Skip to main content
← Back to E Definitions

Explicit trading costs

What Are Explicit Trading Costs?

Explicit trading costs are the direct, quantifiable expenses incurred when buying or selling securities. These costs are readily observable and clearly itemized on trade confirmations or financial statements, falling under the broader category of investment management and market microstructure. Unlike implicit costs, which are less apparent, explicit trading costs represent the upfront fees and charges paid by an investor or fund. They are a significant component of the total cost of ownership for a portfolio and directly impact an investor's net investment performance. Explicit trading costs include, but are not limited to, brokerage commissions, exchange fees, regulatory fees, and taxes on transactions.30

History and Origin

The concept of explicit trading costs, particularly brokerage commissions, has a long history, dating back to the formation of organized financial markets. In the United States, the Buttonwood Agreement of 1792, which laid the groundwork for the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), initially set a standard commission rate for brokers.29 For over 180 years, until 1975, brokerage commissions on U.S. stock exchanges were fixed, meaning all brokers charged the same fee for a given transaction, regardless of the trade size or client28,27.

This changed dramatically on May 1, 1975, a date famously known as "May Day." On this day, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) mandated the deregulation of brokerage commission rates, ending the fixed-price system and ushering in an era of negotiated commissions.26,25 This move aimed to increase competition among brokerage firms and reduce trading costs for investors.24 The immediate consequence was the rise of discount brokers, who offered lower commission rates but generally without investment advice, empowering the emergence of "do-it-yourself" investors.23,22 The competitive pressure initiated on May Day ultimately led to a significant decline in commission rates over the decades, culminating in many online brokers offering commission-free stock and exchange-traded fund (ETF) trades in recent years.21

Key Takeaways

  • Explicit trading costs are direct, easily identifiable expenses associated with executing trades.
  • They primarily consist of commissions, exchange fees, regulatory fees, and certain taxes.
  • These costs directly reduce an investor's gross returns and overall portfolio performance.
  • Historically, brokerage commissions were fixed until deregulation in 1975, leading to greater competition and lower costs.
  • Regulators like the SEC and FINRA require disclosure of various explicit trading costs to promote transparency.

Formula and Calculation

Explicit trading costs are typically calculated as a sum of their individual components. The total explicit cost of a trade can be represented as:

Total Explicit Cost=Brokerage Commission+Exchange Fee+Regulatory Fee+Other Transaction Taxes\text{Total Explicit Cost} = \text{Brokerage Commission} + \text{Exchange Fee} + \text{Regulatory Fee} + \text{Other Transaction Taxes}

Where:

  • Brokerage Commission: A fee charged by a broker for executing a trade. This can be a flat fee, a percentage of the trade value, or a per-share charge.
  • Exchange Fee: A fee levied by the securities exchange where the trade is executed.
  • Regulatory Fee: Fees imposed by regulatory bodies. A common example in the U.S. is the SEC Section 31 Transaction Fee, a small charge on sales of exchange-listed equities to help fund market regulation.
  • Other Transaction Taxes: Any other government-imposed taxes on the transaction.

For example, if an investor buys 100 shares of a stock at $50 per share through a broker charging a flat $5 commission, with an exchange fee of $0.01 per share and a negligible regulatory fee, the explicit cost for the purchase would simply be the commission. For the sale of those shares, all components would apply.

Interpreting Explicit Trading Costs

Interpreting explicit trading costs involves understanding their impact on investment performance and considering their proportion relative to the trade value and overall investment portfolio. While these costs might seem small per individual transaction, they can accumulate significantly, especially for active traders or large investment funds with high portfolio turnover.20 For instance, a frequent trading strategy might incur substantial explicit costs that erode potential gains.19

Investors should scrutinize these costs when selecting a brokerage account or evaluating different investment strategies. Lower explicit costs, such as reduced or zero brokerage commissions, can lead to higher net returns over time, particularly for strategies involving frequent trading or for smaller investment amounts where fixed fees represent a larger percentage of the trade value. Understanding these transparent fees allows investors to make informed decisions about trade execution and financial planning.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investor, Sarah, who wants to sell 200 shares of Company XYZ stock, which she purchased years ago, at a market price of $100 per share. Her brokerage firm charges a flat commission of $7.00 per trade. Additionally, the transaction is subject to an SEC Section 31 Transaction Fee and a small FINRA trading activity fee.

Here's how her explicit trading costs would be calculated for this sale:

  1. Sale Value: 200 shares * $100/share = $20,000
  2. Brokerage Commission: $7.00
  3. SEC Section 31 Transaction Fee: This fee is typically a very small fraction of the dollar value of securities sold, adjusted periodically by the SEC. Let's assume for this example it's $0.000008 times the sale value.
    • $20,000 * $0.000008 = $0.16
  4. FINRA Trading Activity Fee (TAF): This fee also applies to sales and is very small, typically a fraction of a cent per share, with a cap. Let's assume $0.000119 per share.
    • 200 shares * $0.000119 = $0.0238 (rounded to $0.02)

Total Explicit Trading Costs for Sarah's sale:
$7.00 (Commission) + $0.16 (SEC Fee) + $0.02 (FINRA TAF) = $7.18

This $7.18 represents the explicit, out-of-pocket costs Sarah pays for this specific trade, reducing her net proceeds from the $20,000 sale.

