk among policyholders within the same classification. While initially, insurance premiums were largely based on broad statistical averages, insurers soon realized that some entities were consistently safer or riskier than the average. This led to the development of methods to tailor premiums to individual loss experience. One significant early application was in workers' compensation insurance. As states began to mandate workers' compensation coverage in the early 20th century, the need for a fair and equitable system to price policies based on an employer's actual safety record became apparent. This allowed businesses with strong safety programs and fewer workplace claims to pay less than those with frequent accidents. The International Risk Management Institute (IRMI) notes that the formalized experience modification factor for workers' compensation has been a cornerstone of premium determination for decades, evolving from earlier schedule rating systems.31

Key Takeaways

  • Experience rating adjusts insurance premiums based on a policyholder's past loss history.
  • It incentivizes policyholders to improve safety and loss control measures.
  • The outcome of experience rating is often an "experience modification factor" (EMF) that acts as a multiplier to standard premiums.
  • It is widely used in commercial insurance, especially workers' compensation and unemployment insurance.
  • The calculation incorporates actual losses, expected losses, and a credibility factor.

Formula and Calculation

The output of an experience rating calculation is typically an "experience modification factor" (EMF or E-Mod), which is a multiplier applied to a policyholder's standard premium. This factor is derived by comparing the policyholder's actual incurred losses to their statistically expected losses, with a "credibility factor" influencing how much weight is given to the policyholder's specific history versus the industry average.

A simplified conceptual representation of the Experience Modification Factor (EMF) is:

EMF=Actual Losses×Credibility+Expected Losses×(1−Credibility)Expected Losses\text{EMF} = \frac{\text{Actual Losses} \times \text{Credibility} + \text{Expected Losses} \times (1 - \text{Credibility})}{\text{Expected Losses}}

Where:

  • (\text{Actual Losses}) = The employer's incurred losses (claims paid and reserved) over a specific historical period (e.g., typically the three most recent full policy years, excluding the most recent one).
  • (\text{Expected Losses}) = The average losses anticipated for businesses of similar size and industry, based on statistical data compiled by rating bureaus like NCCI (National Council on Compensation Insurance).
  • (\text{Credibility}) = A factor (ranging from 0 to 1) that determines how much weight is given to the employer's actual loss experience. Larger, more stable businesses with significant exposure and data typically have higher credibility, meaning their actual losses have a greater impact on their EMF. Conversely, smaller businesses might have a lower credibility factor, making their EMF lean closer to the industry average.

Interpreting the Experience Rating

Interpreting the experience modification factor (EMF) is straightforward: an EMF of 1.00 indicates that the policyholder's actual loss experience aligns perfectly with the expected losses for their industry and size. An EMF less than 1.00 (e.g., 0.80) suggests that the policyholder's actual losses were lower than expected, resulting in a credit that reduces their premium. Conversely, an EMF greater than 1.00 (e.g., 1.20) signifies that actual losses exceeded expectations, leading to a debit that increases their premium.

This factor directly influences the final premium paid. For example, a business with a standard premium of $10,000 and an EMF of 0.80 would pay $8,000, while one with an EMF of 1.20 would pay $12,000. Understanding this factor is crucial for effective risk management and managing insurance costs, as it directly ties safety performance to financial outcomes.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "SafeBuild Construction," a company with a strong safety record. Their standard annual workers' compensation premium is $50,000. Over the past three years, their actual incurred claims (actual losses) totaled $30,000. Based on industry statistics for similar construction companies of their size, their expected losses were $45,000. Due to their consistent operation and size, they have a credibility factor of 0.70.

Using the simplified conceptual formula for EMF:

EMF=Actual Losses×Credibility+Expected Losses×(1−Credibility)Expected Losses\text{EMF} = \frac{\text{Actual Losses} \times \text{Credibility} + \text{Expected Losses} \times (1 - \text{Credibility})}{\text{Expected Losses}}
EMF=$30,000×0.70+$45,000×(1−0.70)$45,000\text{EMF} = \frac{\$30,000 \times 0.70 + \$45,000 \times (1 - 0.70)}{\$45,000}
EMF=$21,000+$45,000×0.30$45,000\text{EMF} = \frac{\$21,000 + \$45,000 \times 0.30}{\$45,000}
EMF=$21,000+$13,500$45,000\text{EMF} = \frac{\$21,000 + \$13,500}{\$45,000}
EMF=$34,500$45,000\text{EMF} = \frac{\$34,500}{\$45,000}
EMF≈0.767\text{EMF} \approx 0.767

SafeBuild Construction's calculated EMF is approximately 0.77. This factor will then be applied to their standard premium:

(Adjusted\ Premium = Standard\ Premium \times EMF)
(Adjusted\ Premium = $50,000 \times 0.77)
(Adjusted\ Premium = $38,500)

In this hypothetical example, SafeBuild's excellent loss history results in a $11,500 reduction in their annual workers' compensation premium, demonstrating the financial benefits of their strong safety culture.

Practical Applications

Experience rating is predominantly applied in lines of commercial insurance where the policyholder's actions and specific loss history significantly impact future claims. Its most prominent application is in workers' compensation insurance, where it directly modifies an employer's premium based on their workplace safety record and the cost of injuries. The National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI) develops and administers the experience rating plan used in most U.S. states, ensuring consistency in how employers' workers' compensation premiums are adjusted.30

Beyond workers' compensation, experience rating principles are also utilized in:

  • Unemployment Insurance: States use experience rating to set unemployment tax rates for employers. Businesses with a history of fewer employee layoffs and unemployment claims pay lower unemployment taxes. The U.S. Department of Labor outlines how states use experience rating formulas to determine employer contribution rates for unemployment insurance.29
  • General Liability Insurance: For large organizations or specific industries, a component of the general liability policy premium might be adjusted based on their claims history.
  • Self-insurance Programs: Entities that self-insure a portion of their risks often use internal experience rating methodologies to project future costs and allocate funds to their self-funded reserves. This method helps them estimate their likely future liabilities based on past trends, allowing for more precise financial planning.

Limitations and Criticisms

While experience rating effectively incentivizes risk reduction, it has certain limitations and faces criticism. One primary concern is that it can create "perverse incentives." For instance, an employer might be discouraged from reporting minor injuries or incidents to avoid increasing their experience modification factor, potentially compromising employee well-being or masking underlying hazard issues. The Brookings Institution has highlighted how experience rating, particularly in areas like unemployment insurance, can create disincentives for socially desirable actions due to its focus on individual cost minimization.28

Another limitation is that the historical data used for experience rating may not always reflect current conditions. A business that has recently implemented significant safety improvements might still be penalized by past adverse loss experience for several years until the old data cycles out. Conversely, a business with a historically clean record might face unexpected increases if new, unforeseen risks emerge that aren't yet reflected in their past claims. Furthermore, for smaller businesses, the credibility factor is typically low, meaning their actual loss experience has less impact. This can limit their ability to significantly lower premiums through safety improvements alone, as their rate remains largely influenced by broad industry averages. The reliance on historical statistical analysis means that the system is reactive rather than purely proactive.

Experience Rating vs. Merit Rating

Experience rating and merit rating are both methods used by insurers to adjust premiums based on specific policyholder characteristics, but they differ in their focus. Experience rating primarily looks backward, evaluating an insured's actual historical loss experience (claims incurred) over a defined period (e.g., the last three to five years) to predict future losses and adjust premiums accordingly. It quantifies the impact of past claims on future costs.

In contrast, merit rating typically looks at specific forward-looking characteristics or operational attributes of the insured that are believed to influence risk, rather than just historical losses. This can include factors like the implementation of specific safety programs, the quality of equipment, management's commitment to safety, or adherence to industry best practices. While a clean loss history (reflecting good experience) can be one aspect considered, merit rating often involves a more qualitative assessment of risk mitigation efforts that may not yet be fully reflected in loss data. In some contexts, merit rating is also referred to as "schedule rating," where specific credits or debits are applied based on a predefined schedule of risk factors. An actuary helps develop the underlying data and methodologies for both systems.

FAQs

What types of insurance typically use experience rating?

Experience rating is most commonly used in commercial insurance lines such as workers' compensation, commercial auto insurance, and unemployment insurance. It's less common for personal lines like individual auto or homeowners' insurance, which rely more on individual factors, driving records (for auto), and property characteristics.

How does a policyholder improve their experience rating?

To improve their experience rating and achieve a lower premium, a policyholder must reduce their incurred claims over the rating period. This is achieved through proactive risk management strategies, such as implementing robust safety programs, providing employee training, maintaining equipment, and fostering a culture of safety to prevent accidents and occupational illnesses.

How long does an experience rating period typically last?

The specific period for which loss data is collected to calculate an experience modification factor varies by insurance line and jurisdiction. For workers' compensation, it commonly involves the loss data from the three most recently completed policy years, excluding the immediately preceding year (to allow time for claims to develop).

Can an experience rating factor change significantly year over year?

Yes, an experience modification factor can change significantly year over year, particularly for companies that experience a large or unusual claim event. A single severe incident or a cluster of smaller claims can substantially increase the factor, leading to higher premiums. Conversely, several years with no or minimal claims can lead to a steady decrease in the factor.

Does a high deductible affect experience rating?

While a higher deductible reduces the immediate cash outlay for an insurer per claim, it doesn't directly alter the underlying loss data used in experience rating. However, companies with higher deductibles often have a greater incentive to manage smaller claims internally to avoid them impacting their experience rating, as their retained risk is higher. The experience rating calculation primarily considers the total incurred losses, regardless of who pays the initial portion.

References

27 IRMI. "Workers' Compensation Experience Modification Factor: A Brief History." Accessed August 2, 2025. https://www.irmi.com/articles/expert-commentary/workers-compensation-experience-modification-factor-a-brief-history
26 NCCI. "NCCI Experience Rating." Accessed August 2, 2025. https://www.ncci.com/Articles/Pages/NCCI-Experience-Rating.aspx
25 U.S. Department of Labor. "Unemployment Insurance Experience Rating." Accessed August 2, 2025. https://oui.doleta.gov/unemploy/esrating.asp
24 Brookings. "The Perverse Incentives of Experience Rating." Accessed August 2, 2025. `https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-perverse-incentives-of-experience-rating/[1](https://www.protectiveinsurance.com/docs/default-source/documents/protective-insurance/loss-prevention/Protective-Experience-Mod-Brochure-20170626.pdf), 234, 567891011121314, 15161718192021