Practical Applications

Explicit trading costs are a critical consideration across various facets of the financial world:

  • Retail Investing: Individual investors directly encounter explicit costs in the form of brokerage commissions when buying or selling stocks, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), or mutual funds. The shift towards commission-free trading by many online brokers has significantly reduced this component for stock and ETF trades, making investment entry more accessible.18
  • Portfolio Management: Professional portfolio managers actively consider explicit costs when making asset allocation and rebalancing decisions. High transaction costs can significantly dilute returns, especially for strategies requiring frequent adjustments or high portfolio turnover.17 Efficient order execution strategies aim to minimize these costs.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Regulatory bodies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) implement rules requiring broker-dealers to disclose explicit trading costs and their order routing practices.16,15 For instance, SEC Rule 606 and FINRA Rule 6151 mandate quarterly disclosures of order routing information, helping investors understand how their orders are handled and any potential conflicts of interest.14,13 This regulatory push aims to enhance market transparency.12
  • Performance Measurement: When evaluating investment performance, especially for actively managed funds, explicit trading costs are subtracted from gross returns to arrive at net returns. This provides a more accurate picture of the fund's actual profitability for investors.

Limitations and Criticisms

While explicit trading costs are straightforward to identify, focusing solely on them can provide an incomplete picture of the total cost of trading. A primary limitation is that explicit costs do not capture the entirety of transaction costs an investor faces; they omit implicit costs.11 Implicit costs, such as the bid-ask spread and market impact, can often exceed explicit costs and are crucial determinants of overall trading expenses, especially for large trades or illiquid securities.10

For instance, a "commission-free" trade might still incur significant implicit costs if the broker routes the order to a venue that offers payment for order flow (PFOF), potentially leading to less favorable execution prices than could be obtained elsewhere.9 Although regulations like SEC Rule 606 aim to disclose these routing practices and potential conflicts, the actual monetary impact on an individual trade's execution price remains an implicit cost, not an explicit one.8,7 Critics argue that while explicit costs have largely diminished, particularly for retail investors, the opacity of implicit costs continues to pose challenges for accurately assessing the true cost of trading and its impact on investment returns.6 Furthermore, despite regulatory efforts, the effectiveness of fee disclosure rules in truly informing investors remains a subject of ongoing debate.5

Explicit Trading Costs vs. Implicit Trading Costs

The distinction between explicit and implicit trading costs is fundamental in understanding the total expenses associated with securities transactions.

Explicit trading costs are the direct, quantifiable fees paid to intermediaries and regulatory bodies. They are transparent and appear as line items on trade confirmations. Examples include brokerage commissions, exchange fees, and regulatory fees like the SEC Section 31 Transaction Fee. These costs are known before the trade is fully executed (e.g., a fixed commission) or are a direct consequence of the trade at a set rate (e.g., regulatory fees per share or value).

In contrast, implicit trading costs are indirect, less obvious, and often more difficult to quantify. They represent the "hidden" costs associated with the price concession an investor experiences due to the act of trading itself. The primary components of implicit costs include:

  • Bid-Ask Spread: The difference between the highest price a buyer is willing to pay (bid) and the lowest price a seller is willing to accept (ask). When an investor buys at the ask and sells at the bid, they incur this cost.
  • Market Impact: The adverse price movement that occurs as a result of an investor's own trade. A large buy order, for instance, might push the price of a security up, forcing the buyer to pay a higher average price for the total order.4
  • Opportunity Cost: The potential profit foregone due to delayed execution or the inability to execute a trade at a desired price.

While explicit costs are fixed or clearly calculated, implicit costs are variable and depend heavily on factors like market liquidity, trade size, and market volatility.3 Investors and institutions often employ sophisticated trading strategies to minimize implicit trading costs, which can often be substantially larger than their explicit counterparts.

FAQs

What are common examples of explicit trading costs?

Common examples of explicit trading costs include brokerage commissions, which are fees paid to a broker for executing a trade; exchange fees, charged by the stock market where the trade occurs; and regulatory fees, such as those imposed by the SEC or FINRA. These are direct, visible charges.

Have explicit trading costs changed over time?

Yes, explicit trading costs have changed significantly, especially brokerage commissions. Historically, commissions were fixed at high rates. However, due to deregulation in 1975 and increased competition, particularly from discount brokers and later online platforms, commissions for stock and ETF trades have dramatically decreased, with many firms now offering commission-free trading.2,1

Why are explicit trading costs important to investors?

Explicit trading costs are important to investors because they directly reduce the net return on an investment. Even small fees can accumulate over time, especially with frequent trading or large transaction volumes, impacting overall investment performance and potentially diminishing the effectiveness of an investment strategy.

Are explicit trading costs always zero for "commission-free" trades?

No, "commission-free" typically refers only to the brokerage commission. Other explicit costs, such as small regulatory fees (like the SEC Section 31 fee) and exchange fees on sales, may still apply. Furthermore, implicit trading costs, such as the bid-ask spread and market impact, are still present and can significantly affect the actual cost of the trade.